Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Myo-Glandular Flap Breast Reduction: Preventing the Bottoming out Deformity—A Novel Technique

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large, heavy breasts are a common complaint among women causing various functional and aesthetic concerns. The plastic surgery community has offered a variety of surgical techniques to address this condition. Most of these operations developed during the 1970s–1980s cemented their place in history as fundamentals of breast reduction surgery and are still widely taught today. Despite ongoing plastic surgery advances, long-term complications surrounding breast reduction surgery remain a concern, even to experienced surgeons. Its apparent trends have shifted focus over time; from the basics of developing a patient-safe and easily replicable technique, toward developing more refined maneuvers allowing surgeons to reach desired and long-lasting outcomes while preventing known complications. The bottoming out phenomena, lack of nipple areola complex sensitivity, upper pole emptiness with low setting breasts and high revision rates still plague the breast reduction landscape. We present a novel technique involving a pectoralis major-based myo-glandular flap with breast parenchymal suspension to the upper chest wall to combat bottoming out and upper pole emptiness. These procedural elements allow the breasts to attain not only acceptable results, with smaller, round and well-projected breasts, but also to create an active opposing vector to resist the gravitational forces which otherwise pull breast tissue inferiorly creating the bottoming out deformity.

Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wise RJ (1956) A preliminary report on a method of planning the mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 17:367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lassus C (1996) A 30-year experience with vertical mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:373e80

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammaplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 094:100e14

    Google Scholar 

  4. Orlando JC, Gutherie RH Jr (1975) The superomedial dermal pedicle for nipple transposition. Br J Plast Surg 28:42–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nahai F (2005) Clinical decision-making in breast surgery. The art of aesthetic surgery. Quality Medical publishing Inc, St. Louis, pp 1817–58

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lejour M (1999) Vertical mammaplasty: early complications after 250 personal consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:764–770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall-Findlay EJ (2002) Pedicles in vertical reduction and mastopexy. Clin Plastic Surg 29:379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM (1977) Reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique. An alternative to free nipple and areola grafting for severe macromastia or extreme ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 59:500–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dancey A, Khan M, Dawson J, Gigantomastia PF (2008) A classification and review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(5):493–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall-Findlay EJ (2010) The three breast dimensions: analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(6):1632–1642. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ccdb97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall-Findlay E (2012) Comentary on: vertical reduction mammaplasty utilizing the superomedial pedicle: is it really for everyone? [Peer comentary on (k)vertical reduction mammaplasty utilizing the superomedial pedicle: is it really for everyone?(k) by Neaman KC]. Aesthet Surg J 32(6):726–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/109O82OX12452757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Graf R, Biggs TM, Steely RL (2000) Breast shape: a technique for better upper pole fullness. Aesthet Plast Surg 24(5):348–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Graf R (2002) In search of better shape in mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(1):309–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hidalgo DA, Elliot LF, Palumbo S, Casas S, Hammond D (1999) Current trends in breast reduction. Plast Recosntr Surg 104:806–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pennington DG (2006) Improving the results of inferior pedicle breast reduction using pedicle suspension and plication. Aesthet Plast Surg 30(4):309–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Davison SP, Mesbahi AN, Ducic I et al (2007) The versatility of the superomedial pedicle with various skin reduction patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(6):1466–1476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hammond DC, Loffredo M (2012) Breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(5):829e-e839. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2efc

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Graf R, Ricardo Dall Oglio Tolazzi A, Balbinot P et al (2016) Influence of the pectoralis major muscle sling in chest wall-based flap suspension after vertical mammaplasty: ten-year follow-up. Aesthet Surg J 36(10):1113–1121 (Epub 2016 Jul 8)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Graf R, Reis de Araujo LR, Rippel R, Neto LG et al (2003) Reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy using the vertical scar and thoracic wall flap technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 27(1):6–12 (Epub 2003 Apr 14)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reus WF, Mathes SJ (1987) Preservation of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Makboul M, Abdelhamid M, Al-Attar G (2017) Long term follow up and patient satisfaction after reduction mammoplasty: superomedial versus inferior pedicle. World J Plast Surg 6(1):82–87

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Atluntas ZK, Kamburoglu HO, Yavuz N et al (2015) Long-term changes in nipple-areolar complex position and inferior pole length in superomedial pedicle inverted “T” scar reduction mammaplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 39(3):325–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-015-0470-3 (Epub 2015 Mar 18)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Quan M, Fadl A, Small K et al (2011) Defining pseudoptosis (bottoming out) 3 years after short-scar medial pedicle breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35(3):357–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9615-6 (Epub 2010 Nov 17)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kankaya Y, Melike O, Sungur N (2016) Four flap suspension technique for prevention of bottoming out after breast reduction. Ann Surg Treat Res 90(1):10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown HR, Izaddoost S, Bullocks JM (2010) Preventing the “bottoming out” and “star-gazing” phenomena in inferior pedicle breast reduction with an acellular dermal matrix internal brassiere. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:760–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zehm S, Puelzl P, Wechselberger G et al (2012) Inferior pole length and long-term aesthetic outcome after superior and inferior pedicled reduction mammaplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg 36(5):1128–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9938-6 (Epib 2012 Jul 19)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hamdi M, Greuse M, De Mey A, Webster MH (2001) A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 54:39–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamdi M, Blondeel P, Van de Sijpe K, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S (2003) Evaluation of nipple-areola complex sensitivity after the latero-central glandular pedicle technique in breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 56(4):360–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cruz-Korchin N, Korchin L (2003) Vertical versus Wise pattern breast reduction: patient satisfaction, revision rates, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Garcia ES, Veiga DF, Sabino-Neto M, Beraldo Cardoso FN et al (2015) Sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex and sexual function following reduction mammaplasty. Aesthet Surg J 35(7):NP193-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjsv034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Echo A, Guerra G, Yuksel E (2011) The dermal suspension sling: shaping the inferior pedicle during breast reduction. Aesthet Plast Surg 35(4):608–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9632-5 (Epub 2010 Dec 7)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hammond DC (2004) The short scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction (SPAIR) mammaplasty. Semin Plast Surg 18(3):231–243. https://doi.org/10.1055/s2004-831910

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hall-Findlay EJ (2013) Discussion: a matched cohort study of superomedial pedicle vertical scar breast reduction (100 breasts) and traditional inferior pedicle Wise-pattern reduction (100) breasts: an outcomes study over 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(5):1077–1079. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS-0b013e3182a48bb4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kirwan L, Wazir U, Mokbel K (2015) Breast auto-augmentation: a versatile method of breast rehabilitation-a retrospective series of 107 procedures. Arch Plast Surg 42:438–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Würinger E, Mader N, Posch E, Holle J (1998) Nerve and vessel supplying ligamentous suspension of the mammary gland. Plast Reconstr Surg 101(6):1486–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadri O. Sozer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained for usage of photographs.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sozer, S.O., Phillips, P.M. Myo-Glandular Flap Breast Reduction: Preventing the Bottoming out Deformity—A Novel Technique. Aesth Plast Surg 45, 1419–1428 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02189-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02189-4

Keywords

Navigation