Skip to main content
Log in

Ilex paraguariensis Hosts Root-Trichoderma spp. with Plant-Growth-Promoting Traits: Characterization as Biological Control Agents and Biofertilizers

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the effect of native plant-growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPM) as bio-inoculants was assessed as an alternative to improve Ilex paraguariensis Saint Hilaire growth in the nursery. Fourteen Trichoderma strains isolated from yerba mate roots were evaluated in vitro for their potential as biological control agents (BCA) and PGPM. The PGPM properties were evaluated through the strain’s antagonistic activity against three fungal pathogens (Alternaria sp., F. oxysporum, and F. solani) plus the production of extracellular cell-wall-degrading enzymes such as chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, and cellulase. These results were used to calculate different PGPM indices to select the strains with the optimal properties. Four Trichoderma strains: T. asperelloides LBM193, LBM204, LBM206, and Trichoderma sp. LBM202, were selected based on their indirect and direct PGPM properties used in an inoculation assay on yerba mate plants in greenhouse conditions. A highly significant positive effect of bio-inoculation with these Trichoderma strains was observed in one-year-old yerba mate seedlings. Inoculated plants exhibited a greater height, chlorophyll content, and dry weight than un-inoculated plants; those treated with LBM193 manifested the best results. Yerba mate plants treated with LBM202 exhibited a healthy appearance and were more vigorous, showing potential for biocontrol agent. In conclusion, yerba mate seedlings in the Misiones region were found to have a reservoir of Trichoderma species that increases the yield of this crop in the nursery and protects them from adverse biotic and abiotic agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. The inclusion of API in the PCA allows us to use the direct antagonism data of each Trichoderma strain simply in an index value.

References

  1. Bergottini VM, Otegui MB, Sosa DA, Zapata PD, Mulot M, Rebord M et al (2015) Bio-inoculation of yerba mate seedlings (Ilex paraguariensis St. Hil.) with native plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: a sustainable alternative to improve crop yield. Biol Fertil Soils 51:749–755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Laczeski ME, Onetto AL, Cortese IJ, Gisela Y (2020) Isolation and selection of endophytic spore-forming bacteria with plant growth promoting properties isolated from Ilex paraguariensis St. Hil. (yerba mate). An Acad Bras Cienc 92:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gortari F, Petruk Nowosad MI, Laczeski ME, Onetto A, Cortese IJ et al (2019) Biofertilizers and biocontrollers as an alternative to the use of chemical fertilizers and fungicides in the propagation of yerba mate by mini-cuttings. Revista Árvore 43:e430412. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-90882019000400012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Capellari PB, Burgos AM, Cabrera MG, Dalurzo HC, Dávalos M, Dirchwolf P et al (2017) YERBA MATE. Reseña Histórica y Estadística. Producción e industrialización en el siglo XXI. CABA, Argentina. https://repositorio.unne.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/123456789/27897/RIUNNE_FCA_CL_Capellari-PL.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Accessed 6 january 2013

  5. Barbosa JZ, Motta ACV, Consalter R, Poggere GC, Santin D, Wendlig I (2018) Plant growth, nutrients and potentially toxic elements in leaves of yerba mate clones in response to phosphorus in acid soils. An Acad Bras Cienc 90:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Montagnini F, Eibl BI, Barth SR (2011) Organic yerba mate: an environmentally, socially and financially suitable agroforestry system. Boit et forêts des tropiques 308:59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rani L, Thapa K, Kanojia N, Sharma N, Singh S, Grewal AS et al (2021) An extensive review on the consequences of chemical pesticides on human health and environment. J Clean Prod 283:124657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Selvasekaran P, Chidambaram R, Agriculturally important fungi for crop protection (2020) In: Agriculturally Important Fungi for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Cham, pp 1–53

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, Van Der Putten WH (2013) Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:789–799. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rigobelo EC (2021) Baron NC (2021) Endophytic fungi: a tool for plant growth promotion and sustainable agriculture. Mycology. https://doi.org/10.1080/215012031945699

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G, Pirttilä AM, Compant S, Campisano A et al (2015) The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79:293–320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Glick BR (2012) Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: mechanisms and Applications. Scientifica. https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hossain MM, Sultana F, Islam S (2017) Plant Growth-Promoting Fungi (PGPF): Phytostimulation and Induced Systemic Resistance. In: Singh DP et al (eds) Plant-Microbe Plant-Microbe Interactions in Agro-Ecological Perspective. Springer Nature, Gateway East 1, pp 35–91

    Google Scholar 

  14. Compant S, Clément C, Sessitsch A (2010) Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 42(5):669–678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaiero JR, McCall CA, Thompson KA, Day NJ, Best AS, Dunfield KE (2013) Inside the root microbiome: bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. Am J Bot 100(9):1738–1750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cummings NJ, Ambrose A, Braithwaite M, Bissett J, Roslan HA, Abdullah J et al (2016) Diversity of root-endophytic Trichoderma from Malaysian borneo. Mycol Prog. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-016-1192-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kandula DRW, Alizadeh H, Teixiera CSP, Gale D, Stewart A, Hampton JG (2015) Trichoderma bio-inoculant improves seedling emergence, plant growth and seed yield of Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz. New Zeal Plant Prot 68:160–165

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart A, Hill R (2014) Applications of Trichoderma in plant growth promotion. Biotechnology and Biology of Trichoderma. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 415–428

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Bader AN, Salerno GL, Covacevich F, Consolo VF (2020) Trichoderma harzianum strains from Argentina produce indole-3 acetic acid and phosphorus solubilization, promote growth and control wilt disease on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J King Saud Univ - Sci 32(1):867–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2019.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M’Hamdi NB, Ben SI, M’Hamdi M (2018) Evaluation of the efficiency of Trichoderma, Penicillium, and Aspergillus species as biological control agents against four soil-borne fungi of melon and watermelon Egypt J Biol. Pest Control 8(25):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  21. López AC, Alvarenga AE, Zapata PD, Luna F, Villalba LL (2019) Villalba LL (2019) Trichoderma spp from Misiones, Argentina: effective fungi to promote plant growth of the regional crop Ilex paraguariensis St. Hil. Mycol An Int J Fungal Biol. https://doi.org/10.1080/215012031606860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. López AC, Alvarenga AE, Vereschuk ML, Barua RC, Zapata PD, Luna MF, Villalba LL (2020) Trichoderma strains isolated from Ilex paraguariensis St Hil: promising biocontrol agents with chitinolytic activity and plant growth promoter on Lycopersicum esculentum. Arab J Basic Appl Sci 27(1):105–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/25765299.2020.1732033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. López AC, Alvarenga AE, Zapata PD, Luna MF, Villalba LL (2020) Isolation and identification of fungi associated with Ilex paraguariensis St. Hil RECyT 33:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  24. Poletto I, Briao Muniz MF, Ceconi DE, Santin D, Deconto Weber MN, Blume E (2016) Zoneamento e identificação de Fusarium spp. causadores de podridão de raízes em plantios de erva-mate (Ilex paraguariensis St.Hil.) na região do Vale do Taquari, RS. Ciência Florestal, Santa Maria 16(1):1–10

  25. Fahmi AI, Eisaal RA, El-Halfawi KA, Hamza HA, Helwa MS (2016) Identification of Trichoderma spp by DNA barcode and screening for cellulolytic activity. J Microb Biochem Technol 8:3. https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mokhtar H, Dehimat L (2015) In vitro and in vivo efficiency of Trichoderma harzianum against Phoma and Gliocladium soft rot occurred on tomato fruits (Lycopersicon esculentum). Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 4(8):141–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bedine Boat MA, Lambert Sameza M, Iacomi B, Nguemezi Tchameni S, Fekam Boyom F (2019) Screening, identification and evaluation of Trichoderma spp for biocontrol potential of common bean damping-off pathogens. Biocontrol Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2019.1700909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li YT, Hwang SG, Huang YM, Huang CH (2018) Effects of Trichoderma asperellum on nutrient uptake and Fusarium wilt of tomato. Crop Prot 110:275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.03.021

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dolatabad HK, Javan-Nikkhah M, Shier WT (2017) Evaluation of antifungal, phosphate solubilisation, and siderophore and chitinase release activities of endophytic fungi from Pistacia vera. Mycol prog 16:777–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gopinath SCB, Hilda A, Anbu P (2005) Extracellular enzymatic activity profiles in fungi isolated from oil-rich environments. Mycosci 46(2):119–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10267-004-0221-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Deb P, Talukdar SA, Mohsina K, Sarker PK, Sayem SMA (2013) Production and partial characterization of extracellular amylase enzyme from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens P-001. Springerplus 154:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  32. Anisa SK, Girish K (2014) Pectinolytic activity of Rhizopus sp, and Trichoderma viride. Int J Res Pure Appl Microbiol 4(2):28–31

    Google Scholar 

  33. Orozco Colonia BS, Chagas Junior AF (2014) Screening and detection of extracellular cellulases (endo- and exo-glucanases) secreted by filamentous fungi isolated from soils using rapid tests with chromogenic dyes. African J Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2014.14221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rahman MS, Fernando S, Ross B, Wu J, Qin W (2018) Endoglucanase (EG) Activity Assays. In: Lübeck M (ed) Cellulases: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1796. Springer, Berlin, pp 169–83

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Bara MT, Lima AL, Ulhoa CJ (2013) Purification and characterization of an exo-β-1,3-glucanase produced by Trichoderma asperellum. FEMS Microbiol Lett 219:81–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ting ASY, Chai JY (2015) Chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase activities of Trichoderma harzianum in response towards pathogenic and non-pathogenic isolates: early indications of compatibility in consortium. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 4(1):109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2014.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Agaras BC, Scandiani M, Luque A, Fernández L, Farina F, Carmona M, Gally M, Romero A, Wall L, Valverde C (2015) Quantification of the potential biocontrol and direct plant growth promotion abilities based on multiple biological traits distinguish different groups of Pseudomonas spp. isolates. Biol Control 90:173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. López AC, Alvarenga AE, Zapata PD, Luna MF, Villalva LL (2021) Characterization of yerba mate root endophytic Trichoderma isolations as potential plant growth promoting microorganisms. A face transdisciplinar das ciencias agrarias. Atenea, Brasil, pp 97–107

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Poletto I, Muniz MFB, Ceconi DE, Mezzomo R, Rodrigues J (2010) Influência da inoculação de Fusarium spp. e níveis de sombreamento no crescimento e desenvolvimento da erva-mate. Ciência Florestal 20:513–521. https://doi.org/10.5902/198050982065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nancarrow N, Aftab M, Freeman A, Rodoni B, Hollaway G, Trębicki P (2018) Prevalence and incidence of yellow dwarf viruses across a climatic gradient: a four-year field study in southeastern Australia. Plant dis 102(12):2465–2472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. StatPoint INC (2007) Statgraphics Centurion XV, version 15.2.06. Warrenton, USA. https://www.statgraphics.com/

  42. Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW (2018) InfoStat versión 2018, Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. http://www.infostat.com.ar

  43. Malgioglio G, Rizzo GF, Nigro S, du Prey VL, Herforth-Rahmé J, Catara V, Branca F (2022) Plant-Microbe interaction in sustainable agriculture: the factors that may influence the efficacy of PGPM application. Sustain 14(4):1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Zin NA, Badaluddin NA (2020) Annals of agricultural sciences biological functions of Trichoderma spp. for agriculture applications. Ann Agric Sci 65(2):168–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2020.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Moya P, Girotti JR, Toledo AV, Sisterna MN (2018) Antifungal activity of Trichoderma VOCs against Pyrenophora teres, the causal agent of barley net blotch. J Plant Prot Res 58(1):45–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sawant IS, Wadkar PN, Ghule SB, Salunkhe VP, Chavan V (2020) Induction of systemic resistance in grapevines against powdery mildew by Trichoderma asperelloides strains. Australas Plant Pathol 49:107–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hermosa R, Belén Rubio M, Cardoza RE, Nicolás C, Monte E, Gutiérrez S (2013) The contribution of Trichoderma to balancing the costs of plant growth and defense. Int Microbiol 16(2):69–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Alberto Roth Foundation for providing the yerba mate plants for the fungal strains and the greenhouse use in the inoculation assays. We thank Dr. Marcela Sadañoski and his research group for the physicochemical soil analysis. We thank Edgar Poletto for providing the root pathogens. Dr. Donald F. Haggerty, a retired academic career investigator, and native English speaker, edited the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by an innovation project “Universidades Agregando Valor 2017” award N°4285-APN-SECPU#ME/17 provided by the Science and Technology Secretary, Misiones National University and, the PICT-START UP 2017-0007 project granted by the National Agency of Scientific and Technological Promotion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by ACL. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ACL, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana C. López.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

All authors have read the submitted version of the paper and have approved the submission in Current Microbiology.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (TIF 1962 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

López, A.C., Giorgio, E.M., Vereschuk, M.L. et al. Ilex paraguariensis Hosts Root-Trichoderma spp. with Plant-Growth-Promoting Traits: Characterization as Biological Control Agents and Biofertilizers. Curr Microbiol 80, 120 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03231-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03231-1

Navigation