Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effectiveness of the low-power laser and kinesiotaping in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, a pilot study

  • Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correspondence to this article was published on 29 May 2018

Abstract

In mild and moderate cases of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the conservative approach is suggested. The purpose of this study is to assess and compare the effect of low-power laser versus the combination of low-power laser and kinesiotaping on pain, muscle strength, functionality, and electrophysiologic parameters in the patients with CTS. The study was planned as single-blind, prospective, randomized control. 64 hands diagnosed with CTS were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups by closed envelope method. Low-power laser therapy was applied to Group 1 (21 hands), kinesiotaping and low-power laser therapy in group 2 (22 hands), sham laser therapy in Group 3 (21 hands). All patients were assessed by visual numeric pain scale (VNS), hand grip strength (HGS), finger pinch strength (FPS), the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTSQ), before treatment, after treatment (3rd week), and after (12th week) 3 months the treatment with the same physician. Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies were performed with electroneuromyography (ENMG) before the treatment (0th week) and at the end of the 12th week. Comparison of the group 1 with the group 3 showed significantly better improvement in the former in VNS, BCTSQ at 3rd week and 12th week compared to 0th week, and in FPS and HGS at 3rd week. Comparison of the group 2 with the group 3 showed significantly better improvement in the former VNS, BCTSQ, FPS and HGS at 3rd and 12th week compared to 0th week. When Group 1 and Group 2 were compared there was no statistically significant difference in any parameters in the 3rd week, but there was a statistically significant difference in favor of group 2 in FPS and HGS parameters at the 12th week. We have found that the kinesiotaping method applied with low-power laser treatment does not provide any additional benefit to the low-power laser treatment in the short term, however, in the long term, the increase in the HGS and FPS has occurred. In conclusion, low-power laser and kinesiotaping method in the treatment of CTS may be an effective and reliable treatment option in clinical parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bland JDP (2005) Carpal tunnel syndrome. Curr Opin Int Med 4:578–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker WC, Metzler M, Cifu DX, Swartz Z (2000) Neutral wrist splinting in carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparison of night-only versus full-time wear instructions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:424–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodwill CJ (1965) The carpal tunnel syndrome: long-term follow-up showing relation of latency measurements to response to treatment. Ann Phys Med 8:12–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Phalen GS (1966) The carpal tunnel syndrome: 17 years experience in diagnosis and treatment of 654 hands. J B Jt Surg Am 48:211–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamblin MR, Demidova TN (2006) Mechanisms of low level light therapy. Proc Spine 6140(61001):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yu W, Naim JO, McGowan M, Ippolito K, Lanzafame RJ (1997) Photomodulation of oxidative metabolism and electron chain enzymes in rat liver mitochondria. Photochem Photobiol 66:866–871

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weintraub MI (1997) Noninvasive laser neurolysis in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nevre 20(8):1029–1031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li ZJ, Wang Y, Zhang HF, Ma XL, Tian P, Huang Y (2016) Effectiveness of low-level laser on carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of previously reported randomized trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(31):e4424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Irvine J, Chong SL, Amirjani N, Chan KM (2004) Double-blind randomized controlled trial of low-level laser therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nevre 30(2):182–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tascioglu F, Degirmenci NA, Ozkan S, Mehmetoglu O (2012). Low level laser in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical, electrophysiological, and ultrasonographical evaluation. Rheumatol Int 32:409–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rayegani SM, Bahrami MH, Eliaspour D, Raeissadat SA, Shafi Tabar Samakoosh M et al (2013) The effects of low intensity laser on clinical and electrophysiological parameters of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Lasers Med Sci 4(4):182–189

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kenzo Kase J, Walls T Kase (2003) Clinical therapeutic applications of the kinesiotaping method. Ken Ikai Co. Ltd., Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kase K, Hashimato T, Okane T (1996) Kinesio taping perfect manual. Kinesio Taping Association, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  14. Halseth T, McChesney JW, DeBeliso M, Vaughn R, Lien J (2004). The effects of kinesio taping on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med 3:1–7

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Slupik A, Dwornik M, Bialoszewski D, Zych E (2007) Effect of kinesio taping on bioelectrical activity of vastus medialis muscle. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 9(6):644–651

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Öncü J, İlişer R, Yılmaz F, Kuran B (2014) Karpal Tünel Sendromu Tedavisinde Kinezyo Bantlama Tekniğinin Hastalık Semptomları, El Fonksiyonu ve Kavrama Gücüne Etkisi: Tek Kör Randomize Kontrollü Çalışma. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg 60(1):43–S51

    Google Scholar 

  17. Therapy WWAoL (2010) Dose table 780-860nm for low level laser therapy WALT 2010. http://waltza.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Dose_table_780-860nm_for_Low_Level_Laser_Therapy_WALT-2010.pdf

  18. Ritter PL, Gonzalez VM, Laurent DD, Lorig KR (2006) Measurement of pain using the visual numeric scale. J Rheumatol 33:574–580

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Oberg B (2001) Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength. J Rehabil Med 33(1):36–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mathiowetz V (2002) Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength. Occup Ther Int 9:201–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shechtman O, Gestewitz L, Kimble C (2005) Reliability and validity of the DynEx dynamometer. J Hand Ther 18:339–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N (1984) Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg 9:222–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH et al (1993) A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. JBJS 75(11):1585–1592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Leite JCC, Jerosch-Herold C, Song F (2006) A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:78

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Heybeli N, Özerdemoglu RA, Aksoy OG, Mumcu EF (2001). Karpal tünel sendromu: Cerrahi tedavi izleminde fonksiyonel ve semptomatik skorlama. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 35:147–51

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clokie C, Bentley KC, Head TW (1991) The effects of the helium–neon laser on postsurgical discomfort: a pilot study. J Can Dent Assoc 57:584–586

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ailioaie C, Lupusoru-Ailioaie LM (1999) Beneficial effects of laser therapy in the early stages of rheumatoid arthritis onset. Laser Ther 11:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Branco K, Neaser MA (1999) Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical outcome after low-level laser acupuncture, microamps TENS, and other alternative therapies—an open protocol study. J Alter Complement Med 5(1):5–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Olson J, Schimmerling W, Tobias CA (1981) Laser action spectrum of reduced excitability in nerve cells. Brain Res 204:436–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mester E, Mester AF, Mester A (1985) The biomedical effects of laser application. Lasers Surg Med 5(1):31–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rochkind S (1978) Stimulation effect of laser energy on regeneration of traumatically injured peripheral nerves. Morphogen Regen 73:48–50

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rochkind S, Nissan M, Razon N, Schwartz M, Bartal A (1986) Electrophysiological effect of HeNe laser on normal and injured sciatic nerve in the rat. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 83(3):125–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rochkind S, Lubart R, Nissan M, Barr-Nea L (1988) Low-energy laser irradiation and the nervous system: method and results. SPIE Laser Surg Char Ther 907:l00–6

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rochkind S, Barr-Nea L, Razon N, Bartal A, Schwartz M (1987) Stimulatory effect of HeNe low-dose laser on injured sciatic nerves of rats. Neurosurgery 20:843–847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rochkind E, Nissan M, Barr-Nea L, Razon N, Schwartz M, Bartal A (1987) Response of peripheral nerve to HeNe laser. Experimental studies. Lasers Surg Med 7:441–443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tuner J, Hode L (2004). Medical indications. The laser therapy handbook. Prima Boks AB, Grangsberg, pp 118–206

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rochkind S, Vogler I, Barr-Nea L (1990) Spinal cord response to laser treatment of injured peripheral nerve. Spine 15:6–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rochkind S, Rousso M, Nissan M, Viliarreal M, Barr-Nea L, Rees DG (1989) Systemic effects of low-power laser irradiation on the peripheral and central nervous system, cutaneous wounds, and burns. Laser Surg Med 9:174–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yagci I, Elmas O, Akcan E, Ustun I, Gunduz OH, Guven Z (2009) Comparison of splinting and splinting plus low-level laser therapy in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol 28:1059–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chang WD, Wu JH, Jiang JA, Yeh CY, Tsai CT (2008) Carpal tunnel syndrome treated with a diode laser: a controlled treatment of the transverse carpal ligament. Photomed Laser Surg 26:551–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen Y, Zhao CQ, Ye G, Liu CD, Xu WD (2016) Low-power laser therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: effective optical power. Neural Regen Res 11(7):1180–1184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Chang HY, Chou KY, Lin JJ, Lin CF, Wang CH (2010) Immediate effect of forearm Kinesio taping on maximal grip strength and force sense in healthy collegiate athletes. Phys Ther Sport 11:122–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kenzo K (2003) IIlustrated kinesio taping. 4th edn. Ken Ikai, Co. Ltd., Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Kasapoğlu Aksoy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical standards

Ethical approvement was obtained from institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Güner, A., Altan, L. & Kasapoğlu Aksoy, M. The effectiveness of the low-power laser and kinesiotaping in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, a pilot study. Rheumatol Int 38, 895–904 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4020-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4020-6

Keywords

Navigation