Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of radiology in addressing the challenge of lung cancer after lung transplantation

  • Chest
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of lung cancer as a complication of lung transplantation is increasingly recognised. It may become an important survival-limiting factor in lung transplant patients as management of other complications continues to improve and utilisation of extended criteria donors grows. Radiology can play a key role in tackling this issue at multiple stages in the transplantation pathway and follow-up process. Routine chest CT as part of pre-transplant recipient assessment (and donor assessment if available) can identify suspicious lung lesions with high sensitivity and detect chronic structural lung diseases such as pulmonary fibrosis associated with an increased risk of malignancy post-transplant. Pre-transplant CT also provides a comparison for later CT studies in the assessment of nodules or masses. The potential role of regular chest CT for lung cancer screening after transplantation is less certain due to limited available evidence on its efficacy. Radiologists should be cognisant of how the causes of pulmonary nodules in lung transplant patients may differ from the general population, vary with time since transplantation and require specific recommendations for further investigation/follow-up as general guidelines are not applicable. As part of the multidisciplinary team, radiology is involved in an aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic management approach for nodular lung lesions after transplant both through follow-up imaging and image-guided tissue sampling. This review provides a comprehensive overview of available clinical data and evidence on lung cancer in lung transplant recipients, and in particular an assessment of the current and potential roles of pre- and post-transplant imaging.

Key Points

• Lung cancer after lung transplantation may become an increasingly important survival-limiting factor as mortality from other complications declines.

• There are a number of important roles for radiology in tackling the issue which include pre-transplant CT and supporting an aggressive multidisciplinary management strategy where lung nodules are detected in transplant patients.

• The introduction of routine surveillance chest CT after transplant in addition to standard clinical follow-up as a means of lung cancer screening should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CLAD:

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction

DLT:

Double lung transplant

ECD:

Extended criteria donors

PTLD:

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

SLT:

Single lung transplant

References

  1. Venuta F, Van Raemdonck DE (2017) History of lung transplantation. J Thorac Dis 9:5458–5471. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.11.84

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bos S, Vos R, Van Raemdonck DE, Verleden GM (2020) Survival in adult lung transplantation: where are we in 2020? Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 25:268–273. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chambers DC, Cherickh WS, Harhay MO et al (2019) The international thoracic organ transplant registry of the international society for heart and lung transplantation: thirty-sixth adult lung and heart-lung transplantation report – 2019; focus theme: donor and recipient size match. J Heart Lung Transpl. 38:1042–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2019.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Villavicencio MA, Axtell AL, Osho A, et al (2018) Single- versus double-lung transplantation in pulmonary fibrosis: impact of age and pulmonary hypertension. Ann Thorac Surg. 106:856–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.04.060

  5. Ranganath NK, Malas J, Phillips KG et al (2020) Single and double lung transplantation have equivalent survival for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 109:211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.06.090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chauhan D, Karanam AB, Merlo A et al (2016) Post-transplant survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients concurrently listed for single and double lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 35:657–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2015.12.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li D, Liu Y, Wang B (2020) Single versus bilateral lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 15:e0233732. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233732

  8. Riddell P, Kleinerova J, Eaton D et al (2020) Meaningful survival benefit for single lung transplantation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients over 65 years of age. Eur Resp J. 56:1902413. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02413-2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Riddell P, Egan J (2015) International donor conversion rates for lung transplantation need to be standardised. Lancet Respir Med. 3:909–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00462-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Christie IG, Chan EG, Ryan JP, Harano T, Morrell M, Luketich JD, Sanchez PG (2021) National trends in extended criteria donor utilization and outcomes for lung transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 111:421–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonser RS, Taylor R, Collett D, et al (2012) Effect of donor smoking on survival after lung transplantation: a cohort study of a prospective registry. Lancet. 380:747–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60160-3

  12. Habre C, Soccal PM, Triponez F et al (2018) Radiological findings of complications after lung transplantation. Insights Imaging. 9:709–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0647-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gould MK, Tang T, ILA L et al (2015) Recent trends in the identification of incidental pulmonary nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 192:1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201505-0990OC

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Mo Goo J et al (2017) Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. 284:228–243. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bueno J, Landeras L, Chung JH (2018) Updated Fleischner Society Guidelines for managing incidental pulmonary nodules: common questions and challenging scenarios. Radiographics 38:1337–1350. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018180017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee P, Minai OA, Mehta AC, DeCamp MM, Murthy S (2004) Pulmonary nodules in lung transplant recipients: etiology and outcome. Chest. 125:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.125.1.165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morla O, Liberge R, Arrigoni PP, Frampas E (2014) Pulmonary nodules and masses in lung transplant recipients: clinical and CT findings. Eur Radiol. 24:2183–2191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3264-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Collins J, Müller NL, Kazerooni EA, Paciocco G (2000) CT findings of pneumonia after lung transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 175:811–818. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ng YL, Paul N, Patsios D et al (2009) Imaging of lung transplantation: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(3 Suppl):S1–S19. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.7061

  20. Krishnam MS, Suh RD, Tomasian A et al (2007) Postoperative complications of lung transplantation: radiologic findings along a time continuum. Radiographics. 27:957–974. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.274065141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Copp DH, Godwin JD, Kirby KA, Limaye AP (2006) Clinical and radiologic factors associated with pulmonary nodule etiology in organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 6:2759–2764. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01545.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scarsbrook AF, Warakaulle DR, Dattani M, Traill Z (2005) Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder: the spectrum of imaging appearances. Clin Radiol. 60:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2004.08.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bin Saeeden M, Mukhopadhyay S, Randall Lane C, Renapurkar RD (2020) Imaging indications and findings in evaluation of lung transplant graft dysfunction and rejection. Insights Imaging. 11:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0822-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehta AC, Wang J, Abuqayyas S et al (2016) New nodule-newer etiology. World J Transplant 6:15–219. https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v6.i1.215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wingard JR, Hiemenz JW, Jantz JA (2012) How I manage pulmonary nodular lesions and nodular infiltrates in patients with hematologic malignancies or undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 120:1791–1800. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-02-378976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bajaj SK, Tombach B (2017) Respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients: lung findings using chest computed tomography. Radiol Inf Dis. 4:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrid.2016.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chan AW, Fung K, Austin PC et al (2019) Improved keratinocyte carcinoma outcomes with annual dermatology assessment after solid organ transplantation: population-based cohort study. Am J Transplant 19:522–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Fraumeni JF Jr et al (2011) Spectrum of cancer risk among US solid organ transplant recipients. JAMA. 306:1891–1901. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Raemdonck D, Vos R, Yserbyt J et al (2016) Lung cancer: a rare indication for, but frequent complication after lung transplantation. J Thorac Dis 8:S915–S924. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2016.11.05

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Magruder JT, Crawford TC, Grimm JC et al (2017) Risk factors for de novo malignancy following lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 17:227–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Triplette M, Crothers K, Mahale P et al (2019) Risk of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients in the United States. Am J Transplant. 19:1478–1490. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Collett D, Mumford L, Banner NR, Neuberger J, Watson C (2010) Comparison of the incidence of malignancy in recipients of different types of organ: a UK registry audit. Am J Transplant. 10:1889–1896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03181.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Perez-Callejo D, Torrente M, Parejo C, Laporta R, Ussetti P, Provencio M (2018) Lung cancer in lung transplantation: incidence and outcome. Postgrad Med J. 94:15–19. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-134868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Olland ABM, Falcoz PE, Santelmo N, Kessler R, Massard G (2014) Primary lung cancer in lung transplant recipients. Ann Thorac Surg. 98:362–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Drevet G, Duruisseaux M, Maury JM, et al (2020) Lung cancer surgical treatment after solid organ transplantation: a single-center 30-year experience. Lung Cancer. 139:55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.10.023

  36. Shtraichman O, Ahya VN (2020) Malignancy after lung transplantation. Ann Transl Med 8:416. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Raviv, Shitrit D, Amital A et al (2011) Lung cancer in lung transplant recipients: experience of a tertiary hospital and literature review. Lung Cancer. 74:280–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.02.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen LN, Spivack J, Cao T et al (2020) Characteristics and outcomes of lung cancer in solid organ transplant recipients. Lung Cancer. 146:297–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.06.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Raskin J, Vanstapel A, Verbeken EK et al (2020) Mortality after lung transplantation: a single-centre cohort analysis. Transpl Int. 33:130–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. US Preventative Services Taskforce (2021) Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 325:962–970. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Acuna SA, Lam W, Daly C, Kim SJ, Baxter NN (2018) Cancer evaluation in the assessment of solid organ transplant candidates: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 32:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2017.10.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rosenbaum DH, Bhojani RA, Dikman E et al (2005) Routine computed tomography screening of the chest in high-risk cardiac transplant recipients may improve survival. J Heart Lung Transplant. 24:2043–2047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2005.06.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mohammadi S, Bonnet N, Leprince P et al (2007) Long-term survival of heart transplant recipients with lung cancer: the role of chest computed tomography screening. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 55:438–441. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-965306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Finkenstedt A, Graziadei IW, Oberaigner W et al (2009) Extensive surveillance promotes early diagnosis and improved survival of de novo malignancies in liver transplant patients. Am J Transplant. 9:2355–2361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02766.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Acuna SA, Huang JW, Scott AL et al (2017) Cancer screening recommendations for solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Am J Transplant. 17:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13978

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Grewal AS, Padera RF, Boukedes S et al (2015) Prevalence and outcome of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients. Respir Med. 109:427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2014.12.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Copeland H, Awori Hayanga JW, Neyrinck A et al (2020) Donor heart and lung procurement: a consensus statement. J Heart Lung Transplant 39:501–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.020

  48. Gauthier JM, Bierhals AJ, Liu J et al (2019) Chest computed tomography imaging improves potential lung donor assessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 157:1711–1718.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM et al (2011) Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 365:395–409. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1102873

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis T. Delaney.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Carmel Cronin.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• single centre

• non-experimental study including literature review and identification of appropriate case examples to support important points

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delaney, F.T., Murray, J.G., Hutchinson, B.D. et al. The role of radiology in addressing the challenge of lung cancer after lung transplantation. Eur Radiol 32, 8182–8190 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08942-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08942-w

Keywords

Navigation