Abstract
Background
Ptosis of the eyebrows, or a very high and wrinkled forehead, may be found in both young adults and the elderly. Static wrinkles can be effectively addressed by surgery in which the approach varies from endoscopic to open procedures. The absence of a unanimously accepted treatment algorithm creates difficulty in selecting the best option in every case. The aim of this study is to find the optimal treatment, given differently featured patients who are all seeking forehead rejuvenation.
Methods
We carefully reviewed the literature on forehead and brow rejuvenation. Furthermore, 123 brow lift cases in the first author’s practice have been analyzed; as such, the algorithm we proposed here was applied.
Results
In a 10-year follow-up period, seven endoscopic cases have shown relapse. Scarring, the inevitable outcome of any surgical procedure, resulted in pathology in two cases, necessitating a “touch-up” to ameliorate some aesthetic issues. The relatively low complication rate suggests that proper indications have been conveyed; our algorithm demonstrated a high degree of effectiveness.
Conclusions
According to our experience, each technique is more applicable for certain patients. In this sense, our updated algorithm should be extremely helpful to young surgeons who are willing (and technically able) to handle forehead rejuvenation cases.
Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ellenbogen R (1983) Transcoronal eyebrow lift with concomitant upper blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 71:490–499
Neto JNR, Pedroso DB, Vasconcelos FRP et al (2012) Forehead reduction using precapillary incision: experience report and indications. Rev Bras Cir Plast 27(2):238–242
Aiache AE (1994) Endoscopic face-lift. Aesthet Plast Surg 18:275
Ramirez OM (1995) Endoscopic forehead and face-lift: step by step. Open Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 2:116–126
Matarasso A, Terino EO (1994) Forehead-brow rhytidoplasty: reassessing the goals. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:1378
De Cordier BC, De la Torre JI, Al-Hakeem MS et al (2002) Endoscopic forehead lift: review of technique, cases, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(6):1558–1568
Cuzalina A (2004) Facial aesthetic surgery: forehead and brow procedures. In: Miloro M, Ghali GE et al (eds) Peterson’s principles of oral and maxillofacial surgery Ed 2, Vol 2, part 9, section 6–7. BC Decker Inc, Philadelphia, pp 1–18
Gold AH, Bernard RW, Hamas RS et al (2003 May) Brow lift fixation. Aesthet Surg J 23(3):217–219
Malata CM, Abood A (2009 Dec) Experience with cortical tunnel fixation in endoscopic brow lift: the “bevel and slide” modification. Int J Surg 7(6):510–515
Castañares S (1964) Forehead wrinkles, glabellar frown and ptosis of the eyebrows. Plast Reconstr Surg 34:406–413
Liva EL (1983) The surgical correction of brow droop in the aging face. Adv Ophtalm Plast Reconstr Surg 2:169–176
Pires Viana G, Pires Viana GA (2009) Approach to eyebrow ptosis through the modified technique of Castanares. Indian J Plast Surg 42:58–62
Caccialanza E (2011) “Lift”frontale e “lift” sopraccigliare. In: Gasparotti M, Campisi A (eds) Scienza ed Arte nella Chirurgia e Medicina Estetica del Viso. Verduci Editore, Roma, pp 1288–1293
Brennan HG, Rafaty FM (1982) Midforehead incisions in treatment of the aging face. Arch Otolaryngol 108:732–734
Powell B, Younes A, Friedman O (2011) Evaluation of the midforehead brow-lift operation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 13(5):337–342
Ortiz-Monasterio FG, Olmedo A (1978) The coronal incision in rhytidectomy: the brow lift. Clin Plast Surg 5:167
Wojtanowski MH (1994) Bicoronal forehead lift. Aesthet Plast Surg 18:33
Abul-Hassan HS, Van Drasek AG, Acland RD (1986) Surgical anatomy and blood supply for the fascial layers of the temporal regions. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:17
Savani A (1994) Physiopathology of the aging face. In: Psillakis JM (ed) Deep face-lifting techniques. Thieme, New York, pp 11–23
De la Plaza R, Valiente E, Arroya JM (1991) Supraperiosteal lifting of the upper two thirds of the face. Br J Plast Surg 4:325–332
Tirkanits B, Daniel RK (1990) The biplanar forehead lift. Aesthet Plast Surg 14:111
Eaves FF, Barton FE, Knize DM, Paul MD, Rohrich RJ (1997) Comparative methods for brow lift. Aesthet Surg J 17:397–403
Elkwood A, Matarasso A, Rankin M, Elkowitz M, Godek CP (2001) National plastic surgery survey: brow lifting techniques and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:2143–2150
Knize DM (2000) Muscles that act on glabellar skin: a closer look. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:350
Gunter JP, Antrobus SD (1997) Aesthetic analysis of the eyebrows. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:1808
Knize DM (2009 Dec) Anatomic concepts for brow lift procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):2118–2126
Graham DW, Heller J, Kurkjian TJ et al (2011) Brow lift in facial rejuvenation: a systematic literature review of open versus endoscopic techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:335e–341e
Byun S, Mukovozov I, Farrokhyar F, Thoma A (2013) Complications of browlift techniques: a systematic review. Aesthet Surg J 33:189–200
Bracaglia R, D’Ettorre M, Gentileschi S et al (2014) Was the surgeon a satisfactory informant? How to minimize room for claims. Aesthet Surg J 34(4):632–635
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
D’Ettorre Marco and Piovano Luca declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. However, for this type of retrospective study formal consent is not required.
Funding
None
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Patient consent
Patients provided written consent for the use of their images.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piovano, L., D’Ettorre, M. Forehead and brow rejuvenation: definition of a surgical algorithm. Eur J Plast Surg 41, 285–292 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-017-1355-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-017-1355-2