Skip to main content
Log in

Stabilization of Stormwater Biofilters: Impacts of Wetting and Drying Phases and the Addition of Organic Matter to Filter Media

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ripening period refers to a phase of stabilization in sand filters in water treatment systems that follow a new installation or cleaning of the filter. Intermittent wetting and drying, a unique property of stormwater biofilters, would similarly be subjected to a phase of stabilization. Suspended solids are an important parameter that is often used to monitor the stabilization of sand filters in water treatment systems. Stormwater biofilters, however, contain organic material that is added to the filter layer to enhance nitrate removal, the dynamics of which is seldom analyzed in stabilization of stormwater biofilters. Therefore, in this study of stormwater biofiltration in addition to suspended solids (turbidity), organic matter (TOC, DOC, TN, and TKN) was also monitored as a parameter for stabilization of the stormwater biofilter. One Perspex bioretention column (94 mm internal diameter) was fabricated with filter layer that contained 8 % organic material and fed with tapwater with different antecedent dry days (0–40 day) at 100 mL/min. Samples were collected from the outflow at different time intervals between 2 and 150 min and were tested for total organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, total nitrogen, total Kjeldhal nitrogen, and turbidity. The column was observed to experience two phases of stabilization, one at the beginning of each event that lasted for 30 min, while the other phase was observed across subsequent events that are related to the age of filter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADD:

Antecedent dry days

EN:

Event number

min2, min7, min12, min20, min30, min60, min90, min120, and min150:

Concentration of pollutant in the outflow at 2, 7, 12, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min, respectively, from the beginning of outflow

Cpollutant :

Concentration of pollutant

TOC:

Total organic carbon

DOC:

Dissolved organic carbon

TN:

Total nitrogen

TKN:

Total Kjeldhal nitrogen

TU:

Turbidity

ZTOC, ZTN, and ZTU:

Z-scores of TOC, TN, and TU, respectively

References

  • Adu JK, Oades JM (1978) Physical factors influencing decomposition of organic materials in soil aggregates. Soil Biol Biochem 10:109–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch HF (1958) The effet of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen availability. Plant Soil 10(1):9–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birch GF, Fazeli MS, Matthai C (2005) Efficiency of an infiltration basin in removing contaminants from urban stormwater. Environ Monit Assess 101:23–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blecken G, Zinger Y, Deletic A, Fletcher T, and Viklander M (2008) Heavy metal removal by stormwater biofilters: can it withstand alternative wetting and drying conditions?.In 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage: Edinburgh, UK

  • Blecken G, Zinger Y, Deletic A, Fletcher TD, Viklander M (2009a) Impact of a submerged zone and a carbon source on heavy metal removal in stormwater biofilters. Ecol Eng 35:769–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blecken G, Zinger Y, Deletic A, Fletcher TD, Viklander M (2009b) Influence of intermittent wetting and drying conditions on heavy metal removal by stormwater biofilters. Water Res 43:4590–4598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloem J, de Ruiter PC, Koopman GJ, Lebbink G, Brussaard L (1992) Microbial numbers and activity in dried and rewetted arable soil under integrated and conventional management. Soil Biol Biochem 24(7):655–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratieres K, Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Alcazar L, Coustumer SL, and McCarthy DT (2008a) Removal of nutrients, heavy metals and pathogens by stormwater biofilters. In Proceedings 11th international Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, UK, 2008a

  • Bratieres K, Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Zinger Y (2008b) Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: a large-scale design optimisation study. Water Res 42:393–3940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coustumer SL, Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Barraud S, Lewis JF (2009) Hydraulic performance of biofilter systems for stormwater management: influences of design and operation. J Hydrol 376:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP (2007) Field performance of bioretention: water quality. Environ Eng Sci 24(8):1048–1064

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP, Shokouhian M, Sharma H, Minami C (2001) Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management. Water Environ Res 73(1):5–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP, Shokouhian M, Sharma H, Minami C, Winogradoff D (2003) Water quality improvement through bioretention: lead, copper, and zinc removal. Water Environ Res 75(1):73–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP, Shokouhian M, Sharma H, Minami C (2006) Water quality improvement through bioretention media: nitrogen and phosphorous removal. Water Environ Res 78(3):284–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Nobili M, Contin M, Brookes PC (2006) Microbial biomass dynamics in recently air-dried and rewetted soils compared to others stored air-dry for up to 103 years. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2871–2881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denef K, Six J, Paustian K, Merckx R (2001a) Importance of macroaggregate dynamics in controlling soil carbon stabilization: short-term effects of physical disturbance induced by dry–wet cycles. Soil Biol Biochem 33:2145–2153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denef K, Six J, Bossuyt H, Frey SD, Elliott ET, Merckx R, Paustian K (2001b) Influence of dry–wet cycles on the interrelationship between aggregate, particulate organic matter, and microbial community dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1599–1611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fierer N, Schimel JP (2003) A proposed mechanism for the pulse in carbon dioxide production commonly observed following the rapid rewetting of a dry soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67(3):798–805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Firer N, Schimel JP (2002) Effects of drying-rewetting frequency on soil carbon and nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol Biochem 34:777–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fransluebbers K, Weaver RW, Juo ASR, Franzluebbers AJ (1994) Carbon and nitrogen mineralization from cowpea plants part decomposing in moist and in repeatedly dried and wetted soil. Soil Biol Biochem 26(10):1379–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzluebbers AJ, Haney RL, Honeycutt CW, Schomberg HH, Hons FM (2000) Flush of carbon dioxide following rewetting of dried soil relates to active organic pools. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64(2):613–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gold Coast City Council, 2003, Goldcoast planning scheme 2003 Policy 11 - Land development guidelines: Goldcoast

  • Groffman PM, Tiedje JM (1988) Denitrification hysteresis during wetting and drying cycles in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52(6):1626–1629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halverson LJ, Jones TM, Firestone MK (2000) Release of intracellular solutes by four soil bacteria exposed to dilution stress. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64(5):1630–1637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Deletic A (2009) Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale. J Hydrol 365:310–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CH, Davis AP, Needelman BA (2007a) Nitrogen removal from urban stormwater runoff through layered bioretention columns. Water Environ Res 79(12):2404–2411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CH, Davis AP, Needleman BA (2007b) Bioretention column studies of phosphorus removal from urban stormwater runoff. Water Environ Res 79:177–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis P, Rey A, Petsikos C, Wingate L, MRayment M, Pereira J, Banza J, David J, Miglietta F, Borghetti M, Manca G, Valentini R (2007) Drying and wetting of Mediterranean soils stimulates decomposition and carbon dioxide emission: the “Birch effect”. Tree Physiol 27:929–940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kieft TL, Soroker E, Firestone MK (1987) Microbial biomass response to a rapid increase in water potential when dry soil is wetted. Soil Biol Biochem 19(2):119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Davis AP (2009) Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention. J Environ Eng 135(8):567–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist EJ, Jackson LE, Scow KM (1999) Wet–dry cycles affect dissolved organic carbon in two California agricultural soils. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1031–1038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magid J, Kjaergaard C, Gorissen A, Kuikman PJ (1999) Drying and rewetting of a loamy sand soil did not increase the turnover of native organic matter, but retarded the decomposition of added 14C-labelled plant material. Soil Biol Biochem 31:595–602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikha MM, Rice CW, Milliken GA (2005) Carbon and nitrogen mineralization as affected by drying and wetting cycles. Soil Biol Biochem 37:337–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaro M, Nicollier G, Zeyer J, Widmer F (2004) Impact of soil drying-rewetting stress on microbial communities and activities and on degradation of two crop protection products. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(5):2577–2587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajapakse JP, Fenner RA (2011) Evaluation of alternative media for pebble matrix filtration using clay balls and recycled crushed glass. J Environ Eng 137(6):517–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rudaz AO, Davidson EA, Firestone MK (1991) Sources of nitrous oxide production following wetting of dry soil. FEMS Microbiol Lett 85(2):117–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saetre P, Stark JM (2005) Microbial dynamics and carbon and nitrogen cycling following re-wetting of soils beneath two semi-arid plant species. Oecologia 142(2):247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South East Queensland Healthy Waterways, 2010, Construction and establishment guidelines: swales, bioretention systems and wetlands

  • Van Gestel M, Merckx R, Vlassak K (1993) Microbial biomass responses to soil drying and rewetting: the fate of fast- and slow-growing microorganisms in soils from different climates. Soil Biol Biochem 25(1):109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West AW, Sparling GP, Feltham CW, Reynolds J (1992) Microbial activity and survival in soils dried at different rates. Aust J Soil Res 30:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank River Sands Pty Ltd, Australia, for supplying the stormwater biofilter packing material for my experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. N. Subramaniam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Subramaniam, D.N., Egodawatta, P., Mather, P. et al. Stabilization of Stormwater Biofilters: Impacts of Wetting and Drying Phases and the Addition of Organic Matter to Filter Media. Environmental Management 56, 630–642 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0530-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0530-0

Keywords

Navigation