Abstract
To investigate the effects of flow rate on phytoplankton dynamics and related environment variables, a set of enclosure experiments with different flow rates were conducted in an artificial lake. We monitored nutrients, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, turbidity, chlorophyll-a and phytoplankton levels. The lower biomass in all flowing enclosures showed that flow rate significantly inhibited the growth of phytoplankton. A critical flow rate occurred near 0.06 m/s, which was the lowest relative inhibitory rate. Changes in flow conditions affected algal competition for light, resulting in a dramatic shift in phytoplankton composition, from blue-green algae in still waters to green algae in flowing conditions. These findings indicate that critical flow rate can be useful in developing methods to reduce algal bloom occurrence. However, flow rate significantly enhanced the inter-relationships among environmental variables, in particular by inducing higher water turbidity and vegetative reproduction of periphyton (Spirogyra). These changes were accompanied by a decrease in underwater light intensity, which consequently inhibited the photosynthetic intensity of phytoplankton. These results warn that a universal critical flow rate might not exist, because the effect of flow rate on phytoplankton is interlinked with many other environmental variables.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham E R, Law C S, Boyd P W et al. 2000. Importance of stirring in the development of an iron-fertilized phytoplankton bloom. Nature, 407: 727–730.
Ahn C H, Song H M, Lee S et al. 2013. Effects of water velocity and specific surface area on filamentous periphyton biomass in an artificial stream mesocosm. Water, 5: 1 723–1740.
Allan J D, Castillo M M. 2007. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters (2 edn). Springer Verlag.
Basu B K, Pick F R. 1996. Factors regulating phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass in temperate rivers. Limnol. Oceanogr., 41: 1 572–1 577.
Bornette G, Puijalon S. 2011. Response of aquatic plants to abiotic factors: a review. Aquatic Sciences, 73: 1–14.
Chen Y W, Chen K N, Hu Y H. 2006. Discussion on possible error for phytoplankton chlorophyll-a concentration analysis using hot-ethanol extraction method. Journal of Lake Science, 18: 550–552. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Desortova B, Puncochar P. 2011. Variability of phytoplankton biomass in a lowland river: response to climate conditions. Limnologica, 41: 160–166.
Elliott J A. 2010. The seasonal sensitivity of Cyanobacteria and other phytoplankton to changes in flushing rate and water temperature. Global Change Biol., 16: 864–876.
Gao Y X, Zhang Y M, Zhang Y C. 2007. Effects of flow velocity on growth of Microcystis aeruginosa in Taihu Lake. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 23: 57. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Gulati R D, van Donk E. 2002. Lakes in the Netherlands, their origin, eutrophication and restoration: state-of-the-art review. Hydrobiologia, 478: 73–106.
Hansson L A. Effects of competitive interactions on the biomass development of planktonic and periphytic algae in lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr., 33: 121–128.
Hondzo M, Warnaars T A. 2008. Coupled effects of smallscale turbulence and phytoplankton biomass in a small stratified lake. J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 134: 954–960.
Huang W, Liu X, Chen X et al. 2011. Critical flow for water management in a shallow tidal river based on estuarine residence time. Water Resources Management, 25: 2 367–2 385.
Huang X F. 1999. Analysis and Ecological Investigation of Lake. Standards Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
Huang Y L, Liu D F, Chen M X. 2008. Simulation of algae bloom under different flow velocity. Journal of Applied Ecology, 19: 2 293–2 298. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Hudnell H K, Jones C, Labisi B et al. 2010. Freshwater harmful algal bloom (FHAB) suppression with solar powered circulation (SPC). Harmful Algae, 9: 208–217.
Huisman J, Sharples J, Stroom J M et al. 2004. Changes in turbulent mixing shift competition for light between phytoplankton species. Ecology, 85: 2 960–2 970.
Huisman J, Weissing F J. 1994. Light-limited growth and competition for light in well-mixed aquatic environments—an elementary model. Ecology, 75: 507–520.
Leland H V. 2003. The influence of water depth and flow regime on phytoplankton biomass and community structure in a shallow, lowland river. Hydrobiologia, 506: 247–255.
Li F P, Zhang H P, Zhu Y P et al. 2010. Spatial and temporal dynamics in the relationship of phytoplankton biomass and limnological variables in a small artificial lake. AIP Conf. Proc., 1251: 29–32.
Li F P, Zhang H P, Zhu Y P et al. 2013. Effect of flow velocity on phytoplankton biomass and composition in a freshwater lake. Sci. Total Environ., 447: 64–71.
Li J, Li D X, Wang X K. 2012. Three-dimensional unstructuredmesh eutrophication model and its application to the Xiangxi River, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 24: 1 569–1 678.
Liu X A, Zhang M F. 2008. Behavior of evolution and growth of dominant algae in the Chongqing Urban Section along the Three-Gorges Valley. Environmental Science, 29: 1 838–1 843. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Long T Y, Wu L, Meng G H et al. 2011. Numerical simulation for impacts of hydrodynamic conditions on algae growth in Chongqing Section of Jialing River, China. Ecological Modelling, 222: 112–119.
Lucas L V, Thompson J K, Brown L R. 2009. Why are diverse relationships observed between phytoplankton biomass and transport time? Limnol. Oceanogr., 54: 381–390.
Malits A, Peters F, Bayer-Giraldi M et al. 2004. Effects of small-scale turbulence on bacteria: a matter of size. Microbial Ecol., 48: 287–299.
Mitrovic S M, Hardwick L, Dorani F. 2011. Use of flow management to mitigate cyanobacterial blooms in the Lower Darling River, Australia. J. Plankton Res., 33: 229–241.
Mitrovic S M, Oliver R L, Rees C et al. 2003. Critical flow velocities for the growth and dominance of Anabaena circinalis in some turbid freshwater rivers. Freshwater Biology, 48: 164–174.
Nilsson C, Renofalt B M. 2008. Linking flow regime and water quality in rivers: a challenge to adaptive catchment management. Ecol. Soc., 13: 18.
Paerl H W, Huisman J. 2008. Blooms like it hot. Science, 320: 57–58.
Paerl H. 2008. Nutrient and other environmental controls of harmful cyanobacterial blooms along the freshwatermarine continuum. Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms: State of the Science and Research Needs. p.217–237.
Qiu G S, Hu S, Ye D et al. 2011. Investigation on the present situation of eutrophication and water bloom in the branches of Three Gorges Reservoir. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 20: 311–316. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Reynolds C. 2000. Hydroecology of river plankton: the role of variability in channel flow. Hydrol. Process, 14: 3 119–3 132.
Ryan N J, Dabovic J, Bowling L D et al. 2009. The Murray River algal bloom: evaluation and recommendations for the future management of major outbreaks. NSW Office of Water.
Salmaso N, Braioni M. 2008. Factors controlling the seasonal development and distribution of the phytoplankton community in the lowland course of a large river in Northern Italy (River Adige). Aquatic Ecology, 42: 533–545.
Uhlmann D. 1971. Influence of dilution, sinking and grazing rate on phytoplankton populations of hyperfertilized ponds and microecosystems. Mitt. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol, 19: 100–124.
Van Vliet M, Zwolsman J. 2008. Impact of summer droughts on the water quality of the Meuse River. J. Hydrol., 353: 1–17.
Visser A W, Stips A. 2002. Turbulence and zooplankton production: insights from PROVESS. J. Sea Res., 47: 317–329.
Wang H P, Xia J, Xie P et al. 2004. Mechanisms for hydrological factors causing algal blooms in Hanjiang River—based on kinetics of algae growth. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 13: 282–285. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Wetzel R G. 2001. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystem (3rd edn). Academic Press, San Diego.
Wu T F, Qin B Q, Zhu G W et al. 2013. Dynamics of cyanobacterial bloom formation during short-term hydrodynamic fluctuation in a large shallow, eutrophic, and wind-exposed Lake Taihu, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20: 8 546–8 556.
Xie P, Xia J, Dou M et al. 2004. Research into the effects of the middle route of China’ south-to-north water transfer project on water bloom in the middle-down stream of Hanjiang River and the countermeasures Part I: an analysis of the key factors generating water bloom in Hanjiang River. Journal of Natural Resources, 19: 418–423. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhang Y M, Zhang Y C, Zhang L J et al. 2007. The influence of lake hydrodynamics on blue algal growth. China Environmental Science, 27: 707–711. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zhou F X, Chen J H. 2005. Freshwater Microorganisms Atlas. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press.
Zhu G W, Qin B Q, Gao G et al. 2007. Effects of hydrodynamics on phosphorus concentrations in water of Lake Taihu, a large, shallow, eutrophic lake of China. Hydrobiologia, 581: 53–61.
Zhu Y P, Zhang H P, Li F P et al. 2010. Enclosure experiments about the hydrodynamics effects on the plankton. Environmental Science, 31: 69–75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zwolsman J, Van Bokhoven A. 2007. Impact of summer droughts on water quality of the Rhine River: a preview of climate change? Water Sci. Technol., 56: 45–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51379146, 51409190) and the National Science Foundation for Post-Doctoral Scientists of China (No. 2013M531218)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, H., Chen, R., Li, F. et al. Effect of flow rate on environmental variables and phytoplankton dynamics: results from field enclosures. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 33, 430–438 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-015-4063-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-015-4063-4