Skip to main content

Specific Considerations Regarding Consent and Communication with Patients and Family Prior to Neurosurgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essentials of Neurosurgical Anesthesia & Critical Care
  • 1549 Accesses

Abstract

For any medical procedure, informed consent consists of four basic elements: (1) voluntariness, (2) competence, (3) informed, and (4) comprehended (capacity). For neuroanesthesia, satisfaction of the elements may be more difficult due to both the underlying pathology and the difficult choices facing patients undergoing neurosurgery. As a result of the unique nature of neurosurgical cases, anesthesiologists need to allow more time and need to take more care in obtaining consent for the anesthetics used in those cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Reading

  • Appelbaum PS. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1834–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso T, Appelbaum PS. MacArthur competence assessment tool for treatment (MAC-CAT-T). Sarasota: Professional Resource Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SYH, Caine ED. Utility and limits of the mini mental state examination evaluating consent capacity in Alzheimer disease. Psychiatr Serv. 2002;53:1322–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SYH, Karlawish JST, Caine ED. Current state of research on decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;10:151–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcucci C, Seagull FJ, Loreck D, Bourke DL, Sandson NB. Capacity to give surgical consent does not imply capacity to give anesthesia consent: implications for anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(2):596–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymont V, Bingley W, Buchanen A, et al. Prevalence of mental incapacity in medical inpatients and associated risk factors: cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2004;364:1421–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry PB. Informed consent in clinical medicine. Chest. 2007;131:563–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. vol. 2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1949. p. 181–2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Abbey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abbey, K., Allen-Maycock, C. (2020). Specific Considerations Regarding Consent and Communication with Patients and Family Prior to Neurosurgery. In: Brambrink, A., Kirsch, J. (eds) Essentials of Neurosurgical Anesthesia & Critical Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17410-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17410-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17408-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17410-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics