Skip to main content
Log in

Boldness and exploratory behaviors differ between sunfish (Lepomis spp.) congeners in a standardized assay

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The shy-bold behavioral continuum is an element of animal behavior which is often studied for its ecological relevance, particularly in the context of predation risk. How individuals respond to various predation cues is well studied at the individual level, but relatively little is known about how these responses can differ among closely related species. We exposed individual wild-caught juvenile bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) and pumpkinseed (L. gibbosus) to kairomones of a common predator (Northern pike, Esox lucius), conspecific alarm cues, or a lake water control in a Z-maze trial commonly used to assess relative levels of bold and exploratory behaviors. Neither species exhibited any significant behavioral responses to either predation cue, but bluegill consistently displayed more bold-type behaviors than pumpkinseed. Although the lack of a behavioral response to predation cues in this study is equivocal, we identify clear differences in boldness between these two congeners and discuss the possibility of ecological niche differentiation driving these behavioral differences.

Significance Statement

Closely related species exposed to similar predator guilds may differ in their behavioral responses to predation risk, particularly during different life-history stages. We exposed juveniles of two co-occurring sunfish congeners (Lepomis spp.) to chemical predation cues (predator kairomones or conspecific alarm cues) in a Z-maze assay to assess relative levels of bold and exploratory behaviors. Bluegill (L. macrochirus) were consistently bolder and more proactive than pumpkinseed (L. gibbosus). Ontogenetic ecological niche differentiation between these species may be the cause of these observed differences and life-history trajectories should be considered in the design of future research questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Raw data (annotated) and the R code used for analyses are publicly available through the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/6ac9m/; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6AC9M).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions on this manuscript.

Funding

Funding for this project was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. KAA and SJW were further supported by Project Learning Tree.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to conceiving and designing the experiment. KAA and SJW performed the experiments. KAA and CKE analyzed the data. KAA and SJW wrote the original manuscript and all authors contributed edits and revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin A. Adeli.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Scientific Collection Permits were provided by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry and Animal Care Permissions were provided by Carleton University (Permit 112698) under the auspices of the Canadian Council of Animal Care and the guidelines set forth by the Animal Behavior Society/Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by C. C Ioannou.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adeli, K.A., Woods, S.J., Cooke, S.J. et al. Boldness and exploratory behaviors differ between sunfish (Lepomis spp.) congeners in a standardized assay. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 78, 46 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03464-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03464-5

Keywords

Navigation