Abstract
Recent studies under semi-natural conditions have revealed various unique features of activity/rest rhythms in Drosophilids that differ from those under standard laboratory conditions. An additional afternoon peak (A-peak) has been reported for Drosophila melanogaster and another species D. malerkotliana while D. ananassae exhibited mostly unimodal diurnal activity. To tease apart the role of light and temperature in mediating these species-specific behaviours of four Drosophilid species D. melanogaster, D. malerkotliana, D. ananassae, and Zaprionus indianus we simulated gradual natural light and/or temperature cycles conditions in laboratory. The pattern observed under semi-natural conditions could be reproduced in the laboratory for all the species under a variety of simulated conditions. D. melanogaster and D. malerkotliana showed similar patterns where as D. ananassae consistently exhibited predominant morning activity under almost all regimes. Z. indianus showed clearly rhythmic activity mostly when temperature cycles were provided. We find that gradually changing light intensities reaching a sufficiently high peak value can elicit A-peak in D. melanogaster, D. malerkotliana, and D. ananassae even at mild ambient temperature. Furthermore, we show that high mid-day temperature could induce A-peak in all species even under constant light conditions suggesting that this A-peak is likely to be a stress response.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bahn JH, Lee G, Park JH (2009) Comparative analysis of Pdf-mediated circadian behaviors between Drosophila melanogaster and D. virilis. Genetics 181:965–975
Busza A, Murad A, Emery P (2007) Interactions between circadian neurons control temperature synchronization of Drosophila behavior. J Neurosci 27:10722–10733
Daan S, Spoelstra K, Albrecht U, Schmutz I, Daan M et al (2011) Lab mice in the field: unorthodox daily activity and effects of a dysfunctional circadian clock allele. J Biol Rhythms 26:118–129
De J, Varma V, Saha S, Sheeba V, Sharma VK (2013) Significance of activity peaks in fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, under seminatural conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:8984–8989
Edmunds LN (1988) Cellular and molecular bases of biological clocks. Springer, New York
Foster RG, Helfrich-Förster C (2001) The regulation of circadian clocks by light in fruitflies and mice. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356:1779–1789
Glaser FT, Stanewsky R (2005) Temperature synchronization of the Drosophila circadian clock. Curr Biol 15:1352–1363
Grima B, Chelot E, Xia R, Rouyer F (2004) Morning and evening peaks of activity rely on different clock neurons of the Drosophila brain. Nature 431:869–873
Harrisingh MC, Wu Y, Lnenicka GA, Nitabach MN (2007) Intracellular Ca2+ regulates free-running circadian clock oscillation in vivo. J Neurosci 27:12489–12499
Helfrich-Förster C (2009) Does the morning and evening oscillator model fit better for flies or mice? J Biol Rhythms 24:259–270
Kauranen H, Menegazzi P, Costa R, Helfrich-Förster C, Kankainen A et al (2012) Flies in the north: locomotor behavior and clock neuron organization of Drosophila montana. J Biol Rhythms 27:377–387
Khare PV, Barnabas RJ, Kanojiya M, Kulkarni AD, Joshi DS (2002) Temperature dependent eclosion rhythmicity in the high altitude Himalayan strains of Drosophila ananassae. Chronobiol Int 19:1041–1052
Konopka RJ, Pittendrigh C, Orr D (1989) Reciprocal behaviour associated with altered homeostasis and photosensitivity of Drosophila clock mutants. J Neurogenet 6:1–10
Low KH, Lim C, Ko HW, Edery I (2008) Natural variation in the splice site strength of a clock gene and species-specific thermal adaptation. Neuron 60:1054–1067
Majercak J, Sidote D, Hardin PE, Edery I (1999) How a circadian clock adapts to seasonal decreases in temperature and day length. Neuron 24:219–230
Menegazzi P, Yoshii T, Helfrich-Förster C (2012) Laboratory versus nature: the two sides of the Drosophila circadian clock. J Biol Rhythms 27:433–442
Menegazzi P, Vanin S, Yoshii T, Rieger D, Hermann C et al (2013) Drosophila clock neurons under natural conditions. J Biol Rhythms 28:3–14
Pittendrigh CS (1954) On temperature independence in the clock system controlling emergence time in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 40:1018–1029
Prabhakaran PM, Sheeba V (2012) Sympatric Drosophilid species melanogaster and ananassae differ in temporal patterns of activity. J Biol Rhythms 27:365–376
Prabhakaran PM, Sheeba V (2013) Insights into differential activity patterns of drosophilids under semi-natural conditions. J Exp Biol 216:4691–4702
Prabhakaran PM, De J, Sheeba V (2013) Natural conditions override differences in emergence rhythm among closely related drosophilids. PLoS ONE 8:e83048
Rieger D, Fraunholz C, Popp J, Bichler D, Dittmann R et al (2007) The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster favors dim light and times its activity peaks to early dawn and late dusk. J Biol Rhythms 22:387–399
Sayeed O, Benzer S (1996) Behavioral genetics of thermosensation and hygrosensation in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:6079–6084
Simunovic A, Jaenike J (2006) Adaptive variation among Drosophila species in their circadian rhythms. Evol Ecol Res 8:803–811
Stoleru D, Peng Y, Agosto J, Rosbash M (2004) Coupled oscillators control morning and evening locomotor behaviour of Drosophila. Nature 431:862–868
Tomioka K, Sakamoto M, Harui Y, Matsumoto N, Matsumoto A (1998) Light and temperature cooperate to regulate the circadian locomotor rhythm of wild type and period mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 44:587–596
van der Linde K, Houle D, Spicer GS, Steppan SJ (2010) A supermatrix-based molecular phylogeny of the family Drosophilidae. Genet Res (Camb) 92:25–38
Vanin S, Bhutani S, Montelli S, Menegazzi P, Green EW et al (2012) Unexpected features of Drosophila circadian behavioural rhythms under natural conditions. Nature 484:371–375
Yao Z, Shafer OT (2014) The Drosophila circadian clock is a variably coupled network of multiple peptidergic units. Science 343:1516–1520
Yoshii T, Heshiki Y, Ibuki-Ishibashi T, Matsumoto A, Tanimura T et al (2005) Temperature cycles drive Drosophila circadian oscillation in constant light that otherwise induces behavioural arrhythmicity. Eur J Neurosci 22:1176–1184
Yoshii T, Fujii K, Tomioka K (2007) Induction of Drosophila behavioral and molecular circadian rhythms by temperature steps in constant light. J Biol Rhythms 22:103–114
Yoshii T, Vanin S, Costa R, Helfrich-Förster C (2009) Synergic entrainment of Drosophila’s circadian clock by light and temperature. J Biol Rhythms 24:452–464
Acknowledgments
We thank two anonymous reviewers for critical comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We thank Sudeshna Das and Vinod Ilangovan for the collection of flies, Avani Mital and Pawas Singh for help in execution of some of the experiments. We thank Vijay Kumar Sharma and Sheetal Potdar for suggestions and Rajanna and Muniraju for technical assistance. This work was supported by funding from JNCASR, Ramanujan Fellowship (Department of Science and Technology, India) to VS and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (India) fellowship to PMP.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prabhakaran, P.M., Sheeba, V. Simulating natural light and temperature cycles in the laboratory reveals differential effects on activity/rest rhythm of four Drosophilids. J Comp Physiol A 200, 849–862 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0927-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0927-x