Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Factors that influence neurological deficit and recovery in lumbar disc prolapse—a narrative review

  • Review
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neurodeficit due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a serious complication and can range from sensory hypoesthesia in a single dermatome to a debilitating condition like cauda equina syndrome (CES). Many authors have described variable clinical and radiological risk factors for neurodeficit in LDH. Similarly the prognostic factors influencing recovery have been variable across the studies. This narrative review discusses the pathogenesis, most consistent factors associated with the occurrence of neurodeficit in LDH patients and also the factors which have a prognostic role in recovery. Pathological mechanisms like venous congestion, neuronal ischaemia and multiple root impairment act either individually or in combination to result in neurodeficit in LDH patients. Among the clinical risk factors, diabetes mellitus and acute onset of symptoms have been associated with neurodeficit while pre-existing spinal canal stenosis, non-contained discs (sequestrated/migrated) are potential radiological risk factors for developing neurodeficit. When considering prognostic factors for recovery, pre-operative muscle strength is the only significant factor. Knowledge about the causative and prognostic factors in neurodeficit following LDH would help in the successful management of this condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, Buchbinder R (2010) The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. Elsevier Ltd 24(6):769–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rhee JM, Schaufele M, Abdu W (2006) Radiculopathy and the herniated lumbar disc. J Bone Jt Surg 88–A(9):2069–2080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hakleius A (1970) Prognosis in sciatica. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 129:1–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibson JN, Waddell G (2007) Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; Spine 32(16):1735–1747

    Google Scholar 

  5. Radcliff K, Cook C (2016) Surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation: open discectomy (indications, technique, outcomes, and complications). Semin Spine Surg 28(1):14–19 WB Saunders

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rasouli MR, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Shokraneh F, Moradi-Lakeh M, Chou R (2014) Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Cochrane Libr. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010328

  7. Clark AJ, Safaee MM, Khan NR, Brown MT, Foley KT (2017) Tubular microdiscectomy: techniques, complication avoidance, and review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 43(2):E7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Du J, Tang X, Jing X, Li N, Wang Y, Zhang X (2016) Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a translaminar approach, especially for soft, highly down-migrated lumbar disc herniation. Int Orthop 40(6):1247–1252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayer HM, Brock M (1993) Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). Neurosurg Rev 16(2):115–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nie HY, Qi YB, Li N, Wang SL, Cao YX (2018) Comprehensive comparison of therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency target disc decompression and nucleoplasty for lumbar disc herniation: a five year follow-up. Int Orthop 42(4):843–849

  11. Henriques T, Olerud C, Petrén-mallmin M (2001) Cauda equina syndrome as a postoperative complication in five patients operated for lumbar disc herniation. Spine 26(3):293–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalemci O, Kizmazoglu C, Ozer E, Arda MN (2013) Lumbar disc herniation associated with contralateral neurological deficit: can venous congestion be the cause? Asian Spine J 7(1):60–62

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hida S, Naito M, Kubo M (2003) Intraoperative measurements of nerve root blood flow during discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(1):85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Iizuka Y, Iizuka H, Tsutsumi S, Nakagawa Y, Nakajima T, Sorimachi Y et al (2009) Foot drop due to lumbar degenerative conditions: mechanism and prognostic factors in herniated nucleus pulposus and lumbar spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg Spine 10(3):260–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Olmarker K, Rydevik B (1992) Single-versus double-level nerve root compression. An experimental study on the porcine cauda equina with analyses of nerve impulse conduction properties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 279:35–39

  16. Arinzon Z, Adunsky A, Fidelman Z, Gepstein R (2004) Outcomes of decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly diabetic patients. Eur Spine J 13(1):32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Krishnan V, Rajasekaran S, Aiyer SN, Kanna R, Shetty AP (2017) Clinical and radiological factors related to the presence of motor deficit in lumbar disc prolapse: a prospective analysis of 70 consecutive cases with neurological deficit. Eur Spine J 26(10):2642–2649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma J, He Y, Wang A, Wang W, Xi Y, Yu J et al (2018) Risk factors analysis for foot drop associated with lumbar disc herniation: an analysis of 236 patients. World Neurosurg. Elsevier Inc 110:e1017–e1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahlin LB, Shyu BC, Danielsen N, Anderson SA (1989) Effects of nerve compression or ischaemia on conduction properties of myelinated and nonmyelinated nerve fibres. An experimental study in the rabbit common peroneal nerve. Acta Physiol Scand 136(1):97–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Olmarker K (1991) Spinal nerve root compression. Nutrition and function of the porcine cauda equina compressed in vivo. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 242:1–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Suzuki A, Matsumura A, Konishi S (2011) Risk factor analysis for motor deficit and delayed recovery associated with L4/5 lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech 24(1):1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dora C, Wälchli B, Elfering A, Gal I, Weishaupt D, Boos N (2002) The significance of spinal canal dimensions in discriminating symptomatic from asymptomatic disc herniations. Eur Spine J 11(6):575–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lurie JD, Faucett SC, Hanscom B, Tosteson TD, Ball PA, Abdu WA et al (2008) Lumbar discectomy outcomes vary by herniation level in the spine patient outcomes research trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90(9):1811–1819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Y, Fredrickson V, Resnick DK (2015) How should we grade lumbar disc herniation and nerve root compression? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Springer US 473(6):1896–1902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jönsson B, Strömqvist B (1996) Clinical appearance of contained and noncontained lumbar disc herniation. J Spinal Disord 9(1):32–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Postacchini F, Giannicola G, Cinotti G (2002) Recovery of motor deficits after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 84(7):1040–1045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Epstein NE (2002) Foraminal and far lateral lumbar disc herniations: Surgical alternatives and outcome measures. Spinal Cord 40(10):491–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Epstein NE (1995) Evaluation of varied surgical approaches used in the management of 170 far-lateral lumbar disc herniations: indications and results. J Neurosurg 83(4):648–656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. An HS, Vaccaro A, Simeone FA, Balderston RA, O’Neill D (1990) Herniated lumbar disc in patients over the age of fifty. J Spinal Disord 3(2):143–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Weber H (1975) The effect of delayed disc surgery on muscular paresis. Acta Orthop 46(4):631–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Weber H (1973) Traction therapy in sciatica due to disc prolapse (does traction treatment have any positive effect on patients suffering from sciatica caused by disc prolapse?). J Oslo City Hosp 23(10):167–176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dubourg G, Rozenberg S, Fautrel B, Valls-Bellec I, Bissery A, Lang T et al (2002) A pilot study on the recovery from paresis after lumbar disc herniationx. J Spinal Disord 3(2):143–146 discussion 1431

    Google Scholar 

  33. Buttermann GR (2004) Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: epidural steroid injection compared with discectomy. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86–A(4):670–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ghahreman A, Ferch RD, Rao P, Chandran N, Shadbolt B (2009) Recovery of ankle dorsiflexion weakness following lumbar decompressive surgery. J Clin Neurosci. Elsevier Ltd 16(8):1024–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Eysel P, Rompe JD, Hopf C (1994) Prognostic criteria of discogenic paresis. Eur Spine J 3(4):214–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Aono H, Iwasaki M, Ohwada T, Okuda S, Hosono N, Fuji T et al (2007) Surgical outcome of drop foot caused by degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(8):262–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bhargava D, Sinha P, Odak S, Tyagi A, Towns G, Pal D (2012) Surgical outcome for foot drop in lumbar degenerative disease. Glob Spine J 02(03):125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Huang RC, Parvataneni HK, Tsairis P (2002) Improvement of preoperative foot drop after lumbar surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 15(6):490–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lønne G, Solberg TK, Sjaavik K, Nygaard ØP (2012) Recovery of muscle strength after microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 21(4):655–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Petr O, Glodny B, Brawanski K, Kerschbaumer J, Freyschlag C, Pinggera D, Rehwald R, Hartmann S, Ortler M, Thomé C (2017) Immediate versus delayed surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation for acute motor deficits: the impact of surgical timing on functional outcome. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002295

  41. Liu K, Zhu W, Shi J, Jia L, Shi G, Wang Y et al (2013) Foot drop caused by lumbar degenerative disease: clinical features, Prognostic Factors of Surgical Outcome and Clinical Stage. PLoS One 8(11):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  42. Korse NS, Kruit MC, Peul WC, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA (2017) Lumbar spinal canal MRI diameter is smaller in herniated disc cauda equina syndrome patients. PLoS One 12(10):e0186148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Olivero WC, Wang H, Hanigan WC, Henderson JP, Tracy PT, Elwood PW et al (2009) Cauda equina syndrome (CES) from lumbar disc herniations. J Spinal Disord Tech 22(3):202–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ahn UM, Ahn NU, Buchowski JM, Garrett ES, Sieber AN, Kostuik JP (2000) Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(12):1515–1522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Srikandarajah N, Boissaud-Cooke MA, Clark S, Wilby MJ (2015) Does early surgical decompression in cauda equina syndrome improve bladder outcome? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(8):580–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bok Jeon J, Hwan Yoon S, Keun Kim D, Kim J-Y, Author C (2016) The factors that affect improvement of neurogenic bladder by severe lumbar disc herniation in operation. Korean J Spine 13(3):124–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Fraser S, Roberts L, Murphy E (2009) Cauda equina syndrome: a literature review of its definition and clinical presentation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90(11):1964–1968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Korse NS, Pijpers JA, van Zwet E, Elzevier HW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA (2017) Cauda equina syndrome: presentation, outcome, and predictors with focus on micturition, defecation, and sexual dysfunction. Eur Spine J 26(3):894–904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Gleave JRW, Macfarlane R (2002) Cauda equina syndrome: what is the relationship between timing of surgery and outcome? Br J Neurosurg 16(4):325–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Todd NV, Dickson RA (2016) Standards of care in cauda equina syndrome. Br J Neurosurg 30(5):518–522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Korse NS, Jacobs WCH, Elzevier HW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLAM (2013) Complaints of micturition, defecation and sexual function in cauda equina syndrome due to lumbar disk herniation: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 22(5):1019–1029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Qureshi A, Sell P (2007) Cauda equina syndrome treated by surgical decompression: The influence of timing on surgical outcome. Eur Spine J 16(12):2143–2151

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. DeLong WB, Polissar N, Neradilek B (2008) Timing of surgery in cauda equina syndrome with urinary retention: meta-analysis of observational studies. J Neurosurg Spine 8(4):305–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics and Spine surgery, Ganga Medical centre & Hospital. Pvt. Ltd, #313, Mettupalayam road, Sai baba Colony, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, 641001, India

    Ankith NV, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran & Sri Vijay Anand KS

  2. Department of spine surgery, Ganga Medical centre & Hospital. Pvt. Ltd, #313, Mettupalayam road, Sai baba Colony, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, 641001, India

    Rishi Mugesh Kanna & Ajoy Prasad Shetty

Authors
  1. Ankith NV
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sri Vijay Anand KS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rishi Mugesh Kanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ajoy Prasad Shetty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

NV, A., Rajasekaran, S., KS, S.V.A. et al. Factors that influence neurological deficit and recovery in lumbar disc prolapse—a narrative review. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 947–955 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4242-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4242-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation