Abstract
While members of the choosier sex often prefer courting mates with bright, large, or loud phenotypes, social experience can result in variation in mate preferences. Fewer studies, though, have investigated how multiple social parameters might interact to affect such preferences. In the brush-legged wolf spider, Schizocosa ocreata, asynchrony of maturation between sexes provides a time period in which females might be exposed to male courtship prior to making a mating decision. We tested whether adult females demonstrated plasticity in their preferences for vibratory signal amplitude after experience with vibratory playback during their penultimate stage. Penultimate instar females were presented unimodal vibratory courtship signals via piezoelectric disc benders, manipulating the perceived encounter rate (every other day or once per day), the number of males (one or two), and/or the vibratory amplitude (low or high). As adults, each female was presented vibratory playback of a low- or high-amplitude courtship signal in both no-choice and two-choice designs. In no-choice trials, previous experience with different amplitude signals significantly affected adult preferences, while other social parameters did not. Specifically, female S. ocreata preferred high-amplitude signals to low-amplitude signals if previously exposed to high-amplitude signals, while those previously exposed to low-amplitude signals preferred low-amplitude signals. In two-choice trials, however, females preferred high-amplitude signals regardless of their previous social experience, suggesting that innate preferences for high-amplitude signals might outweigh any learned preferences in some contexts. Results from this study complement previous social experience studies in S. ocreata, by clearly demonstrating a second sensory modality through which social learning can occur.
Significance statement
Social experience affects subsequent mate preferences in a variety of taxa, but in many instances, single parameters are examined at a time. Furthermore, in species that use multimodal communication, there remain questions about whether a single sensory modality is sufficient to elicit such plasticity. In this study, we manipulated multiple parameters using vibratory playback to examine whether social experience during the brush-legged wolf spider’s juvenile stage affected preferences for low- and high-amplitude signals as an adult. Ultimately, only the amplitude of the male’s signals that they were exposed to as a juvenile impacted adult mate preference—not the number of perceived males or how often they encountered the males. These results, along with previous studies, demonstrate that S. ocreata is capable of plasticity in response to social cues in multiple modalities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso-Pimentel H, Papaj DR (1996) Operational sex ratio versus gender density as determinants of copulation duration in the walnut fly, Rhagoletis juglandis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:171–180
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Archer MS, Elgar MA (1999) Female preference for multiple partners: sperm competition in the hide beetle, Dermestes maculatus (DeGeer). Anim Behav 58:669–675
Atwell A, Wagner WE (2014) Female mate choice plasticity is affected by the interaction between male density and female age in a field cricket. Anim Behav 98:177–183
Bailey N (2011) Mate choice plasticity in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: effects of social experience in multiple modalities. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:2269–2278
Bailey NW, Zuk M (2008) Acoustic experience shapes female mate choice in field crickets. Proc R Soc Ser B-Bio 275:2645–2650
Balshine-Earn S (1996) Reproductive rates, operational sex ratios and mate choice in St. Peter’s Fish Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39:107–116
Basolo AL (1998) Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions. Proc R Soc Ser B-Bio 265:2223–2228
Berglund A (1994) The operational sex ratio influence choosiness in a pipefish. Behav Ecol 5:254–258
Berglund A (1995) Many mates make male pipefish choosy. Behaviour 132:213–218
Bonduriansky R (2001) The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev 76:305–339
Brandt R, Macdonald DW (2011) To know him is to love him? Familiarity and female preference in the harvest mouse, Micromys minutus. Anim Behav 82:353–358
Burley NT, Foster VS (2006) Variation in female choice of mates: condition influences selectivity. Anim Behav 72:713–719
Byers JA, Byers AA, Dunn SJ (2006) A dry summer diminishes mate search effort by pronghorn females: evidence for a significant cost of mate search. Ethology 112:74–80
Carroll SP, Salamon MH (1995) Variation in sexual selection on male body size within and between populations of the soapberry bug. Anim Behav 50:1463–1474
Chen Y, Clark O, Woolley SC (2017) Courtship song preference in female zebra finches are shaped by developmental auditory experience. Proc R Soc Ser B-Bio 284:20170054
Cocroft RB, Rodriguez RL (2005) The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. Bioscience 55:323–334
Dion E, Pui LX, Weber K, Monteiro A (2020) Early-exposure to new sex pheromone blends alters mate preference in female butterflies and in their offspring. Nat Commun 11:53
Dougherty LR, Shuker DM (2015) The effect of experimental design on the measurement of mate choice: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 26:311–319
Dreiss AN, Cote J, Richard M, Federici P, Clobert J (2010) Age- and sex-specific response to population density and sex ratio. Behav Ecol 21:356–364
Dukas R (2005) Learning affects mate choice in female fruit flies. Behav Ecol 16:800–804
Eriksson A, Anfora G, Lucchi A, Virant-Doberlet M, Mazzoni V (2011) Interplant vibrational communication in a leafhopper insect. PLoS One 6:e19692
Fawcett TW, Johnstone RA (2003) Mate choice in the face of costly competition. Behav Ecol 14:771–779
Fowler-Finn KD, Rodriguez RL (2012) The evolution of experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences. J Evolution Biol 25:1855–1863
Gibson JS, Uetz GW (2008) Seismic communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: components of male seismic signals and mating success. Anim Behav 75:1253–1262
Gibson JS, Uetz GW (2012) Effect of rearing environment and food availability on seismic signaling in male wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim Behav 84:85–92
Gordon SD, Uetz GW (2011) Multimodal communication of wolf spiders on different substrates: evidence for behavioural plasticity. Anim Behav 81:367–375
Gray DA (1999) Intrinsic factors affecting female choice in house crickets: time cost, female age, nutritional condition, body size, and size-relative reproductive investment. J Insect Behav 12:691–700
Hebets EA (2003) Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spiders prefer males of a familiar phenotype. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13390–13395
Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:197–214
Hebets EA, Vink CJ (2007) Experience leads to preference: experienced females prefer brush-legged males in a population of syntopic wolf spiders. Behav Ecol 18:1010–1020
Hebets EA, Wesson J, Shamble PS (2008) Diet influences mate choice selectivity in adult female wolf spiders. Anim Behav 76:355–363
Hedrick AV, Dill LM (1993) Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim Behav 46:193–196
Holveck MJ, Riebel K (2010) Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate. Proc R Soc Ser B-Bio 277:153–160
Hughes KA, Du L, Rodd FH, Reznick DN (1999) Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim Behav 58:907–916
Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions MD (2005) Female mate choice as a condition-dependent life-history trait. Am Nat 166:79–92
Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A (1999) Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution. J Theor Biol 200:97–109
Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64
Jirotkul M (1999) Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male-male competition in guppies. Anim Behav 58:287–294
Johnson JB, Basolo AL (2003) Predator exposure alters female mate choice in the green swordtail. Behav Ecol 14:619–625
Judge KA, Tran K-C, Gwynne DT (2010) The relative effects of mating status and age on the mating behaviour of female field crickets. Can J Zool 88:219–223
Kasumovic MM, Hall MD, Brooks RC (2012) The juvenile social environment introduces variation in the choice and expression of sexually selected traits. Ecol Evol 2:1036–1047
Kasumovic MM, Brooks RC (2011) It’s all who you know: the evolution of socially cued anticipatory plasticity as a mating strategy. Quant Rev Biol 86:181–197
Kasumovic MM, Bruce MJ, Andrade MCB, Herberstein ME (2008) Spatial and temporal demographic variation drives within-season fluctuations in sexual selection. Evolution 62:2316–2325
Kirkpatrick M (1996) Good genes and direct selection in evolution of mating preferences. Evolution 50:2125–2140
Kodrick-Brown A, Nicoletto PF (2001) Age and experience affect female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Am Nat 157:316–323
Kozak EC, Uetz GW (2019) Male courtship signal modality and female mate preference in the wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata: results of digital multimodal playback studies. Curr Zool. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoz025
Kozak EC, Uetz GW (2016) Cross-modal integration of multimodal courtship signals in a wolf spider. Anim Cogn 19:1173–1181
Lynch KS, Rand AS, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W (2005) Plasticity in female mate choice associated with changing reproductive states. Anim Behav 69:689–699
Mazzoni V, Lucchi A, Cokl A, Presern J, Virant-Doberlet M (2009) Disruption of the reproductive behaviour of Scaphoideus titanus by playback of vibrational signals. Entomol Exp Appl 133:174–185
McClintock WJ, Uetz GW (1996) Female choice and pre-existing bias: visual cues during courtship in two Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim Behav 52:167–181
Meyer TB, Uetz GW (2019) Complex male mate choice in the brush-legged wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz). Behav Ecol 30:27–38
Montgomery TH (1903) Studies on the habits of spiders, particularly those of the mating period. P Acad Nat Sci Phila 55:59–149
Moskalik B, Uetz GW (2011) Female hunger state affects mate choice of a sexually selected trait in a wolf spider. Anim Behav 81:715–722
Norton S, Uetz GW (2005) Mating frequency in Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz) wolf spiders: evidence for a mating system with female monogamy and male polygamy. J Arachnol 33:16–24
Persons MH, Uetz GW (2005) Sexual cannibalism and mate choice decisions in wolf spiders: influence of male size and secondary sexual characters. Anim Behav 69:83–94
Punzalan D, Rodd FH, Rowe L (2010) Temporally variable multivariate sexual selection on sexually dimorphic traits in a wild insect population. Am Nat 175:401–414
R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07–0, URL http://www.R-project.org/
Rebar D, Rodriguez RL (2013) Genetic variation in social influence on mate preferences. Proc R Soc Ser B-Bio 280:20130803
Rodriguez RL, Rebar D, Fowler-Finn (2013) The evolution and evolutionary consequences of social plasticity in mate preferences. Anim Behav 85:1041–1047
Rutledge JM, Miller A, Uetz GW (2010) Exposure to multiple sensory cues as a juvenile affects adult female mate preferences in wolf spiders. Anim Behav 80:419–426
Rutledge JM, Uetz GW (2014) Juvenile experience and adult female mating preferences in two closely related Schizocosa species. J Arachnol 42:170–177
Scheffer SJ, Uetz GW, Stratton GE (1996) Sexual selection, male morphology, and the efficacy of courtship signaling in two wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:17–23
Schmitt A, Schuster M, Barth FB (1994) Vibratory communication in a wandering spider, Cupiennius getazi. Female and male preferences for features of the conspecific male’s releaser. Anim Behav 48:1155–1171
Souroukis K, Murray A (1995) Female mating behavior in the field cricket, Gryllus pennsylvanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) at different operational sex ratios. J Insect Behav 8:269–279
Spence R, Smith C (2005) Male territoriality mediates density and sex ratio effects on oviposition in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Anim Behav 69:1317–1323
Stoffer B, Lallo M, Clark DL, Uetz GW (2021) Learning how to eavesdrop in multiple modalities: a test of associative learning using unimodal and multimodal playback. Anim Behav 178:57–66
Stoffer B, Uetz GW (2017) The effects of experience with different courtship modalities on unimodal and multimodal preferences in a wolf spider. Anim Behav 123:187–196
Stoffer B, Uetz GW (2016a) Social experience affects female mate preferences for a visual trait in a wolf spider. Behav Ecol 27:252–261
Stoffer B, Uetz GW (2016b) Tuft size matters: the effects of adult visual social experience on female mate preferences in a wolf spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:2211–2221
Stoffer B, Uetz GW (2015) The effects of social experience with varying male availability on female mate preferences in a wolf spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:927–937
Stratton GE, Uetz GW (1981) Acoustic communication and reproductive isolation in two species of wolf spiders. Science 214:575–577
Stratton GE, Uetz GW (1983) Communication via substratum-coupled stridulation and reproductive isolation in wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim Behav 31:164–172
Stratton GE, Uetz GW (1986) The inheritance of courtship behavior and its role as a reproductive isolating mechanism in two species of Schizocosa wolf spiders. Evolution 40:129–141
ten Cate C, Vos DR (1999) Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: a reassessment. Adv Study Behav 28:1–31
Tinghitella RM, Weigel EG, Head M, Boughman JW (2013) Flexible mate choice when mates are rare and time is short. Ecol Evol 3:2820–2831
Tudor MS, Morris MR (2009) Experience plays a role in female preference for symmetry in the swordtail fish Xiphophorus malinche. Ethology 115:812–822
Uetz GW (2000) Signals and multi-modal signaling in spider communication. In: Espmark Y, Amundsen T, Rosenqvist G (eds) Animal signals: signalling and signal design in animal communication. Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim (Norway), p 387–405
Uetz GW, Clark DL, Roberts JA (2016) Multimodal communication in wolf spider (Lycosidae) – an emerging model for study. Adv Stud Behav 48:117–159
Uetz GW, Denterlein G (1979) Courtship behavior, habitat and reproductive isolation in Schizocosa rovneri Uetz and Dondale (Araneae: Lycosidae). J Arachnol 7:121–128
Uetz GW, Norton S (2007) Preference for male traits in female wolf spiders varies with the choice of available mates, female age and reproductive state. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:631–641
Uetz GW, Papke R, Kilinc B (2002) Influence of feeding regime on body size, body condition and a male secondary sexual character in Schizocosa ocreata wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae): condition-dependence in a visual signaling trait. J Arachnol 30:461–469
Uetz GW, Roberts JA (2002) Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain Behav Evolut 59:222–230
Uetz GW, Roberts JA, Clark DL, Gibson JS, Gordon SD (2013) Multimodal signals increase active space of communication by wolf spiders in a complex litter environment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1471–1482
Uetz GW, Stoffer B, Lallo M, Clark DL (2017) Complex signals and comparative mate assessment in wolf spiders: results from multimodal playback studies. Anim Behav 134:283–299
Verzijden MN, Abbott JK, von Philipsborn AC, Loeschcke V (2015) Male Drosophila melanogaster learn to prefer an arbitrary trait associated with female mating status. Curr Zool 61:1036–1042
Verzijden MN, ten Cate C (2007) Early learning influences species assortative mating preferences in Lake Victoria cichlid fish. Biol Letters 3:134–136
Wacker S, Mobley K, Forsgren E, Myhre LC, de Jong K, Amundsen T (2013) Operational sex ratio but not density affects sexual selection in a fish. Evolution 67:1937–1949
Walling CA, Royle NJ, Lindstrom J, Metcalfe NB (2008) Experience-induced preference for short-sworded males in the green swordtail, Xiphophorous helleri. Anim Behav 76:271–276
Westerman EL, Hodgins-Davis A, Dinwiddie A, Monteiro (2012) Biased learning affects mate choice in a butterfly. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 109:10948–10953
Westerman EL, Chirathivat N, Schyling E, Monteiro A (2014) Mate preferences for a phenotypically plastic trait is learned, and may facilitate preference-phenotype matching. Evolution 68:1661–1670
Witte K, Sawka N (2003) Sexual imprinting on a novel trait in the dimorphic zebra finch: sexes differ. Anim Behav 65:195–203
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the undergraduate and graduate students in the Uetz lab for various assistance with animal care and lab maintenance.
Funding
Funding was provided by NSF Award IOS-1026995 (to GWU) and a University of Cincinnati, Biological Sciences Department Wieman-Wendell-Benedict grant (to BS).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by E. M. Jakob
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The research was conducted as part of the requirements for the Ph.D. in Biological Sciences from the University of Cincinnati and portions of this manuscript were included in the Ph.D. dissertation.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Stoffer, B., Uetz, G.W. Juvenile vibratory experience affects adult mate preferences in a wolf spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 77, 42 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-023-03312-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-023-03312-y