Abstract
Background
Pseudoptosis (bottoming out) is a well-observed phenomenon occurring after all types of breast reduction surgery. The authors’ team previously reported the use of three-dimensional (3D) imaging to demonstrate that significant morphologic changes occur in the breast during the first year after short-scar medial pedicle breast reduction. This study extended this evaluation to postoperative year 3.
Methods
Patients undergoing short-scar medial pedicle breast reduction had 3D photographs taken using the Canfield Vectra 3-pod system or the Konica Minolta V910 during postoperative follow-up visits at 1 month, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years. Patients were assessed for pseudoptosis and breast morphologic changes using the 3D-based measurements.
Results
During the 3 year period, 10 patients completed the study. The total breast volume decreased significantly during the first postoperative year by 20.6% (P < 0.05). No change in volume occurred during postoperative years 2 and 3 (P > 0.05). Pseudoptosis was documented in the first postoperative year by a 6% migration of breast tissue from the upper pole to the lower pole of the breast (P < 0.05), without significant change noted during the next 2 postoperative years (P > 0.05). This redistribution of the breast parenchyma correlated with a decrease in breast anteroposterior projection of 10.6 mm (P < 0.05) during the same period, with an insignificant change during postoperative years 2 and 3. During the first postoperative year, 3D comparative analysis recorded a 4.4-mm difference in the 3D topography (P < 0.05) and no further changes thereafter. The angle of breast projection showed a significant decrease of 17% (P < 0.05) in the first postoperative year and no change in subsequent years.
Conclusion
Three-dimensional photography is a useful tool enabling the plastic surgeon to monitor the postoperative changes in breast morphology objectively. This study provides quantifiable data demonstrating that pseudoptosis and tissue redistribution are limited to the initial postoperative year for patients undergoing short-scar medial pedicle breast reduction. The kinetic change in the breasts during postoperative years 2 and 3 appears to be minimal. Studies comparing the changes in morphology over time with different techniques of breast reduction are underway.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Strombeck JO (1964) Macromastia in women and its surgical treatment. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 341:1
Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468–479
Meshulam-Derazon S, Barnea Y, Zaretski A, Leshem D, Miller U, Meilik B, Weiss J, Shafir R, Amir A, Gur E (2009) Large-volume breast reduction: long-term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 43:65–70
Ferreira MC, Costa MP, Cunha MS, Sakae E, Fels KW (2003) Sensibility of the breast after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:1–5
Dabbah A, Lehman JA, Parker M, Tantri D, Wagner DS (1995) Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg 35:337–446
Rogliani M, Gentile P, Labardi L, Donfrancesco A, Cervelli V (2008) Improvement of physical and psychological symptoms after breast reduction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1647–1649
Eggert E, Schuss R, Edsander-Nord A (2009) Clinical outcome, quality of life, patients’ satisfaction, and aesthetic results after reduction mammaplasty. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 43:201–206
Thoma A, Sprague S, Veltri K, Duku E, Furlong W (2007) A prospective study of patients undergoing breast reduction surgery: health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:13–26
Brown AP, Hill C, Khan K (2000) Outcome of reduction mammaplasty: a patient’s perspective. Br J Plast Surg 53:584
Abramson DL, Pap S, Shifteh S, Glasberg SB (2005) Improving long-term breast shape with the medial pedicle wise pattern breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1937–1943
Reus WF, Mathes SJ (1988) Preservation of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:644–650
Keck M, Kaye K, Thieme I, Ueberreiter K (2007) Vertical mammaplasty: postoperative changes, complications, and patient evaluation. Can J Plast Surg 15:41–43
Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Manson P (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstructr Surg 110:58–70
Tepper OM, Choi M, Small K, Unger J, Davidson E, Rudolph L, Pritchard A, Karp NS (2008) An innovative three-dimensional approach to defining the anatomical changes occurring after short scar medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1875–1885
Kevin S, Tepper OM, Unger JG, Kumar N, Feldman DL, Choi MH, Karp NS (2010) Redefining pseudoptosis from a 3D perspective after short-scar medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:346–353
Karp NS (2004) Medial pedicle/vertical breast reduction made easy: the importance of complete inferior glandular resection. Ann Plast Surg 52:458–464
Choi MH, Unger JG, Small K, Tepper OM, Kumar N, Feldman DL, Karp NS (2009) Defining the kinetcis of breast pseudoptosis after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 62:518–522
Tepper OM, Small K, Rudolph L et al (2006) Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Am J Surg 192:548–551
Fayman MS, Potgieter E, Becker PJ (2001) Outcome study: periareolar mammaplasty patients’ perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:676–684
Conflict of interest
Authors have no financial disclosures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quan, M., Fadl, A., Small, K. et al. Defining Pseudoptosis (Bottoming Out) 3 Years After Short-Scar Medial Pedicle Breast Reduction. Aesth Plast Surg 35, 357–364 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9615-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9615-6