Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Autologous Versus Alloplastic Reconstruction for Patients with Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 24 February 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Autologous flaps may have superior outcomes when compared to implant breast reconstruction in patients with obesity. To date, no published review has illustrated the superiority of autologous to implant-based reconstruction in this study group in terms of aesthetics outcomes and surgical complications.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Embase from inception to December 31, 2020. Studies comparing the outcomes (patient satisfaction and complications) of autologous versus implant-based reconstruction in patients with BMI > 30 were selected.

Results

The search yielded 1633 articles, of which 76 were assessed in full text. A total of 12 articles fit inclusion for qualitative review; of them, 7 were meta-analyzed. Autologous reconstruction had a lower incidence of infection (OR 0.74 [95% CI 0.59, 0.92]), hematoma/seroma formation (OR 0.34 [95% CI 0.23, 0.49]), and reconstructive failure (OR 0.47 [95% CI 0.36, 0.62]), but not skin necrosis (OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.73, 1.25]) or wound dehiscence (OR 1.03 [95% CI 0.72, 1.49]) when compared to implant-based reconstruction. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism occurred more frequently with autologous versus alloplastic reconstruction (OR 2.21 [95% CI 1.09, 4.49] for DVT and OR 2.49 [95% CI 1.13, 5.48] for PE). BREASTQ scores were higher for the autologous breast reconstruction when compared to implant-based group, but failed to reach significance (p value >0.05).

Conclusion

The current evidence in the literature suggests that autologous breast reconstruction has lower surgical complication rate when compared to implant-based reconstruction at the expense of higher risk of thrombotic complications for patients with BMI > 30.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR (2010) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA 303(3):235–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM (2006) Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 295(13):1549–1555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith KB, Smith MS (2016) Obesity statistics. Prim Care 43(1):121-35, ix

  4. Morgen CS, Sørensen TI (2014) Obesity: global trends in the prevalence of overweight and obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10(9):513–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garvey PB, Buchel EW, Pockaj BA, Gray RJ, Samson TD (2005) The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(2):447–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Spear SL, Ducic I, Cuoco F, Taylor N (2007) Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(3):788–795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Riedel E, Davidge K, Hinson A, Disa JJ et al (2008) Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(6):1886–1892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen CL, Shore AD, Johns R, Clark JM, Manahan M, Makary MA (2011) The impact of obesity on breast surgery complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(5):395e–402e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Atisha DM, Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Wilkins EG (2008) The impact of obesity on patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(6):1893–1899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamel GN, Mehta K, Nash D, Jacobson J, Berk R, Rizzo AM et al (2019) Patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life in obese patients: a comparison between microsurgical and prosthetic implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(6):960e-e966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Klement KA, Hijjawi JB, LoGiudice JA, Alghoul M, Omesiete-Adejare P (2019) Microsurgical breast reconstruction in the obese: a better option than tissue expander/implant reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg 144(3):539–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Panayi AC, Agha RA, Sieber BA, Orgill DP (2018) Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 34(5):363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100

  14. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928

  16. Nguyen A, Mahabir RC (2016) An update on the level of evidence for plastic surgery research published in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(7):e798

  17. Garvey PB, Villa MT, Rozanski AT, Liu J, Robb GL, Beahm EK (2012) The advantages of free abdominal-based flaps over implants for breast reconstruction in obese patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5):991–1000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanwright PJ, Davila AA, Hirsch EM, Khan SA, Fine NA, Bilimoria KY et al (2013) The differential effect of BMI on prosthetic versus autogenous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 12,986 patients. Breast 22(5):938–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Srinivasa DR, Clemens MW, Qi J, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Pusic AL et al (2020) Obesity and Breast Reconstruction: Complications and patient-reported outcomes in a multicenter, prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(3):481e-e490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tong WMY, Baumann DP, Villa MT, Mittendorf EA, Liu J, Robb GL et al (2016) Obese women experience fewer complications after oncoplastic breast repair following partial mastectomy than after immediate total breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(3):777–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Huo J, Smith BD, Giordano SH, Reece GP, Tina Shih YC (2016) A comparison of patient-centered economic and clinical outcomes of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction between obese and non-obese patients. Breast 30:118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang F, Koltz PF, Sbitany H (2014) Lessons learned from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: Has centralized data collection improved immediate breast reconstruction outcomes and safety? Plast Reconstr Surg 134(5):859–868

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fischer JP, Wes AM, Kanchwala S, Kovach SJ (2014) Effect of BMI on modality-specific outcomes in immediate breast reconstruction (IBR)—a propensity-matched analysis using the 2005–2011 ACS-NSQIP datasets. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48(5):297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fischer JP, Cleveland EC, Nelson JA, Kovach SJ, Serletti JM, Wu LC et al (2013) Breast reconstruction in the morbidly obese patient: assessment of 30-day complications using the 2005 to 2010 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data sets. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(4):750–761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fischer JP, Wes AM, Tuggle CT, Wu LC (2014) Venous thromboembolism risk in mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: analysis of the 2005 to 2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data sets. Plast Reconstr Surg 133(3):263e-e273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65(2):87–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jagsi R, Jiang J, Momoh AO, Alderman A, Giordano SH, Buchholz TA et al (2014) Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States. J Clin Oncol 32(9):919–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fitzpatrick AM, Gao LL, Smith BL, Cetrulo CL Jr, Colwell AS, Winograd JM et al (2014) Cost and outcome analysis of breast reconstruction paradigm shift. Ann Plast Surg 73(2):141–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Huo J, Smith BD, Giordano SH, Reece GP, Shih YT (2016) Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction and its subsequent complications: a comparison between obese and non-obese women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157(2):373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nguyen KT, Hanwright PJ, Smetona JT, Hirsch EM, Seth AK, Kim JY (2014) Body mass index as a continuous predictor of outcomes after expander-implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 73(1):19–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Cleveland E, Sieber B, Rohrbach JI, Serletti JM et al (2013) Breast reconstruction modality outcome study: a comparison of expander/implants and free flaps in select patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(5):928–934

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Razdan SN, Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, Panchal HJ, Ho AY et al (2017) National breast reconstruction utilization in the setting of postmastectomy radiotherapy. J Reconstr Microsurg 33(5):312–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Negenborn VL, Dikmans REG, Bouman MB, Wilschut JA, Mullender MG, Salzberg CA (2018) Patient-reported Outcomes after ADM-assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: a Cross-sectional Study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 6(2):e1654

  34. Saulis AS, Mustoe TA, Fine NA (2007) A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(6):1669–1676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu C, Zhuang Y, Momeni A, Luan J, Chung MT, Wright E et al (2014) Quality of life and patient satisfaction after microsurgical abdominal flap versus staged expander/implant breast reconstruction: a critical study of unilateral immediate breast reconstruction using patient-reported outcomes instrument BREAST-Q. Breast Cancer Res Treat 146(1):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, Kuhn L, Hawley ST, Wilkins E et al (2009) Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship Period. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Thoma A, Ignacy TA, Ziolkowski N, Voineskos S (2012) The performance and publication of cost-utility analyses in plastic surgery: making our specialty relevant. Can J Plast Surg 20(3):187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait

    Rawan ElAbd

  2. Division of Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

    Neetin Prabhu, Alaa Alibrahim, Emily Burke & Jason Williams

  3. Okanagan Plastic Surgery Center &, Kelowna General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

    Osama Samargandi

  4. Department of Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Osama Samargandi

Authors
  1. Rawan ElAbd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neetin Prabhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alaa Alibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emily Burke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jason Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Osama Samargandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osama Samargandi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article was updated to replace low resolution images and table 3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

ElAbd, R., Prabhu, N., Alibrahim, A. et al. Autologous Versus Alloplastic Reconstruction for Patients with Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Aesth Plast Surg 46, 597–609 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02664-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02664-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation