Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adverse events in lymphoma patients treated with phosphoinositide 3 kinase Inhibitor in clinical trials: a meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Malignant lymphomas are one of the most common cancers worldwide and with high biologic heterogeneity, while the phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K)/mTOR pathway is crucial in maintaining cell growth and survival both in physiological and in pathological conditions (i.e., lymphoma). PI3K inhibitors have been proven to be effective in several subtypes of lymphomas. However, the high incidence of treatment-related adverse events as well as the special safety profile in PI3K inhibitors draws great attention. Thus, this meta-analysis was conducted to compare adverse events in PI3K inhibitors to conventional regimens in lymphoma patients.

Methods

Articles were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials and phase III clinical trials that used PI3K inhibitors comparing with non-PI3K inhibitors in lymphoma patients. To achieve the appropriate results, we calculated the risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Four trials with 1399 patients that met our criteria were included. The PI3K inhibitors group significantly increased the risk of all-grade adverse events (AEs) (RR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92–0.98) and high-grade AEs (RR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.57–0.70), compared with the non-PI3K inhibitors group. Besides, the incidence of neutropenia (RR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74–0.90), pneumonia (RR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46–0.83), and diarrhea (RR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.32–0.49) were significantly high in the PI3Ki group, while the incidence of anemia (RR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.50–1.20) and thrombocytopenia (RR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.51–1.42) had no statistic significant.

Conclusion

PI3K inhibitors increased the risk of certain AEs in lymphoma patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Abate D et al (2019) Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol 5:1749–1768.https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996

  2. (2015) Non-Hodgkin lymphoma statistics. In: Cancer Research UK. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/non-hodgkin-lymphoma. Accessed 28 Sep 2021

  3. SEER Cancer Stat Facts. In: SEER. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/index.html. Accessed 28 Sep 2021

  4. Vivanco I, Sawyers CL (2002) The phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2:489–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC (2006) The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat Rev Genet 7:606–619. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mishra R, Patel H, Alanazi S et al (2021) PI3K inhibitors in cancer: clinical implications and adverse effects. Int J Mol Sci 22:3464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073464

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ et al (2019) Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:ED000142. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao S, Zhang M, Wu K et al (2020) Risk of adverse events in lymphoma patients treated with brentuximab vedotin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 19:617–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2020.1718103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zelenetz AD, Barrientos JC, Brown JR et al (2017) Idelalisib or placebo in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: interim results from a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 18:297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30671-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Flinn IW, Hillmen P, Montillo M et al (2018) The phase 3 DUO trial: duvelisib vs ofatumumab in relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL. Blood 132:2446–2455. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-05-850461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Matasar MJ, Capra M, Özcan M et al (2021) Copanlisib plus rituximab versus placebo plus rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (CHRONOS-3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 22:678–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00145-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Furman RR, Sharman JP, Coutre SE et al (2014) Idelalisib and rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 370:997–1007. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1315226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Curran E, Smith SM (2014) Phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors in lymphoma. Curr Opin Oncol 26:469–475. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000000113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernal A, Pastore RD, Asgary Z et al (2001) Survival of leukemic B cells promoted by engagement of the antigen receptor. Blood 98:3050–3057. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v98.10.3050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis RE, Ngo VN, Lenz G et al (2010) Chronic active B-cell-receptor signalling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Nature 463:88–92. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Munk Pedersen I, Reed J (2004) Microenvironmental interactions and survival of CLL B-cells. Leuk Lymphoma 45:2365–2372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428190412331272703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosich L, Saborit-Villarroya I, Lopez-Guerra M et al (2013) The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibitor NVP-BKM120 overcomes resistance signals derived from microenvironment by regulating the Akt/FoxO3a/Bim axis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Haematologica 98:1739–1747. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2013.088849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmitz R, Young RM, Ceribelli M et al (2012) Burkitt lymphoma pathogenesis and therapeutic targets from structural and functional genomics. Nature 490:116–120. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Okkenhaug K (2002) Impaired B and T cell antigen receptor signaling in p110delta PI 3-kinase mutant mice. Science.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073560

  20. Durand CA, Hartvigsen K, Fogelstrand L et al (2009) Phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110δ regulates natural antibody production, marginal zone and B-1 B cell function, and autoantibody responses. J Immunol 183:5673–5684. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0900432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gopal AK, Kahl BS, de Vos S et al (2014) PI3Kδ inhibition by idelalisib in patients with relapsed indolent lymphoma. N Engl J Med 370:1008–1018. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1314583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Flinn IW, Miller CB, Ardeshna KM et al (2019) DYNAMO: a phase II study of duvelisib (IPI-145) in patients with refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. JCO 37:912–922. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.00915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dreyling M, Santoro A, Mollica L et al (2017) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibition by copanlisib in relapsed or refractory indolent lymphoma. JCO 35:3898–3905. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharman JP, Coutre SE, Furman RR et al (2019) Final results of a randomized, phase III study of rituximab with or without idelalisib followed by open-label idelalisib in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 37:1391–1402. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Flinn IW, O’Brien S, Kahl B et al (2018) Duvelisib, a novel oral dual inhibitor of PI3K-δ, γ, is clinically active in advanced hematologic malignancies. Blood 131:877–887. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2017-05-786566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Davids MS, Fisher DC, Tyekucheva S et al (2021) A phase 1b/2 study of duvelisib in combination with FCR (DFCR) for frontline therapy for younger CLL patients. Leukemia 35:1064–1072. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-01010-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Davids MS, Kuss BJ, Hillmen P et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of duvelisib following disease progression on ofatumumab in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL or SLL in the DUO crossover extension study. Clin Cancer Res 26:2096–2103. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Coutré SE, Barrientos JC, Brown JR et al (2015) Management of adverse events associated with idelalisib treatment: expert panel opinion. Leuk Lymphoma 56:2779–2786. https://doi.org/10.3109/10428194.2015.1022770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Benson AB, Ajani JA, Catalano RB et al (2004) Recommended guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea. JCO 22:2918–2926. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.04.132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Greenwell IB, Ip A, Cohen JB (2017) PI3K inhibitors: understanding toxicity mechanisms and management. Oncology (Williston Park) 31:821–828

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dreyling M, Morschhauser F, Bouabdallah K et al (2017) Phase II study of copanlisib, a PI3K inhibitor, in relapsed or refractory, indolent or aggressive lymphoma. Ann Oncol 28:2169–2178. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Esposito A, Viale G, Curigliano G (2019) Safety, tolerability, and management of toxic effects of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor treatment in patients with cancer: a review. JAMA Oncol 5:1347–1354. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Busaidy NL, Farooki A, Dowlati A et al (2012) Management of metabolic effects associated with anticancer agents targeting the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway. J Clin Oncol 30:2919–2928. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.39.7356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Miller BW, Przepiorka D, de Claro RA et al (2015) FDA approval: idelalisib monotherapy for the treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma and small lymphocytic lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 21:1525–1529. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kienle DL, Stilgenbauer S (2020) Approved and emerging PI3K inhibitors for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 21:917–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2020.1737010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lynch RC, Gopal AK (2020) Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibition in follicular lymphoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 34:727–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hoc.2020.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (Nos. 82170180, 81770126, 82000218), Fujian Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2020J011246, No. 2020J05303), and Xiamen Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology (No. 3502Z20209003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, Z. J. L., W. L. X., and B. X.; data curation, G. X. W. and Y. T. H.; formal analysis, W. H. S.; funding acquisition, W. L. X. and B. X.; methodology, Z. J. L., and H. Y. Z.; resources, W. L. X. and B. X.; software, W. H. S. and Z. J. L.; supervision, Z. J. L. and B. X.; validation, Z. J. L. and W. L. X.; writing—original draft, W. H. S.; writing—review and editing, H. Y. Z.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weilin Xia, Zhijuan Lin or Bing Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shan, W., Wu, G., Huang, Y. et al. Adverse events in lymphoma patients treated with phosphoinositide 3 kinase Inhibitor in clinical trials: a meta-analysis. Ann Hematol 101, 1741–1753 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-022-04876-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-022-04876-x

Keywords

Navigation