Abstract
Background
Paediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is noteworthy for its fibrillary infiltration through neuroparenchyma and its resultant irregular shape. Conventional volumetry methods aim to approximate such irregular tumours to a regular ellipse, which could be less accurate when assessing treatment response on surveillance MRI. Region-of-interest (ROI) volumetry methods, using manually traced tumour profiles on contiguous imaging slices and subsequent computer-aided calculations, may prove more reliable.
Objective
To evaluate whether the reliability of MRI surveillance of DIPGs can be improved by the use of ROI-based volumetry.
Materials and methods
We investigated the use of ROI- and ellipsoid-based methods of volumetry for paediatric DIPGs in a retrospective review of 22 MRI examinations. We assessed the inter- and intraobserver variability of the two methods when performed by four observers.
Results
ROI- and ellipsoid-based methods strongly correlated for all four observers. The ROI-based volumes showed slightly better agreement both between and within observers than the ellipsoid-based volumes (inter-[intra-]observer agreement 89.8% [92.3%] and 83.1% [88.2%], respectively). Bland-Altman plots show tighter limits of agreement for the ROI-based method.
Conclusion
Both methods are reproducible and transferrable among observers. ROI-based volumetry appears to perform better with greater intra- and interobserver agreement for complex-shaped DIPG.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Freeman CR, Farmer JP (1998) Pediatric brain stem gliomas: a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40:265–271
Donaldson SS, Laningham F, Fisher PG (2006) Advances toward an understanding of brain stem gliomas. J Clin Oncol 24:1266–1272
Fisher PG, Breiter SN, Carson BS et al (2000) A clinicopathologic reappraisal of brainstem tumor classification: identification of pilocytic astrocytoma and fibrillary astrocytoma as distinct entities. Cancer 89:1569–1576
National Cancer Institute at the National Institute of Health (date last modified 03/10/2012). PDQ® Childhood Brain Stem Glioma Treatment. Available at: http://cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/child-brain-stem-glioma/HealthProfessional. Accessed 18 January 2013
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2008) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247
James K, Eisenhauer EA, Christian M et al (1999) Measuring response in solid tumours: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:523–528
Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr et al (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280
Schmidt KF, Ziu M, Schmidt NO et al (2004) Volume reconstruction techniques improve the correlation between histological and in vivo tumor volume measurements in mouse models of human gliomas. J Neurooncol 68:207–215
Wapnir IL, Barnard N, Wartenberg D et al (2001) The inverse relationship between microvessel counts and tumor volume in breast cancer. Breast J 7:184–188
Sosna J, Rofsky NM, Gaston SM et al (2003) Determinations of prostate volume at 3-tesla using an external phased array coil comparison to pathologic specimens. Acad Radiol 10:846–853
Mayr NA, Yuh WTC, Taoka T et al (2006) Serial therapy-induced changes in tumor shape in cervical cancer and their impact on assessing tumor volume and treatment response. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:65–72
Keller SS, Roberts N (2009) Measurement of brain volume using MRI: software, techniques, choices and pre-requisites. J Anthropol Sci 87:127–151
Sawilowsky SS (2005) Misconceptions leading to choosing the t test over the Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney U test for shift in location parameter. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 4:598–600
Frazier JL, Lee J, Thomale UW et al (2009) Treatment of diffuse intrinsic brainstem gliomas: failed approaches and future strategies. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:259–269
Hargrave D, Bartels U, Bouffet E (2006) Diffuse brainstem glioma in children: critical review of clinical trials. Lancet Oncol 7:241–248
Wen PY, MacDonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972
Hayward RM, Patronas N, Baker EH et al (2008) Inter-observer variability in the measurement of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. J Neurooncol 90:57–61
Steffen-Smith EA, Baker EH, Venzon D et al (2014) Measurements of the pons as a biomarker of progression for pediatric DIPG. J Neurooncol 116:127–133
Acknowledgments
We thank Sara Elliott for assistance with image preparation prior to analysis.
Conflicts of interest
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riley, G., Armitage, P.A., Batty, R. et al. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: is MRI surveillance improved by region of interest volumetry?. Pediatr Radiol 45, 203–210 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3134-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3134-6