Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The 80-W KTP GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): adjusted analysis of 5-year results of a prospective non-randomized bi-center study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to compare long-term results of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) with an 80-W potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in terms of efficacy, durability, and safety in an adjusted patient population. This prospective, non-randomized bi-center study included 120 (PVP) and 68 (TURP) patients in each arm. Patients were evaluated at 60 months of follow-up. Data from 30 (PVP) and 31 (TURP) patients were available for analysis. The primary outcome measurement was the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 5 years. Secondary outcome measurements included voiding symptoms (quality of life (QoL) score), micturition parameters (maximal flow rate, Q max), post-void residual (PVR) volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, and reoperation rate. At study inclusion, voiding symptoms and micturition parameters were comparable between both groups. Age, prostate volume, and the proportion of patients with platelet aggregation inhibition or oral anticoagulation were significantly higher in the PVP group. No significant difference could be detected between patients available at 60 months and those lost to follow-up in terms of preoperative characteristics in either group. Sixty months postoperatively, the improvement of IPSS, QoL, Q max, and PVR volume showed no significant difference between both groups. PSA reduction was significantly higher after TURP. The reoperation rate due to urethral stricture (PVP, 13 %; TURP, none), bladder neck contracture (PVP, 3 %; TURP, none), and persisting or recurrent adenoma (PVP, 18 %; TURP, 3 %) was significantly higher after the 80-W PVP. Eighty-watt PVP leads to comparable functional outcomes to TURP. However, during a long-term follow-up, significantly more reoperations are necessary after PVP with the 80-W KTP laser, suggesting inferior tissue ablation capacity of the 80-W KTP laser.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reich O, Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Seitz M, Schlenker B, Hermanek P, Lack N, Stief CG, Urology Section of the Bavarian Working Group for Quality A (2008) Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients. J Urol 180(1):246–249. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, Kuntz RM, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, Speakman MJ, Stief CG (2010) Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 58(3):384–397. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rieken M, Bachmann A (2014) Laser treatment of benign prostate enlargement—which laser for which prostate? Nat Rev Urol 11(3):142–152. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2014.23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Emberton M, Gravas S, Michel MC, N’Dow J, Nordling J, de la Rosette JJ, European Association of U (2013) EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 64(1):118–140. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rieken M, Bonkat G, Muller G, Wyler S, Mundorff NE, Puschel H, Gasser T, Bachmann A (2013) The effect of increased maximum power output on perioperative and early postoperative outcome in photoselective vaporization of the prostate. Lasers Surg Med 45(1):28–33. doi:10.1002/lsm.22108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Ansari A, Younes N, Sampige VP, Al-Rumaihi K, Ghafouri A, Gul T, Shokeir AA (2010) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with midterm follow-up. Eur Urol 58(3):349–355. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Capitan C, Blazquez C, Martin MD, Hernandez V, de la Pena E, Llorente C (2011) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Urol 60(4):734–739. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar A, Vasudeva P, Kumar N, Nanda B, Jha SK, Mohanty NK (2013) A prospective randomized comparative study of monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), bipolar TURP and photoselective vaporization of prostate in patients presenting with benign prostatic obstruction—a single center experience. J Endourology/Endourological Soc. doi:10.1089/end.2013.0216

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lukacs B, Loeffler J, Bruyere F, Blanchet P, Gelet A, Coloby P, De la Taille A, Lemaire P, Baron JC, Cornu JN, Aout M, Rousseau H, Vicaut E, Group RS (2012) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight 120-W laser compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol 61(6):1165–1173. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pereira-Correia JA, de Moraes Sousa KD, Santos JB, de Morais Perpetuo D, Lopes-da-Silva LF, Krambeck RL, Muller VJ, Vaz FP (2012) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate (<60 mL): a 2-year randomized double-blind prospective urodynamic investigation. BJU Int 110(8):1184–1189. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10878.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bouchier-Hayes DM, Van Appledorn S, Bugeja P, Crowe H, Challacombe B, Costello AJ (2010) A randomized trial of photoselective vaporization of the prostate using the 80-W potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vs transurethral prostatectomy, with a 1-year follow-up. BJU Int 105(7):964–969. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08961.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Horasanli K, Silay MS, Altay B, Tanriverdi O, Sarica K, Miroglu C (2008) Photoselective potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 70 mL: a short-term prospective randomized trial. Urology 71(2):247–251. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bachmann A, Schurch L, Ruszat R, Wyler SF, Seifert HH, Muller A, Lehmann K, Sulser T (2005) Photoselective vaporization (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a prospective bi-centre study of perioperative morbidity and early functional outcome. Eur Urol 48(6):965–971. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.07.001, discussion 972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruszat R, Wyler SF, Seitz M, Lehmann K, Abe C, Bonkat G, Reich O, Gasser TC, Bachmann A (2008) Comparison of potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: update of a prospective non-randomized two-centre study. BJU Int 102(10):1432–1438. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07905.x, discussion 1438–1439

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gomez Sancha F, Bachmann A, Choi BB, Tabatabaei S, Muir GH (2007) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (GreenLight PV): lessons learnt after 3500 procedures. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10(4):316–322. doi:10.1038/sj.pcan.4500989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruszat R, Seitz M, Wyler SF, Abe C, Rieken M, Reich O, Gasser TC, Bachmann A (2008) GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate: single-center experience and long-term results after 500 procedures. Eur Urol 54(4):893–901. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruszat R, Wyler S, Forster T, Reich O, Stief CG, Gasser TC, Sulser T, Bachmann A (2007) Safety and effectiveness of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulation. Eur Urol 51(4):1031–1038. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.006, discussion 1038–1041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Alexander Bachmann is a consultant for American Medical Systems (AMS) and a principal investigator of a study comparing photoselective vaporization of the prostate with the GreenLight XPS™ laser system and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (The Goliath Study). Heike Püschel is a study nurse and partly paid by AMS. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malte Rieken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, S., Müller, G., Lehmann, K. et al. The 80-W KTP GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): adjusted analysis of 5-year results of a prospective non-randomized bi-center study. Lasers Med Sci 30, 1147–1151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1721-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1721-x

Keywords

Navigation