Abstract
Investigation of the near field dynamics of a single and tandem array of three jets are provided by 2-D time-resolved particle image velocimetry (TR-PIV) measurements. Instantaneous velocity fields are examined in the transverse and spanwise planes with jet to crossflow velocity ratios in the range from 0.9 to 1.7. Previous studies have shown that for high ratios (\(\ge\) 2), the leading jet provides sufficient shielding to ensure that all jets downstream exhibit nearly identical flow characteristics. The current transverse plane measurements exhibit more unique and localized features as a result of the competing effects of pressure gradients and vortex mechanisms assessed via the jet exit profiles, first and second order turbulent statistics, streamline trajectories, recirculation areas and penetrations depths. Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) is applied to the spanwise plane instantaneous velocity fields to determine the statistically dominant features of the single and tandem jet configurations at equivalent velocity ratios. The velocity fields are then reconstructed using the truncated POD modes to provide further insight into the shear layer and wake vortices that drive these configurations. Vortex identification algorithms are applied to the reconstructed velocity fields to determine the statistical characteristics of the vortices, including their centroids, populations, areas and strengths, each of which exhibit largely different dependencies on jet configuration and velocity ratio. Several of the investigated metrics are found to exhibit different behaviors below and above a velocity ratio of unity and also as a function of increasing velocity ratio between 1 and 2, implying that several transitions mechanisms are present in the low velocity ratio regime investigated herein.
Graphic abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amini N, Hassan YA (2009) Measurements of jet flows impinging into a channel containing a rod bundle using dynamic PIV. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:5479–5495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.07.002
Anazadehsayed A, Barzegar Gerdroodbary M, Amini Y, Moradi R (2017) Mixing augmentation of transverse hydrogen jet by injection of micro air jets in supersonic crossflow. Acta Astronaut 137:403–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.05.007
Andreopoulos J, Rodi W (1984) Experimental investigation of jets in a crossflow. J Fluid Mech 138:93–127
Bernero S, Fiedler HE (2000) Application of particle image velocimetry and proper orthogonal decomposition to the study of a jet in a counterflow. Exp Fluids 29:S274–S281
Bonnet JP (1994) Stochastic estimation and proper orthogonal decomposition: complementary techniques for identifying structure. Exp Fluids 17:307–314
Bons JP, Sondergaard R, Rivir RB (2002) The Fluid Dynamics of LPT Blade Separation Control Using Pulsed Jets. J Turbomach 124:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1425392
Brunton SL, Kutz JN (2019) Data-driven science and engineering: Machine learning, dynamical systems and control. Cambridge University Press
Cambonie T, Aider J-L (2014) Transition scenario of the round jet in crossflow topology at low velocity ratios. Phys Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4891850
Cambonie T, Gautier N, Aider JL (2013) Experimental study of counter-rotating vortex pair trajectories induced by a round jet in cross-flow at low velocity ratios. Exp Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-013-1475-9
Crafton J, Forlines A, Palluconi S, Hsu K-Y, Carter C, Gruber M (2015) Investigation of transverse jet injections in a supersonic crossflow using fast-responding pressure-sensitive paint. Exp Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-014-1877-3
Figliola RS, Beasley DE (2011) Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Florschuetz LW, Su CC (1987) Effects of crossflow temperature on heat transfer within an array of impinging jets. J Heat Transfer 109:74–82
Florschuetz LW, Truman CR, Metzger DE (1981) Streamwise flow and heat transfer distributions for jet array impingement with cross flow. J Heat Transfer 103:337–342
Gardner JE, Burgisser A, Stelling P (2007) Eruption and deposition of the Fisher Tuff (Alaska): evidence for the evolution of pyroclastic flows. J Geol 115:417–435
Gavish M, Donoho DL (2014) The Optimal Hard Threshold for Singular Values is 4/3. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 60:5040–5053. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2014.2323359
Gopalan S, Abraham BM, Katz J (2004) The structure of a jet in cross flow at low velocity ratios. Phys Fluids 16:2067–2087. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1697397
Graftieaux L, Michard M, Grosjean N (2001) Combining PIV, POD and vortex identification algorithms for the study of unsteady turbulent swirling flows. Meas Sci Technol 12:1422–1429
Günther T, Theisel H (2018) The State of the Art in Vortex Extraction. Computer Graphics Forum 37:149–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13319
Gutmark EJ, Ibrahim IM, Murugappan S (2011) Dynamics of single and twin circular jets in cross flow. Exp Fluids 50:653–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0965-2
Holmes P, Lumley JL, Berkooz G (1996) Turbulence, Coherent Sturctures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry. Cambridge University Press
Huang Y, Ekkad SV, Han J-C (1998) Detailed Heat Transfer Distributions Under an Array of Orthogonal Impinging Jets. J Thermophys Heat Transfer 12:73–79. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6304
Isaac KM, Jakubowski AK (1985) Experimental study of the interaction of multiple jets with a cross flow. AIAA Journal 23:1679–1683. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9151
Kaffel A, Moureh J, Harion J-L, Russeil S (2016) TR-PIV measurements and POD analysis of the plane wall jet subjected to lateral perturbation. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 77:71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2016.04.001
Karagozian AR (2010) Transverse jets and their control. Prog Energy Combust Sci 36:531–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2010.01.001
Kelso RM, Lim TT, Perry AE (1996) An experimental study of round jets in a cross-flow. J Fluid Mech 306:111–144
Kolář V, Savory E (2007) Dominant flow features of twin jets and plumes in crossflow. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95:1199–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.02.025
Kolář V, Takao H, Todoroki T, Savory E, Okamoto S, Toy N (2003) Vorticity transport within twin jets in crossflow. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 27:563–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894-1777(02)00270-4
Kristo PJ, Sohail S, Reed RS, Kimber ML (2020) Low speed wind tunnel flow diagnostics and benchmark cases for thermal fluids CFD validation efforts. engrXiv. https://doi.org/10.31224/osf.io/k26rp
Krothapalli A, Lourenco L, Buchlin JM (1990) Separated flow upstream of a jet in a crossflow. AIAA Journal 28:414–420. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.10408
Kutz JN, Brunton SL, Brunton BW, Proctor JL (2016) Dynamic mode decomposition: data-driven modeling of complex systems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Landfried DT, Kristo PJ, Clifford CE, Kimber ML (2019) Design of an experimental facility with a unit cell test section for studies of the lower plenum in prismatic high temperature gas reactors. Ann Nucl Energy 133:236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.05.037
Li Z, Huai W, Qian Z (2012) Study on the flow field and concentration characteristics of the multiple tandem jets in crossflow. Science China Technological Sciences 55:2778–2788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-012-4964-9
Ling J, Ruiz A, Lacaze G, Oefelein J (2016) Uncertainty Analysis and Data-Driven Model Advances for a Jet-in-Crossflow. J Turbomach. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034556
Lohse J, Barth HP, Nitsche W (2016) Active control of crossflow-induced transition by means of in-line pneumatic actuator orifices. Exp Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2213-x
Lumley JL (1967) The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. Atmospheric turbulence and radio wave propagation. 23:166–178
M’Closkey RT, King JM, Cortelezzi L, Karagozian AR (2002) The actively controlled jet in crossflow. J Fluid Mech 452:325–335. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112001006589
Mahesh K (2013) The Interaction of Jets with Crossflow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 45:379–407. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101115
Margason RJ (1993) Fifty years of jet in cross flow research AGARD-CP5341. 56; 1–141
Meyer KE, Pedersen JM, ÖZcan O, (2007) A turbulent jet in crossflow analysed with proper orthogonal decomposition. J Fluid Mech 583:199–227. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112007006143
Muppidi S, Mahesh K (2005) Study of trajectories of jets in crossflow using direct numerical simulations. J Fluid Mech 530:81–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112005003514
Narayanan S, Barooah P, Cohen JM (2003) Dynamics and Control of an Isolated Jet in Crossflow. AIAA Journal 41:2316–2330. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6847
New TH, Lim TT, Luo SC (2006) Effects of jet velocity profiles on a round jet in cross-flow. Exp Fluids 40:859–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0124-y
New TH, Zang B (2015) On the trajectory scaling of tandem twin jets in cross-flow in close proximity. Exp Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-2070-z
Nguyen T, Muyshondt R, Hassan YA, Anand NK (2019a) Experimental investigation of cross flow mixing in a randomly packed bed and streamwise vortex characteristics using particle image velocimetry and proper orthogonal decomposition analysis. Phys Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5079303
Nguyen T, White L, Vaghetto R, Hassan Y (2019b) Turbulent flow and vortex characteristics in a blocked subchannel of a helically wrapped rod bundle. Exp Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-019-2778-2
Pratte BD, Baines WD (1967) Profiles of the round turbulent jet in a cross flow. Journal of the Hydraulics Division 93:53–64
Pritchard PJ (2011) Fox and McDonald's Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc
Reed RS, Weiss AW, Kristo PJ, Kimber ML (2020) Hydraulic Comparison of Single and Multiple-Jet Impingement on a Flate Plate 5th Thermal and Fluids Engineering Conference (TFEC). ASTFE Digital Library, Virtual
Ruiz AM, Lacaze G, Oefelein JC (2015) Flow topologies and turbulence scales in a jet-in-cross-flow. Phys Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4915065
Sciacchitano A, Neal DR, Smith BL et al (2015) Collaborative framework for PIV uncertainty quantification: comparative assessment of methods. Meas Sci Technol 26:074004. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/7/074004
Sciacchitano A, Wieneke B (2016) PIV uncertainty propagation. Meas Sci Technol 27:084006. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/27/8/084006
Shapiro SR, King JM, M’Closkey RT, Karagozian AR (2006) Optimization of Controlled Jets in Crossflow. AIAA Journal 44:1292–1298. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19457
Sirovich L (1987) Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 45:561–571
Smith BL, Neal DR, Feero MA, Richards G (2018) Assessing the limitations of effective number of samples for finding the uncertainty of the mean of correlated data. Meas Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aae91d
Smith SH, Mungal MG (1998) Mixing, structure and scaling of the jet in crossflow. J Fluid Mech 357:83–122
Taira K, Brunton SL, Dawson STM et al (2017) Modal Analysis of Fluid Flows: An Overview. AIAA Journal 55:4013–4041. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056060
Vernet R, Thomas L, David L (2009) Analysis and reconstruction of a pulsed jet in crossflow by multi-plane snapshot POD. Exp Fluids 47:707–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0730-6
Wieneke B (2015) PIV uncertainty quantification from correlation statistics. Meas Sci Technol 26:074002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/7/074002
Yu D, Ali MS, Lee JHW (2006) Multiple Tandem Jets in Cross-Flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 132:971–982
Yuan LL, Street RL (1998) Trajectory and entrainment of a round jet in crossflow. Phys Fluids 10:2323–2335. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869751
Ziegler H, Woller PT (1973) Analysis of Stratified and Closely Spaced Jets Exhausting into a Crossflow.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge support from Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP) through the following projects: NEUP 12-3582 entitled “Experimentally Validated Numerical Models of Non-Isothermal Turbulent Mixing in High Temperature Reactors”. NEUP 15-8627 “Experimental Validation Data and Computational Models for Turbulent Mixing of Bypass and Coolant Jet Flows in Gas-Cooled Reactors”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kristo, P.J., Kimber, M.L. Time-resolved particle image velocimetry measurements of a tandem jet array in a crossflow at low velocity ratios. Exp Fluids 62, 67 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03159-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03159-x