Abstract
Consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) of lignocellulosic material into bioethanol has progressed in the past decades; however, several challenges still exist which impede the industrial application of this technology. Identifying the challenges that exist in all unit operations is crucial and needs to be optimised, but only the barriers related to the secretion of recombinant cellulolytic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae will be addressed in this review. Fundamental principles surrounding CBP as a biomass conversion platform have been established through the successful expression of core cellulolytic enzymes, namely β-glucosidases, endoglucanases, and exoglucanases (cellobiohydrolases) in S. cerevisiae. This review will briefly address the challenges involved in the construction of an efficient cellulolytic yeast, with particular focus on the secretion efficiency of cellulases from this host. Additionally, strategies for studying enhanced cellulolytic enzyme secretion, which include both rational and reverse engineering approaches, will be discussed. One such technique includes bio-engineering within genetically diverse strains, combining the strengths of both natural strain diversity and rational strain development. Furthermore, with the advancement in next-generation sequencing, studies that utilise this method of exploiting intra-strain diversity for industrially relevant traits will be reviewed. Finally, future prospects are discussed for the creation of ideal CBP strains with high enzyme production levels.
Key Points • Several challenges are involved in the construction of efficient cellulolytic yeast, in particular, the secretion efficiency of cellulases from the hosts. • Strategies for enhancing cellulolytic enzyme secretion, a core requirement for CBP host microorganism development, include both rational and reverse engineering approaches. • One such technique includes bio-engineering within genetically diverse strains, combining the strengths of both natural strain diversity and rational strain development. |
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abatemarco J, Maen FS, Wagner JM, Lin J, Liu L, Hassouneh W, Yuan S, Alper HS, Abate AR (2017) RNA-aptamers-in-droplets (RAPID) high-throughput screening for secretory phenotypes. Nat Commun 8:332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00425-7
Agaphonov M, Romanova N, Sokolov S, Iline A, Kalebina T, Gellissen G, Teravanesyan M (2005) Defect of vacuolar protein sorting stimulates proteolytic processing of human urokinase-type plasminogen activator in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha. FEMS Yeast Res 5:1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2005.07.003
Amorim HV, Lopes ML, de Castro Oliveira JV, Buckeridge MS, Goldman GH (2011) Scientific challenges of bioethanol production in Brazil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:1267–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3437-6
Argueso JL, Carazzolle MF, Mieczkowski PA, Duarte FM, Netto OVC, Missawa SK, Galzerani F, Costa GG, Vidal RO, Noronha MF, Dominska M (2009) Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. Genome Res 19:2258–2270. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.091777.109
Arima H, Takeshi K, Hisham RI, Hiroyuki A, Kato A (1998) Enhanced secretion of hydrophobic peptide fused lysozyme by the introduction of N-glycosylation signal and the disruption of calnexin gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 440:89–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01437-9
Baek S, Kim S, Lee K, Lee J, Hahn J (2012) Cellulosic ethanol production by combination of cellulase-displaying yeast cells. Enzym Microb Technol 51:366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2012.08.005
Bailey JE, Sburlati A, Hatzimanikatis V, Lee K, Renner WK, Tsai PS (1996) Inverse metabolic engineering: a strategy for directed genetic engineering of useful phenotypes. Biotechnol Bioeng 52:109–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097
Banerjee G, Car S, Scott-Craig JS, Borrusch MS, Bongers M, Walton JD (2010) Synthetic multi-component enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 101:9097–9105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.028
Bao J, Huang M, Petranovic D, Nielsen J (2017) Moderate expression of SEC16 increases protein secretion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 83(14):e03400–e03416. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03400-16
Bartkevičiūtė D, Sasnauskas K (2004) Disruption of the MNN10 gene enhances protein secretion in Kluyveromyces lactis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 8:833–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.03.001
Bassik MC, Kampmann M (2011) Knocking out the door to tunicamycin entry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:11731–11732. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109035108
Basso LC, De Amorim HV, De Oliveira AJ, Lopes ML (2008) Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res 8:1155–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00428.x
Bayer EA, Morag E, Lamed R (1994) The cellulosome—a treasure-trove for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 12:379–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7799(94)90039-6
Beaupere C, Dinatto L, Wasko BM, Chen RB, Vanvalkenburg L, Kiflezghi MG, Lee MB, Promislow DE, Dang W, Kaeberlein M, Labunskyy VM (2018) Genetic screen identifies adaptive aneuploidy as a key mediator of ER stress resistance in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:9586–9591. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804264115
Beneyton T, Wijaya IPM, Postros P, Najah M, Leblond P, Couvent A, Mayot E, Griffiths AD, Drevelle A (2015) High-throughput screening of filamentous fungi using nanoliter range droplet-based microfluidics. Sci Rep 6:27223. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27223
Beneyton T, Thomas S, Griffiths AD, Nicaud JM, Drevelle A, Rossignol T (2017) Droplet-based microfluidic high-throughput screening of heterologous enzymes secreted by the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Microb Cell Factories 16:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0629-5
Bonangelino CJ, Chavez EM, Bonifacino JS (2002) Genomic screen for vacuolar protein sorting genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 13:2486–2501. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.02
Brandt BA, Jansen T, Görgens JF, van Zyl WH (2019) Overcoming lignocellulose-derived microbial inhibitors: advancing the Saccharomyces cerevisiae resistance toolbox. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 13:1520–1536. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2042
Breinig FB, Diehl S, Rau SC, Zimmer C, Schwab H, Schmitt MJ (2006) Cell surface expression of bacterial esterase a by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its enhancement by constitutive activation of the cellular unfolded protein response. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7140–7147. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00503-06
Bussey H, Saville D, Greene D, Tipper DJ, Bostian KA (1983) Secretion of Saccharomyces cerevisiae killer toxin : processing of the glycosylated precursor. Mol Cell Biol 3:1362l70. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.3.8.1362
Butz JA, Niebauer R, Robinson SA (2003) Co-expression of molecular chaperones does not improve the heterologous expression of mammalian G-protein coupled receptor expression in yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 84:292–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10771
Cagnin L, Favaro L, Gronchi N, Rose SH, Basaglia M, van Zyl WH, Casella S (2019) Comparing laboratory and industrial yeast platforms for the direct conversion of cellobiose into ethanol under simulated industrial conditions. FEMS Yeast Res 19:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foz018
Carreto L, Eiriz MF, Gomes AC, Pereira PM, Schuller D, Santos MAS (2008) Comparative genomics of wild type yeast strains unveils important genome diversity. BMC Genomics 9:524. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-524
Carreto L, Eiriz MF, Domingues I, Schuller D, Moura GR, Santos MAS (2011) Expression variability of co-regulated genes differentiates Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. BMC Genomics 12:201. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-201
Carter D, Liti G, Moses AM, Warringer JM, Parts L, James SA, Davey RP, Roberts I, Blomberg A, Warringer J, Burt A, Koufopanou V (2008) Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458:337–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07743
Cedras G, Kroukamp H, Van Zyl WH, Den Haan R (2020) The in vivo detection and measurement of the unfolded protein response in recombinant cellulase producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 67:82–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.1819
Chen Y (2005) Identification of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways that confer resistance to endoplasmic reticulum stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cancer Res 12:669–677. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-05-0181
Chen Y, Pioli D, Piper PW (1994) Overexpression of the gene for polyubiquitin in yeast confers increased secretion of a human leucocyte protease inhibitor. Nat Biotechnol 12:819l23. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0894-819
Chen G, Bradford WD, Seidel CW, Li R (2012) Hsp90 stress potentiates rapid cellular adaptation through induction of aneuploidy. Nature 482:246–250. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10795
Chen L, Du JL, Zhan YJ, Li JA, Zuo RR, Tian S (2018) Consolidated bioprocessing for cellulosic ethanol conversion by cellulase–xylanase cell-surfaced yeast consortium. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 48:653–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826068.2018.1487846
Chesson A (1980) A review: maceration in relation to the post-harvest handling and processing of plant material. J Appl Bacteriol 4:1–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1980.tb05204.x
Chow TYK, Ash JJ, Dignard D, Thomas DY (1992) Screening and identification of a gene, PSE-1, that affects protein secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci 101:709
Cohen M, Stutz F, Belgareh N, Haguenauer-Tsapis R, Dargemont C (2003) Ubp3 requires a cofactor, Bre5, to specifically de-ubiquitinate the COPII protein, Sec23. Nat Cell Biol 5:661. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1003
Cripwell R, Favaro L, Rose SH, Basaglia M, Cagnin L, Casella S, Van Zyl WH (2015) Utilisation of wheat bran as a substrate for bioethanol production using recombinant cellulases and amylolytic yeast. Appl Energy 160:610–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.062
Csoma H, Zakany N, Capece A, Romano P, Sipiczki M (2010) Biological diversity of Saccharomyces yeasts of spontaneously fermenting wines in four wine regions: comparative genotypic and phenotypic analysis. Int J Food Microbiol 140:239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.024
Da Conceição LEFR, Saraiva MAF, Diniz RHS, Oliveira J, Barbosa GD, Alvarez F, Da Mata Correa LF, Mezandri H, Coutrim MX, Afonso RJDCF, Lucas C (2014) Biotechnological potential of yeast isolates from cachaça: the Brazilian spirit. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 42:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-014-1528-y
Da Silva-Filho EA, Dos Santos SKB, Monte Resende AD, De Morais JOF, De Morais MA, Ardaillon Simões D (2005) Yeast population dynamics of industrial fuel-ethanol fermentation process assessed by PCR-fingerprinting. Anton Leeuw Int J G 88:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-004-7283-8
Davison SA, Den Haan R, Van Zyl WH (2016) Heterologous expression of cellulase genes in natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:8241–8254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7735-x
Davison SA, Den Haan R, Van Zyl WH (2019a) Identification of superior cellulase secretion phenotypes in haploids derived from natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates. FEMS Yeast Res 19:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foy117
Davison SA, Keller NT, Van Zyl WH, Den Haan R (2019b) Enzyme and microbial technology improved cellulase expression in diploid yeast strains enhanced consolidated bioprocessing of pretreated corn residues. Enzym Microb Technol 131:109382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2019.109382
Davydenko SG, Juselius JK, Munder T, Bogengruber E, Jäntti J, Keränen S (2004) Screening for novel essential genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved in protein secretion. Yeast 21:463–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1063
De Baetselier A, Vasavada A, Dohet P, Ha-Thi V, De Beukelaer M, Erpicum T, De Clerck L, Hanotier J, Rosenberg S (1991) Fermentation of a yeast producing A. niger glucose oxidase: scale-up, purification and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Nat Biotechnol 9:559–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0691-559
De Ruijter JC, Koskela EV, Frey AD (2016) Enhancing antibody folding and secretion by tailoring the Saccharomyces cerevisiae endoplasmic reticulum. Microb Cell Factories 15:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0488-5
De Ruijter JC, Jurgens G, Frey AD (2017a) Screening for novel genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved in recombinant antibody production. FEMS Yeast Res 17:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fow104
De Ruijter JC, Jurgens G, Frey AD (2017b) Screening for novel genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved in recombinant antibody production. FEMS Yeast Res 17:fow104. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fow104
De Vries AR, Pronk JT, Daran JG (2017) Industrial relevance of chromosomal copy number variation in Saccharomyces yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03206-16
De Witt RN, Kroukamp H, Volschenk H (2019) Proteome response of two natural strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with divergent lignocellulosic inhibitor stress tolerance. FEMS Yeast Res 19:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foy116
Delic M, Göngrich R, Mattanovich D, Gasser B (2014) Engineering of protein folding and secretion - strategies to overcome bottlenecks for efficient production of recombinant proteins. Antioxid Redox Signal 21:414–437. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2014.5844
Den Haan R, Rose SH, Lynd LR, Van Zyl WH (2007a) Hydrolysis and fermentation of amorphous cellulose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 9:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2006.08.005
Den Haan R, Mcbride JE, La Grange DC, Lynd LR, Van Zyl WH (2007b) Functional expression of cellobiohydrolases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae towards one-step conversion of cellulose to ethanol. Enzym Microb Technol 40:1291–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.09.022
Den Haan R, Kroukamp H, Van Zyl JD, Van Zyl WH (2013a) Cellobiohydrolase secretion by yeast: current state and prospects for improvement. Process Biochem 48:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2012.11.015
Den Haan R, Van Zyl JM, Harms TM, Van Zyl WH (2013b) Modeling the minimum enzymatic requirements for optimal cellulose conversion. Environ Res 8:025013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/025013
Den Haan R, Kroukamp H, Mert M, Bloom M, Görgens JF, Van Zyl WH (2013c) Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for next generation ethanol production. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88:983–991. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4068
Den Haan R, Van Rensburg E, Rose SH, Görgens JF, Van Zyl WH (2015) Progress and challenges in the engineering of non-cellulolytic microorganisms for consolidated bioprocessing. Curr Opin Biotechnol 33:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2014.10.003
Deparis Q, Claes A, Foulquié-Moreno MR, Thevelein JM (2017) Engineering tolerance to industrially relevant stress factors in yeast cell factories. FEMS Yeast Res 17:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fox036
Dunn B, Richter C, Kvitek DJ, Pugh T, Sherlock G (2012) Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pan-genome reveals a pool of copy number variants distributed in diverse yeast strains from differing industrial environments. Genome Res 22:908–924. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.130310.111
Fan F, Ma G, Li J, Liu Q, Benz JP, Tian C, Ma Y (2015) Genome-wide analysis of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response during lignocellulase production in Neurospora crassa. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0248-5
Fan LH, Zhang ZJ, Mei S, Lu YY, Li M, Wang ZY, Yang JG, Yang ST, Tan TW (2016) Engineering yeast with bifunctional minicellulosome and cellodextrin pathway for co-utilization of cellulose-mixed sugars. Biotechnol Biofuels 9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0554-6
Favaro L, Basaglia M, Trento A, Van Rensburg E, García-Aparicio M, Van Zyl WH, Casella S (2013) Exploring grape marc as trove for new thermotolerant and inhibitor-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation bioethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:168. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-168
Favaro L, Viktor MJ, Rose SH, Viljoen-Bloom M, Van Zyl WH, Basaglia M, Cagnin L, Casella S (2015) Consolidated bioprocessing of starchy substrates into ethanol by industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains secreting fungal amylases. Biotechnol Bioeng 112:1751–1760. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25591
Favaro L, Jansen T, Van Zyl WH (2019) Exploring industrial and natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for the bio-based economy from biomass: the case of bioethanol. Crit Rev Biotechnol 39:800–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2019.1619157
Fay JC, McCullough HL, Sniegowski PD, Eisen MB (2004) Population genetic variation in gene expression is associated with phenotypic variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol 5:R26. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-4-r26
Fitzgerald I, Glick BS (2014) Secretion of a foreign protein from budding yeasts is enhanced by cotranslational translocation and by suppression of vacuolar targeting. Microb Cell Factories 13:125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-014-0125-0
Francisco JA, Stathopoulos C, Warren RA, Kilburn DG, Georgiou G (1993) Specific adhesion and hydrolysis of celluose by intact Escherichia coli expressing surface anchored cellulase or cellulose binding domains. Bio/Technol 11:491. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0493-491
Fraser HB, Levy S, Chavan A, Shah HS, Perez JC, Zhou Y, Siegal ML, Sinha H (2012) Polygenic cis-regulatory adaptation in the evolution of yeast pathogenicity. Genome Res 22:1930–1939. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.134080.111.22
Fujita Y, Ito J, Ueda M, Fukuda H, Kondo A (2004) Synergistic saccharification and direct fermentation to ethanol of amorphous cellulose by use of an engineered yeast strain codisplaying three types of cellulolytic enzyme. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.2.1207
Galazka JM, Tian C, Beeson WT, Martinez B, Glass NL, Cate JH (2010) Cellodextrin transport in yeast for improved biofuel production. Science 330:84–86. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192838
Gallone B, Steensels J, Prahl T, Soriaga L, Saels V, Herrera-Malaver B, Merlevede A, Roncoroni M, Voordeckers K, Miraglia L, Teiling C (2016) Domestication and divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae beer yeasts. Cell 166:1397–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.020
Gao D, Uppugundla N, Chundawat SP, Yu X, Hermanson S, Gowda K, Brumm P, Mead D, Dale BE (2011) Hemicellulases and auxillary enzymes for improved conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to monosaccharides. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-4-5
Garcia-Rios E, Bos E, Morard M, Parts L, Liti G, Guillamon JM (2017) The genetic architecture of low-temperature adaptation in the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 18:159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3572-2
Gasser B, Maurer M, Gach J, Kunert R, Mattanovich D (2006) Engineering of Pichia pastoris for improved production of antibody fragments. Biotechnol Bioeng 94:353–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit
Gasser B, Sauer M, Maurer M, Stadlmayr G, Mattanovich D (2007) Transcriptomics-based identification of novel factors enhancing heterologous protein secretion in yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:6499r6507. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01196-07
Gasser B, Saloheimo M, Rinas U, Dragosits M, Rodríguez-Carmona E, Baumann K, Giuliani M, Parrilli E, Branduardi P, Lang C, Porro D (2008) Protein folding and conformational stress in microbial cells producing recombinant proteins: a host comparative overview. Microb Cell Factories 7:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-7-11
Gasser B, Prielhofer R, Marx H, Maurer M, Nocon J, Steiger M, Puxbaum V, Sauer M, Mattanovich D (2013) Pichia pastoris: protein production host and model organism for biomedical research. Future Microbiol 8:191–208. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.12.133
Gibbons JG, Rinker DC (2015) The genomics of microbial domestication in the fermented food environment. Curr Opin Genet Dev 35:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2015.07.003
Gilkes NR, Kilburn DG, Miller RC Jr, Warren RA (1991) Bacterial cellulases. Bioresour Technol 36:21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(91)90097-4
Gomez S, Adalid-peralta L, Palafox-fonseca H, Cantu-robles VA, Sciutto E, Fragoso G, Bobes RJ, Laclette JP, Yauner P (2015) Genome analysis of excretory / secretory proteins in Taenia solium reveals their abundance of antigenic regions (AAR ). Sci Rep 5:9683. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09683
Gresham D, Desai MM, Tucker CM, Jenq HT, Pai DA, Ward A, Desevo CG, Botstein D, Dunham MJ (2008) The repertoire and dynamics of evolutionary adaptations to controlled nutrient-limited environments in yeast. PLoS Genet. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000303
Guerfal M, Ryckaert S, Jacobs PP, Ameloot P, Van Craenenbroeck K, Derycke R, Callewaert N (2010) The HAC1 gene from Pichia pastoris: characterization and effect of its overexpression on the production of secreted, surface displayed and membrane proteins. Microb Cell Factories 9:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-49
Guo Z, Robin J, Duquesne S, O’Donohue MJ, Marty A, Bordes F (2018) Developing cellulolytic Yarrowia lipolytica as a platform for the production of valuable products in consolidated bioprocessing of cellulose. Biotechnol Biofuels 11:141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1144-6
Gurgu L, Lafraya Á, Polaina J, Marín-Navarro J (2011) Fermentation of cellobiose to ethanol by industrial Saccharomyces strains carrying the β-glucosidase gene (BGL1) from Saccharomycopsis fibuligera. Bioresour Technol 102:5229–5236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.062
Hackel BJ, Huang D, Bubolz JC, Wang XX, Shusta EV (2006) Production of soluble and active transferrin receptor-targeting single-chain antibody using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Pharm Res 23:790r97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-006-9778-7
Hahn-Hägerdal B, Karhumaa K, Fonseca C, Spencer-Martins I, Gorwa-Grauslund MF (2007) Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:937–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0827-2
Harmsen MM, Bruyne MI, Raue HA, Maat J (1996) Overexpression of binding protein and disruption of the PMR1 gene synergistically stimulate secretion of bovine prochymosin but not plant thaumatin in yeast. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 46:365l70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166231
Hayano T, Hirose M, Kikuchi M (1995) Protein disulfide isomerase mutant lacking its isomerase activity accelerates protein folding in the cell. FEBS Lett 377:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(95)01410-1
Holkeri H, Makarow M (1998) Different degradation pathways for heterologous glycoproteins in yeast. FEBS Lett 429:162–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00586-9
Holland SL, Reader T, Dyer PS, Avery SV (2014) Phenotypic heterogeneity is a selected trait in natural yeast populations subject to environmental stress. Environ Microbiol 16:1729–1740. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12243
Hong E, Davidson AR, Kaiser CA (1996) A pathway for targeting soluble misfolded proteins to the yeast vacuole. J Cell Biol 135:623e33. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.135.3.623
Hou J, Tyo KEJ, Liu Z, Petranovic D, Nielsen J (2012) Metabolic engineering of recombinant protein secretion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 12:491–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00810.x
Hou J, Osterlund T, Liu Z, Petranovic D, Nielsen J (2013) Heat shock response improves heterologous protein secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:3559–3568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4596-9
Hu J, Mok YK, Saddler JN (2018a) Can we reduce the cellulase enzyme loading required to achieve efficient lignocellulose deconstruction by only using the initially absorbed enzymes? ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:6233–6239. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00004
Hu J, Zhai R, Tian D, Saddler JN (2018b) Substrate factors that influence cellulase accessibility and catalytic activity during the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Fang X, Qu Y (eds) Fungal cellulolytic enzymes. Springer, Singapore, pp 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0749-2
Huang M, Bai Y, Sjostrom SL, Hallström BM, Liu Z, Petranovic D, Uhlén M, Joensson HN, Andersson-Svahn H, Nielsen J (2015) Microfluidic screening and whole-genome sequencing identifies mutations associated with improved protein secretion by yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E4689–E4696. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506460112
Hubmann G, Foulquié-moreno MR, Nevoigt E, Duitama J, Meurens N, Pais TM, Mathé L, Thi H, Nguyen T, Swinnen S (2013) Quantitative trait analysis of yeast biodiversity yields novel gene tools for metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 17:68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2013.02.006
Idiris A, Tohda H, Kumagai H, Takegawa K (2010) Engineering of protein secretion in yeast: strategies and impact on protein production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:403–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2447-0
Ilmén M, Den Haan R, Brevnova E, McBride J, Wiswall E, Froehlich A, Koivula A, Voutilainen SP, Silka-Aho M, La Grange DC, Thorngren N (2011) High level secretion of cellobiohydrolases by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-4-30
Inokuma K, Iwamoto R, Bamba T, Haunuma T, Kondo A (2017) Improvement of xylose fermentation ability under heat and acid co-stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using genome shuffling technique. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 5:81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2019.11.004
Inokuma K, Kurono H, Den Haan R, Van Zyl WH, Hasunuma T, Kondo A (2020) Novel strategy for anchorage position control of GPI-attached proteins in the yeast cell wall using different GPI-anchoring domains. Metab Eng 57:110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2019.11.004
Jansen LA, Bracher JM, Papapetridis I, Verhoeven MD, De Bruijn H, De Waal PP, Van Maris AJA, Klaassen P, Pronk JT (2017a) Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation. FEMS Yeast Res 17:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fox044
Jansen T, Hoff JW, Jolly N (2017b) Mating of natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for improved glucose fermentation and lignocellulosic inhibitor tolerance. Folia Microbiol 63:155–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-017-0546-3
Jin M, Sarks C, Gunawan C, Bice BD, Simonett SP, Narasimhan RA, Willis LB, Dale BE, Balan V, Sato TK (2013) Phenotypic selection of a wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation of AFEXTM pretreated corn stover. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:108. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-108
Kanjou N, Nagao K, Ohmiya Y, Ohgiya S (2007) Yeast mutant with efficient secretion identified by a novel secretory reporter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 358:429h34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.140
Kao KC, Sherlock G (2008) Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet 40:1499re1504. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.280
Kaufman RJ (2004) Regulation of mRNA translation by protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. Trends Biochem Sci 29:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2004.01.004
Khan W, Augustyn OPH, Van Der Westhuizen TJ, Lambrechts MG, Pretorius IS (2000) Geographic distribution and evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from vineyards in the warmer, inland regions of the Western Cape in South Africa. S Afr J Enol Vitic 21:17–31. https://doi.org/10.21548/21-1-2184
Khramtsov N, McDade L, Amerik A, Yu E, Divatia K, Tikhonov A, Minto M, Kabongo-Mubalamate G, Markovic Z, Ruiz-Martinez M, Henck S (2011) Industrial yeast strain engineered to ferment ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 102:8310–8313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.075
Kim M, Han K, Kang H, Rhee S (2003) Co-expression of BiP increased antithrombotic hirudin production in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biotechnol 101:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(02)00288-2
Kitagawa T, Kohda K, Tokuhiro K, Hoshida H, Akada R, Takahashi H, Imaeda T (2011) Identification of genes that enhance cellulase protein production in yeast. J Biotechnol 151:194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.12.002
Kleman-Leyer KM, SiiKa-Aho M, Teeri TT, Kirk TK (1996) The cellulases endoglucanase I and cellobiohydrolase II of Trichoderma reesei act synergistically to solubilize native cotton cellulose but not to decrease its molecular size. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2883–2887
Knowles J, Lehtovaara P, Penttilä M, Teeri T, Harkki A, Salovuori I (1987) The cellulase genes of Trichoderma. Anton Leeuw Int J G 53:335–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00400557
Kroukamp H (2015) Improving the protein secretion capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with strain engineering. Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Kroukamp H, Den Haan R, Van Wyk N, Van Zyl WH (2013) Overexpression of native PSE1 and SOD1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improved heterologous cellulase secretion. Appl Energy 102:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.05.062
Kroukamp H, Den Haan R, La Grange DC, Sibanda N, Foulquié-Moreno MR, Thevelein JM, Van Zyl WH (2017) Strain breeding enhanced heterologous cellobiohydrolase secretion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a protein specific manner. Biotechnol J 12:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201700346
Kroukamp H, Den Haan R, Van Zyl JD, Van Zyl WH (2018) Rational strain engineering interventions to enhance cellulase secretion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 12:108–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1824
Krysan D (2009) The cell wall and endoplasmic reticulum stress responses are coordinately regulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Commun Integr Biol. https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.2.3.8097
Kunitake E, Kobayashi T (2017) Conservation and diversity of the regulators of cellulolytic enzyme genes in ascomycete fungi. Curr Genet 63:951–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-017-0695-6
Kvitek DJ, Will JL, Gasch AP (2008) Variations in stress sensitivity and genomic expression in diverse S. cerevisiae isolates. PLoS Genet 10:e1000223. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000223
La Grange DC, Den Haan R, Van Zyl WH (2010) Engineering cellulolytic ability into bioprocessing organisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:1195–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2660-x
Lambertz C, Garvey M, Klinger J, Heesel D, Klose H, Fischer R, Commandeur U (2014) Challenges and advances in the heterologous expression of cellulolytic enzymes: a review. Biotechnol Biofuels 7:135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-014-0135-5
Lamour J, Wan C, Zhang M, Zhao X, Den Haan R (2019) Overexpression of endogenous stress-tolerance related genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improved strain robustness and production of heterologous cellobiohydrolase. FEMS Yeast Res 19:foz035. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fox035
Lee K, Neigeborn L, Kaufman RJ (2003) The unfolded protein response is required for haploid tolerance in yeast. J Biol Chem 278:11818–11827. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M210475200
Li DC, Yang F, Lu B, Chen DF, Yang WJ (2012) Thermotolerance and molecular chaperone function of the small heat shock protein Hsp20p from hyperthermophilic archaeon, Sulfolobus solfataricus. Cell Stress Chaperones 17:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12192-011-0289-z
Liti G, Louis EJ (2012) Advances in quantitative trait analysis in yeast. PLoS Genet 8:e1002912. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002912
Liu G, Qu Y (2019) Engineering of filamentous fungi for efficient conversion of lignocellulose: tools, recent advances and prospects. Biotechnol Adv 37:519–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.12.004
Liu Z, Liu L, Österlund T, Hou J, Huang M, Fagerberg L, Petranovic D, Uhlon M, Nielsen J (2014) Improved production of a heterologous amylase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by inverse metabolic engineering. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:5542–5550. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00712-14
Liu Z, Inokuma K, Ho SH, Den Haan R, Hasunuma T, Van Zyl WH, Kondo A (2015) Combined cell-surface display- and secretion-based strategies for production of cellulosic ethanol with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0344-6
Liu Z, Ho SH, Hasunuma T, Chang JS, Ren NQ, Kondo A (2016) Recent advances in yeast cell-surface display technologies for waste biorefineries. Bioresour Technol 215:324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.132
Liu Z, Inokuma K, Ho S, Den Haan R, Van Zyl WH, Hasunuma T, Kondo A (2017) Improvement of ethanol production from crystalline cellulose via optimizing cellulase ratios in cellulolytic Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 114:1201–1207. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26252
Liu H, Sun J, Chang J-S, Shukla P (2018) Engineering microbes for direction fermentation of cellulose to bioethanol. Crit Rev Biotechnol 38:1089–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2018.1452891
Loaces I, Schein S, Noya F (2017) Ethanol production by Escherichia coli from Arundo donax biomass under SSF, SHF or CBP process configurations and in situ production of a multifunctional glucanase and xylanase. Bioresour Technol 224:307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.075
Losordo Z, Mcbride J, Van Rooyen J, Wenger K, Willies D, Froehlich A, Macedo I, Lynd L (2016) Cost competitive second-generation ethanol production from hemicellulose in a Brazilian sugarcane biorefinery. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 10:589–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1663
Lynd LR (1996) Overview and evaluation of fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass: technology, economics, the environment, and policy. Annu Rev Environ Resour 21:406–465. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.21.1.403
Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Van Zyl WH, Isak S, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Am Soc Microbiol 66:506–577. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506
Lynd LR, Van Zyl WH, McBride JE, Laser M (2005) Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16:577–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2005.08.009
Lynd LR, Liang X, Biddy MJ, Allee A, Cai H, Foust T, Himmel ME, Laser MS, Wang M, Wyman CE (2017a) Cellulosic ethanol: status and innovation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 45:202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2017.03.008
Lynd LR, Guss AM, Himmel ME, Beri D, Herring C, Holwerda EK, Murphy SJ, Olson DG, Paye J, Rydzak T, Shao X, Tian L, Worthen R (2017b) Advances in consolidated bioprocessing using Clostridium thermocellum and Thermoanaerobacter saccharolyticum. In: Wittmann C, Liao JC (eds) Industrial biotechnology: microorganims. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH @ Co. KGaA. 365–395
Malavazi I, Goldman GH, Brown NA (2014) The importance of connections between the cell wall integrity pathway and the unfolded protein response in filamentous fungi. Brief Funct Genomics 13(456–470):11. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elu027
Mandels M, Reese ET (1957) Induction of cellulase in Trichoderma viride as influenced by carbon sources and metals. J Bacteriol 73:269
Marsalek L, Gruber C, Altmann F, Aleschko M, Gasser B, Puxbaum V, Tulln T (2017) Disruption of genes involved in CORVET complex leads to enhanced secretion of heterologous carboxylesterase only in protease deficient Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol J 12:1600584. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201600584
Mhuantong W, Wichadakul D, Phienluphon A, Boonyapakron K, Champreda V, Deenarn P, Suwannarangsee S (2019) Identification and evaluation of novel anchoring proteins for cell surface display on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 12:3085–3097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09667-5
Mukherjee V, Steensels J, Lievens B, Van de Voorde I, Verplaetse A, Aerts G, Willems KS, Thevelein JM, Verstrepen KJ, Ruyters S (2014) Phenotypic evaluation of natural and industrial Saccharomyces yeasts for different traits desirable in industrial bioethanol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:9483–9498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6090-z
Nanduri J, Tartakoff AM (2001) Perturbation of the nucleus: a novel HOG1p-independent, PKC1p-dependent consequence of hypertonic shock in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 12(1835):41. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.12.6.1835
Nevoigt E (2008) Progress in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 72:379–412. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00025-07
Nguyen M, Aiyar RS, Proctor M, Sakhanenko NA, Galas DJ (2014) An evaluation of high-throughput approaches to QTL mapping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 196:853–865. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.160291
Nierras CR, Warner JR (1999) Protein kinase c enables the regulatory circuit that connects membrane synthesis to ribosome synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 274:13235l41. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.19.13235
Oud B, Van Maris AJA, Daran JM, Pronk JT (2012) Genome-wide analytical approaches for reverse metabolic engineering of industrially relevant phenotypes in yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 12:183–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00776.x
Patnala R, Clements J, Batra J (2013) Candidate gene association studies: a comprehensive guide to useful in silico tools. BMC Genet 14:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-14-39
Payne T, Finnis C, Evans LR, Mead DJ, Avery SV, Archer DB, Sleep D (2008) Modulation of chaperone gene expression in mutagenized Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains developed for recombinant human albumin production results in increased production of multiple heterologous proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:7759–7766. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01178-08
Penttilä ME, Andri L, Lehtovaara P, Bailey M, Teeri TT, Knowles JKC (1988) Efficient secretion of two fungal cellobiohydrolases by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 63:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(88)90549-5
Pereira FB, Romaní A, Ruiz HA, Teixeira JA, Domingues L (2014) Industrial robust yeast isolates with great potential for fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 161:192–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.043
Pereira JPC, Verheijen PJT, Straathof AJJ (2016) Growth inhibition of S. cerevisiae, B. subtilis, and E. coli by lignocellulosic and fermentation products. Biotechnol Prod Process Eng 100:9069–9080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7642-1
Peter J, De Chiara M, Friedrich A, Yue J, Pflieger D, Bergström A, Sigwalt A, Bare A, Freel K, Llored A, Cruaud C (2018) Genome evolution across 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates. Nature 556:339. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0030-5
Pringsheim H, Magnus-von Merkatz A (1919) Fermentversuche an Zelluloseabbauprodukten. Hoppe-Seyler´s Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie 105:173–178. https://doi.org/10.1515/bchm2.1919.105.3-4.173
Puxbaum V, Mattanovich D (2015) Quo vadis? The challenges of recombinant protein folding and secretion in Pichia pastoris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:2925–2938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6470-z
Raimondi S, Zanni E, Talora C, Rossi M, Palleschi C, Uccelletti D (2008) SOD1, a new Kluyveromyces lactis helper gene for heterologous protein secretion. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:7130–7137. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00955-08
Rakestraw JA, Baskaran AR, Wittrup KD (2006) A flow cytometric assay for screening improved heterologous protein secretion in yeast. Biotechnol Prog 22:1200–1208. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp0600233
Rakestraw J, Stephen A, Sazinsky L, Piatesi A, Antipov E, Wittrup KD (2009) Directed evolution of a secretory leader for the improved expression of heterologous proteins and full length antibodies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 103:1192–1201. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22338
Renzaho AMN, Kamara JK, Toole M (2017) Biofuel production and its impact on food security in low and middle income countries: implications for the post-2015 sustainable development goals. Renew Sust Energ Rev 78:503–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.072
Rieseberg LH, Archer MA, Wayne RK (1999) Short review transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Hereditary 83:363–372. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00617.x
Robinson AS, Hines V, Wittrup KD (1994) Protein disulfide isomerase overexpression increases secretion of foreign proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Biotechnol 12:381–384. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0494-381
Robinson AS, Bockhaus JA, Voegeler AC, Wittrup KD, Voegler AC, Wittrup KD (1996) Reduction of BiP levels decrease heterologous protein secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 271:10017o22. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.17.10017
Rojas-tapias DF, Helmann JD (2018) Stabilization of Bacillus subtilis SPX under cell wall stress requires the anti-adaptor protein Yirb. PLoS Genet 14:e1007531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007531
Rudolph HK, Antebi A, Fink GR, Buckley CM, Dorman TE, LeVitre J, Davidow LS, Mao J, Moir DT (1989) The yeast secretory pathway is perturbed by mutations in PMR1, a member of a Ca 2+ ATPase family. Cell 58:133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90410-8
Ruohonen L, Toikkanen J, Tieaho V, Outola M, Soderlund H, Keranen S (1997) Enhancement of protein secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by overproduction of SSO protein, a late-acting component of the secretory machinery. Yeast 13:337–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19770330)13:4<337::AID-YEAS98>3.0C);2-K
Ruyters S, Mukherjee V, Verstrepen KJ, Thevelein JM, Willems KA, Lievens B (2014) Assessing the potential of wild yeasts for bioethanol production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 42:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-014-1544-y
Sadie CJ, Rose SH, Den Haan R, Van Zyl WH (2011) Co-expression of a cellobiose phosphorylase and lactose permease enables intracellular cellobiose utilisation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:1373–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3164-z
Sakai A, Shimizu Y, Hishinuma F (1988) Isolation and characterization of mutants which show an oversecretion phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 119:499–506
Sasaki Y, Mitsui R, Yamada R, Ogino H (2019) Secretory overexpression of the endoglucanase by Saccharomyces cerevisiae via CRISPR-δ-integration and multiple promoter shuffling. Enzym Microb Technol 121:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2018.10.014
Schacherer J, Shapiro JA, Ruderfer DM, Kruglyak L (2009) Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 458:342–345. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07670
Schröder M, Kaufman RJ (2005) ER stress and the unfolded protein response. Mutat Res-Fund Mol 569:29–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.056
Schuck S (2016) On keeping the right ER size. Nat Cell Biol 18:1118. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3430
Schuck S, Prinz WA, Thorn KS, Voss C, Prinz A (2009) Membrane protein alleviates expansion endoplasmic reticulum stress independently of the unfolded response. J Cell Biol 187:525–536. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200
Scrimale T, Didone L, De Bentley KL, Krysan DJ (2009) The unfolded protien response is induced by the cell wall integrity mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascade and is required for cell wall integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 20:164–175. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08
Serrano R, Martno H, Casamayor A, Ariao J (2006) Signaling alkaline pH stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae through the WSC1 cell surface sensor and the SLT2 MAPK pathway. J Biol Chem 281:39785–39795. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M604497200
Smekenov I, Baktambayeva M, Bissenbayev K, Saparbayev M, Taipakova S, Bissenbaev AK (2019) Heterologous secretory expression of β-glucosidase from Thermoascus aurantiacus in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Braz J Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-019-00192-1
Smith RA, Duncan MJ, Moir DT (1985) Heterologous protein secretion from yeast. Science 229:1219–1224. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3939723
Song Y, Sata J, Saito A, Usui M, Azakami H, Kato A (2001) Effects of calnexin deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the secretion of glycosylated lysozymes. J Biochem 130:757–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003046
Song H, Gao Y, Yang Y, Xiao W, Liu S, Xia W, Liu Z, Yi L, Jiang Z (2016) Synergistic effect of cellulase and xylanase during hydrolysis of natural lignocellulosic substrates. Bioresour Technol 219:710–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.035
Song X, Li Y, Wu Y, Cai M, Liu Q, Gao K, Zhang X, Bai Y, Xu H, Qiao M (2018) Metabolic engineering strategies for improvement of ethanol production in cellulolytic Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 18:foy090. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foy090
Steensels J, Verstrepen KJ (2014) Taming wild yeast: potential of conventional and nonconventional yeasts in industrial fermentations. Annu Rev Microbiol 68:61–80. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-091213-113025
Steensels J, Snoek T, Meersman E, Nicolino MP, Voordeckers K, Verstrepen KJ (2014) Improving industrial yeast strains: exploiting natural and artificial diversity. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38:947–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12073
Steenwyk J, Rokas A (2017) Extensive copy number variation in fermentation-related genes among Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains. G3 Genes Genom Genet 7:1475–1485. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.040105
Steinmetz LM, Sinha H, Richards DR, Spiegelman JI, Oefner PJ, McCusker JH, Davis RW (2002) Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast. Nature 416:326–330. https://doi.org/10.1038/416326a
Strange A (2016) Optimising recombinant protein secretion in wild strains. Master’s dissertation. University of Kent, UK
Sun H, Schneeberger K (2015) Chapter 19 SHOREmap v3.0: fast and accurate identifi cation of causal mutations from forward genetic screens. Plant Funct Genom (pp 381-395) Humana Press, New York https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2444-8
Sun N, Qian Y, Wang W, Zhong Y, Dai M (2018) Heterologous expression of Talaromyces emersonii cellobiohydrolase Cel7a in Trichoderma reesei increases the efficiency of corncob residues saccharification. Biotechnol Lett 40:1119–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-018-2564-x
Swinnen S, Thevelein JM, Nevoigt E (2012a) Genetic mapping of quantitative phenotypic traits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 12:215–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00777.x
Swinnen S, Schaerlaekens K, Pais K, Claesen J, Hubmann G, Yang Y, Demeke M, Foulquié-Moreno MR, Goovaerts A, Souvereyns K, Clement L (2012b) Identification of novel causative genes determining the complex trait of high ethanol tolerance in yeast using pooled-segregant whole-genome sequence analysis. Genome Res 22:975–984. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.131698.111
Tang H, Bao X, Shen Y, Song M, Wang S (2015) Engineering protein folding and translocation improves heterologous protein secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 112:1872–1882. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25596
Toikkanen JH, Miller KJ, Söderlund H, Jäntti J, Keränen S (2003) The β subunit of the Sec61p endoplasmic reticulum translocon interacts with the exocyst complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 278:20946–20953. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M213111200
Toikkanen JH, Sundqvist L, Keränen S (2004) Kluyveromyces lactis SSO1 and SEB1 genes are functional in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and enhance production of secreted proteins when overexpressed. Yeast 21:1045e55. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1151
Tomimoto K, Fujita Y, Iwaki T, Chiba Y, Jigami Y, Nakayama K, Nakajima Y, Abe H (2013) Protease-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for the synthesis of human-compatible glycoproteins. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 77:2461–2466. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.130588
Torget R, Walter P, Himmel M, Grohmann K (1991) Dilute-acid pretreatment of corn residues and short-rotation woody crops. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 28:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02922590
Torres EM, Sokolsky T, Tucker CM, Chan LY, Boselli M, Dunham MJ, Amon A (2007) Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317:916–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1142210
Torres-Quiroz F, García-Marqués S, Coria R, Randez-Gil F, Prieto JA (2010) The activity of yeast HOG1 MAPK is required during endoplasmic reticulum stress induced by tunicamycin exposure. J Biol Chem 285:20088–20096. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.063578
Tredwell GD, Aw R, Edwards-Jones B, Leak DJ, Bundy JG (2017) Rapid screening of cellular stress responses in recombinant Pichia pastoris strains using metabolite profiling. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 44:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-017-1904-5
Valkonen M, Penttilä M (2003) Effects of inactivation and constitutive expression of the unfolded- protein response pathway on protein production in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:2065–2072. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.4.2065
Valkonen M, Ward M, Wang H, Penttilä M (2003) Improvement of foreign-protein production in Aspergillus niger var. awamori by constitutive induction of the unfolded-protein response. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6979–6986. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.12.6979
Van der Westhuizen TJ, Augustyn OPH, Pretorius IS (2000) Geographical distribution of indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from vineyards in the coastal regions of the Western Cape in South Africa. S Afr J Enol Vitic 21:3–9. https://doi.org/10.21548/21-1-2179
Van Rensburg E, Den Haan R, Smith J, Van Zyl WH, Görgens JF (2012) The metabolic burden of cellulase expression by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y294 in aerobic batch culture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 96:197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4037-9
Van Rijn R, Nieves IU, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO, Vermerris E (2018) Techno-economic evalution of cellulosic ethanol production based on pilot biorefinery data: a case study of sweet sorghum bagasse processed via L+SScF. BioEnergy Res 11:414–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-018-9906-3
Van Rooyen R, Hahn-Hägerdal B, La Grange DC, Van Zyl WH (2005) Construction of cellobiose-growing and fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. J Biotechnol 120:284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.06.013
Van Zyl WH, Lynd L, Den Haan R, McBride JE (2007) Consolidated bioprocessing for bioethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108:205–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2007_061
Van Zyl WH, Chimphango AFA, Den Haan R, Görgens JF, Chirwa PWC (2011) Next-generation cellulosic ethanol technologies and their contribution to a sustainable Africa next-generation cellulosic ethanol technologies and their contribution to a sustainable Africa. Interface Focus 1:196–211. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2010.0017
Van Zyl JD, Den Haan R, Van Zyl WH (2014) Over-expression of native Saccharomyces cerevisiae exocytic SNARE genes increased heterologous cellulase secretion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:5567–5578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5647-1
Van Zyl JD, Den Haan R, Van Zyl WH (2016) Overexpression of native Saccharomyces cerevisiae ER-to-golgi SNARE genes increased heterologous cellulase secretion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:505–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-7022-2
Ventorino V, Aliberti A, Faraco V, Robertiello A, Giacobbe S, Ercolini D, Amore A, Fagnano M, Pepe O (2015) Exploring the microbiota dynamics related to vegetable biomasses degradation and study of lignocellulose-degrading bacteria for industrial biotechnological application. Sci Rep 5:8161. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08161
Vogl T, Thallinger GG, Zellnig G, Drew D, Cregg JM, Glieder A, Freigassner M (2014) Towards improved membrane protein production in Pichia pastoris: general and specific transcriptional response to membrane protein overexpression. New Biotechnol 31:538–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2014.02.009
Wang T, Huang C, Chen H, Ho P, Ke H, Cho H, Ruan S, Hung KY, Wang IL, Yn C, Sung HM (2013) Systematic screening of glycosylation- and trafficking-associated gene knockouts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies mutants with improved heterologous exocellulase activity and host secretion. BMC Biotechnol 13:71. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-13-71
Wang D, Li F, Wang S (2016) Engineering a natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for ethanol production from inulin by consolidated bioprocessing. Biotechnol Biofuels 9:96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0511-4
Wang G, Björk SM, Huang M, Liu Q, Campbell K, Nielsen J, Joensson HN, Petranovic D (2019) RNAi expression tuning, microfluidic screening, and genome recombineering for improved protein production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:201820561. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820561116
Weisz PB, Haag WO, ROdewalk PG (1979) Catalytic production of high-grade fuel (gasoline) from biomass compounds by shape-selective catalysis. Science 4414:57–58. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.206.4414.57
Wenger JW, Schwartz K, Sherlock G (2010) Bulk segregant analysis by high-throughput sequencing reveals a novel xylose utilization gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Gen 6:e1000942. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000942
Wentz E, Shusta EV (2007) A novel high-throughput screen reveals yeast genes that increase secretion of heterologous proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1189–1198. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02427-06
White RE, Powell DJ, Berry C (2011) HIV proteinase inhibitors target the DDI1-like protein of leishmania parasites. FASEB J 25:1729–1736. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.10-178947
Wohlbach DJ, Rovinskiy N, Lewis JA, Sardi M, Schackwitz WS, Martin JA, Deshpande S, Daum CG, Lipzen A, Sato TK, Gasch AP (2014) Comparative genomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae natural isolates for bioenergy production. Genome Biol Evol 6:2557–2566. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu199
Wolff AM, Petersen JGL, Nilsson-tillgren T (1999) The open reading frame YAL048c affects the secretion of proteinase a in S. cerevisiae. Yeast 434:427–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SIC)1097-0061(19990330)15:5,427::AID-YEA362.3.0.CO;2-5
Wu Y, Sun X, Xue X, Luo H, Yao B, Xie X, Su X (2017) Overexpressing key component genes of the secretion pathway for enhanced secretion of an Aspergillus niger glucose oxidase in Trichoderma reesei. Enzym Microb Technol 106:83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.07.007
Xia J, Yang Y, Liu C, Yang S, Bai F (2019) Engineering Zymomonas mobilis for robust cellulosic ethanol production. Trends Biochem Sci 37:960–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.02.002
Xu P, Raden D, Doyle FJ, Robinson AS (2005) Analysis of unfolded protein response during single-chain antibody expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals different roles for BiP and PDI in folding. Metab Eng 7:269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2005.04.002
Xu L, Shen Y, Hou J, Peng B, Tang H, Bao X (2014) Secretory pathway engineering enhances secretion of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 117:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.06.017
Xu Q, Alahuhta M, Wei H, Knoshaug EP, Wang W, Baker JO, Vander Wall TOE, Himmel ME, Zhang M (2018) Biotechnology for biofuels expression of an endoglucanase – cellobiohydrolase fusion protein and Lipomyces starkeyi. Biotechnol Biofuels 11:322. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1301-y
Yamada R, Taniguchi N, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A (2010) Cocktail delta-integration: a novel method to construct cellulolytic enzyme expression ratio-optimized yeast strains. Microb Cell Factories 9:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-32
Yamada R, Taniguchi N, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A (2011) Direct ethanol production from cellulosic materials using a diploid strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with optimized cellulase expression. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-4-8
Yan S, Wu G (2013) Secretory pathway of cellulase: a mini-review. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:177. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-177
Yang H, Liu C, Zou S (2014) Improving Bgl1 gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through meiosis in an isogenic triploid. Biotechnol Lett 36:1279–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-014-1471-z
Yang P, Wu Y, Zheng Z, Cao L, Zhu X, Mu D (2018) CRISPR-Cas9 approach constructing cellulase SESTC- engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of orange peel ethanol. Front Microbiol 9:2436. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02436
Zahrl RJ, Gasser B, Mattanovich D, Ferrer P (2019) Detection and elimination of cellular bottleneck in protein-producing yeasts. In: Recombinant Protein Production in Yeast. Humana Press, New York, pp 75–95
Zakrzewska A, Van Eikenhorst G, Burggraaff JEC, Vis DJ, Hoefsloot H, Delneri D, Oliver SG, Brul S, Smits GJ (2011) Genome-wide analysis of yeast stress survival and tolerance acquisition to analyze the central trade-off between growth rate and cellular robustness. Mol Biol Cell 22:4435–4446. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-08-0721
Zhang BY, Chang A, Kjeldsen TB, Arvan P (2001) Intracellular retention of newly synthesized insulin in yeast is caused by endoproteolytic processing in the Golgi complex. J Cell Biol 153:1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.153.6.1187
Zhang K, Zhang L, Fang Y, Jin X, Qi L, Wu X, Zheng D (2016) Genomic structural variation contributes to phenotypic change of industrial bioethanol yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 16:fov118. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fov118
Zhou S, Ingram LO (2000) Synergistic hydrolysis of carboxymethyl cellulose and acid-swollen cellulose by two endoglucanases (celz and cely) from Erwinia chrysanthemi. J Bacteriol 182:5676–5682. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.20.5676-5682.2000
Funding
The authors would like to thank the National Research Foundation (NRF) for financial support to the Chair of Energy Research (grant number UID 86423 awarded to WHvZ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SAD contributed to the preparation of the manuscript, its formatting, and collection of data for writing and preparing figures. RDH and WHVZ contributed to the design, idea, final editing, and revision of the whole manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davison, S.A., den Haan, R. & van Zyl, W.H. Exploiting strain diversity and rational engineering strategies to enhance recombinant cellulase secretion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104, 5163–5184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10602-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10602-2