Abstract
The standard genetic code is well known to be optimized for minimizing the phenotypic effects of single-nucleotide substitutions, a property that was likely selected for during the emergence of a universal code. Given the fitness advantage afforded by high standing genetic diversity in a population in a dynamic environment, it is possible that selection to explore a large fraction of the space of functional proteins also occurred. To determine whether selection for such a property played a role during the emergence of the nearly universal standard genetic code, we investigated the number of functional variants of the Escherichia coli PhoQ protein explored at different time scales under translation using different genetic codes. We found that the standard genetic code is highly optimal for exploring a large fraction of the space of functional PhoQ variants at intermediate time scales as compared to random codes. Environmental changes, in response to which genetic diversity in a population provides a fitness advantage, are likely to have occurred at these intermediate time scales. Our results indicate that the ability of the standard code to explore a large fraction of the space of functional sequence variants arises from a balance between robustness and flexibility and is largely independent of the property of the standard code to minimize the phenotypic effects of mutations. We propose that selection to explore a large fraction of the functional sequence space while minimizing the phenotypic effects of mutations contributed toward the emergence of the standard code as the universal genetic code.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberts B, Hunt T, Johnson A et al (2008) Cells and genomes. In: Molecular biology of the cell, 5th edn. Garland Science, New York, pp 1–44
Alff-Steinberger C (1969) The genetic code and error transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 64:584–591. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.64.2.584
Berg JM, Tymoczko JL, Stryer L (2002) Protein structure and function. In: Biochemistry, 5th edn, W H Freeman, New York
Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp 2008:P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
Butler T, Goldenfeld N, Mathew D, Luthey-Schulten Z (2009) Extreme genetic code optimality from a molecular dynamics calculation of amino acid polar requirement. Phys Rev E 79:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.060901
Crick FHCH (1968) The origin of the genetic code. J Mol Biol 38:367–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(68)90392-6
Cullmann G, Labouygues JM (1983) Noise immunity of the genetic code. Biosystems 16:9–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(83)90022-9
Epstein CJ (1966) Role of the amino acid “code” and of selection for conformation in the evolution of proteins. Nature 210:25–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/210025a0
Firnberg E, Ostermeier M (2013) The genetic code constrains yet facilitates Darwinian evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 41:7420–7428. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt536
Firnberg E, Labonte JW, Gray JJ, Ostermeier M (2014) A comprehensive, high-resolution map of a gene’s fitness landscape. Mol Biol Evol 31:1581–1592. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu081
Fowler DM, Fields S (2014) Deep mutational scanning: a new style of protein science. Nat Methods 11:801–807. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3027
Francis BR (2013) Evolution of the genetic code by incorporation of amino acids that improved or changed protein function. J Mol Evol 77:134–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-013-9567-y
Freeland SJ, Hurst LD (1998) The genetic code is one in a million. J Mol Evol 47:238–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006381
Freeland SJ, Knight RD, Landweber LF, Hurst LD (2000) Early fixation of an optimal genetic code. Mol Biol Evol 17:511–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026331
Giulio MD (2016) The lack of foundation in the mechanism on which are based the physico-chemical theories for the origin of the genetic code is counterposed to the credible and natural mechanism suggested by the coevolution theory. J Theor Biol 399:134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.04.005
Goldberg AL, Wittes RE (1966) Genetic code: aspects of organization. Science 153:420–424. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.153.3734.420
Goldenfeld N, Woese C (2007) Biology’s next revolution. Nature 445:369–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/445369a
Gonnet G, Cohen M, Benner S (1992) Exhaustive matching of the entire protein sequence database. Science 256:1443–1445. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1604319
Griffiths A, Miller J, Suzuki D et al (2000) An introduction to genetic analysis, 7th edn. W H Freeman, New York
Haig D, Hurst LD (1991) A quantitative measure of error minimization in the genetic-code. J Mol Evol 33:412–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02103132
Harris JK, Kelley ST, Spiegelman GB, Pace NR (2003) The genetic core of the universal ancestor. Genome Res 13:407–412. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.652803
Higgs PG (2009) A four-column theory for the origin of the genetic code: tracing the evolutionary pathways that gave rise to an optimized code. Biol Direct. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-4-16
Johnson DBF, Wang L (2010) Imprints of the genetic code in the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:8298–8303. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000704107
Judson OP, Haydon D (1999) The genetic code: what is it good for? An analysis of the effects of selection pressures on genetic codes. J Mol Evol 49:539–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006575
Knight RD, Freeland SJ, Landweber LF (2001) Rewiring the keyboard: evolvability of the genetic code. Nat Rev Genet 2:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/35047500
Koonin EV, Novozhilov AS (2017) Origin and evolution of the universal genetic code. Annu Rev Genet 51:45–62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-024713
Maeshiro T, Kimura M (1998) The role of robustness and changeability on the origin and evolution of genetic codes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:5088–5093. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.9.5088
Massey SE (2008) A neutral origin for error minimization in the genetic code. J Mol Evol 67:510–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-008-9167-4
Massey SE (2015) Genetic code evolution reveals the neutral emergence of mutational robustness, and information as an evolutionary constraint. Life 5:1301–1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/life5021301
Maynard Smith J (1970) Natural selection and the concept of a protein space. Nature 225:563–564. https://doi.org/10.1038/225563a0
Newman MEJ (2004) Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys Rev E 69:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066133
Newman MEJ, Girvan M (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E 69:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113
Nirenberg MW, Jones OW, Leder P et al (1963) On the coding of genetic information. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 28:549–557. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1963.028.01.074
Novozhilov AS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV (2007) Evolution of the genetic code: Partial optimization of a random code for robustness to translation error in a rugged fitness landscape. Biol Direct. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-2-24
Podgornaia AI, Laub MT (2015) Pervasive degeneracy and epistasis in a protein-protein interface. Science 347:673–677. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257360
Polyansky AA, Hlevnjak M, Zagrovic B (2013) Proteome-wide analysis reveals clues of complementary interactions between mRNAs and their cognate proteins as the physicochemical foundation of the genetic code. RNA Biol 10:1248–1254. https://doi.org/10.4161/rna.25977
Taylor FJR, Coates D (1989) The code within the codons. Biosystems 22:177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(89)90059-2
Terekhanova NV, Bazykin GA, Neverov A et al (2013) Prevalence of multinucleotide replacements in evolution of primates and Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 30:1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst036
Vetsigian K, Woese C, Goldenfeld N (2006) Collective evolution and the genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10696–10701. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603780103
Weber AL, Lacey JC (1978) Genetic code correlations: amino acids and their anticodon nucleotides. J Mol Evol 11:199–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01734481
Woese CR (1965) On the evolution of the genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 54:1546–1552. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.54.6.1546
Woese CR (1967) The genetic code: the molecular basis for genetic expression. Harper & Row, New York
Woese CR (1968) The fundamental nature of the genetic code: prebiotic interactions between polynucleotides and polyamino acids or their derivatives. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 59:110–117
Woese CR, Dugre DH, Dugre SA et al (1966a) On the fundamental nature and evolution of the genetic code. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 31:723–736. https://doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1966.031.01.093
Woese CR, Dugre DH, Saxinger WC, Dugre SA (1966b) The molecular basis for the genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 55:966–974. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.55.4.966
Wolfenden RV, Cullis PM, Southgate CC (1979) Water, protein folding, and the genetic code. Science 206:575–577. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.493962
Wong JT-F (1975) A co-evolution theory of the genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:1909–1912. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.72.5.1909
Wong JT-F (1976) The evolution of a universal genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:2336–2340. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.73.7.2336
Wong JT-F, Ng S-K, Mat W-K et al (2016) Coevolution theory of the genetic code at age forty: pathway to translation and synthetic life. Life 6:12
Yarus M, Widmann JJ, Knight R (2009) RNA-amino acid binding: A stereochemical era for the genetic code. J Mol Evol 69:406–429
Zamyatnin AA (1972) Protein volume in solution. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 24:107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6107(72)90005-3
Zhu W, Freeland S (2006) The standard genetic code enhances adaptive evolution of proteins. J Theor Biol 239:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.07.012
Funding
This work was supported by the Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, funded by the National Science Foundation (PHY-1427654).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tripathi, S., Deem, M.W. The Standard Genetic Code Facilitates Exploration of the Space of Functional Nucleotide Sequences. J Mol Evol 86, 325–339 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-018-9852-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-018-9852-x