Skip to main content
Log in

Variability of T1-weighted signal intensity of pericallosal lipomas in the fetus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pericallosal lipomas are often associated with corpus callosum dysgenesis. The diagnosis of lipoma, suggested on ultrasonography, relies on the classic T1 hyperintensity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, this feature may be absent prenatally.

Objective

Our objective was to study the changes of T1 intensity in fetal lipomas with comparison to postnatal/postmortem data and to assess the factors influencing the signal variations of pericallosal lipomas on prenatal MRI.

Materials and methods

Patients with callosum dysgenesis and interhemispheric hyperechogenicity suggestive of a pericallosal lipoma with available postnatal or postmortem data were included. Gestational age, lipoma size and pattern, corpus callosum size and changes in fetal fat T1 intensity were recorded. Comparison with postmortem neuropathology was available for one fetus.

Results

Eleven patients with callosum dysgenesis and pericallosal lipomas (seven curvilinear and four tubulonodular) were included. All MRI scans were performed in the third trimester. Curvilinear lipomas were thinner and six cases were associated with prenatal T1 iso-intensity. Typical T1 hyperintensity appeared on postnatal MRI only. All tubulonodular lipomas were much larger and showed prenatal T1 hyperintensity. In two patients, the lipoma increased in size on postnatal MRI.

Conclusion

The type and size of a lipoma influence T1 prenatal intensity. Absence of T1 intensity was observed in curvilinear lipomas only. Curvilinear lipomas are much thinner. Changes in T1 intensity may also be related to fat maturation within the lipoma and, subsequently, to gestational age. In the case of callosum dysgenesis, absence of prenatal T1 pericallosal hyperintensity should not exclude the diagnosis of pericallosal lipoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Truwit CL, Barkovich AJ (1990) Pathogenesis of intracranial lipoma: an MR study in 42 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155:855–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yildiz H, Hakyemez B, Koroglu M et al (2006) Intracranial lipomas: importance of localization. Neuroradiology 48:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jabot G, Stoquart-Elsankari S, Saliou G et al (2009) Intracranial lipomas: clinical appearances on neuroimaging and clinical significance. J Neurol 256:851–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dean B, Drayer BP, Beresini DC et al (1988) MR imaging of pericallosal lipoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 9:929–931

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Erro Aguirre ME, de Lapiscina EHM (2014) Lipoma: an overview. In: Hayat M (ed) Tumors of the central nervous system. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 223–229

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ickowitz V, Eurin D, Rypens F et al (2001) Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal follow-up of pericallosal lipoma: report of seven new cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:767–772

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garel C (2004) Pathology of the midline. In: Garel C (ed) MRI of the fetal brain: normal development and cerebral pathologies. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 131–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Atallah A, Lacalm A, Massoud M et al (2017) Limitations and pitfalls in prenatal diagnosis of pericallosal curvilinear lipoma based on a specific imaging pattern. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17400

  9. Garel C, Moutard ML (2014) Main congenital cerebral anomalies: how prenatal imaging aids counseling. Fetal Diagn Ther 35:229–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tart RP, Quisling RG (1991) Curvilinear and tubulonodular varieties of lipoma of the corpus callosum: an MR and CT study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:805–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yilmaz MB, Genc A, Egemen E et al (2016) Pericallosal lipomas: a series of 10 cases with clinical and radiological features. Turk Neurosurg 26:364–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cignini P, Padula F, Giorlandino M et al (2014) Reference charts for fetal corpus callosum length: a prospective cross-sectional study of 2950 fetuses. J Ultrasound Med 33:1065–1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garel C, Cont I, Alberti C et al (2011) Biometry of the corpus callosum in children: MR imaging reference data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1436–1443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tilea B, Alberti C, Adamsbaum C et al (2009) Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: new reference data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:173–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Atanassova P (2001) Immunohistochemical expression of S-100 protein in human embryonal fat cells. Cells Tissues Organs 169:355–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Niwa T, de Vries LS, Manten GT et al (2016) Interhemispheric lipoma, callosal anomaly, and malformations of cortical development: a case series. Neuropediatrics 47:115–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pierre-Kahn A, Zerah M, Renier D et al (1997) Congenital lumbosacral lipomas. Childs Nerv Syst 13:298–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frontini A, Cinti S (2010) Distribution and development of brown adipocytes in the murine and human adipose organ. Cell Metab 11:253–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klingenspor M, Fromme T (2012) Brown adipose tissue. In: Symonds ME (ed) Adipose tissue biology. Springer, New York, pp 39–69

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Saely CH, Geiger K, Drexel H (2012) Brown versus white adipose tissue: a mini-review. Gerontology 58:15–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Symonds ME, Pope M, Budge H (2015) The ontogeny of brown adipose tissue. Annu Rev Nutr 35:295–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Blondiaux E, Chougar L, Gelot A et al (2017) Normal MRI developmental patterns of fetal fat intensity. Pediatr Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-4038-z

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Garel.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chougar, L., Blondiaux, E., Moutard, ML. et al. Variability of T1-weighted signal intensity of pericallosal lipomas in the fetus. Pediatr Radiol 48, 383–391 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-4028-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-4028-1

Keywords

Navigation