Abstract
Introduction
Consenting paediatric patients for surgical procedures remains inherently unique in that it is underpinned by principles such as parental responsibility, assessment of the child’s capacity to consent, and adherence to national/legal guidelines. Quality record keeping is an important objective evidence to demonstrate the highest standards of medical care provided to our patients. The consent form is a crucial medical record encapsulating the attainment of informed consent from a parent/guardian for performing a procedure on their child. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the consenting process in our department to assess adequacy of documentation and parental perspectives.
Methods
A prospective study using qualitative descriptive design was conducted with parents of 50 children requiring neurosurgical procedures over a 3-month period.
Results
All patients understood the primary diagnosis and type of surgery. Procedure-specific risks were understood by 98% and 84% could remember the mentioning of general risks of surgery. Only a minority of parents (24%) could recollect that alternative options of management including no treatment were discussed. In cases where relevant, laterality was only documented in 56% of consent forms. All patients felt that an informed decision regarding consent to surgery was made. However, 12% suggested areas where further improvement could be made in the timing of consent and the way information could be better provided.
Discussion
Consent is more than a signature on a form. It provides objective evidence of a shared decision-making process between the surgeon, patient, and their parent/guardian. Our initial study highlights multiple areas for improvement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
GMC (2008) Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. General Medical Council (GMC), London
GMC (2007) 0–18 guidance for all doctors. General Medical Council (GMC), London
Royal College of Surgeons (2014) RCoSoE. Good surgical practice
Department of Health (2001) Reference guide to consent for examination or treatment. Department of Health
Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360(5):491–499
Fenn P, Diacon S, Gray A, Hodges R, Rickman N (2000) Current cost of medical negligence in the NHS hospitals: analysis of claims database. Br Med J 320:1567–1571
Authority TNL (2013) Factsheet 3: information on claims. The NHS Litigation Authority
De Lourdes Levy M, Larcher V, Kurz R (2003) Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of Ethics Working Group of the Conferation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 162:629–633
Schmitz D, Reinacher PC (2006) Informed consent in neurosurgery - translating ethical theory into action. J Med Ethics 32:497–498
Cocanour CS (2017) Informed consent - it’s more than a signature on a piece of paper. Am J Surg 214(6):993–997
Ellamushi HE, Khan R, Kitchen ND (2000) Consent to surgery in a high risk speciality: a prospective audit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:213–216
The Medical Defence Union (1997) Consent to treatment. The Medical Defence Union, London
General Medical Council (1998) Seeking patients’ consent. General Medical Council, London
Hanson M, Pitt D (2017) Informed consent for surgery: risk discussion and documentation. Can J Surg 60(1):69–70
Koller SE, Moore RF, Goldberg MB, Zhang J, Yu D, Conklin CB, Milner RE, Goldberg AJ (2017) An informed consent program enhances surgery resident education. J Surg Educ 74(5):906–913
Rhoton AL Jr (2003) Operative techniques and instrumentation for neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 53:907–934. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000086737.96693.0F
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The hospital internal audit review department sanctioned our study.
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 459 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silva, A.H.D., Wijesinghe, H., Mundil, N. et al. Consent in paediatric neurosurgery: adequacy of documentation and parental perspectives. Childs Nerv Syst 35, 2363–2369 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04285-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04285-y