Abstract
Background
Eyelid surgery is a cosmetic procedure performed worldwide in the field of plastic surgery. However, achieving optimal outcomes for the upper eyelids presents a challenge, necessitating careful patient selection and appropriate surgical choices.
Objectives
This article aims to provide recommendations for selecting the most suitable surgical procedure among three commonly performed treatments for aged upper eyelids.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted from October 2020 to May 2022, involving 518 patients. Pre- and postoperative photographs were analyzed to evaluate changes in the distance between the eyelids and brows. Notably, patients who habitually use the frontalis muscle to manage upper eyelid redundancy showed significant variations in the lid-brow distance after eyelid surgery.
Results
The study confirmed that addressing skin laxity through upper blepharoplasty or infra-brow excision reduced the stimulus for frontalis activity, resulting in true brow ptosis. However, the degree of compensatory frontalis movement differed among individuals, and changes in the lid-brow distance observed before and after the photos were influenced by various factors. As a result, obtaining clear numerical data regarding the changes in the lid-brow distance following eyelid surgery proved challenging. Nevertheless, after analyzing 518 cases, the author has classified the patients into three groups, which can contribute to more predictable and satisfying outcomes.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis of pre- and postoperative results from 518 patients, this study recommends specific strategies to enhance patient satisfaction. The proposed treatment algorithm may assist beginner surgeons in avoiding angry or tired-looking eyes after periorbital rejuvenation.
Level of Evidence V
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kpodzo DS, Nahai F, McCord CD (2014) Malar mounds and festoons: review of current management. Aesthet Surg J. 34(2):235–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13517897
American Society of Plastic Surgeons (2020) Plastic Surgery Statistics. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics
Data Bridge Market Research (2021) Global eyelid surgery market - industry trends and forecast to 2028. Available at: https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-eyelid-surgery-market
Grand View Research (n.d.) Eyelid surgery market size, share, & trends analysis report by procedure type (upper eyelid surgery, lower eyelid surgery), by end use (clinics & surgery centers, hospitals), by region, and segment forecasts, 2019–2026. Available at: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/eyelid-surgery-market
Choi Y, Kang HG, Nam YS (2017) Three skin zones in the Asian upper eyelid pertaining to the Asian blepharoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 28(4):892–897. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003511
Kim HS, Kim KK (2020) Subbrow lift using frontalis sling to correct lateral orbital laxity. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(6):2119–2126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01879-9
Kim HS, Hwang K, Kim CK, Kim KK (2013) Double-eyelid surgery using septoaponeurosis junctional thickening results in dynamic fold in asians. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 1(2):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0b013e318293dc69
Nahai F (2020) Chapter 28. Endoscopic brow lift. In: Nahai F, Nahai FR, Kenkel JM et al (eds) The art of aesthetic surgery principles and techniques, 3rd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 298–316
Marten TJ, Knize DM (2001) Chapter 6. Forehead aesthetics and preoperative assessment of the foreheadplasty patient. In: Knize DM (ed) The forehead and temporal fossa: anatomy and technique, 1st edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 91–100
Chao JA, Son JH, Guyuron B (2021) The prevalence of blepharoptosis in facial rejuvenation patient population. Aesthet Plast Surg 45(1):193–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01732-z
Kim YC, Kwon JG, Kim SC et al (2018) Comparison of periorbital anthropometry between beauty pageant contestants and ordinary young women with Korean ethnicity: a three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 42(2):479–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-1040-7
Tessier P (1987) Foreword. In: Farkas LG, Munro IR (eds.) Anthropometric facial proportions in medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Springfield, pp ix
Little AC, Jones BC, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM, Perrett DI (2002) Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proc Biol Sci 269(1496):1095–100. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.1984
Guyuron B, Rowe DJ (2008) How to make a long forehead more aesthetic. Aesthet Surg J 28(1):46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2007.10.008
Branham G, Holds JB (2015) Brow/upper lid anatomy, aging and aesthetic analysis. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 23(2):117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2015.01.001
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 10013 KB)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, N.S. Choosing Upper Blepharoplasty, Infra-brow Lift, and Forehead Lift in Asians: An Algorithmic Approach from Personal Experience. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 644–651 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03728-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03728-x