Skip to main content
Log in

Differentiation of benign from malignant solid renal lesions with MRI-based radiomics and machine learning

  • Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder, Retroperitoneum
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Solid renal masses are often indeterminate for benignity versus malignancy on magnetic resonance imaging. Such masses are typically evaluated with either percutaneous biopsy or surgical resection. Percutaneous biopsy can be non-diagnostic and some surgically resected lesions are inadvertently benign.

Purpose

To assess the performance of ten machine learning (ML) algorithms trained with MRI-based radiomics features in distinguishing benign from malignant solid renal masses.

Methods

Patients with solid renal masses identified on pre-intervention MRI were curated from our institutional database. Masses with a definitive diagnosis via imaging (for angiomyolipomas) or via biopsy or surgical resection (for oncocytomas or renal cell carcinomas) were selected. Each mass was segmented for both T2- and post-contrast T1-weighted images. Radiomics features were derived from the segmented masses for each imaging sequence. Ten ML algorithms were trained with the radiomics features gleaned from each MR sequence, as well as the combination of MR sequences.

Results

In total, 182 renal masses in 160 patients were included in the study. The support vector machine algorithm trained on radiomics features from T2-weighted images performed superiorly, with an accuracy of 0.80 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79. Linear discriminant analysis (accuracy = 0.84 and AUC = 0.77) and logistic regression (accuracy = 0.78 and AUC = 0.78) algorithms trained on T2-based radiomics features performed similarly. ML algorithms trained on radiomics features from post-contrast T1-weighted images or the combination of radiomics features from T2- and post-contrast T1-weighted images yielded lower performance.

Conclusion

Machine learning models trained with radiomics features derived from T2-weighted images can provide high accuracy for distinguishing benign from malignant solid renal masses.

Clinical impact

Machine learning models derived from MRI-based radiomics features may improve the clinical management of solid renal masses and have the potential to reduce the frequency with which benign solid renal masses are biopsied or surgically resected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. E. Reuter and J. C. Presti, “Contemporary approach to the classification of renal epithelial tumors.,” Seminars in oncology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 124–37, Apr. 2000.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Collins, J. McKiernan, and J. Landman, “Update on the epidemiology and biology of renal cortical neoplasms.,” Journal of endourology, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 975–85, Dec. 2006, https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.20.975.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. S. K. Kang, W. C. Huang, P. V. Pandharipande, and H. Chandarana, “Solid renal masses: What the numbers tell us,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 202, no. 6, pp. 1196–1206, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.12502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. J. J. Tomaszewski, R. G. Uzzo, and M. C. Smaldone, “Heterogeneity and renal mass biopsy: a review of its role and reliability.,” Cancer biology & medicine, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 162–72, Sep. 2014, https://doi.org/10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. C. Campbell et al., “Guideline for Management of the Clinical T1 Renal Mass,” Journal of Urology, vol. 182, no. 4 SUPPL., pp. 1271–1279, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D. C. Johnson et al., “Preoperatively misclassified, surgically removed benign renal masses: a systematic review of surgical series and United States population level burden estimate.,” The Journal of urology, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 30–5, Jan. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. F. U. Kay et al., “Diagnostic Performance and Interreader Agreement of a Standardized MR Imaging Approach in the Prediction of Small Renal Mass Histology.,” Radiology, vol. 287, no. 2, pp. 543–553, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018171557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. A. D. de Leon, P. Kapur, and I. Pedrosa, “Radiomics in Kidney Cancer: MR Imaging,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2018.08.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Mühlbauer et al., “Radiomics in Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.,” Cancers, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1–15, Mar. 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Bhandari, M. Ibrahim, C. Sharma, R. Liong, S. Gustafson, and M. Prior, “CT-based radiomics for differentiating renal tumours: a systematic review.,” Abdominal radiology (New York), vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 2052–2063, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02832-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Uhlig et al., “Radiomic Features and Machine Learning for the Discrimination of Renal Tumor Histological Subtypes: A Pragmatic Study Using Clinical-Routine Computed Tomography.,” Cancers, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1–14, Oct. 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12103010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Said et al., “Characterization of solid renal neoplasms using MRI-based quantitative radiomics features,” Abdominal Radiology, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 2840–2850, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02540-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. E. R. DeLong, D. M. DeLong, and D. L. Clarke-Pearson, “Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach,” Biometrics, vol. 44, no. 3, 1988, https://doi.org/10.2307/2531595.

  14. R. H. Thompson et al., “Tumor size is associated with malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma cases.,” The Journal of urology, vol. 181, no. 5, pp. 2033–6, May 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.027.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. G. M. Israel, N. Hindman, E. Hecht, and G. Krinsky, “The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas.,” AJR. American journal of roentgenology, vol. 184, no. 6, pp. 1868–72, Jun. 2005, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841868.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. E. A. Lassel, R. Rao, C. Schwenke, S. O. Schoenberg, and H. J. Michaely, “Diffusion-weighted imaging of focal renal lesions: a meta-analysis.,” European radiology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 241–9, Jan. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-3004-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. H. S. Yu et al., “Texture analysis as a radiomic marker for differentiating renal tumors,” Abdominal Radiology, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2470–2478, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1144-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. M. G. Lubner, “Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence for Renal Mass Characterization,” Radiologic Clinics of North America, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 995–1008, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2020.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. U. N. Hoang et al., “Assessment of multiphasic contrast-enhanced mr textures in differentiating small renal mass subtypes,” Abdominal Radiology, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 3400–3409, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1625-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Wang, K. M. Cao, S. M. Jin, X. L. Zhu, J. H. Ding, and W. J. Peng, “Differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes through MRI-based radiomics analysis,” European Radiology, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 5738–5747, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06896-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Goyal et al., “Role of MR texture analysis in histological subtyping and grading of renal cell carcinoma: a preliminary study,” Abdominal Radiology, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3336–3349, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02122-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Razik et al., “MR texture analysis in differentiating renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor angiomyolipoma and oncocytoma.,” The British journal of radiology, vol. 93, no. 1114, p. 20200569, Oct. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200569.

  23. Q. Xu et al., “Differentiating Benign from Malignant Renal Tumors Using T2- and Diffusion-Weighted Images: A Comparison of Deep Learning and Radiomics Models Versus Assessment from Radiologists,” Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, p. jmri.27900, Aug. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27900.

  24. I. L. Xi et al., “Deep learning to distinguish benign from malignant renal lesions based on routine MR imaging,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1944–1952, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. J. E. van Timmeren, D. Cester, S. Tanadini-Lang, H. Alkadhi, and B. Baessler, “Radiomics in medical imaging-"how-to" guide and critical reflection.,” Insights into imaging, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 91, Aug. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00887-2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew L. Wentland.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 43 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Massa’a, R.N., Stoeckl, E.M., Lubner, M.G. et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid renal lesions with MRI-based radiomics and machine learning. Abdom Radiol 47, 2896–2904 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03577-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03577-3

Keywords

Navigation