Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Establishing local diagnostic reference levels for pediatric percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography interventions and optimizing the routine practice

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Liver-transplanted, immunosuppressed pediatric patients undergoing repeated percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) require optimized exposure to ionizing radiation.

Objective

To establish local diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for pediatric PTC and investigate the routine use of X-ray equipment.

Materials and methods

The study retrospectively analyzed data collected between October 2016 and June 2018 from a single center performing PTC. We collected exposure parameters including kerma area product (PKA), air kerma at patient entrance reference point (Ka,r) and fluoroscopy time via a dose archiving and communication system. Local diagnostic reference levels were derived as the 50th percentile of the distributions while considering published recommended weight groups. We investigated exposure variability with procedure complexity and with technical parameters recovered from the radiation dose structured report.

Results

The analysis included 162 PTC procedures performed in 64 children: 58% male, average age 6 years (range 39 days to 16 years) and weight 24 kg (range 3–60 kg). Local DRLs for weight groups 0–5 kg, 5–15 kg, 15–30 kg, 30–50 kg and 50–80 kg were, respectively, 6 cGy.cm2, 22 cGy.cm2, 68 cGy.cm2, 107 cGy.cm2 and 179 cGy.cm2 in PKA. Local DRLs per weight group were also established for intermediate and complex procedures. Radiation dose structured report analysis highlighted good local practice with efficient collimation, low fluoroscopy pulse rate, no magnification and limited use of radiographic acquisitions. Meanwhile, table and detector positioning and tube projection could still be optimized. PKA correlated significantly with the number of acquisitions and tube-to-table distance.

Conclusion

We established local DRLs for children undergoing PTC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lorenz JM, Funaki B, Leef JA et al (2001) Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage in pediatric liver transplant patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:761–765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lorenz JM (2015) The role of interventional radiology in the multidisciplinary management of biliary complications after liver transplantation. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 18:266–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Czubkowski P, Markiewicz-Kijewska M, Janiszewski K et al (2018) Percutaneous treatment of biliary strictures after pediatric liver transplantation. Ann Transplant 23:845–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heffron TG, Emond JC, Whitington PF et al (1992) Biliary complications in pediatric liver transplantation. A comparison of decreased-size and whole grafts. Transplantation 53:391–395

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lallier M, St-Vil D, Luks FI et al (1993) Biliary tract complications in pediatric orthotopic liver transplantation. J Pediatr Surg 28:1102–1105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Horvat N, Marcelino ASZ, Horvat JV et al (2017) Pediatric liver transplant: techniques and complications. Radiographics 37:1612–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kleinerman R (2006) Cancer risks following diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure in children. Pediatr Radiol 36:121–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Linet M, Kim K, Rajaraman P (2009) Children’s exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations. Pediatr Radiol 39:S4–S26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2017) ICRP publication 135: diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP 46:1–144

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Commission (2018) Radiation protection No. 185: European guidelines on diagnostic reference levels for paediatric imaging. http://www.eurosafeimaging.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/rp_185.pdf. Accessed 26 Dec 2019

  11. Righi D, Doriguzzi A, Rampado O et al (2008) Interventional procedures for biliary drainage with bilioplasty in pediatric patients: dosimetric aspects. Radiol Med 113:429–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miraglia R, Maruzzelli L, Tuzzolino F et al (2013) Radiation exposure in biliary procedures performed to manage anastomotic strictures in pediatric liver transplant recipients: comparison between radiation exposure levels using an image intensifier and a flat-panel detector-based system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36:1670–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) (2005) Supplement 94: diagnostic X-ray radiation dose reporting (dose SR). DICOM Standards Committee, Rosslyn

    Google Scholar 

  14. R (2019) The R Project for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org. Accessed 26 Dec 2019

  15. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2011) Radiation dose management for fluoroscopically guided interventional medical procedures. NCRP Report 168. NCRP, Bethesda

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jad Farah.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farah, J., Pariente, D., Esaki, A. et al. Establishing local diagnostic reference levels for pediatric percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography interventions and optimizing the routine practice. Pediatr Radiol 50, 827–832 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04627-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04627-y

Keywords

Navigation