Abstract
Purpose
To describe the novel technique of photoselective sharp enucleation of the prostate (PSEP) with a front-firing 532-nm laser and evaluate its efficacy and safety.
Methods
A seven-step standardized surgical procedure was established, and PSEP was performed in an en bloc or lobulate manner according to the size of the middle lobe of the prostate. The following clinical data of 583 patients who underwent PSEP in our center from November 2016 to May 2018 were retrospectively reviewed: maximum flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score (Qols), post-void residual volume (PVR), prostate volume, operation time, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration, and complications at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.
Results
Of the 583 patients, 475 had complete clinical information and were included in the study. The median operation time was 39 min. There were significant improvements in the Qmax, IPSS, Qols, PVR and PSA concentration at each follow-up time point postoperatively. Postoperative hemorrhage occurred in 22 patients (4.6%), urinary retention in 29 (6.1%), urinary tract infection in 55 (11.6%), bladder neck contracture in 8 (1.7%), urethral strictures in 11 (2.3%), and stress urinary incontinence in 9 (1.9%).
Conclusions
PSEP is effective and safe for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The innovative technique integrates the excellent hemostatic property of the 532-nm laser and the high efficiency of enucleation. It decreases the occurrence of postoperative incontinence associated with “blunt” enucleation of 532-nm laser and eliminates the lack of tissue samples problem associated with photoselective vaporization of the prostate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gavras S, Drake MJ, Gratzke C, Madersbacher C, Tikkinen KAO, Mamoulakis C, Bach T, Gacci M, Herrmann TRW, Karavitakis M, Malde S, Sakalis V, Umbach R (2015) European Association of Urology. Guidelines on the management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) including benign prostate obstruction (BPO). https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-Non-Neurogenic-Male-LUTS-Guidelines-2015-v2.pdf
Lai S, Peng P, Diao T, Hou H, Wang X, Zhang W, Liu M, Zhang Y, Seery S, Wang J (2019) Comparison of photoselective green light laser vaporisation versus traditional transurethral resection for benign prostate hyperplasia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and prospective studies. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028855
Hueber PA, Ben-Zvi T, Liberman D, Bhojani N, Gautam G, Deklaj T, Katz M, Zorn KC (2012) Mid term outcomes of initial 250 case experience with GreenLight 120W-HPS photoselective vaporization prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison of prostate volumes <60 cc, 60 cc-100 cc and >100 cc. Can J Urol 19(5):6450–6458
Valdivieso R, Hueber PA, Meskawi M, Belleville E, Ajib K, Bruyere F, Te AE, Chughtai B, Elterman D, Misrai V, Zorn KC (2018) Multicentre international experience of 532-nm laser photoselective vaporization with GreenLight XPS in men with very large prostates. BJU Int 122(5):873–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14208
Elshal AM, Elmansy HM, Elhilali MM (2013) Two laser ablation techniques for a prostate less than 60 mL: lessons learned 70 months after a randomized controlled trial. Urology 82(2):416–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.02.074
Guo S, Muller G, Lehmann K, Talimi S, Bonkat G, Puschel H, Gasser T, Bachmann A, Rieken M (2015) The 80-W KTP GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): adjusted analysis of 5-year results of a prospective non-randomized bi-center study. Lasers Med Sci 30(3):1147–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1721-x
Gomez Sancha F, Rivera VC, Georgiev G, Botsevski A, Kotsev J, Herrmann T (2015) Common trend: move to enucleation-Is there a case for GreenLight enucleation? Development and description of the technique. World J Urol 33(4):539–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1339-9
Misrai V, Kerever S, Phe V, Zorn KC, Peyronnet B, Roupret M (2016) Direct comparison of GreenLight Laser XPS photoselective prostate vaporization and GreenLight Laser En Bloc Enucleation of the prostate in enlarged glands greater than 80 ml: a study of 120 patients. J Urol 195(4 Pt 1):1027–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.080
Stone BV, Chughtai B, Forde JC, Tam AW, Lewicki P, Te AE (2016) Safety and efficacy of GreenLight XPS laser vapoenucleation in prostates measuring Over 150 mL. J Endourol 30(8):906–912. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0288
Elshal AM, Elkoushy MA, El-Nahas AR, Shoma AM, Nabeeh A, Carrier S, Elhilali MM (2015) GreenLight laser (XPS) photoselective vapo-enucleation versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized controlled study. J Urol 193(3):927–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.097
Panthier F, Pasquier J, Bruel S, Azancot V, De La Taille A, Gasman D (2019) En bloc greenlight laser enucleation of prostate (GreenLEP): about the first hundred cases. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02941-1
Gong Y-G, Liu R-M, Gao R (2015) Photoselective Vaporesection of the prostate with a front-firing lithium triborate laser: surgical technique and experience after 215 procedures. Eur Urol 67(6):1152–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.021
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Kyriazis I, Swiniarski PP, Jutzi S, Wolters M, Netsch C, Burchardt M, Liatsikos E, Xia S, Bach T, Gross AJ, Herrmann TR (2015) Transurethral anatomical enucleation of the prostate with Tm:YAG support (ThuLEP): review of the literature on a novel surgical approach in the management of benign prostatic enlargement. World J Urol 33(4):525–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1529-0
Herrmann TR (2016) Enucleation is enucleation is enucleation is enucleation. World J Urol 34(10):1353–1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1922-3
Tuccio A, Sessa F, Campi R, Grosso AA, Viola L, Muto G, Scoffone C, Cracco CM, Gomez-Sancha F, Misrai V, Muto G, Mari A, Di Maida F, Tellini R, Figueiredo F, Carini M, Oriti R, Amparore D, Fiori C, Porpiglia F, Minervini A (2020) En-bloc endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Urol Nefrol 72(3):292–312. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03706-6
Becker B, Herrmann TRW, Gross AJ, Netsch C (2018) Thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of large volume prostates: preliminary 6-month safety and efficacy results of a prospective randomized trial. World J Urol 36(10):1663–1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2321-8
Endo F, Shiga Y, Minagawa S, Iwabuchi T, Fujisaki A, Yashi M, Hattori K, Muraishi O (2010) Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP: a modification to prevent transient stress urinary incontinence. Urology 76(6):1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.071
Misraï V, Pasquie M, Bordier B, Elman B, Lhez JM, Guillotreau J, Zorn K (2018) Comparison between open simple prostatectomy and green laser enucleation of the prostate for treating large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single-centre experience. World J Urol 36(5):793–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2192-z
Biers SM, Oliver HC, King AJ, Adamson AS (2009) Does laser ablation prostatectomy lead to oncological compromise? BJU Int 103(4):454–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08039.x
Yang Z, Liu T, Wang X (2016) Comparison of thulium laser enucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in a randomized prospective trial with 5-year follow-up. Lasers Med Sci 31(9):1797–1802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-2052-2
Thomas JA, Tubaro A, Barber N, d’Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U, Grimm M-O, Benejam J, Stolzenburg J-U, Riddick A, Pahernik S, Roelink H, Ameye F, Saussine C, Bruyère F, Loidl W, Larner T, Gogoi N-K, Hindley R, Muschter R, Thorpe A, Shrotri N, Graham S, Hamann M, Miller K, Schostak M, Capitán C, Knispel H, Bachmann A (2016) A multicenter randomized noninferiority trial comparing GreenLight-XPS laser vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: two-yr outcomes of the GOLIATH Study. Eur Urol 69(1):94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.054
Leonardo C, Lombardo R, Cindolo L, Antonelli A, Greco F, Porreca A, Veneziano D, Pastore A, Dalpiaz O, Ceruti C, Verze P, Borghesi M, Schiavina R, Falabella R, Minervini A, Group A (2020) What is the standard surgical approach to large volume BPE? Systematic review of existing randomized clinical trials. Minerva Urol Nefrol 72(1):22–29. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03589-6
Funding
Supported by the Foundation of the Innovative Scientific Research of Army Medical University (SWH2016ZDCX2008)and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2018jscx-msyb0682).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YW: Project development, manuscript writing, data analysis; ZL: Project development, manuscript writing; TJ: Data collection and management, manuscript writing; XZ: Data collection and management, statistical analysis; ZC: Data collection and management; JZ: Data collection and management; DY: Data acquisition and management; YZ: Data acquisition and management; ZZ: Project development, supervision, WS: Project development, supervision, manuscript editing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
This retrospective study was performed in compliance with the ethical principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA (No. KY2019117).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to publish
Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 95946 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Jiang, T. et al. Photoselective sharp enucleation of the prostate with a front-firing 532-nm laser: an innovative surgical technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia—a single-center study of 475 cases. World J Urol 39, 3025–3033 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03547-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03547-8