Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring in Infants with Supraventricular Tachycardia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is a frequent cause of tachyarrhythmia in infants < 1 year of age and ambulatory cardiac monitoring is an important tool for diagnosis and follow-up of these patients. We retrospectively reviewed 594 infants (mean age 4.05 months, SD 3.55; 54% M) who underwent ambulatory cardiac monitoring (69% 24 h Holter, 31% extended monitor) through the Pocket ECG system (MediLynx) between January 2016 and July 2020. 170 patients who had the ICD-10 code I47.1 for SVT used at enrollment were analyzed separately. 49 (8.3%) patients had sustained SVT or non-sustained SVT (nSVT) during the study period, including 20 patients (11.8%) who had the ICD-10 code I47.1 at enrollment. Extended ambulatory cardiac monitors detected 61% of all patients with nSVT or SVT and was superior when compared to 24 h Holter (p < 0.0001). In the overall group, the first episode of SVT or nSVT was detected within 24 h of monitoring in 40/49 patients (82%). 48/49 patients (98%) were diagnosed within a week of monitoring and the single remaining patient was diagnosed with nSVT at day 15 of monitoring. There was no significant difference in minimal, maximal, and average heart rate between patients with and without ICD-10 code I47.1 at enrollment or between patients with and without SVT or nSVT. Despite their low yield, ambulatory cardiac monitors are an important diagnostic tool. The ideal length of monitoring in patients with known or suspected SVT has yet to be defined, although all patients in our cohort were identified by day 15 of monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salerno JC, Seslar SP (2009) Supraventricular tachycardia. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 163(3):268–274. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wackel P, Cannon B (2017) Heart rate and rhythm disorders. Pediatr Rev 38(6):243–253. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.2016-0119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ko JK et al (1992) Supraventricular tachycardia mechanisms and their age distribution in pediatric patients. Am J Cardiol 69(12):1028–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(92)90858-v

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Krapp M et al (2003) Review of diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of fetal atrial flutter compared with supraventricular tachycardia. Heart 89(8):913–917. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.89.8.913

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garson A Jr, Gillette PC, McNamara DG (1981) Supraventricular tachycardia in children: clinical features response to treatment and long-term follow-up in patients. J Pediatr 98(6):875–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(81)80578-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vignati G, Annoni G (2008) Characterization of supraventricular tachycardia in infants: clinical and instrumental diagnosis. Curr Pharm Des 14(8):729–735. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161208784007752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Perry JC, Garson A Jr (1990) Supraventricular tachycardia due to wolff-parkinson-white syndrome in children: early disappearance and late recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol 16(5):1215–1220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Snyder CS et al (2003) Usefulness of echocardiography in infants with supraventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 91(10):1277–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00285-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Srinivasan C, Balaji S (2019) Neonatal supraventricular tachycardia. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 19(6):222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2019.09.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hegazy RA, Lotfy WN (2007) The value of Holter monitoring in the assessment of Pediatric patients. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 7(4):204–214

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ayabakan C et al (2000) Analysis of 2017 Holter records in pediatric patients. Turk J Pediatr 42(4):286–293

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pradhan S et al (2019) Ambulatory arrhythmia detection with ZIO(R) XT patch in pediatric patients: a comparison of devices. Pediatr Cardiol 40(5):921–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02089-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bolourchi M et al (2020) Comparison of holter with zio patch electrocardiography monitoring in children. Am J Cardiol 125(5):767–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.11.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors of this investigation and manuscript did not receive any funding or research support by any organization. Participants did not receive any financial support to participate in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors have met appropriate authorship criteria and there have been no author omissions. The authors have approved the manuscript as submitted and had complete access to all study data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas M. Hidalgo Corral.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Olga Witkowska: Employee of Medicalgorithmics S.A.—Medical and Technical Writer (Employee). Marek Dziubiński: Chairman of the Supervisory Board, equity interest in Medicalgorithmics S.A. (Ownership or partnership). Magdalena Ślusarczyk: Employee of Medicalgorithmics S.A. Clinical Consulting Director (Employee). Nicolas M. Hidalgo Corral and Bradley C. Clark have no financial or non-financial relationships to disclose.

Ethical Approval

The Institutional Review Board at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine approved this retrospective observational study. Only de-identified data were collected and analyzed. IRB #: 2020–12175 Reference #: 067818.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was not obtained as this study does not meet the definition of human subjects’ research, as the investigators are not interacting or intervening with living individuals or their identifiable information.

Consent for Publication

We respectfully submit our manuscript, “Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring in Infants with Supraventricular Tachycardia” for publication in Pediatric Cardiology. This manuscript has not been previously published and is not currently under consideration from other publications.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

246_2022_2925_MOESM1_ESM.eps

Supplementary file1 (EPS 996 kb) Supplementary Fig. 1 Example diagnostic strips from monitored patients. A. Beginning strip of a patient with supraventricular tachycardia. B. Strip of a patient with non-sustained supraventricular tachycardia. C. Strip of a patient with non-sustained ventricular tachycardia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hidalgo Corral, N.M., Witkowska, O., Ślusarczyk, M. et al. Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring in Infants with Supraventricular Tachycardia. Pediatr Cardiol 43, 1864–1869 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-02925-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-02925-w

Keywords

Navigation