Abstract
In this work, snapshot proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) is used to study a pulsed jet in crossflow where the velocity fields are extracted from stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (SPIV) results. The studied pulsed jet is characterized by a frequency f = 1 Hz, a Reynolds number Re j = 500 (based on the mean jet velocity \({\overline{U}_{j}}\) = 1.67 cm/s and a mean velocity ratio of R = 1). Pulsed jet and continuous jet are compared via mean velocity field trajectory and Q criterion. POD results of instantaneous, phase-averaged and fluctuating velocity fields are presented and compared in this paper. Snapshot POD applied on one plane allows us to distinguish an organization of the first spatial eigenmodes. A distinction between “natural modes” and “pulsed modes” is achieved with the results obtained by the pulsed and unforced jet. Secondly, the correlation tensor is established with four parallel planes (multi-plane snapshot POD) for the evaluation of volume spatial modes. These resulting modes are interpolated and the volume velocity field is reconstructed with a minimal number of modes for all the times of the pulsation period. These reconstructions are compared to orthogonal measurements to the transverse jet in order to validate the obtained three-dimensional velocity fields. Finally, this POD approach for the 3D flow field reconstruction from experimental data issued from planes parallel to the flow seems capable to extract relevant information from a complex three-dimensional flow and can be an alternative to tomo-PIV for large volume of measurement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Braud C, Heitz D, Braud P, Arroyo G, Delville J (2004) Analysis of the wake-mixing-layer interaction using multiple plane PIV and 3D classical POD. Exp Fluids 37:95–104
Chang Y, Vakili A (1995) Dynamics of vortex rings in crossflow. Phys Fluids 7(7):1583–1597
David L, Fraticelli R, Wieneke B, Thomas L (2007) Investigation of three-dimensional vortex structures in crossflow by time-resolved tomographic PIV. In 7th international symposium on particle image velocimetry, 11–14 September, Rome
Druault P, Chaillou C (2007) Use of proper orthogonal decomposition for reconstructing the 3D in-cylinder mean-flow field from PIV data. CR Mecanique 335:42–47
Elsinga GE, Scarano F, Wieneke B, van Oudheusden BW (2006) Tomographic particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 41:933–947
Eroglu A, Breidenthal R (2001) Structure, penetration and mixing of pulsed jets in crossflow. AIAA Journal 39(3):417–423
Fraticelli R (2008) Jet dans un écoulement transverse à faible nombre de Reynolds—effet de la masse volumique sur la dynamique et le mélange. PhD thesis, Université de Poitiers, France
Fric T, Roshko A (1994) Vortical structure in the wake of a transverse jet. J Fluid Mech 279:1–47
Gordon M, Cater J, Soria J (2004) Investigation of the mean passive scalar field in zero-net-mass flux jets in cross-flow using planar-laser-induced fluorescence. Phys Fluids 16(3):794–808
Gristein F, DeVore C (1996) Dynamics of coherent structures and transition to turbulence in free square jets. Phys Fluids 8(5):1237–1251
Herrmann F, Hinsch K (2004) Light-in-flight holographic particle image velocimetry for wind-tunnel applications. Meas Sci Technol 15:613–621
Hori T, Sakakibara J (2004) High-speed scanning stereoscopic PIV for 3D vorticity measurement in liquids. Meas Sci Technol 15:1067–1078
Johari H (2006) Scaling of fully pulsed jets in crossflow. AIAA Journal 44:2719–2725
Johari H, Pacheco-Tougas M, Hermanson J (1999) Penetration and mixing of fully modulated turbulent jets in crossflow. AIAA Journal 37:842–850
Kähler C (2004) Investigation of the spatio-temporal flow structure in the buffer region of a turbulent boundary layer by means of multiplane stereo PIV. Exp Fluids 36:114–130
Kelso R, Lim T, Perry A (1996) An experimental study of round jets in cross-flow. J Fluid Mech 306:111–144
Liberzon A, Gurka R, Lampert S, Hetsroni G (2005) Multi-dimensional characterization of coherent structures using three-plane stereoscopic PIV. In 6th international symposium on particle image velocimetry, Passadena, California
Lumley J (1967) The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. In: Yaglom AM, Tatarsky VI (eds) Proc Atm Turb And Radio Wave Prop. Nauka, Moscow, pp 166–178
M’Closkey R, King J, Cortelezzi L, Karagozian A (2002) The actively controlled jet in crossflow. J Fluid Mech 452:325–335
Megerian S, Davitian J, Alves B, Karagozian A (2007) Transverse-jet shear-layer instabilities. Part 1. Experimental studies. J Fluid Mech 593:93–129
Meyer K, Pedersen J, Özcan O (2007) A turbulent jet in crossflow analysed with proper orthogonal decomposition. J Fluid Mech 583:199–227
Narayanan S, Barooah P, Cohen J (2003) Dynamics and control of an isolated jet in crossflow. AIAA Journal 41(12):2316–2330
Podvin B, Fraigneau Y, Lusseyran F, Gougat P (2006) A reconstruction method for the flow past an open cavity. J Fluids Eng 128:531–540
Shapiro S, King J, M’Closkey R, Karagozian A (2006) Optimization of controlled jets in crossflow. AIAA Journal 44(6):1292–1298
Sirovich L (1987) Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures Part I: coherent structures. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics XLV 3:561–571
Smith S, Mungal M (1998) Mixing, structure and scaling of the jet in crossflow. J Fluid Mech 357:83–122
Su L, Mungal M (2004) Simultaneous measurements of scalar and velocity field evolution in turbulent crossflowing jets. J Fluid Mech 513:1–45
Acknowledgments
This work is funded partially by the 13th CPER and the ANR VIVE3D. Their supports are greatly acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vernet, R., Thomas, L. & David, L. Analysis and reconstruction of a pulsed jet in crossflow by multi-plane snapshot POD. Exp Fluids 47, 707–720 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0730-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0730-6