Skip to main content
Log in

MRI for appendicitis in pregnancy: is seeing believing? clinical outcomes in cases of appendix nonvisualization

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The primary objective of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes in cases of appendix nonvisualization with MRI in pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis and the implications of appendix nonvisualization for excluding appendicitis.

Methods

Fifty-eight pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis evaluated with MRI at three centers from a single institution were retrospectively reviewed by three radiologists with varying levels of abdominal imaging experience. All scans were performed on a 1.5-Tesla Siemens unit. Cases were evaluated for diagnostic quality, visualization of the appendix, presence of appendicitis, and alternate diagnoses. Clinical outcomes were gathered from the electronic medical record.

Results

Of the 58 patients who underwent MRI for suspected appendicitis, 50 cases were considered adequate diagnostic quality by all three radiologists. The rate of appendix visualization among the three radiologists ranged from 60 to 76% (p = 0.44). The appendix was nonvisualized by at least one of the three radiologists in 25 cases (50%). Of these, none had a final diagnosis of appendicitis including one patient who underwent appendectomy. MRI suggested an alternate diagnosis in 6 (24%) patients with appendix nonvisualization. For the three reviewers, the agreement level on whether or not the appendix was visualized on the MRI had a Light’s kappa value of 0.526, indicating a “moderate” level of agreement (p value < 0.01).

Conclusion

Despite only moderate level of interobserver agreement for appendix visualization, appendix nonvisualization on MRI in pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis confers a significant reduction in the risk of appendicitis compared to all comers as long as the study is adequate diagnostic quality and there are no secondary signs of appendicitis present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Chart 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basaran A, Basaran M (2009) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64(7):481–488; quiz 499.

  2. Duke E, Kalb B, Arif-Tiwari H, et al. (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MRI for evaluation of acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 206(3):508–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee KS, Rofsky NM, Pedrosa I (2008) Localization of the appendix at MR imaging during pregnancy: utility of the cecal tilt angle. Radiology. 249(1):134–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pedrosa I, Lafornara M, Pandharipande PV, Goldsmith JD, Rofsky NM (2009) Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology. 250(3):749–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Theilen LH, Mellnick VM, Longman RE, et al. (2015) Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected appendicitis in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212(3):345.e341–346.

  6. Nikolaidis P, Hwang CM, Miller FH, Papanicolaou N (2004) The nonvisualized appendix: incidence of acute appendicitis when secondary inflammatory changes are absent. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 183(4):889–892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganguli S, Raptopoulos V, Komlos F, Siewert B, Kruskal JB (2006) Right lower quadrant pain: value of the nonvisualized appendix in patients at multidetector CT. Radiology. 241(1):175–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shah BR, Stewart J, Jeffrey RB, Jeffery RB, Olcott EW (2014) Value of short-interval computed tomography when sonography fails to visualize the appendix and shows otherwise normal findings. J Ultrasound Med. 33(9):1589–1595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehnert BE, Gross JA, Linnau KF, Moshiri M (2012) Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emerg Radiol. 19(4):293–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kearl YL, Claudius I, Behar S, et al. (2016) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for appendicitis in diagnostic and nondiagnostic studies. Acad Emerg Med. 23(2):179–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nitta N, Takahashi M, Furukawa A, et al. (2005) MR imaging of the normal appendix and acute appendicitis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 21(2):156–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sayf Al-Katib.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Sayf Al-Katib declares that he has no conflict of interest. Farnoosh Sokhandon declares that she has no conflict of interest. Michael Farah declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Katib, S., Sokhandon, F. & Farah, M. MRI for appendicitis in pregnancy: is seeing believing? clinical outcomes in cases of appendix nonvisualization. Abdom Radiol 41, 2455–2459 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0864-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0864-y

Keywords

Navigation