Abstract
Septic arthritis (SA) and gout are the main suspected etiologies of acute monoarthritis. Differentiating them is essential because SA is an emergency. The performance of a gout diagnostic score developed by Janssens et al. was investigated in a cohort of patients with acute arthritis suspected of being septic. This was an ancillary study of a single-center cohort of patients with suspected SA. Patients were classified into three groups according to the final diagnosis (gout, SA or other diagnosis). We assessed the performance of the score (sensitivity [Se], specificity [Sp], positive and negative predictive value [PPV, NPV], area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve) for the diagnosis of gouty arthritis. In total, 138 patients were included: 28 (20.3%) had gout, 42 (30.4%) SA, and 68 (49.3%) another diagnosis. The median diagnostic score was 7.0 [4.5; 8.8] for patients with gout, 3.5 [2.5; 6.0] for those with SA and 3.0 [2.0–5.0] for those with another diagnosis. With a score threshold of ≥ 8, the Se for a diagnosis of gout was 28.6%, Sp 96.4%, PPV 66.7%, and NPV 84.1%. With a threshold of ≤ 4, the Se was 82.1%, Sp 64.5%, PPV 37.1%, and NPV 93.4%. The area under the ROC for the diagnostic score was 0.79. The performance of the clinico-biological score of Janssens et al. for a diagnosis of gout applied to a cohort of patients with acute arthritis and suspected of being septic was poor. Joint aspiration remains necessary to differentiate SA from another etiology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Couderc M, Pereira B, Mathieu S et al (2015) Predictive value of the usual clinical signs and laboratory tests in the diagnosis of septic arthritis. CJEM 17:403–410
Clerc O, Prod’hom G, Greub G, et al (2011) Adult native septic arthritis: a review of 10 years of experience and lessons for empirical antibiotic therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:1168–1173
Kennedy N, Chambers ST, Nolan I et al (2015) Native joint septic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, and microbiological causes in a New Zealand population. J Rheumatol 42:2392–2397
Weston VC, Jones AC, Bradbury N et al (1999) Clinical features and outcome of septic arthritis in a single UK Health District 1982–1991. Ann Rheum Dis 58:214–219
Ferrand J, El Samad Y, Brunschweiler B et al (2016) Morbimortality in adult patients with septic arthritis: a three-year hospital-based study. BMC Infect Dis 16:239
Gupta MN, Sturrock RD, Field M (2001) A prospective 2-year study of 75 patients with adult-onset septic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 40:24–30
Carpenter CR, Schuur JD, Everett WW et al (2011) Evidence-based diagnostics: adult septic arthritis. Acad Emerg Med 18:781–796
Mathews CJ, Weston VC, Jones A et al (2010) Bacterial septic arthritis in adults. Lancet 375:846–855
McGillicuddy DC, Shah KH, Friedberg RP et al (2007) How sensitive is the synovial fluid white blood cell count in diagnosing septic arthritis? Am J Emerg Med 25:749–752
Eberst-Ledoux J, Tournadre A, Mathieu S et al (2012) Septic arthritis with negative bacteriological findings in adult native joints: a retrospective study of 74 cases. Joint Bone Spine 79:156–159
Margaretten ME, Kohlwes J, Moore D et al (2007) Does this adult patient have septic arthritis? JAMA 297:1478–1488
Dubost J-J (2006) Septic arthritis with no organism: a dilemma. Joint Bone Spine 73:341–343
Neogi T, Jansen TLTA, Dalbeth N et al (2015) 2015 Gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheumatol 67:2557–2568
Janssens HJEM, Fransen J, van de Lisdonk EH et al (2010) A diagnostic rule for acute gouty arthritis in primary care without joint fluid analysis. Arch Intern Med 170:1120–1126
Kienhorst LBE, Janssens HJEM, Fransen J et al (2015) The validation of a diagnostic rule for gout without joint fluid analysis: a prospective study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54:609–614
Robin F, Berthoud O, Albert JD, et al (2021) External validation of Gout-calculator performance on a cohort of acute arthritis (SYNOLACTATE) sparing distal joints such as hallux and midfoot. A cross-sectional study of 170 patients. Clin Rheumatol 40:1983–1988
Lee K-H, Choi S-T, Lee S-K et al (2015) Application of a novel diagnostic rule in the differential diagnosis between acute gouty arthritis and septic arthritis. J Korean Med Sci 30:700–704
Shah K, Spear J, Nathanson LA et al (2007) Does the presence of crystal arthritis rule out septic arthritis? J Emerg Med 32:23–26
Couderc M, Bart G, Coiffier G et al (2020) 2020 French recommendations on the management of septic arthritis in an adult native joint. Joint Bone Spine 87:538–547
Ferreyra M, Coiffier G, Albert J-D et al (2017) Combining cytology and microcrystal detection in nonpurulent joint fluid benefits the diagnosis of septic arthritis. Joint Bone Spine 84:65–70
Albert J-D, Le Corvec M, Berthoud O et al (2021) Ruling out septic arthritis risk in a few minutes using mid-infrared spectroscopy in synovial fluids. Rheumatology (Oxford) 60:1158–1165
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lafforgue, A., Lambert, C., Dubost, JJ. et al. Performance of a diagnostic score for gouty arthritis: results from a cohort of acute arthritis suspected of being septic. Rheumatol Int 43, 119–124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05216-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05216-y