Skip to main content
Log in

Single Versus Double Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Techniques in Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Comparative Single-Center Study

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of single Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RYR) and double Roux-en-Y reconstruction (dRYR) on intraoperative outcome and postoperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD).

Methods

All patients who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2005 for dRYR and RYR after PD or PPPD at the study hospital were evaluated for inclusion. Comparison of categorical patient characteristics was performed using the χ 2 test. Data were reported as median and range. Differences were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U test. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification scheme and the recommendations of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

Results

A total of 319 patients were included in final analysis. The median time of surgery was significantly shorter when performing a single Roux-en-Y loop reconstruction (55 min in PD and 50 min in PPPD) (p < 0.001). Saved time had a significant effect on the cost of surgery (p < 0.001). No impact on postoperative outcome according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, the ISGPS definitions of pancreatic fistulas, and delayed gastric emptying was evident. The relaparotomy rate due to severe postoperative hemorrhage was significantly higher in the dRYR PD cohort (2.2 vs. 11.9 %, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Double Roux-en-Y reconstruction of the alimentary tract is not beneficial in terms of surgical outcome and postoperative morbidity and mortality and should be avoided due to unnecessarily prolonged surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Specht G, Stinshoff K (2001) Walther Kausch (1867–1928) and his significance in pancreatic surgery. Zentralbl Chir 126:479–481 (in German)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schnelldorfer T, Adams DB, Warshaw AL, Lillemoe KD, Sarr MG (2008) Forgotten pioneers of pancreatic surgery: beyond the favorite few. Ann Surg 247:191–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR (1935) Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 102:763–779

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schnelldorfer T, Sarr MG (2009) Alessandro codivilla and the first pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 144:1179–1184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weitz J, Koch M, Kleeff J, Muller MW, Schmidt J, Friess H et al (2004) Kausch-Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy. Technique and results. Chirurg 75:1113–1119 (in German)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Machado MC, da Cunha JE, Bacchella T, Bove P (1976) A modified technique for the reconstruction of the alimentary tract after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 143:271–272

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pescio G, Cariati E (1996) A new reconstructive method after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the triple Roux on a “P” loop. Rationale and radionuclide scanning evaluation. HPB Surg 9:223–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Karanicolas PJ, Davies E, Kunz R, Briel M, Koka HP, Payne DM et al (2007) The pylorus: take it or leave it? Systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus standard Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1825–1834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Heukaufer C, Antes G, Buchler MW, Seiler CM (2007) A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 245:187–200

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Albertson DA (1994) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with reconstruction by Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy: no operative mortality in a series of 25 cases. South Med J 87:197–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan AW, Agarwal AK, Davidson BR (2002) Isolated Roux Loop duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy avoids pancreatic leaks in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 19:199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kingsnorth AN (1994) Safety and function of isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy after Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76:175–179

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Papadimitriou JD, Fotopoulos AC, Smyrniotis B, Prahalias AA, Kostopanagiotou G, Papadimitriou LJ (1999) Subtotal pancreatoduodenectomy: use of a defunctionalized loop for pancreatic stump drainage. Arch Surg 134:135–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sutton CD, Garcea G, White SA, O’Leary E, Marshall LJ, Berry DP et al (2004) Isolated Roux-loop pancreaticojejunostomy: a series of 61 patients with zero postoperative pancreaticoenteric leaks. J Gastrointest Surg 8:701–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaman L, Sanyal S, Behera A, Singh R, Katariya RN (2008) Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy vs single loop pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Int J Surg 6:306–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Perwaiz A, Singhal D, Singh A, Chaudhary A (2009) Is isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy superior to conventional reconstruction in pancreaticoduodenectomy? HPB 11:326–331

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ballas K, Symeonidis N, Rafailidis S, Pavlidis T, Marakis G, Mavroudis N et al (2010) Use of isolated Roux loop for pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 16:3178–3182

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grobmyer SR, Hollenbeck ST, Jaques DP, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo R, Coit DG et al (2008) Roux-en-Y reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 143:1184–1188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Casadei R, Zanini N, Pezzilli R, Calculli L, Ricci C, Antonacci N et al (2008) Reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: isolated Roux loop pancreatic anastomosis. Chir Ital 60:641–649

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hochwald SN, Grobmyer SR, Hemming AW, Curran E, Bloom DA, Delano M et al (2010) Braun enteroenterostomy is associated with reduced delayed gastric emptying and early resumption of oral feeding following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol 101:351–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Önder Cantürk for the preparation of the illustrations.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Reeh.

Additional information

F. G. Uzunoglu and M. Reeh have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uzunoglu, F.G., Reeh, M., Wollstein, R. et al. Single Versus Double Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Techniques in Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Comparative Single-Center Study. World J Surg 38, 3228–3234 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2742-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2742-5

Keywords

Navigation