Skip to main content
Log in

Segmental reversal of distal small intestine in short bowel syndrome: a study on the influence on postoperative weight and intestinal topography in piglets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of segmental reversal of the distal 20 cm of the small intestine in piglets with induced SBS compared to controls with SBS alone. Primary endpoint was postoperative weight change over a period of 1 month. Secondary endpoints were the influence on cell proliferation and mucosal architecture shown by histological analysis.

Methods

Sixteen piglets underwent a 60% resection of the distal small intestine and were randomized into two groups. Group 1 short bowel syndrome alone (SBS) (n = 8) and group 2 with reversal of a distal small intestinal segment (SBS-RS) (n = 8). Body weight was measured daily and the pigs were euthanized after 1 month. Crypt depths, villus heights and muscle layers thicknesses were measured. For the evaluation of microvilli of the brush border of the epithelium and cell proliferation, immunohistochemical staining with Villin and Ki-67 was performed.

Results

No statistically significant differences were observed concerning weight gain. Mean ± SD weight gain was 2.31 ± 2.85 kg for SBS-RS and 2.03 ± 1.27 kg for SBS (p = 0.8). In the proximal jejunal segment a significant increase in villus heights was found in the SBS group and increase in the thickness of the circular and longitudinal muscle layers in the SBS-RS group. In the distal ileal segment the longitudinal muscle layer thicknesses were increased in the SBS group. Otherwise, no significant changes were found.

Conclusion

Reversal of a 20-cm distal segment showed no effect on weight gain, but there were some significant histological changes of unknown clinical significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Keefe SJ, Buchman AL, Fishbein TM, Jeejeebhoy KN, Jeppesen PB, Shaffer J (2006) Short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure. Consensus definitions and overview. Clin Grastroenterol Hepatol 4:6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weale A, Edwards A, Bailey M, Lear P (2005) Intestinal adaptation after massive intestinal resection. Postgrad Med J 81:178–184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Warner BW (2016) The pathogenesis of resection-associated intestinal adaptation. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beyer-Beriot L, Joly F, Maggiori L et al (2012) Segmental reversal of small bowel can end permanent parenteral nutrition dependency. An experience of 38 adults with short bowel syndrome. Ann Surg 256:739–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Layac S, Beyer L, Corcos O et al (2013) Increased intestinal absorption by segmental reversal of the small bowel in adult patients with short-bowel syndrome. A case control study. Am J Clin Nutr 97:100–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Søndenaa K, Nesvik I, Nygaard K, Sauer T (1991) Mucosal surface area of reversed intestinal segment in rats. Scand J Gastroenterol 26:1240–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chabert J, Pellissier S, Eribon O, Roche M (2000) Reversed bowel segments for the treatment of short bowel syndrome. Assessment of their minimal length in correlation with electromyographic pattern in the rat. Neurogastroenterol Motil 12:53–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Digalakis M, Papamichail M, Glava C et al (2011) Interposition of reversed jejunal segment enhances intestinal adaptation in short bowel syndrome. An experimental study on pigs. J Surg Res 171:551–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koffeman GL, Hulscher JB, Schoots IG, van Gulik TM, Heij HA, Van Gemert WG (2015) Intestinal lengthening and reversed segment in a piglet short bowel syndrome model. J Surg Res 195:433–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson JS, Quigley EM, Adrian TE (1995) Effect of reversed intestinal segments on intestinal structure and function. J Surg Res 58:19–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weih S, Nickkholgh A, Kessler M et al (2013) Models of short bowel syndrome in pigs. A technical review. Eur Surg Res 51:66–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee CH, Lo HC, Chou MC, Tsai HR (2007) Oral antibiotics attenuate bowel segment reversal-induced systemic inflammatory response and body weight loss in massively bowel-resected rats. JPN J Parenter Enter Nutr 31:397–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gillard L, Mayeur C, Robert V et al (2017) Microbiota is involved in post-resection adaptation in humans with short bowel syndrome. Front Physiol 8:224

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson JS, Langnas AN, Pinch LW et al (1995) Surgical approach to short bowel syndrome. Experience in a population of 160 patients. Ann Surg 222:600–605

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Layec S, Beyer L, Corcos O et al (2013) Increased intestinal absorption by segmental reversal of the small bowel in adult patients with short-bowel syndrome. A case-control-study. Am J Clin Nutr 97:100–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Jakob Le Fèvre Harslund, Pernille Simonsen and Peter Bollen, Biomedical Laboratory, University of Southern Denmark, for technical assistance. Kirsten Dahl, Department of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, for the histological preparation. Ulrich Halekoh, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, for statistical assistance.

Funding

The study was funded by Odense University Hospital Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niels Qvist.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare.

Ethical approval

The study was performed in compliance with the ethical standards for experimental studies on animals and was approved by The Animal Experiments Inspectorate (2015-15-0201-00551).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grave, P.K., Thomsen, S.V., Clark, P.S. et al. Segmental reversal of distal small intestine in short bowel syndrome: a study on the influence on postoperative weight and intestinal topography in piglets. Pediatr Surg Int 34, 671–677 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4269-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4269-6

Keywords

Navigation