Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to retrospectively evaluate the right lower quadrant ultrasounds in women presenting during the second or third trimester of pregnancy for the frequency of appendix visualization and accuracy in diagnosing appendicitis. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study. We reviewed imaging records from 99 consecutive pregnant women from 2001 to 2011 who presented during the second (≥14 weeks gestation) or third trimester for right lower quadrant ultrasound to evaluate the appendix. Visualization of the appendix as well as the size and compressibility, if identified, were recorded. The medical records and labs related to the initial patient presentation, subsequent management, and follow-up were reviewed for surgical and clinical outcomes. Pathology records were reviewed to determine if appendicitis was present when appendectomy was performed. Patients who underwent appendectomy were considered to have appendicitis based on pathology results, and patients managed non-operatively with symptom improvement and those with a normal appendix at pathology were considered to not have appendicitis. During the study period, 99 women meeting inclusion criteria presented to our institution for right lower quadrant ultrasound to evaluate the appendix during the second or third trimester of pregnancy. The mean gestational age at presentation was 23 weeks (±7 weeks). The mean maternal age was 28 years (±6.6 years). The appendix was not visualized in 97% (96/99) of right lower quadrant ultrasound examinations. Of the three studies in which the appendix was visualized, two were considered positive for appendicitis and one was considered negative. Eight patients in this group ultimately underwent appendectomy, including the two patients with positive right lower quadrant ultrasounds, and appendicitis confirmed at pathology in seven of these cases (87.5%). Right lower quadrant ultrasound successfully demonstrated an abnormal appendix in 28.7% (two of seven) of surgically confirmed cases; however, this technique did not detect appendicitis in 71% (five of seven) of patients with surgically proven disease due to nonvisualization of the appendix. Retrospective review of right lower quadrant ultrasounds performed during the second and third trimester of pregnancy suggests that this modality has limited utility for diagnosing appendicitis due to infrequent visualization of the appendix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kort B, Katz VL, Watson WJ (1993) The effect of nonobstetric operation during pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177:371–376

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kammerer WS (1979) Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy. Med Clin North Am 63:1157–1164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kammerer WS (1987) Nonobstetric surgery in pregnancy. Med Clin North Am 71:551–560

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Andersen B, Nielsen TF (1999) Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78:758–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mourad J, Elliott JP, Erickson L, Lisboa L (2000) Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1027–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stone K (2002) Acute abdominal emergencies associated with pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:553–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bailey LE, Finley RK, Miller SF, Jones LM (1986) Acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Am Surg 52:218–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yilmaz HG, Akgun Y, Bac B, Celik Y (2007) Acute appendicitis in pregnancy—risk factors associated with principal outcomes: a case control study. Int J Surg 5:192–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berry J, Malt RA (1984) Appendicitis near its centenary. Ann Surg 200:567–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJ (1992) Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate. Eur J Surg 158:37–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA et al (1997) Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 21:313–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hale DA, Molloy M, Pearl RH, Schutt DC, Jaques DP (1997) Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal. Ann Surg 225:252–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ (1995) The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study. Ann Surg 221:278–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Balthazar EJ, Rofsky NM, Zucker R (1998) Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Am J Gastroenterol 93:768–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, Jeffrey RB (2002) Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 225:131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McGee TM (1989) Acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 29:378–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, Hiatt JR, Ko CY, Cryer HM (2007) Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg 205:534–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ueberrueck T, Koch A, Meyer L, Hinkel M, Gastinger I (2004) Ninety-four appendectomies for suspected acute appendicitis during pregnancy. World J Surg 28:508–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mazze RI, Källén B (1991) Appendectomy during pregnancy: a Swedish registry study of 778 cases. Obstet Gynecol 77:835–840

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB et al (2010) Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 254:460–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Basaran A, Basaran M (2009) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64:481–488, quiz 499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros RK (2008) Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 112:333–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosen MP, Ding A, Blake MA et al (2011) ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) right lower quadrant pain-suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol 8:749–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Puylaert JB (1986) Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158:355–360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Puylaert JB, Rutgers PH, Lalisang RI et al (1987) A prospective study of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. N Engl J Med 317:666–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C (1994) Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 190:31–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lim HK, Bae SH, Seo GS (1992) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: value of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:539–542

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Israel GM, Malguria N, McCarthy S, Copel J, Weinreb J (2008) MRI vs. ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:428–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Oto A, Srinivasan PN, Ernst RD et al (2006) Revisiting MRI for appendix location during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:883–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Baer JL, Reis RA, Arens RA (1932) Appendicitis in pregnancy with changes in position and axis of the normal appendix in pregnancy. JAMA 98:1359–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Yousef MM, Warnock N, Berbaum KS (1995) Sonography of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Abdom Imaging 20:149–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD, Siewert B, Ngo L, Rofsky NM (2006) MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 238:891–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cobben LP, Groot I, Haans L, Blickman JG, Puylaert J (2004) MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:671–675

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, et al (2009) Levels of evidence. Centre for Evidence-based Medicine, Oxford

  35. Andersson RE, Lambe M (2001) Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol 30:1281–1285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Andersson RE (2007) The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis. World J Surg 31:86–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce E. Lehnert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehnert, B.E., Gross, J.A., Linnau, K.F. et al. Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emerg Radiol 19, 293–299 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1029-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1029-0

Keywords

Navigation