Skip to main content
Log in

Defining Pseudoptosis (Bottoming Out) 3 Years After Short-Scar Medial Pedicle Breast Reduction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pseudoptosis (bottoming out) is a well-observed phenomenon occurring after all types of breast reduction surgery. The authors’ team previously reported the use of three-dimensional (3D) imaging to demonstrate that significant morphologic changes occur in the breast during the first year after short-scar medial pedicle breast reduction. This study extended this evaluation to postoperative year 3.

Methods

Patients undergoing short-scar medial pedicle breast reduction had 3D photographs taken using the Canfield Vectra 3-pod system or the Konica Minolta V910 during postoperative follow-up visits at 1 month, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years. Patients were assessed for pseudoptosis and breast morphologic changes using the 3D-based measurements.

Results

During the 3 year period, 10 patients completed the study. The total breast volume decreased significantly during the first postoperative year by 20.6% (P < 0.05). No change in volume occurred during postoperative years 2 and 3 (P > 0.05). Pseudoptosis was documented in the first postoperative year by a 6% migration of breast tissue from the upper pole to the lower pole of the breast (P < 0.05), without significant change noted during the next 2 postoperative years (P > 0.05). This redistribution of the breast parenchyma correlated with a decrease in breast anteroposterior projection of 10.6 mm (P < 0.05) during the same period, with an insignificant change during postoperative years 2 and 3. During the first postoperative year, 3D comparative analysis recorded a 4.4-mm difference in the 3D topography (P < 0.05) and no further changes thereafter. The angle of breast projection showed a significant decrease of 17% (P < 0.05) in the first postoperative year and no change in subsequent years.

Conclusion

Three-dimensional photography is a useful tool enabling the plastic surgeon to monitor the postoperative changes in breast morphology objectively. This study provides quantifiable data demonstrating that pseudoptosis and tissue redistribution are limited to the initial postoperative year for patients undergoing short-scar medial pedicle breast reduction. The kinetic change in the breasts during postoperative years 2 and 3 appears to be minimal. Studies comparing the changes in morphology over time with different techniques of breast reduction are underway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strombeck JO (1964) Macromastia in women and its surgical treatment. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 341:1

    Google Scholar 

  2. Westreich M (1997) Anthropomorphic breast measurement: protocol and results in 50 women with aesthetically perfect breasts and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:468–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Meshulam-Derazon S, Barnea Y, Zaretski A, Leshem D, Miller U, Meilik B, Weiss J, Shafir R, Amir A, Gur E (2009) Large-volume breast reduction: long-term results. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 43:65–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferreira MC, Costa MP, Cunha MS, Sakae E, Fels KW (2003) Sensibility of the breast after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dabbah A, Lehman JA, Parker M, Tantri D, Wagner DS (1995) Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg 35:337–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogliani M, Gentile P, Labardi L, Donfrancesco A, Cervelli V (2008) Improvement of physical and psychological symptoms after breast reduction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:1647–1649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eggert E, Schuss R, Edsander-Nord A (2009) Clinical outcome, quality of life, patients’ satisfaction, and aesthetic results after reduction mammaplasty. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 43:201–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thoma A, Sprague S, Veltri K, Duku E, Furlong W (2007) A prospective study of patients undergoing breast reduction surgery: health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:13–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown AP, Hill C, Khan K (2000) Outcome of reduction mammaplasty: a patient’s perspective. Br J Plast Surg 53:584

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abramson DL, Pap S, Shifteh S, Glasberg SB (2005) Improving long-term breast shape with the medial pedicle wise pattern breast reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1937–1943

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reus WF, Mathes SJ (1988) Preservation of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:644–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Keck M, Kaye K, Thieme I, Ueberreiter K (2007) Vertical mammaplasty: postoperative changes, complications, and patient evaluation. Can J Plast Surg 15:41–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Manson P (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstructr Surg 110:58–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tepper OM, Choi M, Small K, Unger J, Davidson E, Rudolph L, Pritchard A, Karp NS (2008) An innovative three-dimensional approach to defining the anatomical changes occurring after short scar medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1875–1885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kevin S, Tepper OM, Unger JG, Kumar N, Feldman DL, Choi MH, Karp NS (2010) Redefining pseudoptosis from a 3D perspective after short-scar medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:346–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karp NS (2004) Medial pedicle/vertical breast reduction made easy: the importance of complete inferior glandular resection. Ann Plast Surg 52:458–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi MH, Unger JG, Small K, Tepper OM, Kumar N, Feldman DL, Karp NS (2009) Defining the kinetcis of breast pseudoptosis after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 62:518–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tepper OM, Small K, Rudolph L et al (2006) Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Am J Surg 192:548–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fayman MS, Potgieter E, Becker PJ (2001) Outcome study: periareolar mammaplasty patients’ perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:676–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Authors have no financial disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nolan Karp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quan, M., Fadl, A., Small, K. et al. Defining Pseudoptosis (Bottoming Out) 3 Years After Short-Scar Medial Pedicle Breast Reduction. Aesth Plast Surg 35, 357–364 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9615-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9615-6

Keywords

Navigation