Skip to main content
Log in

CTLA-4 Blockade Suppresses Progression of Residual Tumors and Improves Survival After Insufficient Radiofrequency Ablation in a Subcutaneous Murine Hepatoma Model

  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether anti-CTLA-4 therapy could suppress residual tumor progression and improve survival after insufficient radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in a subcutaneous murine hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) model.

Materials and Methods

Forty mice with tumors established on their right flanks were randomly divided into four groups: control group (no treatment), RFA group (insufficient RFA alone), anti-CTLA-4 group (anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy), and RFA + anti-CTLA-4 group (insufficient RFA + anti-CTLA-4). In each group, eight mice were assessed for residual tumors and survival; another two mice were killed on day 14 for histopathologic studies. On day 42, a re-challenge test was performed in the survived mice of RFA + anti-CTLA-4 group to determine whether systemic anti-tumor immunity was established.

Results

The specific growth rate of residual tumors was significantly less in RFA + anti-CTLA-4 group than that of the other three groups (all p < 0.05). The disease control rate was 50% in RFA + anti-CTLA-4 group, while no animals in the other three groups showed disease control. Animals in RFA + anti-CTLA-4 group had longer survival times than those in the other three groups (all p < 0.05). Expression of CD4+ lymphocytes in residual tumors and IFN-γ production in response to H22 tumor cells were significantly higher in RFA + anti-CTLA-4 group than those in the other three groups (all p < 0.05). Three of the five survived mice in RFA + anti-CTLA-4 group underwent tumor re-challenge exhibited tumor rejection.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that CTLA-4 blockade injection could suppress the growth of residual tumors and improve survival after insufficient RFA in a subcutaneous murine HCC model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shiina S, Tateishi R, Arano T, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: 10-year outcome and prognostic factors. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:569–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lencioni R, Cioni D, Crocetti L, et al. Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: long-term results of percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation. Radiology. 2005;234:961–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed M, Brace CL, Lee FT, et al. Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation. Radiology. 2011;258:351–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan K, Chen MH, Yang W, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term outcome and prognostic factors. Eur J Radiol. 2008;67:336–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McWilliams JP, Yamamoto S, Raman SS, et al. Percutaneous ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: current status. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:S204–S213213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi D, Lim HK, Rhim H, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma as a first-line treatment: long-term results and prognostic factors in a large single-institution series. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:684–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Waki K, Aikata H, Katamura Y, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation as first-line treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma: results and prognostic factors on long-term follow up. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:597–604.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee DH, Lee JM, Lee JY, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma as first-line treatment: long-term results and prognostic factors in 162 patients with cirrhosis. Radiology. 2014;270:900–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang X, Sofocleous CT, Erinjeri JP, et al. Margin size is an independent predictor of local tumor progression after ablation of colon cancer liver metastases. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2013;36:166–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Okusaka T, Okada S, Ueno H, et al. Satellite lesions in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma with reference to clinicopathologic features. Cancer. 2002;95:1931–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim YS, Lim HK, Rhim H, et al. Ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28:897–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kong J, Kong J, Pan B, et al. Insufficient radiofrequency ablation promotes angiogenesis of residual hepatocellular carcinoma via HIF-1alpha/VEGFA. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e37266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmed M, Kumar G, Moussa M, et al. Oncogenesis: an “off-target” effect of radiofrequency ablation. Radiology. 2015;276:426–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi L, Wang J, Ding N, et al. Inflammation induced by incomplete radiofrequency ablation accelerates tumor progression and hinders PD-1 immunotherapy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Den Brok MHMGM, Sutmuller RPM, Van Der Voort R, et al. In situ tumor ablation creates an antigen source for the generation of antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2004;64:4024–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lemdani K, Mignet N, Boudy V, et al. Local immunomodulation combined to radiofrequency ablation results in a complete cure of local and distant colorectal carcinoma. Oncoimmunology. 2019;8:1550342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehta A, Oklu R, Sheth RA. Thermal ablative therapies and immune checkpoint modulation: can locoregional approaches effect a systemic response? Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:9251375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Slovak R, Ludwig JM, Gettinger SN, et al. Immuno-thermal ablations—boosting the anticancer immune response. J Immunother Cancer. 2017;5:78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Minami Y, Nishida N, Kudo M. Radiofrequency ablation of liver metastasis: potential impact on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:5045–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Duffy AG, Ulahannan SV, Makorova-Rusher O, et al. Tremelimumab in combination with ablation in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2017;66:545–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xie C, Duffy AG, Mabry-Hrones D, et al. Tremelimumab in combination with microwave ablation in patients with refractory biliary tract cancer. Hepatology. 2019;69:2048–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Watanabe H, Okada M, Kaji Y, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours—revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 2009;36:2495–501.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hamamoto S, Okuma T, Yamamoto A, et al. Radiofrequency ablation and immunostimulant OK-432: combination therapy enhances systemic antitumor immunity for treatment of VX2 lung tumors in rabbits. Radiology. 2013;267:405–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kageyama K, Yamamoto A, Okuma T, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors in combination with local OK-432 injection prolongs survival and suppresses distant tumor growth in the rabbit model with intra- and extrahepatic VX2 tumors. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2013;36:1383–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Waitz R, Solomon SB, Petre EN, et al. Potent induction of tumor immunity by combining tumor cryoablation with anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Cancer Res. 2012;72:430–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Showalter A, Limaye A, Oyer JL, et al. Cytokines in immunogenic cell death: applications for cancer immunotherapy. Cytokine. 2017;97:123–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Haen SP, Pereira PL, Salih HR, et al. More than just tumor destruction: immunomodulation by thermal ablation of cancer. Clin Dev Immunol. 2011;2011:160250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen L, Sun J, Yang X. Radiofrequency ablation-combined multimodel therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: current status. Cancer Lett. 2016;370:78–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu Z, Geng J, Zhang M, et al. Treatment of osteosarcoma with microwave thermal ablation to induce immunogenic cell death. Oncotarget. 2014;5:6526–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Adkins I, Sadilkova L, Hradilova N, et al. Severe, but not mild heat-shock treatment induces immunogenic cell death in cancer cells. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1311433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma P, Allison JP. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science (80-). 2015;348:56–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Greten TF, Mauda-Havakuk M, Heinrich B, et al. Combined locoregional-immunotherapy for liver cancer. J Hepatol. 2019;70:999–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim YS, Lim HK, Rhim H, et al. Ten-year outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation as first-line therapy of early hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of prognostic factors. J Hepatol. 2013;58:89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Shanghai Anticancer Association EYAS PROJECT (Grant Number SACA-CY1C17).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jialin Shen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Consent for Publication

For this type of study, consent for publication is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (JPEG 60 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Wang, J., Jiang, J. et al. CTLA-4 Blockade Suppresses Progression of Residual Tumors and Improves Survival After Insufficient Radiofrequency Ablation in a Subcutaneous Murine Hepatoma Model. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 43, 1353–1361 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02505-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02505-6

Keywords

Navigation