Skip to main content
Log in

Contrast defect of left atrial appendage on computed tomography is associated with higher risk of recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The previous study has shown that the contrast defect of the left atrial appendage (LAA) on contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography (CT) is associated with a higher rate of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to investigate the association between LAA CT contrast defect and the risk of arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation (CA) in patients with paroxysmal AF. A total of 283 paroxysmal AF patients [age: 67 ± 10 years, 185 (65%) males] who underwent cardiac CT before CA were retrospectively analyzed. The presence or absence of LAA CT contrast defect was visually assessed using early phase CT images. Recurrence was an episode of atrial arrhythmia beyond the first 90 days post-ablation. LAA flow velocity was measured using transesophageal echocardiography in 246 paroxysmal AF patients. Sixty-eight (24%) patients had an LAA CT contrast defect. LAA flow velocity was significantly reduced in patients with LAA CT defect compared to those without (56.8 ± 28.7 cm/s vs. 41.1 ± 19.1 cm/s, p < 0.001). During a median follow-up period of 858 days, arrhythmia recurrence was identified in 85 (30%) patients. On a Kaplan Meier curve, patients with LAA CT contrast defect had significantly higher recurrence rates than those without (p = 0.043). On a multivariable Cox regression analysis, LAA CT contrast defect was a significant and independent predictor after adjustment of age, sex and left atrial volume index (hazard ratio: 1.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.03–3.07, p = 0.036). LAA CT contrast defect was associated with decreased LAA flow velocity and a higher rate of arrhythmia recurrence after CA, suggesting its usefulness as a non-invasive predictor for high-risk AF patients resistant to CA therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

CA:

Catheter ablation

CT:

Computed tomography

LAA:

Left atrial appendage

TEE:

Transesophageal echocardiography

References

  1. Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Delling FN, Djousse L, Elkind MSV, Ferguson JF, Fornage M, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Kwan TW, Lackland DT, Lewis TT, Lichtman JH, Longenecker CT, Loop MS, Lutsey PL, Martin SS, Matsushita K, Moran AE, Mussolino ME, Perak AM, Rosamond WD, Roth GA, Sampson UKA, Satou GM, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Shay CM, Spartano NL, Stokes A, Tirschwell DL, VanWagner LB, Tsao CW, American Heart Association Council on E, Prevention Statistics C, Stroke Statistics S (2020) Heart disease and stroke statistics-2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 141(9):e139–e596

    Google Scholar 

  2. Colilla S, Crow A, Petkun W, Singer DE, Simon T, Liu X (2013) Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the US adult population. Am J Cardiol 112(8):1142–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB (1991) Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham study. Stroke 22(8):983–988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruddox V, Sandven I, Munkhaugen J, Skattebu J, Edvardsen T, Otterstad JE (2017) Atrial fibrillation and the risk for myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 24(14):1555–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d’Avila A, de Groot N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T (2017) 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary. Heart Rhythm 14(10):e445–e494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P, Investigators SAI (2015) Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 372(19):1812–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Anselmino M, Mohanty P, Salvetti I, Gili S, Horton R, Sanchez JE, Bai R, Mohanty S, Pump A, Cereceda Brantes M, Gallinghouse GJ, Burkhardt JD, Cesarani F, Scaglione M, Natale A, Gaita F (2012) Does the left atrial appendage morphology correlate with the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation? Results from a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(6):531–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee JM, Shim J, Uhm JS, Kim YJ, Lee HJ, Pak HN, Lee MH, Joung B (2014) Impact of increased orifice size and decreased flow velocity of left atrial appendage on stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 113(6):963–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khurram IM, Dewire J, Mager M, Maqbool F, Zimmerman SL, Zipunnikov V, Beinart R, Marine JE, Spragg DD, Berger RD, Ashikaga H, Nazarian S, Calkins H (2013) Relationship between left atrial appendage morphology and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 10(12):1843–1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kimura T, Takatsuki S, Inagawa K, Katsumata Y, Nishiyama T, Nishiyama N, Fukumoto K, Aizawa Y, Tanimoto Y, Tanimoto K, Jinzaki M, Fukuda K (2013) Anatomical characteristics of the left atrial appendage in cardiogenic stroke with low CHADS2 scores. Heart Rhythm 10(6):921–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fukushima K, Fukushima N, Kato K, Ejima K, Sato H, Fukushima K, Saito C, Hayashi K, Arai K, Manaka T, Ashihara K, Shoda M, Hagiwara N (2016) Correlation between left atrial appendage morphology and flow velocity in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17(1):59–66

    Google Scholar 

  12. Inoue T, Suematsu Y (2019) Poor enhancement pattern of left atrial appendage in cardiac computed tomography is associated with stroke in persistent atrial fibrillation patients. J Thorac Dis 11(8):3315–3324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d’Avila A, de Groot N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T (2018) 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary. Europace 20(1):157–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martinez MW, Kirsch J, Williamson EE, Syed IS, Feng D, Ommen S, Packer DL, Brady PA (2009) Utility of nongated multidetector computed tomography for detection of left atrial thrombus in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2(1):69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Saremi F, Channual S, Gurudevan SV, Narula J, Abolhoda A (2008) Prevalence of left atrial appendage pseudothrombus filling defects in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2(3):164–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Funabashi N, Takaoka H, Uehara M, Murayama T, Ozawa K, Kobayashi Y (2015) LAA CT contrast defects correlate with TEE LAA velocity and CHADS(2)-score and are a prognostic indicator for embolism in subjects with atrial fibrillation or flutter. Int J Cardiol 185:297–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yaghi S, Chang AD, Akiki R, Collins S, Novack T, Hemendinger M, Schomer A, Grory BM, Cutting S, Burton T, Song C, Poppas A, McTaggart R, Jayaraman M, Merkler A, Kamel H, Elkind MSV, Furie K, Atalay MK (2020) The left atrial appendage morphology is associated with embolic stroke subtypes using a simple classification system: a proof of concept study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 14(1):27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ouchi K, Sakuma T, Ojiri H (2020) A predictor for defects in filling of the left atrial appendage on cardiac computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 44(2):284–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu S, Zhang H, Li H (2021) Cardiac computed tomography versus transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of left atrial appendage thrombus: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 10(23):e022505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamp O, Verhorst PM, Welling RC, Visser CA (1999) Importance of left atrial appendage flow as a predictor of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 20(13):979–985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fatkin D, Kelly RP, Feneley MP (1994) Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol 23(4):961–969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Handke M, Harloff A, Hetzel A, Olschewski M, Bode C, Geibel A (2005) Left atrial appendage flow velocity as a quantitative surrogate parameter for thromboembolic risk: determinants and relationship to spontaneous echocontrast and thrombus formation—a transesophageal echocardiographic study in 500 patients with cerebral ischemia. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18(12):1366–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shingo Kato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakamura, T., Kato, S., Fukui, K. et al. Contrast defect of left atrial appendage on computed tomography is associated with higher risk of recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Vessels 38, 394–401 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-022-02166-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-022-02166-0

Keywords

Navigation