Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors affecting infection development after meningomyelocele repair in newborns and the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and surgical variables that may be associated with wound infection and meningitis/ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt infection in newborns diagnosed with meningomyelocele (MMC), as well as the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing these complications.

Material and methods

The data of 91 neonates diagnosed with MMC, who underwent surgical intervention between May 2012 and December 2014, were retrospectively evaluated. Multivariant logistic regression analysis was used to determine the possible clinical and neurosurgical variables associated with meningitis/VP shunt infection and surgical wound infection. Spearman’s test was performed for the correlation analysis.

Results

Following MMC closure, of the 91 neonates, 18 (16.4 %) developed meningitis/shunt infection and 12 (11 %) developed surgical wound infection. The operation time was not a significant independent risk factor for the development of meningitis (RR 0.618 [0.199–1.922], p = 0.406). Open neural placodes that were not covered by any pseudomembrane (myeloschisis), external ventricular drainage (EVD) use, and flap transposition were determined as significant relative risk factors for the development of meningitis (RR 8.655 [2.329–32.157], p = 0.001; RR 9.404 [1.183–74.743], p = 0.034; RR 8.125 [2.496–26.448], p = 0.001; and RR 3.150 [1.963–10.308], p = 0.048, respectively). Deep surgical wound infection was not correlated with the operation time or wound surface area. However, there was an intermediate but very significant positive correlation between meningitis and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, length of hospitalization, and flap transposition (r = 0.377, 0.420, 0.357, and 0.503, respectively; for all values, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

There was no association between MMC closure and development of infection. Since it carries a high risk for the development of meningitis, the EVD system should be avoided unless necessary. Routine prophylactic antibiotic use did not reduce the infection risk in MMC repair surgery. Thus, antibiotics should not be used if there are no risk factors predisposing to infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schroeder HK, Nunes JC, Madeira L, Moritz JL, Walz R, Linhares MN (2012) Postsurgical infection after myelomeningocele repair: a multivariate analysis of 60 consecutive cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 114:981–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY, Brock JW, Burrows PK, Johnson MP et al (2011) A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 364:993–1004

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowman RM, Boshnjaku V, McLone DG (2009) The changing incidence of myelomeningocele and its impact on pediatric neurosurgery: a review from the Children’s Memorial Hospital. Childs Nerv Syst 25:801–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yilmaz A, Müslüman AM, Dalgic N, Cavusoglu H, Kanat A, Kolak I, Aydın Y (2010) Shunt insertion in newborns with myeloschisis/myelomeningocele and hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci 17:1493–1496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clemmensen D, Rasmussen MM, Mosdal C (2010) A retrospective study of infections after primary VP shunt placement in the newborn with myelomeningocele without prophylactic antibiotics. Childs Nerv Syst 26:1517–1521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner W, Schwarz M, Perneczky A (2002) Primary myelomeningocele closure and consequences. Curr Opin Urol 12:465–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Partington MD (2001) Congenital hydrocefalus. Neurosurg Clin N Am 36:737–741

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lien SC, Maher CO, Garton HJ, Kasten SJ, Muraszko KM, Buchman SR (2010) Local and regional flap closure in myelomeningocele repair: a 15-year review. Childs Nerv Syst 26:1091–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Müslüman AM, Karşıdağ S, Sucu DÖ, Akçal A, Yılmaz A, Sirinoğlu D, Aydın Y (2012) Clinical outcomes of myelomeningocele defect closure over 10 years. J Clin Neurosci 19:984–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM (1988) CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. J Infect Control 16:128–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Furyk JS, Swann O, Molyneux E (2011) Systematic review: neonatal meningitis in the developing world. Trop Med Int Health 16:672–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vanaclocha V, Saiz-sapena N, Levia J (1996) Shunt malfunction in relation to shunt infection. Acta Neurochir 138:829–834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vinchon M, Dhellemmes P (2006) Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: risk factors and long term follow-up. Childs Nerv Syst 22:692–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Radmanesh F, Nejat F, El Khashab M, Ghodsi SM, Ardebili HE (2009) Shunt complications in children with myelomeningocele: effect of timing of shunt placement. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:516–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Caldarelli M, Di Rocco C, La Marca F (1996) Shunt complications in the first postoperative year in children with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst 12:748–754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Charney EB, Melchionni JB, Antonucci DL (1991) Ventriculitis in newborns with myelomeningocele. Am J Dis Child 145:287–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Northrup H, Volcik KA (2000) Spina bifida and other neural tube defects. Curr Probl Pediatr 30:313–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McLone DG, Dias L, Kaplan WE (1985) Concepts in the management of spina bifida. In: Humphreys RP (ed) Concepts in paediatric neurosurgery, 5th edn. Karger, Basel, pp 14–28

    Google Scholar 

  19. Charney EB, Weller SC, Sutton LN, Bruce DA, Schut LB (1985) Management of the newborn with myelomeningocele: time for a decision-making process. Pediatrics 75:58–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aygün C, Kurucu S, Çakmak-Çelik F, Dağçınar A, Tanyeri B, Küçüködük Ş (2013) Experience of a tertiary care center on 100 newborns with neural tube defects. Turk J Pediatr 55:359–364

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Muskett A, Barber WH, Parent AD, Angel MF (2012) Contemporary postnatal plastic surgical management of meningomyelocele. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65:572–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nihat Demir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demir, N., Peker, E., Gülşen, İ. et al. Factors affecting infection development after meningomyelocele repair in newborns and the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis. Childs Nerv Syst 31, 1355–1359 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2701-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-015-2701-y

Keywords

Navigation