Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of life in children operated for spina bifida; low- and middle-income country perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Spina bifida is a potentially disabling congenital condition and affects the quality of life (QOL). We aimed to assess clinical outcomes and QOL in children who underwent spina bifida repair at our hospital.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study on children who underwent spina bifida repair at our hospital over 10 years. Phone calls were made to parents of the children, and the Health Utility Index Mark 3 (HUI 3) score was used to assess QoL, and degree of disability. Demographics and clinical data were obtained from the medical chart review. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS (version 21).

Results

Eighty children with a median age of 1.1 months (IQR 0.03–2.0) at the time of presentation, were included in this study. The mean follow-up period was 6.04 ± 2.54 years and the median HUI-3 score was 0.64 (IQR: 0.40 – 0.96) on a scale of 0 (dead) to 1 (perfectly healthy). Based on the severity of disability, 12 (23.1%) children had mild disability, 4 (7.7%) had moderate disability, and 23 (44.2%) had severe disability. Factors including a leaking spina bifida and paraplegia at presentation; radiological findings of hydrocephalus and Chiari malformation, were associated with a significantly low QOL. Children who required CSF diversion (EVD/ VP shunt) during the repair or at a later stage also had significantly low QOL.

Conclusion

In LMIC, children with myelomeningocele (MMC) born with lower limb weakness, hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation, and those presenting with leaking MMC, have a significantly low QoL at a mean follow-up of 6 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

QoL:

Quality of Life

LMIC:

Low- and middle-income countries

HUI 3:

Health Utility Index Mark 3

NTDs:

Neural tube defects

MMC:

Myelomeningocele

SE:

Standard error

CI:

Confidence interval

HUI:

Health Utilities Index

CHQ-PF-50:

Child Health Questionnaire Parent form 50

ETV:

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy

VAD:

Ventricular access device

References

  1. Rocque BG, Bishop ER, Scogin MA, Hopson BD, Arynchyna AA, Boddiford CJ et al (2015) Assessing health-related quality of life in children with spina bifida. J Neurosurg Pediatr 15(2):144–149. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.PEDS1441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sims-Williams HJ, Sims-Williams HP, Mbabazi Kabachelor E, Warf BC (2017) Quality of life among children with spina bifida in Uganda. Arch Dis Child 102(11):1057–1061. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-312307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chakraborty A, Crimmins D, Hayward R, Thompson D (2008) Toward reducing shunt placement rates in patients with myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1(5):361–365. https://doi.org/10.3171/PED/2008/1/5/361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization (2002) WHOQOL-HIV instrument: scoring and coding for the WHOQOL-HIV instruments: users manual. World Health Organization

  5. Sawin KJ, Bellin MH (2010) Quality of life in individuals with spina bifida: a research update. Dev Disabil Res Rev 16(1):47–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rofail D, Maguire L, Kissner M, Colligs A, Abetz-Webb L (2013) A review of the social, psychological, and economic burdens experienced by people with spina bifida and their caregivers. Neurol Ther 2(1–2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-013-0007-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rehman L, Shiekh M, Afzal A, Rizvi R (2020) Risk factors, presentation and outcome of meningomyelocele repair. Pak J Med Sci 36(3):422–425. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.1237

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, Goldsmith CH, Zhu Z, DePauw S et al (2002) Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Med Care 40(2):113–128. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200202000-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamashiro KJ, Galganski LA, Hirose S (2019) Fetal myelomeningocele repair. Semin Pediatr Surg 28(4):150823. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2019.07.006

  10. Rozensztrauch A, Iwanska M, Baglaj M (2021) The Quality of Life of Children with Myelomeningocele: A Cross-Sectional Preliminary Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010756

  11. North T, Cheong A, Steinbok P, Radic JA (2018) Trends in incidence and long-term outcomes of myelomeningocele in British Columbia. Childs Nerv Syst 34(4):717–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3685-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fayyaz M, Khushdil A, Baqai S (2020) Neural tube defects, their implications and solutions in Muslim society. J Pak Med Assoc 6:1–8. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan B, Khan MU, Ullah W, Ullah A, Ali M (2017) Maternal Concepts and Practices of Antenatal Care in Patients with Spinal Dysraphism. Pak J Neuro Surg 21(3):150–154

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fatima U, Gul S, Quddus I, Mehdi SH (2022) Awareness of maternal folate intake and prenatal screening in reducing the incidence of Myelomeningocele: a cross sectional study. PJMHS 16(1):40–42

  15. Brohi AR, Brohi SR, Khaskheli MS (2008) Pattern and Frequency of Craniospinal anomalies. J Surg Pak (International) 13(2):67–70

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saleem M, Ali M, Hussnain Q (2010) Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors for Neural Tube Defects in Patients at Sheikh Zayed Hospital Rahim Yar Khan. Pakistan J Medical Health Sci 4(3)

  17. Jamali MA, Naz A, Mari AR, Brohi SR, Jamali S, Wagan FF, Jamali AA (2020) Frequency of Neural Tube Defects Among 1000 pregnant women delivering at PMC Hospital Nawabshah. Journal of Peoples University of Medical & Health Sciences Nawabshah. (JPUMHS) 10(3)

  18. Nisar YB, Alam A, Aurangzeb B, Dibley MJ (2014) Perceptions of antenatal iron-folic acid supplements in urban and rural Pakistan: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14:344

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G (2003) The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Young NL, Sheridan K, Burke TA, Mukherjee S, McCormick A (2013) Health outcomes among youths and adults with spina bifida. J Pediatr 162(5):993–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.10.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Karmur BS, Kulkarni AV (2018) Medical and socioeconomic predictors of quality of life in myelomeningocele patients with shunted hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 34(4):741–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3691-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Seker Abanoz E, Ozmen M, Caliskan M, Gokcay G, Aydinli N (2020) Ambulation, lesion level, and health-related quality of life in children with myelomeningocele. Childs Nerv Syst 36(3):611–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04348-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Phillips BC, Gelsomino M, Pownall AL, Ocal E, Spencer HJ, O’Brien MS et al (2014) Predictors of the need for cerebrospinal fluid diversion in patients with myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg Pediatr 14(2):167–172. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.PEDS13470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Battibugli S, Gryfakis N, Dias L, Kelp-Lenane C, Figlioli S, Fitzgerald E et al (2007) Functional gait comparison between children with myelomeningocele: shunt versus no shunt. Dev Med Child Neurol 49(10):764–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00764.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Flanagan A, Gorzkowski M, Altiok H, Hassani S, Ahn KW (2011) Activity level, functional health, and quality of life of children with myelomeningocele as perceived by parents. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(5):1230–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1651-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hampton LE, Fletcher JM, Cirino PT, Blaser S, Kramer LA, Drake J et al (2011) Hydrocephalus status in spina bifida: an evaluation of variations in neuropsychological outcomes. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8(3):289–298. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.6.PEDS10584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramachandra P, Palazzi KL, Skalsky AJ, Marietti S, Chiang G (2013) Shunted hydrocephalus has a significant impact on quality of life in children with spina bifida. PMR 5(10):825–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.05.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Machado HR, Santos de Oliveira R (2004) Simultaneous repair of myelomeningocele and shunt insertion. Childs Nerv Syst 20(2):107–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0853-7

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mujtaba Khalil, Saqib Kamran Bakhshi and Zara Shah conceived and designed the project, and wrote the manuscript. Shilpa Golani and Hassaan Musood collected data. Faiza Urooj and Nida Zahid performed the analysis. Michael Christopher Dewan and Muhammad Shahzad Shamim reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Shahzad Shamim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study has been approved by the institutional ethics research committee at Aga Khan University Hospital.

Consent to participate/publication

Informed consent was obtained from legal guardians.

Conflict of interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khalil, M., Bakhshi, S.K., Shah, Z. et al. Quality of life in children operated for spina bifida; low- and middle-income country perspective. Childs Nerv Syst 39, 3155–3161 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-05993-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-05993-2

Keywords

Navigation