Skip to main content
Log in

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: is MRI surveillance improved by region of interest volumetry?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Paediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is noteworthy for its fibrillary infiltration through neuroparenchyma and its resultant irregular shape. Conventional volumetry methods aim to approximate such irregular tumours to a regular ellipse, which could be less accurate when assessing treatment response on surveillance MRI. Region-of-interest (ROI) volumetry methods, using manually traced tumour profiles on contiguous imaging slices and subsequent computer-aided calculations, may prove more reliable.

Objective

To evaluate whether the reliability of MRI surveillance of DIPGs can be improved by the use of ROI-based volumetry.

Materials and methods

We investigated the use of ROI- and ellipsoid-based methods of volumetry for paediatric DIPGs in a retrospective review of 22 MRI examinations. We assessed the inter- and intraobserver variability of the two methods when performed by four observers.

Results

ROI- and ellipsoid-based methods strongly correlated for all four observers. The ROI-based volumes showed slightly better agreement both between and within observers than the ellipsoid-based volumes (inter-[intra-]observer agreement 89.8% [92.3%] and 83.1% [88.2%], respectively). Bland-Altman plots show tighter limits of agreement for the ROI-based method.

Conclusion

Both methods are reproducible and transferrable among observers. ROI-based volumetry appears to perform better with greater intra- and interobserver agreement for complex-shaped DIPG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freeman CR, Farmer JP (1998) Pediatric brain stem gliomas: a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40:265–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Donaldson SS, Laningham F, Fisher PG (2006) Advances toward an understanding of brain stem gliomas. J Clin Oncol 24:1266–1272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher PG, Breiter SN, Carson BS et al (2000) A clinicopathologic reappraisal of brainstem tumor classification: identification of pilocytic astrocytoma and fibrillary astrocytoma as distinct entities. Cancer 89:1569–1576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. National Cancer Institute at the National Institute of Health (date last modified 03/10/2012). PDQ® Childhood Brain Stem Glioma Treatment. Available at: http://cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/child-brain-stem-glioma/HealthProfessional. Accessed 18 January 2013

  5. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2008) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. James K, Eisenhauer EA, Christian M et al (1999) Measuring response in solid tumours: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:523–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr et al (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt KF, Ziu M, Schmidt NO et al (2004) Volume reconstruction techniques improve the correlation between histological and in vivo tumor volume measurements in mouse models of human gliomas. J Neurooncol 68:207–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wapnir IL, Barnard N, Wartenberg D et al (2001) The inverse relationship between microvessel counts and tumor volume in breast cancer. Breast J 7:184–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sosna J, Rofsky NM, Gaston SM et al (2003) Determinations of prostate volume at 3-tesla using an external phased array coil comparison to pathologic specimens. Acad Radiol 10:846–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayr NA, Yuh WTC, Taoka T et al (2006) Serial therapy-induced changes in tumor shape in cervical cancer and their impact on assessing tumor volume and treatment response. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Keller SS, Roberts N (2009) Measurement of brain volume using MRI: software, techniques, choices and pre-requisites. J Anthropol Sci 87:127–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sawilowsky SS (2005) Misconceptions leading to choosing the t test over the Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney U test for shift in location parameter. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 4:598–600

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frazier JL, Lee J, Thomale UW et al (2009) Treatment of diffuse intrinsic brainstem gliomas: failed approaches and future strategies. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:259–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hargrave D, Bartels U, Bouffet E (2006) Diffuse brainstem glioma in children: critical review of clinical trials. Lancet Oncol 7:241–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wen PY, MacDonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hayward RM, Patronas N, Baker EH et al (2008) Inter-observer variability in the measurement of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. J Neurooncol 90:57–61

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steffen-Smith EA, Baker EH, Venzon D et al (2014) Measurements of the pons as a biomarker of progression for pediatric DIPG. J Neurooncol 116:127–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sara Elliott for assistance with image preparation prior to analysis.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Garan T. Riley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riley, G., Armitage, P.A., Batty, R. et al. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: is MRI surveillance improved by region of interest volumetry?. Pediatr Radiol 45, 203–210 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3134-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3134-6

Keywords

Navigation