Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic performance of loss of nigral hyperintensity on susceptibility-weighted imaging in parkinsonism: an updated meta-analysis

  • Neuro
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate diagnostic performance of loss of nigral hyperintensity on SWI in differentiating idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (IPD) or primary parkinsonism (including IPD and Parkinson-plus syndrome) from healthy/disease controls.

Methods

MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify original articles investigating the diagnostic performance of loss of nigral hyperintensity for differentiating IPD or primary parkinsonism from healthy/disease control, up to April 3, 2020. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. The proportion of nondiagnostic scan, inter- and intrareader agreement, and the proportion of concordance between clinical laterality and imaging asymmetry were also pooled.

Results

Nineteen articles covering 2125 patients (1097 with primary parkinsonism, 1028 healthy/disease controls) were included. For discrimination between IPD and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91–0.98) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92–0.97). For discrimination between primary parkinsonism and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75–0.94) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85–0.97). The pooled proportion of non-diagnostic scans on random-effects modeling was 4.2% (95% CI, 2.5–6.9%). The inter- and intrareader agreements were almost perfect, with the pooled coefficients being 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78–0.89) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89–0.99), respectively. The pooled proportion of concordant cases was 69.3% (95% CI, 58.4–78.4%).

Conclusions

Loss of nigral hyperintensity on SWI can differentiate IPD or primary parkinsonism from a healthy/disease control group with high accuracy. However, the proportion of non-diagnostic scans is not negligible and must be taken into account.

Key Points

For discrimination between idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity of loss of nigral hyperintensity were 0.96 and 0.95.

For discrimination between primary parkinsonism and healthy/disease controls, pooled sensitivity and specificity of loss of nigral hyperintensity were 0.87 and 0.93.

The pooled proportion of non-diagnostic scans on random-effects modeling was 4.2%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

CBD:

Corticobasal degeneration

CI:

Confidence interval

DC:

Disease control

ET:

Essential tremor

FOV:

Field of view

FTD:

Frontotemporal dementia

HC:

Healthy control

HSROC:

Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic

IPD:

Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease

IQR:

Interquartile range

LBD:

Lewy body dementia

MCI:

Mild cognitive impairment

MSA:

Multiple system atrophy

MSA-C:

MSA with cerebellar features

MSA-P:

MSA with predominant parkinsonism

PSP:

Progressive supranuclear palsy

SCI:

Subjective cognitive impairment

SD:

Standard deviation

SWI:

Susceptibility-weighted imaging

UPDRS:

Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale

VP:

Vascular parkinsonism

References

  1. Gibb WR, Lees AJ (1988) The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51:745–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jellinger KA (2003) How valid is the clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease in the community? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:1005–1006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Lees AJ (2001) Improved accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Lewy body Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 57:1497–1499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meara J, Bhowmick BK, Hobson P (1999) Accuracy of diagnosis in patients with presumed Parkinson’s disease. Age Ageing 28:99–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M et al (2015) MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 30:1591–1601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lehéricy S, Sharman MA, Dos Santos CL, Paquin R, Gallea C (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging of the substantia nigra in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 27:822–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwon DH, Kim JM, Oh SH et al (2012) Seven-Tesla magnetic resonance images of the substantia nigra in Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol 71:267–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cosottini M, Frosini D, Pesaresi I et al (2014) MR imaging of the substantia nigra at 7 T enables diagnosis of Parkinson disease. Radiology 271:831–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwarz ST, Afzal M, Morgan PS, Bajaj N, Gowland PA, Auer DP (2014) The ‘swallow tail’ appearance of the healthy nigrosome - a new accurate test of Parkinson’s disease: a case-control and retrospective cross-sectional MRI study at 3T. PLoS One 9:e93814

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao P, Zhou PY, Li G et al (2015) Visualization of nigrosomes-1 in 3T MR susceptibility weighted imaging and its absence in diagnosing Parkinson’s disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 19:4603–4609

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Noh Y, Sung YH, Lee J, Kim EY (2015) Nigrosome 1 detection at 3T MRI for the diagnosis of early-stage idiopathic Parkinson disease: assessment of diagnostic accuracy and agreement on imaging asymmetry and clinical laterality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:2010–2016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Stezin A, Naduthota RM, Botta R et al (2018) Clinical utility of visualisation of nigrosome-1 in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Eur Radiol 28:718–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Damier P, Hirsch EC, Agid Y, Graybiel AM (1999) The substantia nigra of the human brain. II Patterns of loss of dopamine-containing neurons in Parkinson's disease. Brain 122(Pt 8):1437–1448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blazejewska AI, Schwarz ST, Pitiot A et al (2013) Visualization of nigrosome 1 and its loss in PD: pathoanatomical correlation and in vivo 7 T MRI. Neurology 81:534–540

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahlknecht P, Krismer F, Poewe W, Seppi K (2017) Meta-analysis of dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity on magnetic resonance imaging as a marker for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 32:619–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chau MT, Todd G, Wilcox R, Agzarian M, Bezak E (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of the appearance of Nigrosome-1 on magnetic resonance imaging in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 78:12–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bae YJ, Kim JM, Kim E et al (2016) Loss of nigral hyperintensity on 3 Tesla MRI of parkinsonism: comparison with 123I-FP-CIT SPECT. Mov Disord 31:684–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reiter E, Mueller C, Pinter B et al (2015) Dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity on 3.0T susceptibility-weighted imaging in neurodegenerative parkinsonism. Mov Disord 30:1068–1076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilman S, Low PA, Quinn N et al (1999) Consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Sci 163:94–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Litvan I, Agid Y, Jankovic J et al (1996) Accuracy of clinical criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome). Neurology 46:922–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA (2001) A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med 20:2865–2884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim KW, Lee J, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers-part I. General guidance and tips. Korean J Radiol 16:1175–1187

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee J, Kim KW, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: a practical review for clinical researchers-part II. Statistical methods of meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol 16:1188–1196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Suh CH, Park SH (2016) Successful publication of systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy. Korean J Radiol 17:5–6

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM et al (2002) Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2:9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L (2005) The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 58:882–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ 323:101–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hamza TH, van Houwelingen HC, Stijnen T (2008) The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability. J Clin Epidemiol 61:41–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stijnen T, Hamza TH, Ozdemir P (2010) Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data. Stat Med 29:3046–3067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Oustwani CS, Korutz AW, Lester MS, Kianirad Y, Simuni T, Hijaz TA (2017) Can loss of the swallow tail sign help distinguish between Parkinson disease and the Parkinson-plus syndromes? Clin Imaging 44:66–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang N, Yang H, Li C, Fan G, Luo X (2017) Using ‘swallow-tail’ sign and putaminal hypointensity as biomarkers to distinguish multiple system atrophy from idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a susceptibility-weighted imaging study. Eur Radiol 27:3174–3180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Calloni SF, Conte G, Sbaraini S et al (2018) Multiparametric MR imaging of parkinsonisms at 3 Tesla: its role in the differentiation of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease versus atypical parkinsonian disorders. Eur J Radiol 109:95–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sugiyama A, Sato N, Kimura Y et al (2018) MR findings in the substantia nigra on phase difference enhanced imaging in neurodegenerative parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 48:10–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cheng Z, He N, Huang P et al (2020) Imaging the Nigrosome 1 in the substantia nigra using susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping: an application to Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage Clin 25:102103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Perez Akly MS, Stefani CV, Ciancaglini L et al (2019) Accuracy of nigrosome-1 detection to discriminate patients with Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor. Neuroradiol J 32:395–400

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Sung YH, Lee J, Nam Y et al (2019) Initial diagnostic workup of parkinsonism: dopamine transporter positron emission tomography versus susceptibility map-weighted imaging at 3T. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 62:171–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao XJ, Niu XY, You HY et al (2019) Signal alteration of substantia nigra on 3.0T susceptibility-weighted imaging in Parkinson’s disease and vascular parkinsonism. Curr Med Sci 39:831–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jin L, Wang J, Wang C et al (2019) Combined visualization of nigrosome-1 and neuromelanin in the substantia nigra using 3T MRI for the differential diagnosis of essential tremor and de novo Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol 10:100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Rizzo G, De Blasi R, Capozzo R et al (2019) Loss of swallow tail sign on susceptibility-weighted imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies. J Alzheimers Dis 67:61–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shams S, Fällmar D, Schwarz S et al (2017) MRI of the swallow tail sign: a useful marker in the diagnosis of Lewy body dementia? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:1737–1741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chong Hyun Suh.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Chong Hyun Suh.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was not required for this study because this study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ethical approval

IRB approval was not required for this study because this study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methodology

• Meta-analysis

• Performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 115 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, P.H., Lee, D.H., Suh, C.H. et al. Diagnostic performance of loss of nigral hyperintensity on susceptibility-weighted imaging in parkinsonism: an updated meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 31, 6342–6352 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07627-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07627-6

Keywords

Navigation