Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of patient characteristics and stem alignment on distal femoral cortical hypertrophy after cemented polished tapered stem implantation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of over 10 years of total hip arthroplasty (THA) practice with ExeterTM stems and the clinical relevance of distal femoral cortical hypertrophy (DFCH).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 127 hips (120 patients) that had undergone THA with ExeterTM stems between 2004 and 2007. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses for the stem of all 127 hips were performed using different endpoints. Of 127 hips, 100 (94 patients) had complete 10-year follow-up data, including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ) as the patient-reported outcomes, and the clinical relevance of DFCH was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

The survival of the stem with the endpoint of re-operation for loosening, > 5-mm subsidence, and re-operation for any reason were 100%, 99.1% (95% CI 97.5–100%), and 98.3% (95% CI 96.0–100%), respectively. Of 100 hips followed completely for 10 years, DFCH occurred in 20 hips (20%). The satisfaction and pain visual analog scale of JHEQ revealed high satisfaction and less pain in patients with DFCH. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, body weight > 55 kg (odds ratio: 2.88, p = 0.035) and varus stem alignment (odds ratio: 6.56, p = 0.003) were found to be predictors for DFCH.

Conclusions

The incidence of DFCH with the ExeterTM stem was 20%. A body weight > 55 kg and varus stem alignment are predictors for future DFCH. DFCH with the ExeterTM stem indicates a good outcome with less hip pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fujita H, Katayama N, Iwase T, Otsuka H (2012) Multi-center study of use of the Exeter stem in Japan: evaluation of 1000 primary THA. J Orthop Sci 17:370–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Petheram TG, Whitehouse SL, Kazi HA, Hubble MJ, Timperley AJ, Wilson MJ, Howell JR (2016) The Exeter universal cemented femoral stem at 20 to 25 years: a report of 382 hips. Bone Joint J 98-B(11):1441–1449

  3. Westerman RW, Whitehouse SL, Hubble MJW, Timperley AJ, Howell JR, Wilson MJ (2018) The Exeter V40 cemented femoral component at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Bone Joint J 100-B(8):1002–1009

  4. Shen G (1998) Femoral stem fixation. An engineering interpretation of the long-term outcome of Charnley and Exeter stems. J Bone Jt Surg Br 80(5): 754–756

  5. Junnila M, Laaksonen I, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Ivar Havelin L, Furnes O, Marie Fenstad A, Pedersen AB, Overgaard S, Kärrholm J, Garellick G, Malchau H, Mäkelä KT (2016) Implant survival of the most common cemented total hip devices from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database. Acta Orthop 87(6):546–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. The NJR editorial board. 15th Annual report 2018. National joint registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. Surgical data to 31 December 2017. https://www.njrreports.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2015th%20Annual%20Report%202018.pdf. Accessed 2 Apr 2019

  7. Iwase T, Morita D, Takemoto G, Fujita H, Katayama N, Otsuka H (2019) Peri-prosthetic bone remodeling and change in bone mineral density in the femur after cemented polished tapered stem implantation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(5):1061–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwase T, Morita D, Ito T, Takemoto G, Makida K (2016) Favorable results of primary total hip arthroplasty with acetabular impaction bone grafting for large segmental bone defects in dysplastic hips. J Arthroplasty 31(10):2221–2226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D'Aubigné RM, PosteL M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36-A(3):451–475

  10. Matsumoto T, Kaneuji A, Hiejima Y, Sugiyama H, Akiyama H, Atsumi T et al (2012) Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ): a patient-based evaluation tool for hip-joint disease. The Subcommittee on Hip Disease Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci 17(1):25–38

  11. Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH (1992) Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Jt Surg Br 74(3):385–389

  12. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fowler JL, Gie GA, Lee AJC, Ling RSM (1988) Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin N Am 19(3):477–489

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris WH, McCarthy JC Jr, O’Neill DA (1982) Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 64(7):1063–1067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Jt Surg Am 55(8):1629–1632

  16. Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53(282):457–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Noble PC, Box GG, Kamaric E, Fink MJ, Alexander JW, Tullos HS (1995) The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 316:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14(3):231–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transpl 48(3):452–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morishima T, Ginsel BL, Choy GG, Wilson LJ, Whitehouse SL, Crawford RW (2014) Periprosthetic fracture torque for short versus standard cemented hip stems: an experimental in vitro study. J Arthroplasty 29(5):1067–1671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Choy GG, Roe JA, Whitehouse SL, Cashman KS, Crawford RW (2013) Exeter short stems compared Joint Replacement Registry. J Arthroplasty 28(1):103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rivière C, Grappiolo G, Engh CA Jr, Vidalain J, Chen AF, Boehler N, Matta J, Vendittoli PA (2018) Long-term bone remodelling around 'legendary' cementless femoral stems. EFORT Open Rev 3(2):45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Teusink MJ, Callaghan KA, Klocke NF, Goetz DD, Callaghan JJ (2013) Femoral remodeling around Charnley total hip arthroplasty is unpredictable. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3838–3846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Katsimihas M, Katsimihas G, Lee MB, Learmonth ID (2006) Distal femoral cortical hypertrophy: predisposing factors and their effect on clinical outcome. Hip Int 16(1):18–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hallam P1, Haddad F, Cobb J (2004) Pain in the well-fixed, aseptic titanium hip replacement. The role of corrosion. J Bone Jt Surg Br 86(1):27–30

  26. Goto K, Furuya Y, Oda K, Minami R, Sano K, Sugimoto M, Matsuda S (2018) Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty using Charnley Elite-Plus stem and the effect of stem 381 geometry on radiographic distal femoral cortical hypertrophy. J Orthop Sci 23(2):365–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Daniel M, Antolič V, Iglič A, Kralj-Iglič V (2001) Determination of contact hip stress from nomograms based on mathematical model. Med Eng Phys 23(5):347–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jung M, Kim CS (2014) Analysis of stress distribution around total hip stems custom-designed for the standardized Asian femur configuration. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 28(3):525–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mavčič B, Pompe B, Antolič V, Daniel M, Iglič A, Kralj-Iglič V (2002) Mathematical estimation of stress distribution in normal and dysplastic human hips. J Orthop Res 20(5):1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaneuji A, Yamada K, Hirosaki K, Takano M, Matsumoto T (2009) Stem subsidence of polished and rough double-taper stems: in vitro mechanical effects on the cement–bone interface. Acta Orthop 80(3):270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiki Iwase.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. This study was conducted following approval by the Institutional Review Board of the authors’ institution (Approval No. H29-28).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iwase, T., Morita, D. & Takemoto, G. The effects of patient characteristics and stem alignment on distal femoral cortical hypertrophy after cemented polished tapered stem implantation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 30, 559–567 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02605-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02605-1

Keywords

Navigation