Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Image-guided synovial biopsy with a focus on infection

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Image-guided biopsy of the synovium is a relatively uncommon but safe procedure with a high-diagnostic yield in the correct clinical scenario. Whilst surgical and arthroscopic techniques are still commonly performed and remain the gold standard, they are more invasive, expensive and not widely available. Ultrasound and X-ray-guided synovial biopsy are being increasingly performed by radiologists to diagnose both native and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) to guide surgical and microbiological management. The purpose of this review article is to present the historical background to synovial biopsy particularly related to potential joint infection, including common and uncommon pathogens encountered, sampling techniques and pitfalls, focusing mainly on its role in PJI and its role in patient pathways and decision-making within a joint infection multi-disciplinary framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forestier J. Instrumentation pour médical. C R Soc Biol (Paris). 1932;110:186.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Polley HF, Bickel WH. Punch biopsy of synovial membrane. Ann Rheum Dis. 1951;10:277–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Parker RH, Pearson CM. A simplified synovial biopsy needle. Arthritis Rheum. 1963;6:172–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. La AM. punction biopsie synoviale de la hanche. Med Hyg. 1970;37:1153–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beaulé V, Larédo J-D, Cywiner C, et al. Synovial membrane: percutanious biopsy. Radiology. 1990;177(2):581–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baeten D, Van den Bosch F, Elewaut D, et al. Needle arthroscopy of the knee with synovial biopsy sampling: technical experience in 150 patients. Clin Rheumatol. 1999;18(6):434–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McKee TC, Belair JA, Sobol K, et al. Efficacy of image-guided synovial biopsy. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49(6):921–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Vugt RM, van Dalen A, Bijlsma JW. Ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy of the wrist. Scan J Rheumatol. 1997;26:212–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marin F, Lasbleiz J, Albert JD, et al. Synovial biopsy under US guidance: technical considerations and results [in French]. J Radiol. 2006;87:561–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ottink KD, Strahm C, Muller-Kobold A, Sendi P, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M. Factors to consider when assessing the diagnostic accuracy of synovial leukocyte count in periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Jt Infect. 2019;4(4):167–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Roerdink RL, Huijbregts HJTAM, van Lieshout AWT, Dietvorst M, van der Zwaard BC. The difference between native septic arthritis and prosthetic joint infections: a review of literature. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019;27(2):2309499019860468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Linke S, Thurmer A, Bienger K, et al. Microbiological pathogen analysis in native versus periprosthetic joint infections: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Weston VC, Jones AC, Bradbury N, et al. Clinical features and outcome of septic arthritis in a single UK health district 1982–1991. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58:214–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nolla JM, Gomez-Vaquero C, Corbella X, et al. Groupd B streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae) pyogenic arthritis in nonpregnant adults. Medicine (Baltimore). 2003;82:119–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bardin T. Gonococcal arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2003;17:201–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shirtliff ME, Mader JT. Acute septic arthritis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:527–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Silveira LH, Cuellar ML, Citera G, et al. Candida arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1993;19:427–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldenburg DL. Septic arthritis. Lancet. 1998;351:197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1645–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1645–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gbejuade HO, Lovering AM, Webb JC. The role of microbial biofilms in prosthetic joint infections. Acta Orthop. 2015;86:147–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaplan SS, Heine RP, Simmons RL. Defensins impair phagocytic killing by neutrophils in biomaterial-related infection. Infect Immun. 1999;67:1640–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gbejuade HO, Lovering AM, Webb JC. The role of microbial biofilms in prosthetic joint infections. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(2):147–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Renz N, Mudrovcic S, Paerka C, Trampuz A. Orthopaedic implant-associated infections caused by Cutibacterium spp. – a remaining diagnostic challenge. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0202639.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Vilchez HH, Escudero-Sanchez R, et al. Prosthetic shoulder joint infection by Cutibacterium acnes: does rifampicin improve diagnosis? A retrospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. Antibiotics. 2021;10(5):475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamp MC, van Kempen RWTM, Janssen L, van der Steen MCM. First results of a uniform regional treatment protocol and registration for acute prosthetic join infection in the South-East of the Netherlands. J Bone Jt Infect. 2019;4(3):133–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Steckelberg JM, Osmon DR (2000) Prosthetic joint infections. In: Waldvogel FA, Bisno AL, editors. Infections associated with indwelling medical devices.

  28. Pandey R, Berendt AR, Athanasou NA. Histological and microbiological findings in non-infected and infected revision arthroplasty tissues. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:570–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Romanò CL, Petrosillo N, Argento G, Sconfienza LM, Treglia G, Alavi A, et al. The role of imaging techniques to define a peri-prosthetic hip and knee joint infection: multidisciplinary consensus statements. J Clin Med. 2020;9(8):2548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, et al. The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:1309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tigges S, Stiles RG, Roberson JR. Appearance of septic hip prostheses on plain radiographs. Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:377–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Signore A, Sconfienza LM, Borens O, Glaudemans AWJM, Cassar-Pullicino V, Trampuz A, Winkler H, Gheysens O, Vanhoenacker FMHM, Petrosillo N, Jutte PC. Consensus document for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a joint paper by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(4):971–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Galley J, Sutter R, Stern C, Filli L, Rahm S, Pfirrmann CWA. Diagnosis of periprosthetic hip joint infection using MRI with metal artifact reduction at 1.5 T. Radiology. 2020;296(1):98–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Weybright PN, Jacobson JA, Murry KH, Lin J, Fessell DP, Jamadar DA, et al. Limited effectiveness of sonography in revealing hip joint effusion: preliminary results in 21 adult patients with native and postoperative hips. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:215–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mandegaran R, Agrawal K, Vijayanathan S, et al. The value of 99mTc-MDP bone SPECT/CT in evaluation of patients with painful knee prosthesis. Nucl Med Commun. 2018;39(5):397–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Saleh A, George J, Faour M, et al. Serum biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infections. Bone Joint Res. 2018;7(1):85–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27:302–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee YS, Koo K-H, Kim HJ, et al. Synovial fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Boint Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(24):2077–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bingham J, Clarke H, Spangehl M, et al. The alpha defensin-1 biomarker assay can be used to evaluate the potentially infected total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(12):4006–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Jacovides CL, Parvizi J, Adeli B, et al. Molecular markers for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(6 suppl):99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Renz N, Yermak K, Parka C, Trampuz A. Alpha-defensin lateral flow test for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: not a screening but a confirmatory test. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:742–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ottink KD, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Kampinga GA, Jutte PC, Ploegmakers JJ. Puncture protocol in the diagnostic work-up of a suspected chronic prosthetic joint infection of the hip. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(6):1904–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rajakulasingham R, Cleaver L, Khoo M, Pressney I, et al. Introducing image-guided synovial aspiration and biopsy in assessing peri-prosthetic joint infection: an early single-centre experience. Skelet Radiol. 2021;50:2031–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sitt JC, Griffith JF, Lai FM, et al. Ultrasound-guided synovial Tru-cut biopsy: indications, technique, and outcome in 111 cases. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(5):2002–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Najm A, Orr C, Heymann MF, et al. Success rate and utility of ultrasound-guided synovial biopsies in clinical practice. J Rheumatol. 2016;43(12):2113–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cross MC, Kransdorf MJ, Chivers FS, et al. Utility of percutaneous joint aspiration and synovial biopsy in identifying culture-positive infected hip arthroplasty. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43(2):165–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Partridge DG, Winnard C, Townsend R, Cooper R, Stockley I. Joint aspiration, including culture of reaspirated saline after a ‘dry tap’, is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of hip and knee prosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(6):749–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Swan JS, Braunstein EM, Capello W. Aspiration of the hip in patients treated with Girdlestone arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(3):545–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hughes JG, Vetter EA, Patel R, et al. Culture with BACTEC Peds Plus/F bottle compared with conventional methods for detection of bacteria in synovial fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4468–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Parlier-Cuau C, Hamze B, Champsaur P, et al. Percutaneous biopsy of the synovial membrane. Semin Musculoskeletal Radiol. 1997;1:189–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Fink B, Gebhard A, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schafer P. High diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in periprosthetic joint infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(3):956–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Kelly S, Humby F, Filer A, et al. Ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy: a safe, well-tolerated and reliable technique for obtaining high-quality synovial tissue from both large and small joints in early arthritis patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:611–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Just SA, Humby F, Lindegaard H, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and safety in patients undergoing synovial biopsy: comparison of ultrasound-guided portal and forceps and arthroscopic-guided synovial biopsy techniques in five centres across Europe. RMD Open. 2018;4(2):e000799.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Browning S, Manning L, Metcalf S, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative prosthetic joint infections from the Prosthetic Joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand Observational (PIANO) cohort study. J Bone Joint Infect. 2022;7:203–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Biddle M, Kennedy JW, Wright PM, Ritchie ND, Meek RMD, Rooney BP. Improving outcomes in acute and chronic periprosthetic hip and knee joint infection with a multidisciplinary approach. Bone Jt Open. 2021;2(7):509–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Swansea, SA6 6NL, UK

    R. Macnair

  2. Department of Radiology, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, Middlesex, UK

    R. Rajakulasingam, S. Singh, M. Khoo, B. Upadhyay, R. Hargunani & Ian Pressney

Authors
  1. R. Macnair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Rajakulasingam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Khoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B. Upadhyay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Hargunani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ian Pressney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Pressney.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Macnair, R., Rajakulasingam, R., Singh, S. et al. Image-guided synovial biopsy with a focus on infection. Skeletal Radiol 52, 831–841 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04245-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04245-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation