Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Medical and socioeconomic predictors of quality of life in myelomeningocele patients with shunted hydrocephalus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Children with myelomeningocele (MMC) often develop hydrocephalus, and the combination of these conditions can lead to psychosocial, cognitive, and physical health issues that decrease their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The goal of the present study was to understand the QOL in patients with MMC and shunted hydrocephalus.

Methods

Data from the Toronto Hydrocephalus QOL Database was acquired between 2004 and 2009 using parent-completed questionnaires and, when appropriate, child-completed questionnaires: Hydrocephalus Outcome Questionnaire (HOQ) and the Health Utilities Index. We identified several medical and socioeconomic factors potentially relevant to the outcome measure (e.g., level of myelomeningocele, length of stay in hospital, and shunt-related hospital admissions; family functioning, income, parental education, employment status, etc.). Linear regression models were used to examine associations between potential predictor variables and HRQOL, with P < 0.05 in the multivariate model suggesting significance.

Results

The analysis consisted of 131 patients (mean age = 12.6, SD = 3.7). The mean HUI score was 0.51, and the mean HOQ overall health score was 0.67. There was a significant association between lower age and higher HOQ social-emotional health (P = 0.03) and HUI scores (P = 0.03), lower anatomical level of myelomeningocele and higher HUI scores (P = 0.01), better family functioning and higher HOQ overall health scores (P = 0.004), and higher family income and higher HOQ overall health, physical health, and HUI scores (P = 0.001, P = 0.003, and P = 0.02, respectively).

Conclusion

Myelomeningocele patients with shunted hydrocephalus can have a poor health-related quality of life. Our results indicate a strong association of income and family functioning on quality of life, along with younger age and lower level of myelomeningocele.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parekh AD, Trusler LA, Pietsch JB, Byrne DW, DeMarco RT, Pope JC IV, Adams MC, Deshpande JK, Brock JW III (2006) Prospective, longitudinal evaluation of health related quality of life in the pediatric spina bifida population undergoing reconstructive urological surgery. J Urol 176(4):1878–1882. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00620-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu JS, Dong C, Casey JT, Greiman A, Mukherjee S, Kielb SJ (2015) Quality of life related to urinary continence in adult spina bifida patients. Cent Eur J Urol 68:61–67. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.01.494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Danielsson AJ, Bartonek Å, Levey E, McHale K, Sponseller P, Saraste H (2008) Associations between orthopaedic findings, ambulation and health-related quality of life in children with myelomeningocele. J Child Orthop 2(1):45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-007-0069-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Müller-Godeffroy E, Michael T, Poster M, Seidel U, Schwarke D, Thyen U (2008) Self-reported health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 50(6):456–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02054.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stubberud J, Riemer G (2012) Problematic psychosocial adaptation and executive dysfunction in women and men with myelomeningocele. Disabil Rehabil 34(9):740–746. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.619617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rudeberg A, Donati F, Kaiser G (1995) Psychosocial aspects in the treatment of children with myelomeningocele: an assessment after a decade. Eur J Pediatr 154(S4):S85–S89. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02191514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindehall B, Möller A, Hjälmås K, Lindehall B, Möller A, Hjälmås K, Jodal U, Abrahamsson K (2008) Psychosocial factors in teenagers and young adults with myelomeningocele and clean intermittent catheterization. Scand J Urol Nephrol 42(6):539–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365590802273218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heffelfinger AK, Koop JI, Fastenau PS et al (2008) The relationship of neuropsychological functioning to adaptation outcome in adolescents with spina bifida. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 14(05):793–804. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617708081022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hampton LE, Fletcher JM, Cirino PT, Blaser S, Kramer LA, Drake J, Dennis M (2011) Hydrocephalus status in spina bifida: an evaluation of variations in neuropsychological outcomes. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8(3):289–298. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.6.PEDS10584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Verhoef M, Barf HA, Post MWM, van Asbeck FWA, Gooskens RHJM, Prevo AJH (2006) Functional independence among young adults with spina bifida, in relation to hydrocephalus and level of lesion. Dev Med Child Neurol 48(02):114–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162206000259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rocque BG, Bishop R, Scogin MA et al (2015) Assessing health-related quality of life in children with spina bifida. J Neurosurg Pediatr 15(2):144–149. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.PEDS1441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramachandra P, Palazzi KL, Skalsky AJ, Marietti S, Chiang G (2013) Shunted hydrocephalus has a significant impact on quality of life in children with spina bifida. Pm&R 5(10):825–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dupepe EB, Hopson B, Johnston JM, Rozzelle CJ, Jerry Oakes W, Blount JP, Rocque BG (2016) Rate of shunt revision as a function of age in patients with shunted hydrocephalus due to MMC. Neurosurg Focus 41(5):E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.8.FOCUS16257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bakaniene I, Prasauskiene A, Vaiciene-Magistris N (2016) Health-related quality of life in children with myelomeningocele: a systematic review of the literature. Child Care Health Dev 42(5):625–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flanagan A, Gorzkowski M, Altiok H, Hassani S, Ahn KW (2011) Activity level, functional health, and quality of life of children with myelomeningocele as perceived by parents. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(5):1230–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1651-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Rabin D, Dirks PB, Humphreys RP, Rutka JT (2004) Measuring the health status of children with hydrocephalus by using a new outcome measure. J Neurosurg 101(2):141–146. https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2004.101.2.0141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kulkarni AV (2010) Quality of life in childhood hydrocephalus: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 26(6):737–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-010-1131-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kulkarni AV, Cochrane DD, McNeely PD, Shams I (2008) Medical, social, and economic factors associated with health-related quality of life in Canadian children with hydrocephalus. J Pediatr 153(5):689–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.04.068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kulkarni AV, Shams I (2007) Quality of life in children with hydrocephalus: results from the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto. J Neurosurg 107(5):358–364. https://doi.org/10.3171/PED-07/11/358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kulkarni AV, Shams I, Cochrane DD, McNeely PD (2010) Quality of life after endoscopic third ventriculostomy and cerebrospinal fluid shunting: an adjusted multivariable analysis in a large cohort. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6(1):11–16. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.3.PEDS09358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY et al (2011) A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 364(26):993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1402121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Luthy DA, Wardinsky T, Shurtleff DB, Hollenbach KA, Hickok DE, Nyberg DA, Benedetti TJ (1991) Cesarean section before the onset of labor and subsequent motor function in infants with meningomyelocele diagnosed antenatally. N Engl J Med 324(10):662–666. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199103073241004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Armstrong DC, Dirks PB (1999) Measurement of ventricular size: reliability of the frontal and occipital horn ratio compared to subjective assessment. Pediatr Neurosurg 31(2):65–70. https://doi.org/10.1159/000028836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Hayon BB, Drake JM, Ossip MG, Tuli S, Clarke M (1998) Frontal and occipital horn ratio: a linear estimate of ventricular size for multiple imaging modalities in pediatric hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 29(5):245–249. https://doi.org/10.1159/000028730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Byles J, Byrne C, Boyle M, Offord DR (1988) Ontario Child Health Study: reliability and validity of the general functioning scale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Fam Process 30:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller EW, Epstein NB, Bishop DS, Keitner GI (1986) The McMaster family assessment device: reliability and validity. J Marital Fam Ther 11:345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kulkarni AV, Rabin D, Drake JM (2004) An instrument to measure the health status in children with hydrocephalus: the Hydrocephalus Outcome Questionnaire. J Neurosurg 101(2):134–140. https://doi.org/10.3171/ped.2004.101.2.0134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kulkarni AV (2006) Distribution-based and anchor-based approaches provided different interpretability estimates for the Hydrocephalus Outcome Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 59(2):176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, Boyle M (1995) Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index. PharmacoEconomics 7(6):503–520. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199507060-00005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Battibugli S, Gryfakis N, Dias L, Kelp-Lenane C, Figlioli S, Fitzgerald E, Hroma N, Seshadri R, Sullivan C (2007) Functional gait comparison between children with myelomeningocele: shunt versus no shunt. Dev Med Child Neurol 49(10):764–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00764.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Buffart LM, van den Berg-emons RJG, van Meetren J et al (2009) Lifestyle, participation, and health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 51(11):886–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03293.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sumpter R, Dorris L, Brannan G, Carachi R (2012) Quality of life and behavioural adjustment in childhood hydrocephalus. Scott Med J 57(1):18–25. https://doi.org/10.1258/smj.2011.011286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Freeman KA, Smith K, Adams E, Mizokawa S, Neville-Jan A, West Coast Spina Bifida Consortium (2013) Is continence status associated with quality of life in young children with spina bifida? J Pediatr Rehabil Med 6(4):215–223. https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-140263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Young NL, Sheridan K, Burke TA, Mukherjee S, McCormick A (2013) Health outcomes among youths and adults with spina bifida. J Pediatr 162(5):993–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.10.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tezcan S, Simsek TT (2013) Comparison of health-related quality of life between children with cerebral palsy and spina bifida. Res Dev Disabil 34(9):2725–2733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.05.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bartonek Å, Saraste H, Danielsson A (2012) Health-related quality of life and ambulation in children with myelomeningocele in a Swedish population. Acta Paediatr Int J Paediatr 101(9):953–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02742.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang J-C, Lai C-J, Wong T-T, Liang ML, Chen HH, Chan RC, Yang TF (2013) Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with spinal dysraphism: results from a Taiwanese sample. Childs Nerv Syst 29(9):1671–1679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2117-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen E, Martin AD, Matthews KA (2006) Socioeconomic status and health: do gradients differ within childhood and adolescence? Soc Sci Med 62(9):2161–2170. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2005.08.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hungerford A, Cox MJ (2006) Family factors in child care research. Eval Rev 30(5):631–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X06291532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Szilagyi PG, Schor EL (1998) The health of children. Health Serv Res 33(4 Pt 2):1001–1039

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Bier JB, Boston H (2005) Medical, functional, and social determinants of health-related quality of life in individuals with myelomeningocele. 609–612

  42. Selber P, Dias L (1998) Sacral-level myelomeningocele: long-term outcome in adults. J Pediatr Orthop 18(4):423–427. https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-199807000-00002

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zegers S, Houterman S, Uiterwaal C, et al (2015) Adolescent behavior quality of life in children with spina bifida: a cross-sectional evaluation of 102 patients and their parents. J Child Adolesc Behav 3(04). doi:https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4494.1000225

  44. McCormick MC, Charney EB, Stemmler MM (2008) Assessing the impact of a child with spina bifida on the family. Dev Med Child Neurol 28(1):53–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1986.tb03831.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. MacNeily AE, Jafari S, Scott H, Dalgetty A, Afshar K (2009) Health related quality of life in patients with spina bifida: a prospective assessment before and after lower urinary tract reconstruction. J Urol 182(4):1984–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JURO.2009.02.060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rendeli C, Ausili E, Tabacco F, Caliandro P, Aprile I, Tonali P, Salvaggio E, Padua L (2005) Assessment of health status in children with spina bifida. Spinal Cord 43(4):230–235. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Olesen JD, Kiddoo DA, Metcalfe PD (2013) The association between urinary continence and quality of life in paediatric patients with spina bifida and tethered cord. Paediatr Child Health 18(7):e32–e38

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Moore C, Kogan B, Parekh A (2004) Impact of urinary incontinence on self-concept in children with spina bifida. J Urol 171(4):1659–1662. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000117865.98229.E5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was partially funded by the University of Toronto Comprehensive Research for Medical Students (CREMS) Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada

    Brij S. Karmur & Abhaya V. Kulkarni

Authors
  1. Brij S. Karmur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abhaya V. Kulkarni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhaya V. Kulkarni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest with respect to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karmur, B.S., Kulkarni, A.V. Medical and socioeconomic predictors of quality of life in myelomeningocele patients with shunted hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 34, 741–747 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3691-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3691-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation