Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does increased diameter of metal femoral head associated with highly cross-linked polyethylene augment stress on the femoral stem and cortical hypertrophy?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cortical hypertrophy (CH) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is thought as a process of femoral cortical functional adaptation against the stem. However, no study has been performed to investigate the association between CH and femoral head size. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors related to femoral CH around the cementless stem after THA.

Methods

THAs in 31 patients using 36-mm metal head and as a control, age-matched 62 THAs with 32-mm metal head have been analyzed. Radiographs were reviewed at four years to determine cortical thickness change from immediate post-operative one. Pre-operative and immediate post-operative radiographs were used to calculate the femoral morphology, canal fill ratio, stem alignment, and femoral and acetabular offset. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for CH.

Results

Patients with a 36-mm metal head had a significantly higher rate of severe CH (P = 0.001) than those with a 32-mm metal head. The multivariate logistic regression analysis with dependent variables of CH showed that the use of a 36-mm metal head had a significantly positive effect on CH. The odds ratio of a 36-mm metal head in mild CH was 2.517 (95% confidence interval, 1.032–6.143; P = 0.043), and that in severe CH was 8.273 (95% confidence interval, 2.679–25.551; P = 0.000). Age and the canal flare index were weakly and negatively influenced by mild CH.

Conclusions

The use of a 36-mm metal head was the dominant risk factor for CH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data available within the article or its supplementary materials.

References

  1. American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) (2012) 2019 Annual Report. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), Rosemont

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) (2019) 2019 Annual Report. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), Rosemont

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sariali E, Lazennec JY, Khiami F, Catonné Y (2009) Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter. Acta Orthop 80(3):277–282. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453670902988378

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD (2007) Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(8):1832–1842. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.F.01313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zijlstra WP, De Hartog B, Van Steenbergen LN, Scheurs BW, Nelissen R (2017) Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 88(4):395–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1317515

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsikandylakis G, Kärrholm J, Hailer NP, Eskelinen A, Mäkelä KT, Hallan G, Furnes ON, Pedersen AB, Overgaard S, Mohaddes M (2018) No increase in survival for 36-mm versus 32-mm femoral heads in metal-on-polyethylene THA: a registry study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476(12):2367–2378. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000000508

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Chess DG, Charron KD (2009) Wear rate of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(4):773–782. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.00244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Engh CA, Bobyn JD (1988) The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 231:7–28

    Google Scholar 

  9. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257:107–128

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ritter MA, Fechtman RW (1988) Distal cortical hypertrophy following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 3(2):117–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(88)80076-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dayton MR, Incavo SJ (2005) Component loosening in total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplast 16(2):161–170. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2005.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishii S, Homma Y, Baba T, Ozaki Y, Matsumoto M, Kaneko K (2016) Does the canal fill ratio and femoral morphology of Asian females influence early radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented proximally coated, tapered-wedge stem? J Arthroplast 31(7):1524–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho YJ, Chun YS, Rhyu KH, Baek JH, Liang H (2016) Distal femoral cortical hypertrophy after hip arthroplasty using a cementless double tapered femoral stem. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 24(3):317–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1602400309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolff J (1986) The law of bone remodelling. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Yeung Y, Chiu KY, Yau WP, Tang WM, Cheung WY, Ng TP (2006) Assessment of the proximal femoral morphology using plain radiograph-can it predict the bone quality? J Arthroplast 21(4):508–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hallgren KA (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 8(1):23–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Scholl L, Longaray J, Raja L, Lee R, Faizan A, Herrera L, Thakore M, Nevelos J (2016) Friction in modern total hip arthroplasty bearings: effect of material, design, and test methodology. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 230(1):50–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411915619452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burroughs BR, Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, Wannomae KK, Christensen S, Lozynsky AJ, Harris WH (2006) In vitro comparison of frictional torque and torsional resistance of aged conventional gamma-in-nitrogen sterilized polyethylene versus aged highly crosslinked polyethylene articulating against head sizes larger than 32 mm. Acta Orthop 77(5):710–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610012881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sumner DR, Galante JO (1992) Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:202–212

    Google Scholar 

  20. Innmann MM, Weishorn J, Bruckner T, Streit MR, Walker T, Gotterbarm T, Merle C, Maier MW (2019) Fifty-six percent of proximal femoral cortical hypertrophies 6 to 10 years after Total hip arthroplasty with a short Cementless curved hip stem - a cause for concern? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20(1):261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2645-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Slullitel PA, Oñativia JI, Llano L, Comba F, Zanotti G, Piccaluga F, Buttaro MA (2018) Periprosthetic stress fracture around a well-fixed type 2B short uncemented stem. Sicot j 4:33. https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2018031

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Orler R, Ganz R (1999) Lateral insufficiency fractures of the femur caused by osteopenia and varus angulation: a complication of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 14(8):982–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90014-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Howie DW, Holubowycz OT, Middleton R (2012) Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(12):1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.K.00570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, O'Connor D, Perinchief RS, Estok DM 2nd, Jasty M, Harris WH (2001) Larger diameter femoral heads used in conjunction with a highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: a new concept. J Arthroplast 16(8 Suppl 1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2001.28376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hernández-Vaquero D, Suárez-Vazquez A, Fernandez-Lombardia J (2008) Charnley low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. Five to 25 years survivorship in a general hospital. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Meneghini RM, Lovro LR, Wallace JM, Ziemba-Davis M (2016) Large metal heads and vitamin E polyethylene increase frictional torque in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 31(3):710–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heiner AD, Lundberg HJ, Baer TE, Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD (2008) Effects of episodic subluxation events on third body ingress and embedment in the THA bearing surface. J Biomech 41(10):2090–2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kocagoz SB, Underwood RJ, MacDonald DW, Gilbert JL, Kurtz SM (2016) Ceramic heads decrease metal release caused by head-taper fretting and corrosion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(4):985–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4683-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SI conceived the concept of this study. YH and SI designed the study. SI and YS obtained the data. SI wrote the initial draft. YH reviewed and edited the draft. SI and YH performed the statistical analysis. TB, KK, MI, and YH ensured the accuracy of the data and analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuhiro Homma.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Inst. Ethical Review Board.

Consent to participate

All authors have participated in the research.

Consent for publication

All authors of this paper have read and approved the final version submitted.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishii, S., Homma, Y., Baba, T. et al. Does increased diameter of metal femoral head associated with highly cross-linked polyethylene augment stress on the femoral stem and cortical hypertrophy?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 45, 1169–1177 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04994-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04994-7

Keywords

Navigation