Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Different loss of dopamine transporter according to subtype of multiple system atrophy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) loss as measured by 18F-fluorinated-N-3-fluoropropyl-2-b-carboxymethoxy-3-b-(4-iodophenyl) nortropane ([18F]FP-CIT) PET differs according to the metabolic subtype of multiple system atrophy (MSA) as assessed by [18F]FDG PET.

Methods

This retrospective study included 50 patients with clinically diagnosed MSA who underwent [18F]FP-CIT and [18F]FDG brain PET scans. The PET images were analysed using 12 striatal subregional volume-of-interest templates (bilateral ventral striatum, anterior caudate, posterior caudate, anterior putamen, posterior putamen, and ventral putamen). The patients were classified into three metabolic subtypes according to the [18F]FDG PET findings: MSA-Pm (striatal hypometabolism only), MSA-mixedm (both striatal and cerebellar hypometabolism), and MSA-Cm (cerebellar hypometabolism only). The subregional glucose metabolic ratio (MRgluc), subregional DAT binding ratio (BRDAT), and intersubregional ratio (ISRDAT; defined as the BRDAT ratio of one striatal subregion to that of another striatal subregion) were compared according to metabolic subtype.

Results

Of the 50 patients, 13 presented with MSA-Pm, 16 presented with MSA-mixedm, and 21 presented with MSA-Cm. The BRDAT of all striatal subregions in the MSA-Pm and MSA-mixedm groups were significantly lower than those in the MSA-Cm group. The posterior putamen/anterior putamen ISRDAT and anterior putamen/ventral striatum ISRDAT in the MSA-Pm and MSA-mixedm groups were significantly lower than those in the MSA-Cm group.

Conclusion

Patients with MSA-Pm and MSA-mixedm showed more severe DAT loss in the striatum than patients with MSA-Cm. Patients with MSA-Cm had more diffuse DAT loss than patients with MSA-Pm and MSA-mixedm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilman S, Wenning GK, Low PA, Brooks DJ, Mathias CJ, Trojanowski JQ, et al. Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Neurology. 2008;71:670–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Litvan I, Goetz CG, Jankovic J, Wenning GK, Booth V, Bartko JJ, et al. What is the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of multiple system atrophy? A clinicopathologic study. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:937–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Geser F, Wenning GK, Seppi K, Stampfer-Kountchev M, Scherfler C, Sawires M, et al. Progression of multiple system atrophy (MSA): a prospective natural history study by the European MSA Study Group (EMSA SG). Mov Disord. 2006;21:179–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Osaki Y, Wenning GK, Daniel SE, Hughes A, Lees AJ, Mathias CJ, et al. Do published criteria improve clinical diagnostic accuracy in multiple system atrophy? Neurology. 2002;59:1486–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ozawa T, Paviour D, Quinn NP, Josephs KA, Sangha H, Kilford L, et al. The spectrum of pathological involvement of the striatonigral and olivopontocerebellar systems in multiple system atrophy: clinicopathological correlations. Brain. 2004;127:2657–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adler CH, Beach TG, Hentz JG, Shill HA, Caviness JN, Driver-Dunckley E, et al. Low clinical diagnostic accuracy of early vs advanced Parkinson disease: clinicopathologic study. Neurology. 2014;83:406–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Joutsa J, Gardberg M, Roytta M, Kaasinen V. Diagnostic accuracy of parkinsonism syndromes by general neurologists. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20:840–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Paviour DC, Price SL, Jahanshahi M, Lees AJ, Fox NC. Regional brain volumes distinguish PSP, MSA-P, and PD: MRI-based clinico-radiological correlations. Mov Disord. 2006;21:989–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim YJ, Ichise M, Ballinger JR, Vines D, Erami SS, Tatschida T, et al. Combination of dopamine transporter and D2 receptor SPECT in the diagnostic evaluation of PD, MSA, and PSP. Mov Disord. 2002;17:303–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Juh R, Pae CU, Lee CU, Yang D, Chung Y, Suh T, et al. Voxel based comparison of glucose metabolism in the differential diagnosis of the multiple system atrophy using statistical parametric mapping. Neurosci Res. 2005;52:211–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwon KY, Choi CG, Kim JS, Lee MC, Chung SJ. Diagnostic value of brain MRI and 18F-FDG PET in the differentiation of Parkinsonian-type multiple system atrophy from Parkinson's disease. Eur J Neurol. 2008;15:1043–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nocker M, Seppi K, Donnemiller E, Virgolini I, Wenning GK, Poewe W, et al. Progression of dopamine transporter decline in patients with the Parkinson variant of multiple system atrophy: a voxel-based analysis of [123I]beta-CIT SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1012–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Perju-Dumbrava LD, Kovacs GG, Pirker S, Jellinger K, Hoffmann M, Asenbaum S, et al. Dopamine transporter imaging in autopsy-confirmed Parkinson's disease and multiple system atrophy. Mov Disord. 2012;27:65–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim GM, Kim SE, Lee WY. Preclinical impairment of the striatal dopamine transporter system in sporadic olivopontocerebellar atrophy: studied with [(123)I]beta-CIT and SPECT. Eur Neurol. 2000;43:23–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jin S, Oh M, Oh SJ, Oh JS, Lee SJ, Chung SJ, et al. Differential diagnosis of parkinsonism using dual-phase F-18 FP-CIT PET imaging. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;47:44–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee PH, An YS, Yong SW, Yoon SN. Cortical metabolic changes in the cerebellar variant of multiple system atrophy: a voxel-based FDG-PET study in 41 patients. Neuroimage. 2008;40:796–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lyoo CH, Jeong Y, Ryu YH, Lee SY, Song TJ, Lee JH, et al. Effects of disease duration on the clinical features and brain glucose metabolism in patients with mixed type multiple system atrophy. Brain. 2008;131:438–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Oh M, Kim JS, Kim JY, Shin KH, Park SH, Kim HO, et al. Subregional patterns of preferential striatal dopamine transporter loss differ in Parkinson disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and multiple-system atrophy. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:399–406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mawlawi O, Martinez D, Slifstein M, Broft A, Chatterjee R, Hwang DR, et al. Imaging human mesolimbic dopamine transmission with positron emission tomography: I. Accuracy and precision of D(2) receptor parameter measurements in ventral striatum. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001;21:1034–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Oh JS, Oh M, Chung SJ, Kim JS. Cerebellum-specific 18F-FDG PET analysis for the detection of subregional glucose metabolism changes in spinocerebellar ataxia. Neuroreport. 2014;25:1198–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gilman S, Low PA, Quinn N, Albanese A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Fowler CJ, et al. Consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Sci. 1999;163:94–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Adams RD, Vanbogaert L, Vandereecken H. Striato-nigral degeneration. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1964;23:584–608.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed Z, Asi YT, Sailer A, Lees AJ, Houlden H, Revesz T, et al. The neuropathology, pathophysiology and genetics of multiple system atrophy. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2012;38:4–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ozawa T, Tada M, Kakita A, Onodera O, Tada M, Ishihara T, et al. The phenotype spectrum of Japanese multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:1253–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu CS, Weng YH, Chen MC, Chen RS, Tzen KY, Wey SP, et al. 99mTc-TRODAT-1 imaging of multiple system atrophy. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:49–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Munoz E, Iranzo A, Rauek S, Lomena F, Gallego J, Ros D, et al. Subclinical nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation in the cerebellar subtype of multiple system atrophy (MSA-C). J Neurol. 2011;258:2248–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lewis SJ, Pavese N, Rivero-Bosch M, Eggert K, Oertel W, Mathias CJ, et al. Brain monoamine systems in multiple system atrophy: a positron emission tomography study. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;46:130–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kume A, Takahashi A, Hashizume Y. Neuronal cell loss of the striatonigral system in multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Sci. 1993;117:33–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wenning GK, Colosimo C, Geser F, Poewe W. Multiple system atrophy. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3(2):93–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jellinger KA, Seppi K, Wenning GK. Grading of neuropathology in multiple system atrophy: proposal for a novel scale. Mov Disord. 2005;20 Suppl 12:S29–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Teune LK, Bartels AL, de Jong BM, Willemsen AT, Eshuis SA, de Vries JJ, et al. Typical cerebral metabolic patterns in neurodegenerative brain diseases. Mov Disord. 2010;25:2395–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ghaemi M, Hilker R, Rudolf J, Sobesky J, Heiss WD. Differentiating multiple system atrophy from Parkinson's disease: contribution of striatal and midbrain MRI volumetry and multi-tracer PET imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73:517–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Otsuka M, Kuwabara Y, Ichiya Y, Hosokawa S, Sasaki M, Yoshida T, et al. Differentiating between multiple system atrophy and Parkinson's disease by positron emission tomography with 18F-dopa and 18F-FDG. Ann Nucl Med. 1997;11:251–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pickel VM, Beckley SC, Joh TH, Reis DJ. Ultrastructural immunocytochemical localization of tyrosine hydroxylase in the neostriatum. Brain Res. 1981;225:373–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nandhagopal R, Kuramoto L, Schulzer M, Mak E, Cragg J, McKenzie J, et al. Longitudinal evolution of compensatory changes in striatal dopamine processing in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 2011;134:3290–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Watanabe H, Saito Y, Terao S, Ando T, Kachi T, Mukai E, et al. Progression and prognosis in multiple system atrophy: an analysis of 230 Japanese patients. Brain. 2002;125:1070–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wenning GK, Geser F, Krismer F, Seppi K, Duerr S, Boesch S, et al. The natural history of multiple system atrophy: a prospective European cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:264–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Cook GJ. Pitfalls in PET/CT interpretation. Q J Nucl Med Mol imaging. 2007;51:235–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIP) (no. 2014R1A5A2010008) and by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI14C2768).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and complied with the principles of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. No formal consent is required for this type of study.

Informed consent

The institutional review board of Asan Medical Center granted exempt status for this retrospective study and waived the need for informed consent.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Seung Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H.W., Kim, J.S., Oh, M. et al. Different loss of dopamine transporter according to subtype of multiple system atrophy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43, 517–525 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3191-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3191-6

Keywords

Navigation