Introduction

Acute loading of bone tissue is thought to stimulate bone formation and is of growing interest clinically and in the study of bone physiology. Abnormal bone physiology is not only a key element in joint disease and osteoporosis, but skeletal fragility is directly related to mortality [1,2,3] and risk of fracture [4]. Studies of bone adaptation to loading have shown that stress on bone cells and strain-mediated fluid flow are crucial in regulating bone metabolism [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, the acute response of loading in bone is still poorly understood and difficult to measure in humans in vivo.

Molecular information from PET has shown promise in early detection of metabolic abnormalities of bone metabolism in osteoarthritis [12, 13], associations to bone pain [12,13,14,15,16], and early indication of bone degradation in diseases such as osteoarthritis [14] and osteoporosis [17]. PET has also been used to demonstrate changes in glucose uptake and blood flow in bone marrow in response to exercise loading [18,19,20]. [18F]-sodium fluoride ([18F]-NaF) is a well-established bone-seeking agent which may serve as a marker to study bone turnover. In particular, kinetic modeling of dynamic [18F]NaF uptake can quantify bone physiology including bone perfusion (K1), bone mineralization (k3), and tracer plasma clearance (Ki). Animal studies [8, 21,22,23,24] have shown both an acute hyperemia [22, 24] and a large increase in [18F]-NaF standard uptake values (SUV) in response to acute loading, which lasts up to 7 days after loading [21, 22, 24]. Furthermore, this response has been positively correlated with the force intensity of the applied load on the bone [21]. The dynamics of [18F]NaF uptake after acute bone loading have not been reported in humans. To date, human studies of bone adaptation to loading have been based on changes in structure and mineral density over periods of weeks and months of high-impact exercise. The aim of this study is to evaluate quantitative measures of [18F]NaF uptake and tracer kinetics to assess the acute physiological vascular and metabolic response of bone to loading in the human knee using PET/MRI.

Methods

Subject population

The study was approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board (Stanford University, Administrative Panels for the Protection of Human Subjects). All subjects were informed about the nature of the study and provided written consent prior to participating. The knee joints of 12 healthy subjects (seven females, five males; age: 34 ± 7 years; body-mass index: 23.1 ± 3.3 kg/m2) were scanned using [18F]NaF PET/MRI before and after performing one-legged step-up and drop–land exercises.

Exercise protocol

After a baseline PET/MRI scan, subjects performed an exercise protocol consisting of 100 repetitions of stepping up on a 25-cm stool using the right leg (step-up), followed by a straight-legged drop jump landing on the left leg (drop–land) (Fig. 1) at a rate of approximately 15 steps a minute. The drop–land exercise induces a high bone-strain magnitude and strain rate, and effectively strengthens bone in humans via a bone adaptation response [25]. The PET/MRI scan was repeated immediately after exercise.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Exercise protocol. Subjects performed 100 repetitions involving stepping up on a 25 cm stool with their right leg and jumping down and landing on their left leg.

Bilateral PET/MRI imaging

Simultaneous PET and MRI scanning was performed at baseline prior to exercise and post-exercise. Scanning was performed on a 3 T whole-body time-of-flight PET/MRI hybrid system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with a 16-channel flexible phased-array wrap coil (NeoCoil, Pewaukee, WI, USA) around each knee [26]. Both knees were scanned in one PET bed (field of view = 26 cm) in list mode for 50 min immediately after hand injection of 93 ± 2 MBq of [18F]NaF. After exercise, prior to the second injection, 3 min of additional PET scan time was acquired to estimate activity remaining from the first injection. This residual NaF activity was then subtracted from the images used for post-exercise time activity curves and SUV images.

MRI data of both knees was acquired simultaneously with PET data, and included sequences for MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). MRA data was acquired using a 3D GRE sequence with imaging parameters: TR/TE = 21/2.1 ms, slices = 18, slice thickness = 1.2 mm, and flip angle = 15°. Data for MRAC [27] were acquired using a 2-point Dixon fat-water, T1-weighted fast spoiled gradient echo sequence with acquisition parameters: TR/TE1/TE2 = 4.1/1.1/2.2 ms; FOV = 50 × 37.5 cm; matrix = 256 × 128; slice thickness/overlap = 5.2/2.6 mm; 120 images/slab; scan time = 18 s.

Kinetic modelling

Dynamic PET frames were reconstructed to derive the image-derived input function (IDIF) and time–activity curves as previously described [28]. Frame times were 40 × 1 s, 13 × 10 s and 23 × 2 min for the IDIF and 8 × 2 s, 24 × 2 min for r the time–activity curves. Reconstructions were performed using time-of-flight OSEM with three iterations and 21 subsets including corrections for attenuation, scatter, randoms, and dead-time.

The IDIF was derived from [18F]NaF activity (kBq/ml) within the popliteal arteries of the knees on the PET/MRI as previously described [28]. Voxels with the highest 10% of NaF activity within the arteries, as determined by the MRA, were included in IDIF analysis. To compare with the IDIF at steady-state, a 3-ml venous blood sample was taken 50 min after the first injection and measured in a well counter. At this point, arterial and venous blood concentrations are assumed to have equilibrated [29].

Time–activity curves were fitted to the three-compartmental (two tissue) tracer kinetic model described by Hawkins et al. [30], which consists of a vascular (blood) compartment, a fluid extravascular bone tissue compartment, and a compartment representing fluoride binding into the bone matrix. Data-fitting using the nonlinear regression (NLR) method was used to estimate rate constants K1, k2, and k3. This was performed on a ROI basis using COMKAT software and voxelwise using PMOD software to produce parametric maps. Estimates of blood volume, partial volume effects, and dispersion were included in the model. The rate of total plasma clearance, KiNLR, was determined from calculated rate constants using the equation:

$$ {{\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{i}}}^{\mathrm{NLR}}={\mathrm{K}}_1\times {\mathrm{k}}_3/\left({\mathrm{k}}_2+{\mathrm{k}}_3\right) $$

For comparison, Ki values were also obtained using the graphical PATLAK method (KiPAT) [31].

Bone segmentations and regions of interest (ROIs)

Cortical bone was defined as the long bone of the femur and tibia 6–8 cm from the centre of the joint space, excluding sites of tendon insertion. Trabecular bone ROIs in the proximal tibia and femoral condyle of the knee joint were drawn for both legs, maintaining a distance of 3 mm from the subchondral bone. Subchondral bone of the femur was further segmented into five regions: trochlea, medial and lateral central and posterior regions.

In addition, we identified focal areas with abnormally high increases in post-exercise uptake. These subchondral bone ROIs consisted of four or more adjacent voxels with an absolute SUV increase after exercise greater than two standard deviations above the mean SUV increase. Abnormal focal ROIs were termed ROIfocal and were applied to pre- and post-exercise SUV and kinetic parameter maps for analysis.

Statistical analysis

A single mixed effects model was created to perform three analyses on the measured parameters SUV, SUVmax, KiNLR, K1, extraction fraction (k3/(k2 + k3)), k2, k3, and blood volume using general linear regression, a Laplacian fit method and with subjects set as a random effect. The first analysis tested for a significant effect of exercise on the parameters of interest (fixed effect = pre- or post-exercise scan, dependant variable = mean ROI values for given parameter). The second incorporated an ANOVA test of regression coefficients for significant differences in the response to exercise between cortical, subchondral, and trabecular bone tissues and between the step-up/drop–land legs (fixed effects = tissue type and leg, dependant variable = change in parameter ROI values after exercise). The third analysis also included an ANOVA test for regional differences in response to exercise between subchondral ROIs and step-up vs drop–land leg (fixed effects = subchondral ROI and leg, dependant variable = change in subchondral ROI values after exercise). Reported p-values were corrected for eight comparisons (number of parametric values tested) using a Bonferroni correction. Correlations between SUV, KiNLR, and KiPat were analysed using least products linear regression with a Pearson’s adjusted R2 value to evaluate goodness of fit. Image co-registration, ROI analysis, calculations, and statistical analysis were performed with software created in MATLAB 2016b (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).

Results

Exercise induced a response in [18F]NaF kinetics in all bone tissues (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3), with increases in SUV, SUVmax, Ki, blood volume, and k2, along with a decrease in extraction fraction in all bone tissues (p <  0.001). In cortical bone, k3 increased after exercise as opposed to a post-exercise decrease of k3 in trabecular and subchondral bone (p < 0.01). SUV increases were lowest in cortical bone (47%) and highest in subchondral bone (131%) (p < 0.001). SUV increases were significantly higher in the step-up (right) knee (p < 0.05). Absolute and relative changes in SUV values and kinetic parameters for cortical, subchondral, and trabecular bone are presented in Table 1. On an individual level, regional variations in SUV increases (Fig. 3) and changes in kinetic parameters (Fig. 4) were observed between medial–lateral compartments as well as between step-up (right) and drop–land (left) legs.

Fig. 2
figure 2

[18F]NaF SUV images for one subject at baseline and post exercise. Example images from each leg of one subject before and after exercise. SUV values increased significantly in all subjects after performing the one leg step-up (right leg) and one leg drop–land (left leg) exercise. SUV increases were higher in the step-up leg and varied regionally throughout the bone tissues of the knee (p < 0.05)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Percentage increase in NaF uptake in the step-up (right) leg and drop–land (left) leg after exercise in one subject. Mean value projection image of SUV changes in subchondral and cortical bone for one subject. Spatial distributions for a given subject, such as the higher medial versus lateral difference in this subject, were evident and varied greatly between individuals. On a group level, SUV values were higher in the right step-up leg and regional differences in subchondral ROIs were significant within each knee (p < 0.05)

Table 1 Absolute and relative post-exercise increases in parametric values
Fig. 4
figure 4

Changes in kinetic parameters after exercise in one subject. After exercise, an increase in measured Ki, K1, and k2 values and a decrease in k3 values were obtained using NLR fitting. The opposing changes in k2 and k3 values both contribute to a decrease in extraction fraction (Ex) from near total extraction at baseline (k3/(k2+k3) ≈1) to a range of 0.35–0.8. Above are parametric maps for one subject at baseline and after exercise. Individuals had diverse patterns of activation including visible asymmetry between the step-up and drop–land leg in the post-exercise parametric maps. In subchondral bone, changes in SUV and values of all kinetic parameters, except blood volume and k2, varied significantly between the subregional ROIs

However, on a group level, significant differences in increases were only observed in SUV, Ki, K1, and blood volume of subchondral bone between the step-up leg (p < 0.05) and the drop–land leg (Fig. 5). All compartments of subchondral bone within each knee showed significant (p < 0.05) post-exercise changes of SUV and all kinetic parameters (Fig. 6) with the exception of blood volume and k2. The patella had the highest absolute changes in SUV and kinetic parameters (p < 0.05) of all the subchondral ROIs, as well as the largest differences between the step-up and drop–land legs (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Parametric values at rest and after step-up drop–land exercise. SUV, Ki, K1, k2, and blood volume increased significantly in all three bone tissues, in both legs, after exercise (p < 0.01). In cortical bone,l k3 increased while k3 decreased in subchondral and trabecular bone (p < 0.01). In all tissues, extraction fraction (k3/(k2+k3)) decreased significantly (p < 0.01) due to k2 changes being proportionally larger than k3. Outliers are presented as ’+

Fig. 6
figure 6

Distribution of sub-regional changes in subchondral bone [18F]NaF uptake parameters. The patella region of subchondral bone had larger increases in SUV (p < 0.01) and Ki (p < 0.01) than the mean increases in subchondral bone. The patella also had significant differences in SUV and Ki between step-up (right) and drop–land (left) legs (p < 0.05). All p-values are corrected for 20 comparisons using a Bonferroni correction. Outliers are presented as ’+

Higher post-exercise KiNLR values were measured in all tissues. This was driven by increases in K1 values that exceeded the decreases in extraction fraction. An increase in fluoride flux back to blood plasma (k2) in all tissues contributed to a decrease of overall extraction fraction (k3/(k2 + k3)). The decrease in extraction fraction was found to be inversely proportional to K1 increases (R2 = 0.43, p < 0.01) (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Relationship between the change in K1 and the change in extraction fraction. An inverse relationship was observed between the change in bone perfusion (K1) and the change in extraction fraction after exercise (ΔExtraction fraction= −12 × ΔK1 − 0, R2=0.43, p <0.01)

Ki and SUV values were highly correlated (R2 > 0.8) both before and after exercise, although the correlation coefficient was altered due to a relatively larger increase in SUV values than KiNLR values. Prior to exercise, the regression slope of KiNLR against SUV was 85, whereas after exercise the slope increased to 105 (Fig. 7). The correlation between KiNLR and Kipat remained unchanged in both conditions (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Relationship between KiNLR and Kipat as well as Ki and SUV a before and b after acute loading. KiNLR and Kipat maintained a similar correlation before and after exercise. However, the correlation between Ki and SUV changed significantly (p < 0.01). The slope for the linear correlation between KiNLR and SUV increased from 81 (a) to 105 (b) with little change in goodness of fit (R2 = 0.84 and 0.82 respectively)

Increases in [18F]NaF uptake parameters did not always follow a regional or compartmental pattern. Eight ROIfocal were identified in the post-exercise [18F]NaF PET images of six subjects (Fig. 9). Of these, three of the focal points already had significantly higher activity (Fig. 9c) than the surrounding subchondral tissue at baseline, and five were unremarkable at baseline (Fig. 8a, b). The relative mean increase in SUV was 342% (209–518%) for the focal points appearing normal at baseline, and 111% (82–180%) for the focal points which were identifiable at baseline .

Fig. 9
figure 9

Examples of high uptake ROIafp post-exercise. In six of the 12 healthy subjects, a total of eight focal points of high uptake were identified in post-exercise [18F]NaF PET SUV images such as the three examples given. The images represent cases of the focal region being visible prior to exercise and a maintaining a similar ratio to surrounding tissue after exercise as well as cases where the focal point was unremarkable prior to exercise (b), or barely discernible (c).

Differences between venous blood samples and IDIF values measured at 50 min were on average within 0.2 KBq/ml, which corresponds to a coefficient of variation (CV) of 12%. Comparing the computed IDIF between repeated acquisitions across 12 subjects, a CV of 8.4% was observed at 2 min after injection, 10.6% at 10 min, and 9.9% at 25 min. The input function of the second injection was on average 0.25 KBq/ml higher than the first injection throughout the 50-min time period across all subjects.

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated kinetic modeling of dynamic [18F]NaF PET uptake to detect changes in bone physiology after an acute exercise bout. In healthy volunteers, exercise induced a significant change in uptake parameters, suggesting that [18F]NaF PET may provide a sensitive measure of the metabolic and hemodynamic response of bone to acute joint loading. Notably, the difference in exercise task performed by the right and left leg (step-up vs drop–land) was reflected in quantifiable differences of the patellar acute response between the two knees. Other regional differences were observed in parameter changes throughout the subchondral bone of each knee, suggesting discrepancies in the mechanical loading of these subsections. Further, focal areas of elevated [18F]NaF PET uptake may identify regions where there is an inconsistent response of the bone–cartilage unit to loading in areas that appear normal on MRI. Some focal points were evident prior to exercise and maintained a similar elevated uptake compared to surrounding tissue post exercise, and others were not evident until post exercise. These findings suggest that kinetic modeling of [18F]NaF PET may provide a promising non-invasive method to study the effects of acute loading on bone remodeling, which may increase our understanding of the effects of loading on bone and joints in healthy individuals as well as in patients with arthritis/arthrosis.

The changes in kinetic parameters observed included large increases in perfusion, as measured by fluoride influx (K1), and blood volume which coincided with a decrease in the rate of fluoride extraction k3/(k3 + k2) (Table 1 and supplementary material). This combination is indicative of a hyperemia effect, where an increased delivery of substrates exceeds consumption during a vascular response to stimulation. Changes of blood volume from near zero at baseline to a volume fraction of 1–2% after exercise indicate a vasodilation of the capillary bed as well. In humans, blood flow increases of 130% at the mid femur have been reported for bone, bone marrow included [19], as have increases in blood volume in the tibia [32] during exercise. Further, the exercise-induced hyperemia in bone marrow has been shown to be in part regulated by opposing vasodilators (nitric oxide, prostaglandin, and adenosine) and vasoconstricting factors such as the α-adrenoreceptor. [20, 33]. Although clinical bone-loading studies using [18F]NaF are sparse, our findings are similar to previous animal studies. Rat forelimbs were found to have increases in the rates of fluoride influx (K1 by 113%), fluoride metabolism (Ki by 133%), and fluoride incorporation into bone (k3 by 13%), as well as an increase in bone blood flow (26%) in cortical bone after heavy loading [24]. Discrepancies in the magnitude of change reported previously and this study may be due to differences in type and magnitude of loading, timing of the post-exercise scanning, and/or differences in bone physiology between rats and humans. Another study of [18F]NaF SUV values in the shaft of the rat forelimb reported an increase of 50% immediately after bone loading with comparable force magnitudes, which is similar to the 47% increase we measured in cortical bone [21]. However, the same study also observed increases in SUV to be greater with higher loading forces and that SUV values continued to increase over time peaking 4–7 days after loading. Time delays of up to 5 days have been registered between a single period of mechanical loading in vivo and observed increases of collagen and mineral apposition on surface of the loaded bone matrix [7]. Similarly, increased blood flow in the rat ulna has been found to peak 5 days after loading [22]. It should be noted that the aforementioned studies used bone-loading devices as opposed to the more physiologic type of exercise in the present study. Such loading studies also tend to employ loads that exceed forces under normal exercise, which means the time and load dependency of a measured response in bone requires more study. Still, the interconnection of vascular fluctuations in bone with an anabolic effect on bone remodelling has been established [34,35,36].

The changes in [18F]NaF kinetics, total uptake, and SUV induced by exercise in this study suggest a localised response in bone tissue that may be load-dependant, with high inter-subject variability. Although the step-up and jump–landing exercises are functionally different, they result in a similar loading environment in the knee joint. The tibiofemoral joint experiences compressive forces from both ground reaction forces and muscle forces, while the patella experiences tensile forces from the quadriceps and compressive forces through its articulation with the trochlea. Stair ascent and descent are similar biomechanical tasks to the step-up and jump–landing exercises. There are slight differences in peak ground reaction forces between stair ascent:(1.1 bodyweights) versus stair descent (1.4 bodyweights), but both involve peak quadriceps forces of 2.4 bodyweights [37]. As a result, the right and left tibiofemoral joints may have experienced similar loading, but the right patella may have transmitted greater quadriceps forces than the left. In this study, both legs showed the highest SUV and KiNLR increases in the patella, which may correspond with the large forces transmitted through the patella. The right patella, however, demonstrated higher SUV and KiNLR than the left, which may be explained by the greater quadriceps forces in the step-up activity. The whole-body biomechanics of the two tasks are similar, but tissue-level strains have high inter-subject and spatiotemporal variability [37]. Differences in movement dynamics, varus/valgus alignment, muscle strength, and coordination strategies could all contribute to a high degree of inter-subject variability in forces applied on the bones. Even if the applied forces were identical between subjects, local bone strain is also dependent on the geometry and microstructure of each individual’s bones, resulting in further variability. We also observed intersubject discrepancies in the spatial distribution of kinetic/SUV changes, which may reflect inter-subject differences in bone strain. Furthermore, these discrepancies imply that the physiological mechanisms responsible for the altered kinetics are locally regulated, as opposed to a uniform increase in flow to the bones of the knee region.

SUV values increased more than Ki values even though the two were correlated before and after exercise. One reason for this bias could be the 0.25 KBq/ml extra blood activity (an increase of approx 10% during the 30 to 50 min time period) after the second injection. SUV may also be artificially elevated due to a reduction in the extraction of fluoride in other areas of the body, such as the kidneys. Exercise is known to reduce blood flow to other areas of the body, including the kidneys, via activation of the sympathetic nerve system [38]. Increasing the proportion of fluoride available to bone tissue in the knee would not alter Ki, as it is accounted for by the input function. SUV, on the other hand, is calibrated to the injected dose and does not account for remaining activity in the blood from the first injection or for changes in fluoride extraction elsewhere in the body including the kidneys [38].

Findings of focal areas in subchondral bone with abnormally high increases in 18F-NaF uptake after exercise, ROIfocal, are of particular interest. Many of these regions showed no abnormalities in 18F-NaF uptake compared to adjacent regions at baseline pre-exercise or structural subchondral bone abnormalities on MRI. This suggests that 18F-NaF PET may identify regions where there is an improper response of the bone–cartilage unit to acute loading in areas that appear structurally normal on MRI. Biomarkers that can effectively assess early breakdown of joint function, before structural changes are seen, are crucial for the development and evaluation of disease-modifying treatments, and increased 18F-NaF uptake detected after acute loading may be a promising candidate. Longitudinal studies are necessary to identify the relationship of these regions of increased uptake after acute joint stress and the pathophysiology of bone and cartilage degeneration in these regions.

There are several limitations in this study. First, the study was designed for high loading of the knee joint to ensure detection of an eventual osteogenic response from exercise. The study design is, for this reason, limited in its ability to interpret the relationship between the amount of stress applied to bone tissue and the corresponding response. The exercise paradigm included both high strain magnitudes and high strain rates on the knee joint [7], and used the maximum number of cycles reported to ensure saturation of mechanostimulation [5]. To determine the relationship between the stress applied to bone and the resulting response, all three of these elements would have to be varied in a controlled fashion.

This study used a cross-sectional analysis of healthy volunteers with no symptoms or history of knee injury or pain. Further, no histopathology was acquired in ROIs with abnormal focal increases in uptake after exercise. While increased bone activity detected by 18F-NaF after acute loading is suggestive of higher bone loading due to a breakdown of proper joint function, longitudinal studies or histopathology are needed to confirm degenerative changes in these areas. A study focusing on patient groups with known pathology would help assess the utility of stimulating bone tissue in diagnostics. The number of subjects in this study is also small, which limits its ability to identify factors such as BMI, varus/valgus alignment, disease, or activity level that could alter the kinetics in bone tissue. The exercise in this study is also inappropriate for many patient groups. A paradigm designed for patients could, however, induce a similar response, given that ~95% of the osteogenic effect can be achieved after climbing only ~20 to 40 steps (~2000 μƐ in compression) [5, 39, 40].

Furthermore, there are technical limitations to consider. Kinetic studies are more complicated than conventional imaging, requiring more computation, expertise, and the robust determination of an input function. The IDIF methods used in this study have previously been shown to correlate with late-stage venous blood measures and to be reproducible. Further, input function values in this study correspond well with literature values for arterial sampling [29], but using arterial sampling is still considered a gold standard. The use of two consecutive injections was accounted for, but may create an adverse bias in the results, as blood activity levels from the second injection were slightly higher than the first. The blood volume measured by this method is difficult to verify independently in humans with a gold standard. Lastly, despite the numerous advantages from combining PET imaging with MRI in knee examinations, PET/MR is also known to underestimate SUV values by approximately 10% due to MR-based attenuation correction of its PET images [41].

The ability to image the physiological response of bone tissue to loading would be a valuable clinical tool. Decreased mechanosensitivity in bone tissue has been identified in osteoporosis [42, 43] and patients with spinal cord injury [32], and to decline in the general population with age [44,45,46]. Medicinal treatment or therapies employing mechanostimulation including exercise [47], muscle stimulation [6, 48], vibration therapy [49], or drug treatment [17, 50] could better be imaged using [18F]NaF PET. For prostate and breast cancer, studies have shown bone-loading exercise to be a safe and viable suppressant of tumor growth in bone metastasis [51, 52]. The use of kinetics, even at rest, haa been proven to be clinically feasible and has the potential to offer more information. For instance, Ki has been shown to be highly reproducible in the human spine [53, 54] and to be more valuable in monitoring osteoporosis patients than SUV values [55]. Subchondral bone changes that are present prior to and during the development of OA have demonstrated increased bone blood flow and bone remodeling in [18F]NaF PET studies [15]. An association between pain and mean normalized standardized uptake values (SUV) has been established in different bone types [12, 15, 16], and increased [18F]NaF SUV values may precede visible lesions [12, 14]. Thus, detecting early changes in bone remodeling and bone physiology with [18F]NaF kinetics could help in understanding disease. In those cases where pathology causing elevated SUV is poorly understood or where there is weak contrast to healthy bone, the response of bone tissue to mechanostimulation could further elucidate dysfunction.

Conclusions

Loading acutely alters bone physiology affecting [18F]NaF-PET kinetics, with a local response depending on tissue, site, and exercise. Our data support previous evidence of mechanostimulation initiating an early hyperemia phase in bone adaptation. These findings suggest that kinetic modeling of [18F]NaF PET may provide a non-invasive method to study the effects of acute loading on joint biomechanics and bone remodeling, which may have large implications for our understanding of early stages of arthritis/arthrosis.