Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of single Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RYR) and double Roux-en-Y reconstruction (dRYR) on intraoperative outcome and postoperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD).
Methods
All patients who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2005 for dRYR and RYR after PD or PPPD at the study hospital were evaluated for inclusion. Comparison of categorical patient characteristics was performed using the χ 2 test. Data were reported as median and range. Differences were analyzed with the Mann–Whitney U test. Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification scheme and the recommendations of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).
Results
A total of 319 patients were included in final analysis. The median time of surgery was significantly shorter when performing a single Roux-en-Y loop reconstruction (55 min in PD and 50 min in PPPD) (p < 0.001). Saved time had a significant effect on the cost of surgery (p < 0.001). No impact on postoperative outcome according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, the ISGPS definitions of pancreatic fistulas, and delayed gastric emptying was evident. The relaparotomy rate due to severe postoperative hemorrhage was significantly higher in the dRYR PD cohort (2.2 vs. 11.9 %, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Double Roux-en-Y reconstruction of the alimentary tract is not beneficial in terms of surgical outcome and postoperative morbidity and mortality and should be avoided due to unnecessarily prolonged surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Specht G, Stinshoff K (2001) Walther Kausch (1867–1928) and his significance in pancreatic surgery. Zentralbl Chir 126:479–481 (in German)
Schnelldorfer T, Adams DB, Warshaw AL, Lillemoe KD, Sarr MG (2008) Forgotten pioneers of pancreatic surgery: beyond the favorite few. Ann Surg 247:191–202
Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR (1935) Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg 102:763–779
Schnelldorfer T, Sarr MG (2009) Alessandro codivilla and the first pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 144:1179–1184
Weitz J, Koch M, Kleeff J, Muller MW, Schmidt J, Friess H et al (2004) Kausch-Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy. Technique and results. Chirurg 75:1113–1119 (in German)
Machado MC, da Cunha JE, Bacchella T, Bove P (1976) A modified technique for the reconstruction of the alimentary tract after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 143:271–272
Pescio G, Cariati E (1996) A new reconstructive method after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the triple Roux on a “P” loop. Rationale and radionuclide scanning evaluation. HPB Surg 9:223–227
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213
Karanicolas PJ, Davies E, Kunz R, Briel M, Koka HP, Payne DM et al (2007) The pylorus: take it or leave it? Systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus standard Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1825–1834
Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Heukaufer C, Antes G, Buchler MW, Seiler CM (2007) A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 245:187–200
Albertson DA (1994) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with reconstruction by Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy: no operative mortality in a series of 25 cases. South Med J 87:197–201
Khan AW, Agarwal AK, Davidson BR (2002) Isolated Roux Loop duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy avoids pancreatic leaks in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg 19:199–204
Kingsnorth AN (1994) Safety and function of isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy after Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76:175–179
Papadimitriou JD, Fotopoulos AC, Smyrniotis B, Prahalias AA, Kostopanagiotou G, Papadimitriou LJ (1999) Subtotal pancreatoduodenectomy: use of a defunctionalized loop for pancreatic stump drainage. Arch Surg 134:135–139
Sutton CD, Garcea G, White SA, O’Leary E, Marshall LJ, Berry DP et al (2004) Isolated Roux-loop pancreaticojejunostomy: a series of 61 patients with zero postoperative pancreaticoenteric leaks. J Gastrointest Surg 8:701–705
Kaman L, Sanyal S, Behera A, Singh R, Katariya RN (2008) Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy vs single loop pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Int J Surg 6:306–310
Perwaiz A, Singhal D, Singh A, Chaudhary A (2009) Is isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy superior to conventional reconstruction in pancreaticoduodenectomy? HPB 11:326–331
Ballas K, Symeonidis N, Rafailidis S, Pavlidis T, Marakis G, Mavroudis N et al (2010) Use of isolated Roux loop for pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 16:3178–3182
Grobmyer SR, Hollenbeck ST, Jaques DP, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo R, Coit DG et al (2008) Roux-en-Y reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 143:1184–1188
Casadei R, Zanini N, Pezzilli R, Calculli L, Ricci C, Antonacci N et al (2008) Reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: isolated Roux loop pancreatic anastomosis. Chir Ital 60:641–649
Hochwald SN, Grobmyer SR, Hemming AW, Curran E, Bloom DA, Delano M et al (2010) Braun enteroenterostomy is associated with reduced delayed gastric emptying and early resumption of oral feeding following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Oncol 101:351–355
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Önder Cantürk for the preparation of the illustrations.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
F. G. Uzunoglu and M. Reeh have contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uzunoglu, F.G., Reeh, M., Wollstein, R. et al. Single Versus Double Roux-en-Y Reconstruction Techniques in Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Comparative Single-Center Study. World J Surg 38, 3228–3234 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2742-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2742-5