Skip to main content
Log in

Male condition and group heterogeneity predict extra-group paternity in a Neotropical bat

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extra-group paternity, in which offspring are sired by a male outside the breeding group, may alter the distribution of reproductive success in a population, thus affecting the opportunity for sexual selection. Both inter- and intraspecific studies have focused largely on mating systems in which females choose their social mates, and less is known about extra-group paternity in polygynous systems in which social mates are largely dictated by male-male competition. In this study, we examine the frequency and distribution of extra-group paternity in a harem-forming bat, Phyllostomus hastatus. We find that despite aggressive harem defense, males are unable to fully monopolize reproduction within their harem and over 70% of harems contain extra-group offspring. Harem males in better body condition suffered less paternity loss, but we found no effect of male age or body size. Even though the age and size of individual females did not predict offspring paternity, we found a significant effect of age heterogeneity within the group. Harems composed of differently aged females were more likely to contain extra-group offspring. Our results not only provide evidence for the role of male defense in preventing extra-group paternity but also suggest that social group composition has consequences for male reproductive success.

Significance statement

In polygynous societies, the ability to monopolize mating is critical to reproductive success. As the group size increases, defense often becomes more difficult, resulting in increased rates of extra-group paternity. We find that among greater spear-nosed bats, extra-group offspring occur in most harems, but the overall rate of extra-group paternity is relatively low despite their large harems (15–30 females). Variation in the rate of extra-group paternity between harems is explained by male body condition (i.e., relative mass) but not harem size. Additionally, the rate of extra-group paternity is not explained entirely by male attributes, as we find that age heterogeneity within the female group is a significant predictor of the extra-group paternity rate. Our results support the hypothesis that not only the physical condition of a male influences his ability to monopolize reproduction but also the group composition influences the female mating behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Adams DM, Li Y, Wilkinson GS (2018) Male scent gland signals mating status in greater spear-nosed bats, Phyllostomus hastatus. J Chem Ecol 44:975–986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adams DM, Nicolay C, Wilkinson GS (2020) Patterns of sexual dimorphism and mating systems. In: Fleming TH, Davalos L, Mello M (eds) Phyllostomid bats: a unique mammalian radiation. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Kirkpatrick M (2005) The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females. Am Nat 165:S26–S37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barton K (2017). MuMIn: Multi-model inference (R package Version 1.40.0), https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn

  • Birkhead TR (1978) Behavioural adaptations to high density nesting in the common guillemot Uria aalge. Anim Behav 26:321–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1991) Frequent copulations and mate guarding as alternative paternity guards in birds: a comparative study. Behaviour 118:170–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn KM, Moss CF, Wilkinson GS (2009) Pup guarding by greater spear-nosed bats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1693–1703

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose APH, Henshaw JM, Zimmermann H, Fritzsche K, Sefc KM (2019) Inclusive fitness benefits mitigate costs of cuckoldry to socially paired males. BMC Biol 17:2

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW (1977) Lek mating behavior in the hammer-headed bat. Z Tierpsychol 5:225–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer L, Barr I, van de Pol M, Burke T, Komdeur J, Richardson DS (2010) MHC-dependent survival in a wild population: evidence for hidden genetic benefits gained through extra-pair fertilizations. Mol Ecol 19:3444–3455

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet-Rossinni AK, Wilkinson GS (2009) Methods for age estimation and the study of senescence in bats. In: Kunz TH, Parsons S (eds) Ecological and Behavioral Methods for the Study of Bats. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 315–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Isvaran K (2007) Sex differences in ageing in natural populations of vertebrates. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:3097–3104

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1995) Sexual coercion in animal societies. Anim Behav 49:1345–1365

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohas A, Yoccoz NG, Allaine D (2007) Extra-pair paternity in alpine marmots, Marmota marmota: genetic quality and genetic diversity effects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1081–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechmann DKN, Kalko EKV, König B, Kerth G (2005) Mating system of a neotropical roost-making bat: the white-throated, round-eared bat, Lophostoma silvicolum (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:316–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabiani A, Galimberti F, Sanvito S, Hoelzel AR (2004) Extreme polygyny among southern elephant seals on Sea Lion Island, Falkland Islands. Behav Ecol 15:961–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree ED, Dickinson JL (2011) Natural extrapair paternity matches receptivity patterns in unguarded females: evidence for importance of female choice. Anim Behav 82:1167–1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol Ecol 11:2195–2212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harts AM, Booksmythe I, Jennions MD (2016) Mate guarding and frequent copulation in birds: a meta-analysis of their relationship to paternity and male phenotype. Evolution 70:2789–2808

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselquist D, Bensch S (1991) Trade-off between mate guarding and mate attraction the polygynous great reed warbler. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:187–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselquist D, Sherman PW (2001) Social mating systems and extrapair fertilizations in passerine birds. Behav Ecol 12:457–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasson O, Stone L (2009) Male infertility, female fertility and extrapair copulations. Biol Rev 84:225–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heckel G, Voigt CC, Mayer F, von Helversen O (1999) Extra-harem paternity in the white-lined bat Saccopteryx bilineata (Emballonuridae). Behaviour 136:1173–1185

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckel G, von Helversen O (2003) Genetic mating system and the significance of harem associations in the bat Saccopteryx bilineata. Mol Ecol 12:219–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoelzel AR, Le Boeuf BJ, Reiter J, Campagna C (1999) Alpha-male paternity in elephant seals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:298–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Isvaran K, Clutton-Brock T (2007) Ecological correlates of extra-group paternity in mammals. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Isvaran K, Sankaran S (2017) Do extra-group fertilizations increase the potential for sexual selection in male mammals? Biol Lett 13:20170313

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • James CJW (1977) Studies of reproduction in the female neotropical bat Phyllostomus hastatus hastatus (Pallas) with observations of general biology and ecology in Trinidad, W.I. PhD dissertation, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2008) GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Morrell LJ (2005) Mate guarding, male attractiveness, and paternity under social monogamy. Behav Ecol 16:724–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz TH, August PV, Burnett CD (1983) Harem social organization in cave roosting Artibeus jamaicensis (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Biotropica 15:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz TH, Robson SK, Nagy KA (1998) Economy of harem maintenance in the greater spear-nosed bat, Phyllostomus hastatus. J Mammal 79:631–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Leboeuf BJ, Mesnick S (1991) Sexual behavior of male northern elephant seals: 1. Lethal injuries to adult females. Behaviour 116:143–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemons PR, Marshall TC, McCloskey SE, Sethi SA, Schmutz JA, Sedinger JS (2015) A likelihood-based approach for assessment of extra-pair paternity and conspecific brood parasitism in natural populations. Mol Ecol Resour 15:107–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lukas D, Clutton-Brock T (2014) Costs of mating competition limit male lifetime breeding success in polygynous mammals. Proc R Soc B 281:20140418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado-Chaparro AA, Montiglio PO, Forstmeier W, Kempenaers B, Farine DR (2018) Linking the fine-scale social environment to mating decisions: a future direction for the study of extra-pair paternity. Biol Rev 93:1558–1577

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mays HL, Hill GE (2004) Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends Ecol Evol 19:554–559

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken GF, Bradbury JW (1977) Paternity and genetic heterogeneity in the polygynous bat, Phyllostomus hastatus. Science 198:303–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken GF, Bradbury JW (1981) Social organization and kinship in the polygynous bat Phyllostomus hastatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:11–34

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken GF, Wilkinson GS (2000) Bat mating systems. In: Crichton EG, Krutzsch PH (eds) Reproductive Biology of Bats. Academic Press, London, pp 321–362

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney F, Derrickson SR, Mineau P (1983) Forced copulation in waterfowl. Behaviour 86:250–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer CFJ, Kalko EK, Kerth G (2009) Small-scale fragmentation effects on local genetic diversity in two phyllostomid bats with different dispersal abilities in Panama. Biotropica 41:95–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Michálková R, Tomášek O, Adámková M, Kreisinger J, Albrecht T (2019) Extra-pair paternity patterns in European barn swallows Hirundo rustica are best explained by male and female age rather than male ornamentation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73:119

    Google Scholar 

  • Minias P, Wojczulanis-Jakubas K, Rutkowski R, Kaczmarek K, Janiszewski T (2016) Spatial patterns of extra-pair paternity in a waterbird colony: separating the effects of nesting density and nest site location. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:369–376

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Murray KL, Fleming TH (2008) Social structure and mating system of the buffy flower bat, Erophylla sezekorni (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae). J Mammal 89:1391–1400

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega J, Arita HT (2002) Subordinate males in harem groups of Jamaican fruit-eating bats (Artibeus jamaicensis): Satellites or sneaks? Ethology 108:1077–1091

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega J, Guerrero JA, Maldonado JE (2008) Aggression and tolerance by dominant males of Artibeus jamaicensis: strategies to maximize fitness in harem groups. J Mammal 89:1372–1378

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega J, Maldonado JE, Wilkinson GS, Arita HT, Fleischer RC (2003) Male dominance, paternity, and relatedness in the Jamaican fruit-eating bat (Artibeus jamaicensis). Mol Ecol 12:2409–2415

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1990) Sperm competition games: sneaks and extra-pair copulations. Proc R Soc Lond B 242:127–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Ball MA (2005) Sperm competition, mating rate and the evolution of testis and ejaculate sizes: a population model. Biol Lett 1:235–238

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall RSPE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research - an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M, Kempenaers B (1998) Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends Ecol Evol 13:52–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pew J, Wang J, Muir P, Frasier T (2014) related: related: an R package for analyzing pairwise relatedness data based on codominant molecular markers (R package version 0.8), https://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/related/

  • Porter TA, Wilkinson GS (2001) Birth synchrony in greater spear-nosed bats (Phyllostomus hastatus). J Zool 253:383–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Promislow DEL (1992) Costs of sexual selection in natural populations of mammals. Proc R Soc Lond B 247:203–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Racey PA, Entwistle AC (2000) Life-history and reproductive strategies of bats. In: Crichton EG, Krutzsch PH (eds) Reproductive biology of bats. Academic Press, London, pp 636–414

    Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Richardson DS, Komdeur J, Burke T, von Schantz T (2005) MHC-based patterns of social and extra-pair mate choice in the Seychelles warbler. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:759–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid JM, Sardell RJ (2012) Indirect selection on female extra-pair reproduction? Comparing the additive genetic value of maternal half-sib extra-pair and within-pair offspring. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:1700–1708

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S-J, Nikitopoulos E, Cords M (2014) Factors affecting low resident male siring success in one-male groups of blue monkeys. Behav Ecol 25:852–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter SJ, Ransome RD, Faulkes CG, Dawson DA, Jones G (2006) Long-term paternity skew and the opportunity for selection in a mammal with reversed sexual size dimorphism. Mol Ecol 15:3035–3043

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F (2008) genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlicht L, Valcu M, Kempenaers B (2015) Spatial patterns of extra-pair paternity: beyond paternity gains and losses. J Anim Ecol 84:518–531

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating systems and strategies. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikes RS (2016) 2016 Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education. J Mammal 97:663–688

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smuts BB, Smuts RW (1993) Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Adv Stud Behav 22:1–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern AA, Kunz TH (1998) Intraspecific variation in postnatal growth in the greater spear-nosed bat. J Mammal 79:755–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern AA, Kunz TH, Bhatt SS (1997) Seasonal wing loading and the ontogeny of flight in Phyllostomus hastatus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). J Mammal 78:1199–1209

    Google Scholar 

  • Storz JF, Bhat HR, Kunz TH (2001) Genetic consequences of polygyny and social structure in an Indian fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx. II. Variance in male mating success and effective population size. Evolution 55:1224–1232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend AK, Clark AB, McGowan KJ (2010) Direct benefits and genetic costs of extrapair paternity for female American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos). Am Nat 175:E1–E9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man. Aldline, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Uller T, Olsson M (2008) Multiple paternity in reptiles: patterns and processes. Mol Ecol 17:2566–2580

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt CC, Heckel G, Mayer F (2005) Sexual selection favours small and symmetric males in the polygynous greater sac-winged bat Saccopteryx bilineata (Emballonuridae, Chiroptera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:457–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ, Arnold SJ (1980) The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behavior, female choice, and sperm precedence. Anim Behav 28:446–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ, Shuster SM (2004) Sexual selection: harem size and the variance in male reproductive success. Am Nat 164:E83–E89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ward HL, Ransome RD, Jones G, Rossiter SJ (2014) Determinants and patterns of reproductive success in the greater horseshoe bat during a population recovery. PLoS ONE 9:e87199

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Mays HL Jr (2005) Tests of spatial and temporal factors influencing extra-pair paternity in red-winged blackbirds. Mol Ecol 14:2155–2167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Sherman PW (1997) Density and extra-pair fertilizations in birds: a comparative analysis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Stewart IRK (2003) Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 34:365–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson GS, Boughman JW (1998) Social calls coordinate foraging in greater spear-nosed bats. Anim Behav 55:337–350

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson GS, Carter GG, Bohn KM, Adams DM (2016) Non-kin cooperation in bats. Phil Trans R Soc B 371:20150095

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson GS, Chapman AM (1991) Length and sequence variation in evening bat D-loop mtDNA. Genetics 128:607–617

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson GS, Mayer F, Kerth G, Petri B (1997) Evolution of repeated sequence arrays in the D-loop region of bat mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 146:1035–1048

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong BBM, Candolin U (2005) How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biol Rev 80:559–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Wildlife Section of the Forestry Division of Trinidad and Tobago for their permission and cooperation during field observations and sample collection. Additionally, we thank Anika Ross, Beatrice Mao, Gerald Carter, and Sally Yanuzzi for their assistance in the field, and Julia Clark for her assistance in the lab. We thank Kim Paczolt and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript. We are grateful for the funding provided by the American Society of Mammalogists, the Animal Behavior Society, the Society for the Study of Evolution, and the Cosmos Foundation.

Funding

This work was funded by grants awarded to DMA from the American Society of Mammalogists, the Animal Behavior Society, the Society for the Study of Evolution, and the Cosmos Foundation and grants from the NSF to GSW.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle M. Adams.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards set forth by the American Society of Mammalogists (Sikes 2016) and were approved by the University of Maryland Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol # R-11-21). Permission to work with wild populations was granted by the Forestry Division of Trinidad and Tobago.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Knoernschild

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 48 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adams, D.M., Wilkinson, G.S. Male condition and group heterogeneity predict extra-group paternity in a Neotropical bat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74, 136 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02919-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02919-9

Keywords

Navigation