Skip to main content
Log in

Colony size and depth affect wound repair in a branching coral

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coral colonies regularly suffer tissue damage from natural and anthropogenic sources. The resultant wounds can decrease colony fitness and act as sources of infection or algal overgrowth. By systematically breaking branches on 54 Pocillopora meandrina colonies and following in situ tissue regeneration (April–August 2017), variation in the wound recovery process was investigated within colonies, among colonies, and across four sites on O‘ahu, Hawai‘i. Ninety-five percent of all wounds healed, with an average healing time of 42 days. Average healing time was not different between initial and subsequent wounds. The relative importance of intrinsic factors, extrinsic factors, and disturbance history for the wound repair process was examined. Previous colony stressors, i.e., percent live coral tissue and bleaching history, were not correlated with wound healing time. These results indicate that wound repair is a priority for P. meandrina. Colony size and depth were significantly correlated with wound healing time: larger colonies healed 14 days faster than smaller colonies, and deeper colonies healed 25 days slower than shallower colonies. These findings support the hypothesis that larger colonies have more energy available for tissue regeneration. The observation of longer healing times for deeper colonies is likely driven by extrinsic factors that vary with depth, including temperature, wave energy, and irradiance. Overall, we show that wound healing in P. meandrina is physiologically resilient to previous stressors, but is affected by both colony size and depth. Understanding drivers of variation in regenerative processes for corals is critical for predicting coral population recovery after disturbances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated during this study are provided in the electronic supplementary material.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

J. Jones supported this project with boat and dive safety guidance. Fieldwork was conducted by C. Counsell, E. Johnston, T. Sale, D. Ford, and C. Schlieman. Both C. Counsell’s and E. Johnston’s participation in this study was supported by National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowships (Grant No. 2012103208 and 2015184863, respectively). Additional funding was provided by the Castle Foundation (Grant No. 3846, M Hixon PI). This is HIMB contribution No. 1771 and SOEST contribution No. 10810. We thank the three anonymous reviewers and the associate editor whose comments improved this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chelsie W. W. Counsell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the sampling, care, and use of animals were followed and all necessary approvals were obtained. Sampling was completed under the HIMB Special Activity Permit 2018-3.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: D. Gochfeld.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reviewed by undisclosed experts.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Counsell, C.W.W., Johnston, E.C. & Sale, T.L. Colony size and depth affect wound repair in a branching coral. Mar Biol 166, 148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-019-3601-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-019-3601-6

Navigation