Skip to main content
Log in

Selective CT for PET/CT: dose reduction in Langerhans cell histiocytosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), FDG PET demonstrates active disease in bone. Other imaging modalities show the effects of bone destruction by LCH.

Objective

To evaluate a selective CT method for reducing effective dose from FDG PET/CT in LCH, using whole-body modified attenuation correction CT at extremely low exposure settings, with repeat selective limited-volume CT at typical localization settings.

Materials and methods

Fifty-one PET/CT scans were performed in 23 LCH patients, median patient age 8.5 years (range: 1–25 years). Thirty-four were performed with modified attenuation correction CT settings, with bed positions (excluding head and neck) repeated at localization CT settings in regions with abnormal or difficult to interpret PET findings.

Results

Of 34 modified attenuation correction PET/CT scans, 10 required repeat localization CT of 1 to 3 bed positions (total: 17 bed positions). Lytic bone lesions were easily recognized at modified attenuation correction settings. Calculated average effective dose for the 34 whole-body CT scans at modified attenuation correction settings was 1.65 mSv. Average effective dose per patient for repeat imaging of 17 bed positions at localization settings was 1.19 mSv. Average total effective dose from CT for all 34 scans performed at the modified attenuation correction CT settings, including the 10 repeat localization CT scans, was 2.0 mSv. High-quality PET scans were consistently obtained with reduced FDG-administered activities of 3.7 MBq/kg (0.10 mCi/kg). In active LCH, abnormal FDG uptake was seen in all lytic bone lesions ≥9 mm, including cranial vault lesions.

Conclusion

Substantial reduction in effective dose is possible using selective CT techniques for FDG PET/CT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anton CG (2012) Langerhans cell histiocytosis. In: Donnelly LF, Jones CG, O’Hara SM, Anton CG et al (eds) Diagnostic imaging: pediatrics, vol 6, 2nd edn. Amirsys, Salt Lake City, pp 120–123

    Google Scholar 

  2. Binkovitz LA, Olshefski RS, Adler BH (2003) Coincidence FDG-PET in the evaluation of Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis: preliminary findings. Pediatr Radiol 33:598–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaste SC, Rodriguez-Galindo C, McCarville ME et al (2007) PET-CT in pediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Radiol 37:615–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Phillips M, Allen C, Gerson P et al (2009) Comparison of FDG-PET scans to conventional radiography and bone scans in management of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer 52:97–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. The French Langerhans’ Cell Histiocytosis Study Group (1996) A multicentre retrospective survey of Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis: 348 cases observed between 1983 and 1993. Arch Dis Child 75:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernstrand C, Sandstedt B, Ahström L et al (2005) Long-term follow-up of Langerhans cell histiocytosis: 39 years’ experience at a single centre. Acta Paediatr 94:1073–1084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fahey FH, Palmer MR, Strauss KJ et al (2007) Dosimetry and adequacy of CT-based attenuation correction for pediatric PET: phantom study. Radiology 243:96–104, Erratum in: Radiology 2008 248:1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stabin MG, Gelfand MJ (1998) Dosimetry of pediatric nuclear medicine procedures. Q J Nucl Med 42:93–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. ImPACT Software. London, UK. http://www.impactscan.org/. Accessed 3 June 2014

  10. Alessio AM, Kinahan PE, Manchanda V et al (2009) Weight-based, low-dose pediatric whole-body PET/CT protocols. J Nucl Med 50:1570–1577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee HJ, Ahn BC, Lee SW et al (2012) The usefulness of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Ann Nucl Med 26:730–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mueller WP, Melzer HI, Schmid I et al (2013) The diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET and MRI in paediatric histiocytosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40:356–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelfand MJ, Parisi MT, Treves ST (2010) Pediatric radiopharmaceutical administered doses: 2010 North American consensus guidelines. J Nucl Med 52:318–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gelfand M, Huang J, Sharp S (2011) PET with selective CT at follow-up in pediatric and adolescent patients with lymphoma (abstract). Pediatr Radiol 41:S270–S271

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Gelfand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gelfand, M.J., Sharp, S.E. & Palumbo, J.S. Selective CT for PET/CT: dose reduction in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Pediatr Radiol 45, 81–85 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3103-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3103-0

Keywords

Navigation