Skip to main content
Log in

MRI targeted single fraction HDR Brachytherapy for localized Prostate Carcinoma: a feasibility study of focal radiation therapy (ProFocAL)

  • Urogenital
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the study was to establish the setup and workflow for delivering focal MRI-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer (PCA) and to assess patient comfort and safety aspects of MRI-guided single-fraction HDR.

Methods

Patients with histologically proven focal low- to intermediate-risk PCA with a single PIRADS 4/5 lesion were treated with percutaneous interstitial HDR brachytherapy in a single fraction with a minimum dose for the gross tumor volume of 20 Gy while sparing the organ at risk (OAR). Using a 3T-MRI, brachytherapy catheters were placed transgluteal in freehand technique. No antibiotic therapy or general analgesics were administered. Patient data, procedure time, patient discomfort, and complications were recorded. Quarterly PSA controls, biannual follow-up imaging, and annual re-biopsy were planned.

Results

So far, 9 patients were successfully treated and followed for 6 months. Mean intervention time was 34 min. Using the VAS scale, the pain reported for the intervention ranged from 2 to 3. Short-term follow-up showed no acute genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity so far. None of the patients displayed signs of infection. PSA levels in all patients decreased significantly. On follow up no residual PCA was detected treated region so far. PSA levels in all patients decreased significantly. On follow-up, no residual PCA was detected so far.

Conclusions

MR-guided single-fraction focal HDR brachytherapy for localized PCA is feasible as well as safe for the individual patient. Catheters can be placed accurately and maximum therapeutic dose distribution can be restricted to the tumor. Countersigning the minimally invasive character of the procedure, no general anesthesia or antibiosis is necessary.

Key Points

• MR-guided focal HDR brachytherapy allows an accurate placement of catheters with maximum therapeutic dose distribution restricted to the tumor.

• No major anesthesia or antibiosis is necessary emphasizing the minimal invasive character of the procedure.

• Patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate carcinoma in particular may benefit to halt disease progression whereas treatment-related morbidity is reduced compared with radical therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACR:

American College of Radiology

AS:

Active surveillance

EBRT:

External beam radiation therapy

GTV:

Gross tumor volume

HDR:

High-dose-rate brachytherapy

HIFU:

High-focused ultrasound

LDR :

Low-dose rate brachytherapy

OAR:

Organs at risk

PCA :

Prostate cancer

PSA :

Prostate-specific antigen

PTV:

Planning target volume

RT:

Percutaneous radiotherapy

VAS:

Virtual analog scale

References

  1. Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM et al (2012) Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Intervention versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) Study Group. N Engl J Med 367:203–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA et al (2016) 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. ProtecT Study Group. N Engl J Med 375:1415–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bokhorst LP, Valdagni R, Rannikko A et al (2016) PRIAS study group. A decade of active surveillance in the PRIAS study: an update and evaluation of the criteria used to recommend a switch to active treatment. Eur Urol 70:954–960

  4. van der Poel HG, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E et al (2018) Focal therapy in primary localised prostate cancer: the European Association of Urology Position in 2018. Eur Urol 74:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Galalae RM, Martinez A, Mate T et al (2004) Long-term outcome by risk factors using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost with or without neoadjuvant androgen suppression for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:1048–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zamboglou N, Tselis N, Baltas D et al (2012) High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as monotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: treatment evolution and mature results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:672–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ricke J, Wust P, Stohlmann A et al (2004) CT-Guided brachytherapy. A novel percutaneous technique for interstitial ablation of liver metastases. Strahlenther Onkol 180:274–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ricke J, Thormann M, Ludewig M et al (2010) MR-guided liver tumor ablation employing open high-field 1.0T MRI for image-guided brachytherapy. Eur Radiol 20:1985–1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bretschneider T, Peters N, Hass P, Ricke J (2012) Update on interstitial brachytherapy. Radiologe 52:70–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fischbach F, Wien L, Krueger S et al (2018) Feasibility study of MR-guided transgluteal targeted in-bore biopsy for suspicious lesions of the prostate at 3 Tesla using a freehand approach. Eur Radiol 28:2690–2699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vargas HA, Hötker AM, Goldman DA et al (2016) Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol 26:1606–1612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fayers PM (2001) Interpreting quality of life data: population-based reference data for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur J Cancer 37:1331–1334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sacco DE, Daller M, Grocela JA, Babayan RK, Zietman AL (2003) Corticosteroid use after prostate brachytherapy reduces the risk of acute urinary retention. BJU Int 91:345–349

  14. Doyle CA, Loadsman JA, Hruby G (2008) An audit of analgesia requirements for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Anaesth Intensive Care 36:707–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Peach MS, Trifiletti DM, Libby B (2016) Systematic review of focal prostate brachytherapy and the future implementation of image-guided prostate HDR brachytherapy using MR-ultrasound fusion. Prostate Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4754031

  16. Demanes DJ, Martinez AA, Ghilezan M et al (2011) High dose rate monotherapy: safe and effective brachytherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:1286–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grills IS, Martinez AA, Hollander M et al (2004) High dose rate brachytherapy as prostate cancer monotherapy reduces toxicity compared to low dose rate palladium seeds. J Urol 171:1098–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sartor AO, Hricak H, Wheeler TM et al (2008) Evaluating localized prostate cancer and identifying candidates for focal therapy. Urology 72:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu W, Laitinen S, Khan S et al (2009) Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nat Med 15:559–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Haffner MC, Mosbruger T, Esopi DM et al (2013) Tracking the clonal origin of lethal prostate cancer. J Clin Invest 123:4918–4922

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bott SR, Ahmed HU, Hindley RG, Abdul-Rahman A, Freeman A, Emberton M (2010) The index lesion and focal therapy: an analysis of the pathological characteristics of prostate cancer. BJU Int 106:1607–1611

  22. Gburek BM, Kollmorgen TA, Qian J, D'Souza-Gburek SM, Lieber MM, Jenkins RB (1997) Chromosomal anomalies in stage D1 prostate adenocarcinoma primary tumors and lymph node metastases detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Urol 157:223–227

  23. Wise AM, Stamey TA, McNeal JE, Clayton JL (2002) Morphologic and clinical significance of multifocal prostate cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 60:264–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kasivisvanathan V, Emberton M, Ahmed HU (2013) Focal therapy for prostate cancer: rationale and treatment opportunities. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 25:461–473

  25. Mouraviev V, Villers A, Bostwick DG, Wheeler TM, Montironi R, Polascik TJ (2011) Understanding the pathological features of focality, grade and tumour volume of early-stage prostate cancer as a foundation for parenchyma-sparing prostate cancer therapies: active surveillance and focal targeted therapy. BJU Int 108:1074–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Fischbach.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Frank Fischbach.

Conflict of interest

The co-author, Christian Stehning, is a staff of the company Philips Healthcare.

All other authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• Prospective

• Observational

• Performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fischbach, F., Hass, P., Schindele, D. et al. MRI targeted single fraction HDR Brachytherapy for localized Prostate Carcinoma: a feasibility study of focal radiation therapy (ProFocAL). Eur Radiol 30, 2072–2081 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06505-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06505-0

Keywords

Navigation