Abstract
Objectives
To determine the feasibility of 4D flow MRI for visualization and quantification of the portal venous haemodynamics in children and young adults.
Methods
4D flow was performed in 28 paediatric patients (median age, 8.5 years; interquartile range, 5.2–16.5), 15 with non-operated native portal system and 13 with surgically created portal shunt. Image quality assessment for 3D flow visualization and flow pattern analyses was performed. Regional 4D flow peak velocity and net flow were compared with 2D-cine phase contrast MRI (2D-PC MR) in the post-surgical patients.
Results
Mean 3D flow visualization quality score was excellent (mean ± SD, 4.2 ± 0.9) with good inter-rater agreement (κ,0.67). Image quality in children aged >10 years was better than children ≤10 years (p < 0.05). Flow pattern was defined for portal, superior mesenteric, splenic veins and splenic artery in all patients. 4D flow and 2D-PC MR peak velocity and net flow were similar with good correlation (peak velocity: 4D flow 22.2 ± 9.1 cm/s and 2D-PC MR 25.2 ± 11.2 cm/s, p = 0.46; r = 0.92, p < 0.0001; net flow: 4D flow 9.5 ± 7.4 ml/s and 2D-PC MR 10.1 ± 7.3 ml/s, p = 0.65; r = 0.81, p = 0.0007).
Conclusions
4D flow MRI is feasible and holds promise for the comprehensive 3D visualization and quantification of portal venous flow dynamics in children and young adults.
Key Points
• 4D flow MRI is feasible in children and young adults.
• 4D flow MRI has the ability to non-invasively characterize portal haemodynamics.
• Image quality of 4D flow MRI is better is older children.
• 4D flow MRI can accurately quantify portal flow compared to 2D-cine PC MRI.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- 2D-PC MR:
-
2D-cine phase contrast MR imaging
- 4D flow MRI:
-
3D-cine phase contrast MRI with three-directional velocity encoding (flow)
- GRAPPA:
-
Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions
- VENC:
-
Velocity encoding
References
Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Kozerke S, Hope M, Wieben O (2012) 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 36:1015–1036
Frydrychowicz A, Landgraf BR, Niespodzany E et al (2011) Four-dimensional velocity mapping of the hepatic and splanchnic vasculature with radial sampling at 3 tesla: a feasibility study in portal hypertension. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:577–584
Stankovic Z, Frydrychowicz A, Csatari Z et al (2010) MR-based visualization and quantification of three-dimensional flow characteristics in the portal venous system. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:466–475
Stankovic Z, Csatari Z, Deibert P et al (2012) Normal and altered three-dimensional portal venous hemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis. Radiology 262:862–873
Roldan-Alzate A, Frydrychowicz A, Niespodzany E et al (2013) In vivo validation of 4D flow MRI for assessing the hemodynamics of portal hypertension. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1100–1108
Stankovic Z, Csatari Z, Deibert P et al (2013) A feasibility study to evaluate splanchnic arterial and venous hemodynamics by flow-sensitive 4D MRI compared with Doppler ultrasound in patients with cirrhosis and controls. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:669–675
Stankovic Z, Jung B, Collins J et al (2014) Reproducibility study of four-dimensional flow MRI of arterial and portal venous liver hemodynamics: influence of spatio-temporal resolution. Magn Reson Med 72:477–484
Stankovic Z, Rossle M, Euringer W et al (2015) Effect of TIPS placement on portal and splanchnic arterial blood flow in 4-dimensional flow MRI. Eur Radiol 25:2634–2640
Ling SC (2012) Advances in the evaluation and management of children with portal hypertension. Semin Liver Dis 32:288–297
Shneider BL, Bosch J, de Franchis R et al (2012) Portal hypertension in children: expert pediatric opinion on the report of the Baveno v Consensus Workshop on Methodology of Diagnosis and Therapy in Portal Hypertension. Pediatr Transplant 16:426–437
La Mura V, Nicolini A, Tosetti G, Primignani M (2015) Cirrhosis and portal hypertension: the importance of risk stratification, the role of hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement. World J Hepatol 7:688–695
Suk KT (2014) Hepatic venous pressure gradient: clinical use in chronic liver disease. Clin Mol Hepatol 20:6–14
Lin LW, Duan XJ, Wang XY et al (2008) Color Doppler velocity profile and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in assessment of liver cirrhosis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 7:34–39
Robinson KA, Middleton WD, Al-Sukaiti R, Teefey SA, Dahiya N (2009) Doppler sonography of portal hypertension. Ultrasound Q 25:3–13
Dyvorne HA, Knight-Greenfield A, Besa C et al (2015) Quantification of hepatic blood flow using a high-resolution phase-contrast MRI sequence with compressed sensing acceleration. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:510–518
Gabbour M, Schnell S, Jarvis K, Robinson JD, Markl M, Rigsby CK (2015) 4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging: blood flow quantification compared to 2-D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography. Pediatr Radiol 45:804–813
Krishnamurthy R, Cheong B, Muthupillai R (2014) Tools for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 4:104–125
Roldan-Alzate A, Frydrychowicz A, Said A et al (2015) Impaired regulation of portal venous flow in response to a meal challenge as quantified by 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:1009–1017
Bernstein MA, Zhou XJ, Polzin JA et al (1998) Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction. Magn Reson Med 39:300–308
Walker PG, Cranney GB, Scheidegger MB, Waseleski G, Pohost GM, Yoganathan AP (1993) Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging 3:521–530
Bock J, Frydrychowicz A, Stalder AF et al (2010) 4D phase contrast MRI at 3 T: effect of standard and blood-pool contrast agents on SNR, PC-MRA, and blood flow visualization. Magn Reson Med 63:330–338
Schnell S, Entezari P, Mahadewia RJ et al (2015) Improved semiautomated 4D flow MRI analysis in the aorta in patients with congenital aortic valve anomalies versus tricuspid aortic valves. J Comput Assist Tomogr. doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000312
Buonocore MH (1998) Visualizing blood flow patterns using streamlines, arrows, and particle paths. Magn Reson Med 40:210–226
Geiger J, Hirtler D, Burk J et al (2014) Postoperative pulmonary and aortic 3D haemodynamics in patients after repair of transposition of the great arteries. Eur Radiol 24:200–208
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Schnell S, Markl M, Entezari P et al (2014) k-t GRAPPA accelerated four-dimensional flow MRI in the aorta: effect on scan time, image quality, and quantification of flow and wall shear stress. Magn Reson Med 72:522–533
Jung B, Honal M, Ullmann P, Hennig J, Markl M (2008) Highly k-t-space-accelerated phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 60:1169–1177
Frydrychowicz A, Wieben O, Niespodzany E, Reeder SB, Johnson KM, Francois CJ (2013) Quantification of thoracic blood flow using volumetric magnetic resonance imaging with radial velocity encoding: in vivo validation. Investig Radiol 48:819–825
Gu T, Korosec FR, Block WF et al (2005) PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:743–749
Cheng JY, Hanneman K, Zhang T et al (2015) Comprehensive motion-compensated highly accelerated 4D flow MRI with ferumoxytol enhancement for pediatric congenital heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. doi:10.1002/jmri.25106
Hsiao A, Lustig M, Alley MT et al (2012) Rapid pediatric cardiac assessment of flow and ventricular volume with compressed sensing parallel imaging volumetric cine phase-contrast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:W250–W259
Petersson S, Dyverfeldt P, Sigfridsson A, Lantz J, Carlhall CJ, Ebbers T (2016) Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 75:1249–1255
Dyvorne H, Knight-Greenfield A, Jajamovich G et al (2015) Abdominal 4D flow MR imaging in a breath hold: combination of spiral sampling and dynamic compressed sensing for highly accelerated acquisition. Radiology 275:245–254
Singh AK, Nachiappan AC, Verma HA et al (2010) Postoperative imaging in liver transplantation: what radiologists should know. Radiographics 30:339–351
Acknowledgements
A scientific paper with partial material was presented at the annual meeting of The Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) in April 2014.
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Keyur Parekh. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. No study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported. Methodology: prospective, diagnostic or prognostic study, performed at one institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
File format -.mov. Twelve-year-old male patient with history of extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis treated with meso-Rex bypass surgery. Movie 1 shows mild flow acceleration proximal to the narrowing at meso-Rex/left portal vein anastomosis and reduced flow at the site of narrowing on 4D flow MRI. Turbulent flow in the dilated left portal vein can be seen (MPG 1738 kb)
File format -.mov. Eight-year-old female patient with surgically corrected extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis with a meso-Rex bypass. Patient was treated with balloon dilation for severe narrowing of meso-Rex bypass at left portal vein anastomosis. On follow-up imaging, transient flow acceleration (red coloured pathlines at 358 ms, heart rate 90 bpm) was seen at the left portal vein anastomosis on 4D flow MRI images. (MPG 1734 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parekh, K., Markl, M., Rose, M. et al. 4D flow MR imaging of the portal venous system: a feasibility study in children. Eur Radiol 27, 832–840 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4396-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4396-1