Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate diagnostic performance of loss of nigral hyperintensity on SWI in differentiating idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (IPD) or primary parkinsonism (including IPD and Parkinson-plus syndrome) from healthy/disease controls.
Methods
MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify original articles investigating the diagnostic performance of loss of nigral hyperintensity for differentiating IPD or primary parkinsonism from healthy/disease control, up to April 3, 2020. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. The proportion of nondiagnostic scan, inter- and intrareader agreement, and the proportion of concordance between clinical laterality and imaging asymmetry were also pooled.
Results
Nineteen articles covering 2125 patients (1097 with primary parkinsonism, 1028 healthy/disease controls) were included. For discrimination between IPD and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91–0.98) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92–0.97). For discrimination between primary parkinsonism and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75–0.94) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85–0.97). The pooled proportion of non-diagnostic scans on random-effects modeling was 4.2% (95% CI, 2.5–6.9%). The inter- and intrareader agreements were almost perfect, with the pooled coefficients being 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78–0.89) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89–0.99), respectively. The pooled proportion of concordant cases was 69.3% (95% CI, 58.4–78.4%).
Conclusions
Loss of nigral hyperintensity on SWI can differentiate IPD or primary parkinsonism from a healthy/disease control group with high accuracy. However, the proportion of non-diagnostic scans is not negligible and must be taken into account.
Key Points
• For discrimination between idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity of loss of nigral hyperintensity were 0.96 and 0.95.
• For discrimination between primary parkinsonism and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity of loss of nigral hyperintensity were 0.87 and 0.93.
• The pooled proportion of non-diagnostic scans on random-effects modeling was 4.2%.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AD:
-
Alzheimer’s disease
- CBD:
-
Corticobasal degeneration
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- DC:
-
Disease control
- ET:
-
Essential tremor
- FOV:
-
Field of view
- FTD:
-
Frontotemporal dementia
- HC:
-
Healthy control
- HSROC:
-
Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic
- IPD:
-
Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- LBD:
-
Lewy body dementia
- MCI:
-
Mild cognitive impairment
- MSA:
-
Multiple system atrophy
- MSA-C:
-
MSA with cerebellar features
- MSA-P:
-
MSA with predominant parkinsonism
- PSP:
-
Progressive supranuclear palsy
- SCI:
-
Subjective cognitive impairment
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- SWI:
-
Susceptibility-weighted imaging
- UPDRS:
-
Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale
- VP:
-
Vascular parkinsonism
References
Gibb WR, Lees AJ (1988) The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51:745–752
Jellinger KA (2003) How valid is the clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease in the community? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:1005–1006
Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Lees AJ (2001) Improved accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Lewy body Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 57:1497–1499
Meara J, Bhowmick BK, Hobson P (1999) Accuracy of diagnosis in patients with presumed Parkinson’s disease. Age Ageing 28:99–102
Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M et al (2015) MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 30:1591–1601
Lehéricy S, Sharman MA, Dos Santos CL, Paquin R, Gallea C (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging of the substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 27:822–830
Kwon DH, Kim JM, Oh SH et al (2012) Seven-Tesla magnetic resonance images of the substantia nigra in Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol 71:267–277
Cosottini M, Frosini D, Pesaresi I et al (2014) MR imaging of the substantia nigra at 7 T enables diagnosis of Parkinson disease. Radiology 271:831–838
Schwarz ST, Afzal M, Morgan PS, Bajaj N, Gowland PA, Auer DP (2014) The ‘swallow tail’ appearance of the healthy nigrosome - a new accurate test of Parkinson’s disease: a case-control and retrospective cross-sectional MRI study at 3T. PLoS One 9:e93814
Gao P, Zhou PY, Li G et al (2015) Visualization of nigrosomes-1 in 3T MR susceptibility weighted imaging and its absence in diagnosing Parkinson’s disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 19:4603–4609
Noh Y, Sung YH, Lee J, Kim EY (2015) Nigrosome 1 detection at 3T MRI for the diagnosis of early-stage idiopathic Parkinson disease: assessment of diagnostic accuracy and agreement on imaging asymmetry and clinical laterality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:2010–2016
Stezin A, Naduthota RM, Botta R et al (2018) Clinical utility of visualisation of nigrosome-1 in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Eur Radiol 28:718–726
Damier P, Hirsch EC, Agid Y, Graybiel AM (1999) The substantia nigra of the human brain. II Patterns of loss of dopamine-containing neurons in Parkinson's disease. Brain 122(Pt 8):1437–1448
Blazejewska AI, Schwarz ST, Pitiot A et al (2013) Visualization of nigrosome 1 and its loss in PD: pathoanatomical correlation and in vivo 7 T MRI. Neurology 81:534–540
Mahlknecht P, Krismer F, Poewe W, Seppi K (2017) Meta-analysis of dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity on magnetic resonance imaging as a marker for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 32:619–623
Chau MT, Todd G, Wilcox R, Agzarian M, Bezak E (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of the appearance of Nigrosome-1 on magnetic resonance imaging in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 78:12–20
Bae YJ, Kim JM, Kim E et al (2016) Loss of nigral hyperintensity on 3 Tesla MRI of parkinsonism: comparison with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT. Mov Disord 31:684–692
Reiter E, Mueller C, Pinter B et al (2015) Dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity on 3.0T susceptibility-weighted imaging in neurodegenerative parkinsonism. Mov Disord 30:1068–1076
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700
Gilman S, Low PA, Quinn N et al (1999) Consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Sci 163:94–98
Litvan I, Agid Y, Jankovic J et al (1996) Accuracy of clinical criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome). Neurology 46:922–930
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536
Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA (2001) A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med 20:2865–2884
Kim KW, Lee J, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers-part I. General guidance and tips. Korean J Radiol 16:1175–1187
Lee J, Kim KW, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers-part II. Statistical methods of meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol 16:1188–1196
Suh CH, Park SH (2016) Successful publication of systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy. Korean J Radiol 17:5–6
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560
Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM et al (2002) Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2:9
Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L (2005) The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 58:882–893
Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ 323:101–105
Hamza TH, van Houwelingen HC, Stijnen T (2008) The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability. J Clin Epidemiol 61:41–51
Stijnen T, Hamza TH, Ozdemir P (2010) Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data. Stat Med 29:3046–3067
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Oustwani CS, Korutz AW, Lester MS, Kianirad Y, Simuni T, Hijaz TA (2017) Can loss of the swallow tail sign help distinguish between Parkinson disease and the Parkinson-plus syndromes? Clin Imaging 44:66–69
Wang N, Yang H, Li C, Fan G, Luo X (2017) Using ‘swallow-tail’ sign and putaminal hypointensity as biomarkers to distinguish multiple system atrophy from idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a susceptibility-weighted imaging study. Eur Radiol 27:3174–3180
Calloni SF, Conte G, Sbaraini S et al (2018) Multiparametric MR imaging of parkinsonisms at 3 Tesla: its role in the differentiation of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease versus atypical parkinsonian disorders. Eur J Radiol 109:95–100
Sugiyama A, Sato N, Kimura Y et al (2018) MR findings in the substantia nigra on phase difference enhanced imaging in neurodegenerative parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 48:10–16
Cheng Z, He N, Huang P et al (2020) Imaging the Nigrosome 1 in the substantia nigra using susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping: an application to Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage Clin 25:102103
Perez Akly MS, Stefani CV, Ciancaglini L et al (2019) Accuracy of nigrosome-1 detection to discriminate patients with Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor. Neuroradiol J 32:395–400
Sung YH, Lee J, Nam Y et al (2019) Initial diagnostic workup of parkinsonism: dopamine transporter positron emission tomography versus susceptibility map-weighted imaging at 3T. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 62:171–178
Zhao XJ, Niu XY, You HY et al (2019) Signal alteration of substantia nigra on 3.0T susceptibility-weighted imaging in Parkinson’s disease and vascular parkinsonism. Curr Med Sci 39:831–835
Jin L, Wang J, Wang C et al (2019) Combined visualization of nigrosome-1 and neuromelanin in the substantia nigra using 3T MRI for the differential diagnosis of essential tremor and de novo Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol 10:100
Rizzo G, De Blasi R, Capozzo R et al (2019) Loss of swallow tail sign on susceptibility-weighted imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies. J Alzheimers Dis 67:61–65
Shams S, Fällmar D, Schwarz S et al (2017) MRI of the swallow tail sign: a useful marker in the diagnosis of Lewy body dementia? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:1737–1741
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Chong Hyun Suh.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was not required for this study because this study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ethical approval
IRB approval was not required for this study because this study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methodology
• Meta-analysis
• Performed at one institution
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 115 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, P.H., Lee, D.H., Suh, C.H. et al. Diagnostic performance of loss of nigral hyperintensity on susceptibility-weighted imaging in parkinsonism: an updated meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 31, 6342–6352 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07627-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07627-6