Abstract
This study aims to compare long-term results of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) with an 80-W potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in terms of efficacy, durability, and safety in an adjusted patient population. This prospective, non-randomized bi-center study included 120 (PVP) and 68 (TURP) patients in each arm. Patients were evaluated at 60 months of follow-up. Data from 30 (PVP) and 31 (TURP) patients were available for analysis. The primary outcome measurement was the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 5 years. Secondary outcome measurements included voiding symptoms (quality of life (QoL) score), micturition parameters (maximal flow rate, Q max), post-void residual (PVR) volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value, and reoperation rate. At study inclusion, voiding symptoms and micturition parameters were comparable between both groups. Age, prostate volume, and the proportion of patients with platelet aggregation inhibition or oral anticoagulation were significantly higher in the PVP group. No significant difference could be detected between patients available at 60 months and those lost to follow-up in terms of preoperative characteristics in either group. Sixty months postoperatively, the improvement of IPSS, QoL, Q max, and PVR volume showed no significant difference between both groups. PSA reduction was significantly higher after TURP. The reoperation rate due to urethral stricture (PVP, 13 %; TURP, none), bladder neck contracture (PVP, 3 %; TURP, none), and persisting or recurrent adenoma (PVP, 18 %; TURP, 3 %) was significantly higher after the 80-W PVP. Eighty-watt PVP leads to comparable functional outcomes to TURP. However, during a long-term follow-up, significantly more reoperations are necessary after PVP with the 80-W KTP laser, suggesting inferior tissue ablation capacity of the 80-W KTP laser.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Reich O, Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Seitz M, Schlenker B, Hermanek P, Lack N, Stief CG, Urology Section of the Bavarian Working Group for Quality A (2008) Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients. J Urol 180(1):246–249. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.058
Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, Kuntz RM, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, Speakman MJ, Stief CG (2010) Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 58(3):384–397. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.005
Rieken M, Bachmann A (2014) Laser treatment of benign prostate enlargement—which laser for which prostate? Nat Rev Urol 11(3):142–152. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2014.23
Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Emberton M, Gravas S, Michel MC, N’Dow J, Nordling J, de la Rosette JJ, European Association of U (2013) EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 64(1):118–140. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.004
Rieken M, Bonkat G, Muller G, Wyler S, Mundorff NE, Puschel H, Gasser T, Bachmann A (2013) The effect of increased maximum power output on perioperative and early postoperative outcome in photoselective vaporization of the prostate. Lasers Surg Med 45(1):28–33. doi:10.1002/lsm.22108
Al-Ansari A, Younes N, Sampige VP, Al-Rumaihi K, Ghafouri A, Gul T, Shokeir AA (2010) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with midterm follow-up. Eur Urol 58(3):349–355. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.026
Capitan C, Blazquez C, Martin MD, Hernandez V, de la Pena E, Llorente C (2011) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Urol 60(4):734–739. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.043
Kumar A, Vasudeva P, Kumar N, Nanda B, Jha SK, Mohanty NK (2013) A prospective randomized comparative study of monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), bipolar TURP and photoselective vaporization of prostate in patients presenting with benign prostatic obstruction—a single center experience. J Endourology/Endourological Soc. doi:10.1089/end.2013.0216
Lukacs B, Loeffler J, Bruyere F, Blanchet P, Gelet A, Coloby P, De la Taille A, Lemaire P, Baron JC, Cornu JN, Aout M, Rousseau H, Vicaut E, Group RS (2012) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight 120-W laser compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol 61(6):1165–1173. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.052
Pereira-Correia JA, de Moraes Sousa KD, Santos JB, de Morais Perpetuo D, Lopes-da-Silva LF, Krambeck RL, Muller VJ, Vaz FP (2012) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate (<60 mL): a 2-year randomized double-blind prospective urodynamic investigation. BJU Int 110(8):1184–1189. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10878.x
Bouchier-Hayes DM, Van Appledorn S, Bugeja P, Crowe H, Challacombe B, Costello AJ (2010) A randomized trial of photoselective vaporization of the prostate using the 80-W potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vs transurethral prostatectomy, with a 1-year follow-up. BJU Int 105(7):964–969. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08961.x
Horasanli K, Silay MS, Altay B, Tanriverdi O, Sarica K, Miroglu C (2008) Photoselective potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 70 mL: a short-term prospective randomized trial. Urology 71(2):247–251. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.017
Bachmann A, Schurch L, Ruszat R, Wyler SF, Seifert HH, Muller A, Lehmann K, Sulser T (2005) Photoselective vaporization (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a prospective bi-centre study of perioperative morbidity and early functional outcome. Eur Urol 48(6):965–971. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.07.001, discussion 972
Ruszat R, Wyler SF, Seitz M, Lehmann K, Abe C, Bonkat G, Reich O, Gasser TC, Bachmann A (2008) Comparison of potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: update of a prospective non-randomized two-centre study. BJU Int 102(10):1432–1438. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07905.x, discussion 1438–1439
Gomez Sancha F, Bachmann A, Choi BB, Tabatabaei S, Muir GH (2007) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (GreenLight PV): lessons learnt after 3500 procedures. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10(4):316–322. doi:10.1038/sj.pcan.4500989
Ruszat R, Seitz M, Wyler SF, Abe C, Rieken M, Reich O, Gasser TC, Bachmann A (2008) GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate: single-center experience and long-term results after 500 procedures. Eur Urol 54(4):893–901. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.053
Ruszat R, Wyler S, Forster T, Reich O, Stief CG, Gasser TC, Sulser T, Bachmann A (2007) Safety and effectiveness of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulation. Eur Urol 51(4):1031–1038. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.006, discussion 1038–1041
Conflict of interest
Alexander Bachmann is a consultant for American Medical Systems (AMS) and a principal investigator of a study comparing photoselective vaporization of the prostate with the GreenLight XPS™ laser system and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (The Goliath Study). Heike Püschel is a study nurse and partly paid by AMS. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, S., Müller, G., Lehmann, K. et al. The 80-W KTP GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): adjusted analysis of 5-year results of a prospective non-randomized bi-center study. Lasers Med Sci 30, 1147–1151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1721-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1721-x