Abstract
In the last decades, the easy genetic manipulation, the external fertilization, the high percentage of homology with human genes and the reduced husbandry costs compared to rodents, made zebrafish a valid model for studying human diseases and for developing new therapeutical strategies. Since zebrafish shares with mammals the same bone cells and ossification types, it became widely used to dissect mechanisms and possible new therapeutic approaches in the field of common and rare bone diseases, such as osteoporosis and osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), respectively. OI is a heritable skeletal disorder caused by defects in gene encoding collagen I or proteins/enzymes necessary for collagen I synthesis and secretion. Nevertheless, OI patients can be also characterized by extraskeletal manifestations such as dentinogenesis imperfecta, muscle weakness, cardiac valve and pulmonary abnormalities and skin laxity. In this review, we provide an overview of the available zebrafish models for both dominant and recessive forms of OI. An updated description of all the main similarities and differences between zebrafish and mammal skeleton, muscle, heart and skin, will be also discussed. Finally, a list of high- and low-throughput techniques available to exploit both larvae and adult OI zebrafish models as unique tools for the discovery of new therapeutic approaches will be presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a family of inherited bone dysplasias characterized by a wide range of genetic and phenotypic variability [1]. Commonly referred to as “brittle bone disease”, OI is a rare collagen I-related condition affecting approximately 1 in 15–20 000 births and patients are mainly characterized by reduced bone mineral density (BMD), increased bone fragility, increase susceptibility to fractures, presence of dentinogenesis imperfecta and in several cases by extraskeletal features such as blue sclerae, hearing loss, ligamentous laxity, pulmonary disfunctions, cardiac valve abnormalities and muscle weakness [2,3,4]. Traditionally considered an autosomal dominant disorder, OI is primarily caused by dominant mutations in COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes, affecting collagen I structure. Nevertheless, over the past 20 years, many other OI forms have been identified predominantly associated to recessive and X-linked mutations affecting several genes encoding proteins and enzymes involved in collagen I synthesis, osteoblast differentiation and function [5].
The deep investigation of the disease pathophysiology can take advantage of several OI animal models either carrying spontaneous mutations or defects introduced by genetic manipulation. Naturally occurring OI has been described in Charolais cattle, sheep, cats and dogs [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. However, only in few cases the molecular defect has been characterized and biochemical studies performed [11, 13, 14]. The most frequently used models to study OI are rodents due to the possibility to introduce knock out or knock in defects in their genome associated to their pathophysiological similarities to humans [15].
In the last decades Danio rerio (D. rerio) also emerged as a new powerful vertebrate model to dissect the molecular mechanisms of OI and as powerful tool for drug discovery [16]. Indeed, the external development, the embryo and larvae transparency, the impressive number of embryos from a single mating, the early skeletal formation from 4–5 days post fertilization (dpf) and the possibility to deliver drugs in water made zebrafish a unique tool to investigate bone in health and disease [17].
Collagen I in zebrafish is ubiquitously expressed as in mammals, anyway it should be considered that it is an heterotrimer constituted by the folding of three and not two different α chains. Indeed, as a result of the fish-specific whole genome duplication [18], zebrafish has two orthologous genes of human COL1A1 namely col1a1a and col1a1b, which encode the α1 and the α3 chains, respectively. The α1(I) and α3(I) chains assemble with the α2(I) encoded by col1a2 orthologue of human COL1A2. col1a1a, col1a1b share similar spatial–temporal expression pattern starting from the zygote stage until adulthood and the α1 and α3 chains have the same electrophoretic migration and similar amino acid composition, confirming the origin from a common ancestor. The collagen I C-propeptide domain fundamental for proα(I) chain recognition as well as the collagen-non collagenous protein binding domains are also highly conserved between human and zebrafish [19].
Concerning the skeleton, zebrafish shares with mammals the bone cell types, their gene expression profiles and the ossification processes [20, 21]. Furthermore, zebrafish bones undergo remodeling mediated by the activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts miming mammals’ bone turnover and this strengthen its relevance to study bone biology and bone related diseases [21, 22].
The transparency of zebrafish embryos and larvae has been largely used in developmental studies to directly follow in vivo organs and tissues formation, including bone, also taking advantage of the several transgenic lines available expressing fluorescent proteins under a wide range of specific promoters [23, 24].
The availability of new optimized protocols and high-resolution imaging techniques (i.e. MicroCT or Synchrotron), allow also to follow bone growth in adulthood, thus enabling the evaluation of both short and long term pharmacological therapeutic outcomes [16].
Of relevance, zebrafish has the unique ability to regenerate various tissues and organs such as caudal fins, heart, scales, central nervous system, jaw, retina, spinal cord, pancreas, liver and kidney [25, 26], providing a tremendous tool to investigate in adults in vivo both hard and soft tissues formation. For instance, fin regeneration was exploited to dissect the mechanisms underlying adverse effects of glucocorticoids (GCs), therapeutic agents commonly used to treat immune-mediated diseases [27].
Lastly, the ease of application of the reverse genetic approaches, such as CRISPR/Cas9, enabled in zebrafish the generation of several models of heritable pathologies [16]. Even if the above mention fish-specific whole genome duplication complicated teleost genetic manipulation, the investigation of the gene pairs can help to elucidate the mechanisms that underly protein structure and function as well as signal transduction cascades, genetic regulatory networks, and evolution of tissue and organ function, representing a relevant advantage for studying human diseases [28].
This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the available zebrafish models of OI, to discuss the possibility to use zebrafish to evaluate the skeletal and extraskeletal features of the disease and to provide an up-to-date summary of their power to dissect OI pathophysiology to pave the way for drug discovery.
Zebrafish and OI: Skeletal and Extraskeletal Features
Collagen I is the major protein of our body, thus not only bone but also soft tissues are compromised in the onset of OI. Therefore, a deeper investigation of the disease has to be addressed by a multidisciplinary approach and the use of animal models recapitulating OI outcome is a need to properly evaluate skeletal and extraskeletal compromised tissues/organs and to develop and evaluate the efficacy of precise pharmacological treatments. Zebrafish shares with mammals the development and organization of several organs and tissues [16], thus it represents an alternative model to investigate the disease physiopathology with a comprehensive strategy (Table 1). In this section a deep description of zebrafish organs, known to be impaired in OI, will be provided underling similarities and differences with mammals and their potentiality for providing new insights on the disease.
Skeletal Tissues
The zebrafish skeleton can be generally categorized into craniofacial, including parietal bones, jaw, and opercles and axial skeleton, comprising the vertebral column, ribs, intermuscular bones, unpaired dorsal, anal, and caudal fins [29]. Generally, skeletal cell types are conserved in zebrafish, with chondroblasts/cytes and osteoblast/cytes deriving from mesenchymal stem cells and osteoclasts deriving from the monocytes fusion [21]. Despite small morphological differences, skeletal cells functions are conserved between zebrafish and mammals and they share gene expression with few peculiarity (i.e. sox9 and col10) [30]. For instance, in mammals Sox9 is expressed in all chondroprogenitors and differentiated chondrocytes and plays essential roles during endochondral bone formation [31]. On the other hand, zebrafish sox9a and sox9b orthologues are required for both cartilage-replacement and dermal bones [32]. In contrast to mammals, where collagen 10 is an exclusive marker for hypertrophic chondrocytes [33], col10a1 expression in teleosts is also found in early and mature osteoblasts prior to mineralization and partially overlapping with osterix (osx) expression [34].
In zebrafish the mineralization starts from 4 to 5 dpf and three bone ossification types are described, namely intramembranous, endochondral and perichondral. The two first are shared between teleosts and mammals although with some peculiarities, whereas the latter is only described in teleost. The intramembranous ossification originates from the direct condensation of mesenchymal stem cells that differentiate into osteoblasts, deposit bone matrix and finally mineralize. Endochondral ossification requires a cartilage template that calcifies and it is subsequentially replaced by bone [16]. In the ceratohyal and the radials in the pectoral fin, type I endochondral ossification takes place in a process resembling the mammalian one, characterized by resting, proliferation and hypertrophic zone, followed by a zone where chondroclasts degrade the cartilaginous matrix. Finally, osteoblasts lay down bone matrix. In the hyomandibula, branchial arches, ethmoid and hypuralia type II endochondral ossification takes place, for which calcification and ossification zones are absent and the cartilage template is replaced by adipocytes [16]. Tubular concave bones are filled with adipose tissue, since zebrafish lacks bone marrow and hematopoietic stem cells seed the kidney [35, 36]. Despite the conserved role of cartilage as a template in bone formation, a wide spectrum of cartilage types has been reported in adult teleosts, with features that can also overlap other tissues (i.e. bone) [22]. For example, one of the most studied intermediate skeletal tissues in teleosts is chondroid bone, which is formed by chondrocyte-like cells surrounded by a bone-like matrix [37]. This heterogeneous tissue is usually considered as transient or pathological in mammals, while it is physiologically present in the mature zebrafish skeleton [22]. Therefore, care must be taken when analyzing cartilage in zebrafish, especially in adults. However, the cell types, the genetic pathways that regulate cartilage development and composition are remarkably conserved between teleosts and humans.
Craniofacial Skeleton
As in other vertebrates, like mice, most of the zebrafish craniofacial skeleton elements develop from the cranial neural crest [38, 39]. The zebrafish skull includes 73 bones, contrary to the 22 present in mammals, likely due to the progressive fusion of skeletal elements during evolution [40, 41]. Despite the differences in number, bony structures in zebrafish have clear homologs in mammals. In the viscerocranium, pharyngeal arches give rise to the lower part of the skull, composed of the lower jaw, the palate and ceratohyal and hyomandibular bones. Contrarily to mammals’ posterior arches that form laryngeal cartilage, zebrafish have ceratobranchial cartilages, which support the gill tissues [42]. In addition, the anatomical structure of the skull vault and its cranial sutures are conserved between human and zebrafish. The sutures are patent in early development, allowing skull and brain to grow, but while they close in human during early childhood, they never do in zebrafish. Nevertheless, knock out zebrafish that model a congenital form of craniosynostosis have been generated and exploited to elucidate the selective requirement of tcf12 and twist1b in coronal suture formation to gain a better understanding of the developmental basis of suture loss in Saethre-Chotzen syndrome [43].
As part of the craniofacial skeleton the lower jaw development is regulated by Endothelin-1 signaling, a conserved pathway between mammals and zebrafish. Indeed, loss of Edn1 severely impairs Meckel’s cartilage and ceratohyal bone formation in fish and in mice [44]. In human, EDN1 mutations are responsible for the auriculo-condylar syndrome (ACS), a syndromic condition affecting craniofacial development, and particularly ears and lower jaw development [45]. In addition, zebrafish jaw is able to regenerate after damage, a process that involves hybrid cartilage-bone tissue (i.e. chondroid bone) and a transient cartilaginous callus formation [46].
Despite the differences the core pathways and bone development in zebrafish resemble the ones in mammals. Furthermore, the differences from mammals make this model a powerful tool to provide more insights into gene function [30].
Axial Skeleton
Zebrafish axial skeleton derives from paraxial mesoderm, as in mammals. Nevertheless, mammals vertebral centrum formation is determined by somites along the spine [47], while in teleosts the notochord plays a key role in the vertebral column segmentation [48]. Particularly, mammalian vertebra is built on a cartilaginous precursor characterized by endochondral ossification, while zebrafish vertebral centra form through direct intramembranous ossification. In contrast to mammals, they are filled with vacuolated notochord cells and become surrounded by adipose tissue [49]. Zebrafish vertebral bodies do not contain bone marrow and adult hematopoiesis takes place in the kidney. Moreover, zebrafish vertebrae have trabecular bone even if it is micrometer-thin and found surrounding the narrow centra [37]. These discrepancies need to be considered when the zebrafish is used as a model for vertebral investigation in diseases. Nevertheless, zebrafish vertebral column is largely used in the field of bone research to evaluate bone quality parameters in both physiological and pathological conditions. Indeed, zebrafish share almost the same number of vertebrae (30 to 32 in zebrafish versus 33 in human) and the same physiological curvature with human, namely kyphosis in the abdominal region where the ribs protect the viscera and lordosis in the caudal region [50]. As in human, the natural body curvature in teleosts can be emphasized by environmental, nutrition, physical injury or genetic factors and malformation on vertebral column can be easily detectable [51]. Indeed, several scoliosis models have been generated by both forward and reverse genetic approaches [52]. The spine curvature alterations or deformities have been used as a parameter to systematically screen adult zebrafish models of bone diseases generated through ENU mutagenesis [29, 53, 54]. Spinal dislocation is a well-established parameter for investigating aging since backbone deformities, together with vertebrae shape and tissue alterations, are often reported in older fish [55].
Compared to mice, for which gravitational forces apply orthogonally to the spine, zebrafish endure cranial to caudal spinal loads that are originated by swimming forward through water coupled with caudal propulsion and that are quite comparable to the gravitational load to which human are subjected. Thus, by exploiting a swimming chamber, it was possible to increase the forces acting on zebrafish spine mimicking musculoskeletal exercise [56]. Indeed, several OI zebrafish, but not murine models, are characterized by vertebral compressions and fractures, making them the best models to dissect the impact of the disease on column properties in adults [53, 57,58,59,60,61].
Appendicular Skeleton
The appendicular skeleton of zebrafish and human include pectoral (shoulder) and pelvic (hip) girdles with associated appendages: fore- and hindlimbs in human, pectoral and pelvic fins in zebrafish. Human limbs originate from endochondral bones, whereas zebrafish paired fins consist of set of intramembranous bone supported proximally by endochondral radial bones. In human, most of the pectoral and pelvic girdles are also endochondral, although portions of the clavicle and scapula are formed by intramembranous ossification. Similarly, the zebrafish pectoral girdle contains a mixture of intramembranous and endochondral bones, while the pelvic girdle is exclusively endochondral [62]. The expression pathways underling fins and limbs development are generally conserved. Hox genes are required for normal appendage patterning in tetrapods [63] and in teleosts, where hoxa13a−/−; hoxa13b−/− zebrafish mutants fail to form distal fin rays [64]. Beyond pectoral and pelvic fins, zebrafish possess a caudal fin that has no equivalent structure in human, but it has been widely exploited in bone research thanks to its regeneration ability that recapitulate in adult embryonic bone formation. After amputation caudal fin starts to regenerate through a proliferative mass of fibroblasts and osteoblasts able to dedifferentiate to lineage-restricted progenitors and accumulate in the amputation region, forming the blastema. Then, proximal cells begin the differentiation process while the proliferative compartment is maintained in the distal region. Finally, the blastema is totally replaced by differentiated cells and in two weeks caudal fin is fully regrown [65]. The caudal fin regeneration ability helped to dissect the cellular mechanisms involved in osteoporosis induce by glucocorticoids [66]. Also, it has been exploited to investigate the effect of 4-phenilbutyrate (4-PBA), an anabolic drug already demonstrated to improved mineralization and collagen I secretion in dominant and recessive form of OI [67,68,69]. An increased percentage of regenerated caudal fin rays and caudal fin surrounding tissue was observed after 4PBA administration in adult p3h1upv2/upv2 zebrafish model, confirming the positive effect of 4PBA on cellular homeostasis and particularly on bone formation [70]. Therefore, caudal fin regeneration studies represent a valid tool for the identification of new therapeutic approaches, by exploiting adult fish in a minimally invasive way.
Scales
Scales, absent in human, are mineralized structures of the zebrafish exoskeleton, characterized by an external calcified layer and an inner collagen I-rich plate, both containing osteoblasts. Moreover, the expression of both Cathepsin k and Rank, two of the main markers of bone resorption, revealed the presence of osteoclasts as well [71]. Scales are small, abundant and can be easily removed from adult zebrafish without sacrifice the animal, thus representing a rapid and non-invasive tool for high-throughput drug-screening [72]. For instance, alizarin red and calcein double staining on zebrafish scales allowed in vivo visualization of mineralization defects induced by prednisolone (PN) [73]. This glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis zebrafish model was used to assess the effect of alendronate, a well-known bisphosphonate. Recently, transcriptome analysis revealed a high level of conservation in gene expression profile between scales and mammals’ endoskeleton. Among the others, a group of genes involved in OI physiopathology has been found, such as COL1A1, COL1A2, BMP1, CRTAP, SP7 [74]. Interestingly, de Vrieze developed a scale assay exploiting a sp7 transgenic zebrafish in order to screen osteogenic compounds acting on WNT-signaling. This quick, sensitive, and quantifiable tool allowed the identification of 3 compounds out of 77 tested which positively stimulated osteoblast activity [75]. Thus, both scales regeneration and the ex-vivo scales culture represent promising tools to identify novel therapeutical target for bone diseases, including OI.
Teeth
The dentition in zebrafish is replaced continuously throughout life [76]. The general teeth structure, components, and cells are conserved between zebrafish and mammals. Indeed, teeth are formed by a pulp cavity containing nerves and blood vessels surrounded by dentin, which is formed by hydroxyapatite mineral crystals and collagen I [77]. Dentinogenesis and amelogenesis are also conserved, as well as cell types, namely odontoblasts and ameloblasts. Therefore, zebrafish is an attractive model to study odontogenesis, tooth replacement and regeneration both in normal and pathological conditions. Indeed, OI patients are commonly affected by dentinogenesis imperfecta, a rare debilitating disorder affecting dentin formation and causing loss of the overlying enamel with high risk of tooth loss [78]. Zebrafish share several conserved pathways with mammals involved in guarantee normal dentition, such as WNT, hedgehog and TGF-β signaling [79,80,81]. Indeed, the ability of zebrafish to continuously form teeth throughout their lives allowed to elucidate the role of the TGF-β family member receptor Alk8 in dental epithelial patterning and in odontoblast, ameloblast and osteoblast differentiation [82]. Nevertheless, in some cases redundancy can occur in zebrafish, as observed for FGF signaling targets where additional genes are expressed in zebrafish dental epithelium, for which comparable evidence is either scarce or lacking in mammalian dentition [83].
Joints and Ligaments
In adult zebrafish, ligaments exhibit a well-structured arrangement of collagen fibrils that is similar to that observed in mammals [84]. Zebrafish, as mammals, have skeletal joints that can be classified in fibrous joints (i.e. sutures involving skull bones), synovial joints (i.e. in the jaw and pectoral fin) and cartilaginous joints (i.e. the jaw joint between the Meckel’s and palatoquadrate cartilages) [85]. Sutures at the level of the skull are conserved between zebrafish and mammals, while synovial-like joints, observed in zebrafish articular cartilage, in the joint cavity and in the synovium lack an articular disc [86].
In teleosts, the connections of the endplates of vertebral bodies are similar in design and function to mammalian intervertebral disc (IVD). Vacuolated notochord cells centrally located with the same function as the mammalian nucleus pulposus are surrounded by a strong composite ligament that functions like annulus fibrosus [87]. From inside to outside the ligament is composed of collagen II, elastin, and collagen I fiber bundles [88]. In adult teleosts, vacuolated notochord cells turn into fibrous, keratinized, connective tissue and extracellular vacuoles [87]. Of note, IVD degeneration (IVDD), reported in OI type XII individuals carrying SP7 mutations, was described in aged and in the sp7 mutant zebrafish, which are characterized by altered notochord cells and fibrosis. Moreover, disc calcification, which is correlated with premature human IVDD, was observed in Cathepsin k mutants, indicating that both low and high bone mineral density contribute to increment the IVDD risk in zebrafish [89].
Ligament laxity and hypermobility has been proposed as a non-osseous feature that plays a role in scoliosis development in OI, one of the most frequently reported secondary feature of the disease. Nevertheless, no correlation was demonstrated between the severity of spinal phenotype and the presence of ligament laxity in OI patients [90]. Thus, the role of this complication in the pathogenesis of OI can be investigated by exploiting zebrafish as a model to study joints and ligaments.
Skeletal Muscle
Zebrafish musculature is a highly organized contractile system that sustains the body architecture, and it is composed of cephalic, trunk and appendicular muscles. Trunk and tail musculature, responsible for fish locomotion, is very developed compared to craniofacial muscles that are only associated to the mouth, eye and gill movements [91]. Similarities and differences characterize teleost and mammalian musculature system. As in mammals, red and white fibers are present in zebrafish muscles. The red fibers are rich in mitochondria and myoglobin and responsible for slow and prolonged swimming, while the white fibers allow fast contractions [92]. Since zebrafish are highly adapted for rapid and prolonged swimming, their muscles exhibit a higher proportion of fast-twitch fibers, required for quick bursts of movement [93]. In contrast, human muscles display greater diversity, with a mixture of slow- and fast-twitch fibers, enabling a wider range of movements [94]. Myofibrils and sarcomere organization as well as the molecular mechanism involved in muscle contraction, development and maintenance, are conserved between zebrafish and mammals [91]. The main human sarcomere components, such as myosin thick filaments and actin thin filaments, as well as the M- and Z-lines can be easily detected in zebrafish [95]. Indeed, slow myosin heavy chain 1 (smyhc1) zebrafish mutants, carrying mutations in the gene expressed in the first group of muscle fibers formed during myogenesis, show shorter sarcomere length that leads to a reduced swimming activity and increased lethality during larval stage [96].
Unlike human, in which muscle fibers are grouped into fascicles [97], zebrafish muscles are organized in myomeres, which are myofibers segmented muscle units along the body axis [98]. The horizontal septum subdivides the myomeres into hypaxial and epaxial muscles, which are ventrally and dorsally located, respectively [99]. As in mammals, teleosts myogenesis starts with mesoderm-derived cells forming muscle fibers in a multi-stage process that starts with somite formation. Nevertheless, some differences occur in the timing and progenitors’ specification [100]. Somitogenesis is completed by the end of the first day of development in zebrafish [101], while in mice it starts at day E8 [102] and a complete muscle is visible at E13.5 [103]. In vertebrates somites develop in a cranial to caudal direction forming the dermomyotome, a heterogeneous structure composed of both multipotent as well as fate-restricted progenitors giving rise to myocytes, smooth muscle, mitotic muscle progenitors, and also to dorsal dermis and endothelium of adjacent blood vessels [104]. In zebrafish, adaxial cells, responsible for the first myogenesis, are detectable before somite development beside the notochord and myotome formation begins only after somite formation, when adaxial cells migrate to form slow fibers [105]. Adaxial cells position suggested that notochord derived signaling hedgehog factors could direct their fate, indeed the analysis of the zebrafish mutant sonic-you showed that mutations in the sonic hedgehog signaling pathway affect muscle development [106]. In mammals, secondary myogenesis is generally characterized by muscle growth and maturation of the myotome and muscle innervation, while in zebrafish a completely innerved myotome is already formed during the primary myogenesis [107]. The phases of muscle damage repair are conserved between zebrafish and mammals, with connective tissue that forms after muscular injury [108]. This phase is resolved by satellite cells (SCs) characterized by pax7 expression, which proliferate and differentiate into new myofibers [109]. pax7a and pax7b are both expressed in larval and/or adult zebrafish satellite-like cells and are implicated in repair and/or regeneration [110]. Indeed, pax7a;pax7b double mutants are severely deficient in newly-forming myofibers compared to controls [111]. It was recently demonstrated that zebrafish skeletal muscle can regenerate not only after major injuries. Indeed, Oudhoff et al. showed that also several myomeres efficiently regenerated within one month after wounding and that mTOR signaling is required for the replacement of connective with sarcomeric tissues. This new model of zebrafish myomere restoration may provide new medical perspectives for treatment of traumatic injuries [112].
Muscle pathology as part of the pathophysiology of OI was for the first time described in the oim/oim mouse model, carrying mutations in Col1a2 gene [113] and more recently described in the Amish mouse carrying a α2(I)-Gly610Cys substitution [114]. Then, clinicians and basic scientists began to consider and investigate muscle function in OI patients. It was found that more than 80% of OI patients suffer from muscle weakness that seems to correlate with OI severity [115]. The availability of several zebrafish model for OI together with the aforementioned advantages in using zebrafish to study muscles represent an interesting opportunity to deeper dissect muscle pathology in presence of skeletal diseases.
Heart
Contrarily to mammals, zebrafish hearth is simpler and only composed by a single atrium and a single ventriculum, connected by an atrio-ventricular valve [116]. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms driven the heart development are highly conserved between zebrafish and mammals [117]. Hedgehog pathway (Hh) is essential during human cardiac development and zebrafish smoothened mutant embryos display smaller and misshaped heart due to a reduced number of cardiomyocytes, demonstrating that Hh signaling plays an important role in directing multipotent stem cells into the myocardial lineage [118].
Cardiac defects such as valve stenosis, alteration in hemodynamics, arrhythmia and heart failure represent possible extraskeletal features in OI patients, likely due to the collagen I abundance in the myocardium [119]. It was recently reported that COL1A1 mutation in OI correlates with larger diameters of the main pulmonary artery, larger left heart chambers and lower left ventricular ejection fraction, suggesting a relationship of cardiac abnormalities and pathogenic gene mutations in patients [120]. Myocardial hypertrophy at necropsy was described in Col1a1Jrt/+ OI mice at 20–25 weeks of age and transthoracic doppler echocardiography showed that Aga2severe Col1a1 OI mouse hearts at 6–11 days post-birth exhibited thickened intraventricular septa and right ventricular hypertrophy [121, 122].
Zebrafish has gained attention in recent years in the field of regenerative medicine thanks to the ability of regenerate their heart after damage both in larval and adult stage. In zebrafish heart injury induces inflammation followed by replacement of necrotic tissue with fibrotic scar that preserves heart structure integrity. Contrary to mammalian fibrosis that persists leading to a consequent reduction of the heart function, the proliferative activity of teleosts cardiomyocytes allows scar replacement and thus heart regeneration [123]. Injury surviving cardiac cells change their gene expression patterns, upregulating genes involved in embryonic heart development (i.e. vmhc [124], gata4 [125]) and downregulating cardiomyocyte late-differentiation genes (i.e. cmlc1, alpk3a) [126].
Cardiac valves formation is conserved between zebrafish and mammals and it is regulated by the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of atrio-ventricular (AV) endocardial cells that migrate into the atrio-ventricular canal and proliferate to form intermediate endocardial cushions, which subsequentially form mature valve [127]. The availability of several zebrafish models for different mutated OI-related genes together with the availability of specific transgenic lines [128, 129] and the zebrafish heart regeneration ability could help in the investigation of this cardiovascular phenotype to genotype correlation.
Skin
As mammals, zebrafish have epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis. Contrary to mammals, whose stratified structure of epidermis is composed of four layers (basal, spinous, granular and corneum), three layers (surface, intermediate and basal) constitute the teleosts’ epidermis. In terrestrial vertebrates the corneum layer, characterized by dead and keratinized cells, is missing in zebrafish and replaced by a monolayer of living cells sink in an anti-bacterial rich mucus. The intermediate layer is composed by various specialized cell types, while the basal layer is a monolayer of cells attached to the basement membrane via hemidesmosomes. No mammalian appendages such as follicles and sebaceous glands can be found in zebrafish [130, 131].
Dermis is the vascularized subepidermal skin layer characterized by an elastin and collagenous rich stroma produced by fibroblasts, that provides structural support [130]. Layers representing the epidermis and the dermis can be recognized as early as 1 dpf and at 6 dpf. The epidermis is composed of a two-cell layers and is separated from the underlying connective tissue stroma by a basement membrane. The dermal side is composed by collagenous stroma with fibroblastic cells with a well-developed rough endoplasmic reticulum. The major collagens present in human dermis, including collagens I, V and VI, are also expressed in zebrafish skin [132].
Contrary to the not oriented collagen fibrils of mammalian dermis, zebrafish dermal ECM is organized in orthogonal layers of collagen fibrils, reminiscent to the mammalian corneal stroma whose principal role is to contribute to the transparency of the tissue. Thus, the orthogonal organization of the zebrafish dermal ECM might contribute, in the same way, to its optical transparency [133]. Several zebrafish models were generated by exploiting forward, reverse genetic or knock down approaches proving the goodness of the model for human diseases of skin [134].
Zebrafish is able to completely regenerate its skin after injury in a rapid process that resembles the human one. In mammals, wound-healing stages involve several continuous and overlapping processes starting with blood clotting, inflammation, re-epithelialization, granulation tissue formation, and finally remodeling [135], while zebrafish lacks the blood-clotting phase [136]. Similarly to mammals, zebrafish macrophages (lyz-expressing cells) remain in healing wounds longer than neutrophils (mpx-expressing cells [137]) and inflammation precedes granulation tissue formation and vascularization [138]. Thus, the fast and blood-clotting independent re-epithelization and the remodeling of the collagenous scar allow zebrafish to completely restore its skin. OI patients are characterized by a stiff and poorly elastic skin [139], while Ehlers–Danlos (EDS) patients, an OI-related syndrome, present skin hyperintensity and lesions as a result of collagen disorganized and disoriented collagen fibers deposition into ECM [140]. The overmodification and reduced secretion of collagen I in P3H1 null mice, model of OI type VIII, are responsible for thinner and slightly less dense skin respect to wild type [141]. Considering the availability of OI zebrafish models and taking advantage of the larvae transparency as well as the rapid healing after injury in adults, zebrafish could be exploited as a model to investigate the skin formation and repair mechanisms in OI and EDS-related conditions.
OI Zebrafish Models
The availability of forward genetic approaches using large chemical mutagenesis screening [29] and, more recently, the reverse genetic CRISPR/Cas genome editing technique [59, 142], applicable both to the traditional germline F2 analysis and to the more rapid-throughput F0 crispant approach [143], allowed to generate several OI zebrafish mutants available to dissect the mechanisms and the pathophysiology of the disease (Fig. 1). Of interest, OI zebrafish models also reproduce the phenotypic variability described in patients [3], thus representing a unique tool for the identification of possible modifier genes that could be quickly tested taking advantage of the F0-based genetic assay.
Nevertheless, it must be considered that some OI-causative genes have more than one orthologue in teleost due to the whole genome duplication mentioned above (Table 2) [144, 145] and in these circumstances, to target all orthologues with no clear information on their transcription, translation and function properties may represent a challenge.
All the available OI zebrafish models described in this chapter have been listed on the basis of the functional gene classification [2] (Table 3).
OI Zebrafish Carrying Defects in Collagen I Synthesis and Structure
The first OI zebrafish models were identified, following a forward genetic approach based on N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), either by high-throughput sequencing or by skeletal phenotypic screening of adult fish [29, 146]. The first approach allowed the identification of col1a1a+/- and col1a1b+/- mutants characterized by quantitative defects in α1(I) chain, of col1a1admh13/+, col1a1admh14/+, col1a1achi/+ carrying qualitative defects in the α1 chain, as well as col1a1bdmh29/+ with mutation in α3 and of col1a2dmh15/+ characterized by qualitative defects in the α2 chain [53, 54].
col1a1a+/- and col1a1b+/- mutants, heterozygous for a null col1a1a and col1a1b allele, respectively, do not present any skeletal abnormalities, while the double heterozygous mutant col1a1a+/-;col1a1b+/- displays a mild skeletal phenotype, with some cases of low spontaneous fractures, scoliosis and vertebral abnormalities, suggesting the presence of incomplete penetrance. All the three models are characterized by intra-genotype variability [53].
Qualitative collagen defects, mainly due to glycine substitutions, represent the most common cause of classical OI [1]. As generally happens for human patients, phenotypic severity is worst in zebrafish mutants carrying qualitative comparing to quantitative defects.
The col1a1bdmh29/+, col1a1admh13/+ and col1a1admh14/+ mutants, whose mutations result in dominant transmitted amino acid substitutions (Gly1017Asp, p.Gly1123Asp; Gly931Arg, p.Gly1093Arg and Gly982Glu, p.Gly1144Glu. respectively), are all characterized by shorter length compared to control, severe vertebral deformations, an excessive bone formation in the vertebral centrum and osteophyte generation, with a phenotype worsening in adulthood [54]. Among these mutants, col1a1bdmh29/+ shows the most severe phenotype, ranging from moderate to perinatal lethal, with kyphoscoliosis and shorter, thicker, and overmineralized vertebral bodies and frequent rib fractures. From a biochemical point of view col1a1admh13/+ and col1a1admh14/+ are characterized by collagen overmodification, as demonstrated by the delayed electrophoretic migration of collagen α bands, while normal collagen chains migration was detected in col1a1bdmh29/+ mutant.
The col1a2dmh15/+ mutant (Gly801Asp, p.Gly882Asp) is characterized by heavily distorted, misshapen and overmineralized axial and cranial skeleton [53], all features resembling patients’ phenotype [1]. From a biochemical point of view, collagen is not or only slightly overmodified in these zebrafish mutants [53].
The first better characterized OI zebrafish model for classical OI is Chihuahua (Chi/ +), identified after ENU mutagenesis by skeletal phenotypic screening of adult fish [29]. Chi/ + carries a heterozygous glycine substitution in the triple helical domain of α1(I) (Gly574Asp, p.Gly736Asp) [29] and recapitulates a very severe, not lethal form of OI with deformed and fragile bones, multiple rib and vertebral fractures as well as a delay in mineralization starting from larval stage [57, 147]. Due to the disorganized collagen fibers, adults’ vertebrae shape is disrupted and bone geometrical parameters are impaired [61]. Bone stiffness is reduced, while a highly mineralized tissue accumulates near the intervertebral ligament [61, 147].
From a biochemical point of view and, similarly to what observed in OI patients [68] and murine models [148], Chi/ + collagen I is overmodified and partially retained inside the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), leading to ER-stress, as demonstrated by the presence of enlarged ER cisternae and by an increased expression of the collagen specific chaperone Hsp47 [57].
A delay in osteoblast differentiation and in bone formation as well as an increase in bone resorption are present in Chi/ + caudal fin rays [70]. In addition, an increased number of lipid droplets characterizes adult Chi/ + caudal fin, suggesting a skewing of mesenchymal stem cells towards adipocytic rather than osteogenic differentiation [70], as observed in the OI Brtl mouse [148]. Finally, Chi/ + osteocytes lacunar volume and density are impaired, leading to less pronounced osteocyte network [61].
The microwaved zebrafish mutant (med−/−) is the only classical OI zebrafish model with a recessive mutation in col1a1a, which results in the amino acid substitution Glu1050Lys, p.Glu888Lys in the α1 chain. The heterozygotes (med+/-) show only a ruffled fin fold at larval stage without phenotype in the adulthood. Only the homozygotes (med−/−) exhibit delayed ossification at 11 dpf and a peculiar undulated larval fin at the tip of the tail. Impaired bone mineral density of both distal fin rays and vertebrae is also observed in adults [149].
OI Zebrafish with Compromised Collagen Post-Translational Modification
During collagen I folding, procollagen chains undergo post-translational modifications, catalyzed by specific hydroxylases and glycosylases inside the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). In human, the hydroxylation in C3 of α1(I)-Pro986 is specifically catalyzed by the P3H1 complex, which exerts both an enzymatic and a chaperone activity on proα chains and acts as an inhibitor of fibril formation for the folded triple helix. The complex is constituted by cartilage associated protein (CRTAP) encoded by CRTAP, prolyl 3-hydroxyase 1 (P3H1) encoded by P3H1 and cyclophilin B (CyPB) encoded by PPIB, present in a 1:1:1 ratio [150]. Mutations in CRTAP, P3H1 and PPIB genes are responsible in human for OI type VII, VIII and IX, respectively [1].
The CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing was used to knock-out in zebrafish genome either crtap or p3h1. The two models are characterized by a general growth delay, as proved by a reduced fish length, and altered swim bladder inflation. Also, mineralization is delayed in both mutants starting from 1 week post fertilization (wpf) in crtapupv1/upv1 and from 2 wpf in p3h1upv2/upv2. During juvenile stage body and skull disproportions are detectable in both mutants, but the phenotype gets worse during adulthood, when severe vertebral body fusions, deformities and fractures are observed [59]. Similarly, a severe skeletal phenotype characterized by vertebral and ribs fractures was also observed in OI type VII and VIII patients, which generally have higher lethality than zebrafish models [151]. Nevertheless, accordingly with the high mortality rate of OI type VII children with null mutation in CRTAP [152], few crtapupv1/upv1 reach adulthood. Their severe phenotype is characterized by chunky head and several malformations in vertebral endplates. Due to limited availability of crtapupv1/upv1 adults, bone geometrical parameters were analyzed only in p3h1upv2/upv2, which displays reduced vertebral bone volume and thickness [59]. Moreover, a recent study on p3h1upv2/upv2 regeneration ability of the caudal fin reveals a delayed ray regeneration rate as well as a reduced number of rays and an increased number of segments and bifurcations. Since it was reported that the two mineralizing fronts of the forming ray are able to fuse/stitch, through an osteoblast-dependent process, and then to undergo an anti-stitching process, mediated by osteoclasts, that defines the positioning of the branchpoint [153], the increased osteoclast activity observed in p3h1upv2/upv2 at the level of the regenerated caudal fin suggests the presence of an altered bone turnover [70].
Both crtapupv1/upv1 and p3h1upv2/upv2 bone matrix is distinguished by irregularly arranged collagen fibers, stemming from the assemble of impaired collagen I, although collagen fibrils are thicker in crtapupv1/upv1 and thinner in p3h1upv2/upv2 compared to WT [59]. The lack of 3-hydroxylation in zebrafish collagen I made the crtapupv1/upv1 and p3h1upv2/upv2 zebrafish models unique tools to prove the relevance of the 3- hydroxylation complex as collagen specific chaperone.
OI Zebrafish with Compromised Collagen Processing and Cross-Linking
The frilly fins (frf) zebrafish mutant, generated by ENU mutagenesis and characterized by a peculiar undulated fin, carries mutation in bmp1a [154]. BMP1 (bone morphogenetic protein 1) is a metalloprotease involved in the maturation of procollagen through proteolytic removal of the C-terminal propeptide, essential to guarantee collagen self-assembly into fibrils [149, 155]. In zebrafish two bmp1 orthologues exist, bmp1a and bmp1b. Zebrafish frftm317/tm317 homozygous mutant display a ruffled fin, reduced body length and misshaped craniofacial structure [149, 154]. In their adulthood, body and fins length are reduced and a kink at the head-trunk boundary emerges [154].
Strong delay in vertebrae ossification and during fin growth is reported. When the spine eventually ossifies several vertebral deformations and fusions can be detected. Adult fin rays are wavy, fused between each other and characterized by calli and reduced bifurcation number. frf tm317/tm317 display an increased vertebral bone density [60, 149], as also reported in patients affected by OI type XIII [156]. frilly fin fish are characterized by normally differentiated osteoblasts, but with a cuboidal shape, limiting the contact with the bone surface. Finally, mutant’s collagen fibers’ structure is altered, probably due to the collagen I C-terminal propeptide retention [149].
The plod2sa1768 mutant, generated by ENU mutagenesis, is a zebrafish model of Bruck syndrome (BS). The c.2037 T > A homozygous mutation in the plod2 gene leads to the formation of a premature stop codon and to a truncated lysyl hydroxylase 2 (Lh2) protein (p.(Tyr679*)) [58]. Lysyl hydroxylase 2 (LH2) is the enzyme responsible for the hydroxylation of collagen telopeptide lysine residues.This hydroxylation directs cross-linking of collagen fibrils in the extracellular matrix, which provides stability and tensile integrity to the collagen fibrils [157]. Similarly to BS patients, zebrafish plod2sa1768 mutants are characterized by reduced telopeptide lysine hydroxylation that leads to abnormal collagen cross-linking, resulting in severe musculoskeletal malformations with evidence of bone fragility [58].
Loss of Lh2 function in zebrafish causes an early-onset and progressive phenotype similar to the one observed in human BS. Like BS patients, plod2 mutant fish have a short body axis, kyphoscoliosis and compression of the vertebral column, and bowing and kinking of the ribs. Contrary to human patients, microCT analysis revealed impaired bone mass associated with an increased vertebral centra volume and increased vertebral mineral density, suggesting a hyper-mineralization condition [58, 158]. Nevertheless, plod2sa1768 zebrafish may be valuable to investigate some aspects of the two OI-related conditions.
OI Zebrafish with Altered Osteoblast Differentiation and Function
Osterix (OSX) or SP7, a zinc finger-specific transcription factor predominantly expressed in osteoblasts is essential for bone formation and homeostasis, promoting osteoblasts differentiation and maturation [159]. The sp7 zebrafish model has been generated using ENU mutagenesis within the zebrafish mutation project [160]. Mutations in SP7 lead to OI type XII, a recessive form of the disease characterized by several cranial deformities, mild scoliosis, hyperextensibility of the interphalangeal joints and osteoporosis [159]. Contrary to homozygous Osx mutant mice that die in perinatal period for respiratory stress [161], sp7−/− zebrafish are vital and viable [89].
A delay in mineralization starting from 2 wpf, with bones that progressively become misshaped characterizes sp7−/− larvae. During juvenile stage, sp7 mutants present scoliosis, bone growth defects, ribs fractures and specific craniofacial malformations, resembling human patients’ outcome. In addition, 3 months old sp7−/− fish are characterized by a reduced BMD compared to WT siblings [89]. Transmission electron microscopy reveals that sp7−/− osteoblast nuclei are rounder than WT ones, and mutant extracellular matrix vesicles are poor in hydroxyapatite. Increased expression of some early osteoblastogenic markers, such as ihhb, runx2a, runx2b, and impaired expression of late osteogenesis markers, such as bglap and alpl, are described in sp7−/− [162].
OI type XIV is a rare form of osteogenesis imperfecta caused by defects in the trimeric intracellular potassium channel B (TRIC-B), an integral membrane protein encoded by tmem38b [1], necessary for the regulation of Calcium flux [163] across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. TRIC-B null osteoblasts are characterized by inhibited Ca2 calmodulin Kinase II (CaMKII) mediated signaling pathway that dysregulates SMAD signaling, important for proper skeleton growth [164]. In addition, lack of TRIC-B in osteoblasts has been recently proposed to be associated to a significant increase in superoxide production in mitochondria, further supporting mitochondrial dysfunction as well to an altered cell–cell adhesion processes [165].
Two tmem38b zebrafish models have been generated by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. The tmem38bupv4/upv4 zebrafish model is characterized by an out of frame deletion responsible for a premature stop codon at amino acid 122, while the tmem38bupv5/upv5 results from an in frame deletion of 24 nucleotides that leads to the removal of the highly conserved KEV domain [142], required for the correct formation of the pore channel [166, 167]. OI type XIV patients are characterized by a wide spectrum of severity ranging from mild forms with few spontaneous fractures [168] to more severe cases affected by cardiac and pulmonary implications [169]. Interestingly, this variability is reflected in the available models of the disease. Indeed, while the TRIC-B knock out mice are lethal soon after birth [170] and the osteoblasts specific conditional knock out mice present a very severe phenotype [164], tmem38b zebrafish mutants are characterized by milder skeletal features [142]. Particularly, only a reduced notochord mineralization in larvae and misshaped vertebral bodies in juveniles are detectable in tmem38bupv4/upv4. In both zebrafish mutants the under-modification of collagen I is observed, thus reproducing the typical feature observed in OI type XIV patients [171] and conditional knock-out mice [164]. Moreover, an increased expression of the fibrillary collagen chaperone Hsp47b is detected, suggesting the presence of cell stress, likely due to an impaired collagen secretion. Indeed, compromised collagen extracellular deposition is demonstrated by the reduced length of actinotrichia, collagen-made structures at the tip of fin rays. Finally, impaired osteoblasts activity is proved by the limited mineral deposition during caudal fin regeneration [142]. Therefore, the tmem38b zebrafish mutants could represent valid models to investigate the role of Tric-b at cellular level.
TRIC channels together with TRIC-B also include TRIC-A encoded by TMEM38A. Contrary to TRIC-B that is ubiquitously distributed in the body, and coupled with inositol trisphosphate receptor (IP3R), TRIC-A is mostly abundantly present in excitable cells and coupled with ryanodine receptors (RyRs). Indeed, TRIC-A mutations have been identified in patients with stress-induced arrhythmia [172]. TRIC-A knock out mice have a normal lifespan, show abnormal sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ handling in both skeletal and cardiac muscle cells. Moreover, TRIC-A ablation causes hypertension in mice due to altered Ca2+ signaling in smooth muscle [173]. No skeletal diseases associated to TRIC-A deficiency have been described so far in human. Although tmem38a expression has been demonstrated [142], no zebrafish model exists. In addition, the expression analysis of tmem38a in different tmem38b mutants’ tissues did not show any compensatory effect [142].
OI Zebrafish with Defects in the More Recently Identified OI Genes
Four independent ENU-induced homozygous mutations, named bulm757, bulm606, bulm494 and bulm421, were identified in sec24D gene, encoding a specific component of the COPII vesicles, involved in large protein export from the ER [174]. The zebrafish bulldog has been characterized as model for Cole-Carpenter like dysplasia, caused by a mutation in SEC24D gene and presenting some of the osteogenesis imperfecta features [175]. Embryos are shorter than WT and display kinked pectoral fins and shorter and misshapen cranial elements [174, 176]. Early skeletogenesis is not affected by the mutation, while the late cartilage development is altered, resulting in a pronounced dysmorphology. Collagen II and ER-quality control pathway components are overexpressed in bulldog respect to WT and collagen II accumulates in vesicles within mutants’ chondrocytes. These results suggest an impairment in collagen II synthesis and processing and an induced ER-stress response in chondrocytes during craniofacial development [174]. Accordingly, in a human Cole-Carpenter patient fibroblast line the procollagen export from ER is altered and ER cisternae are enlarged [175]. Also, bulldog chondrocytes morphology is altered, highlighting features that are typically shown in chondroprogenitors at earlier developmental stages [174].
Recently, mutations in KIF5B gene have been identified in patients with a clinical diagnosis of OI. KIF5B gene encodes the heavy chain of Kinesin-1, a member of the Kinesin superfamily of motor proteins (KIFs), crucial for intracellular transport. KIF5B is expressed ubiquitously and facilitates the movement of organelles, vesicles, and proteins along microtubules within cells, playing key roles in neuronal axonal transport, cell division, endocytosis/exocytosis [177].
The kif5blof zebrafish is a compound mutant derived from the mating of kif5Ba and kif5Bb mutants, which have been generated by CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. kif5Ba mutants are characterized by a mild, incompletely penetrant phenotype, while kif5Bb mutants are viable fertile adults. To analyze the effect of the kif5B genes loss of function, kif5blof compound mutants has been generated [178]. Similarly to the mouse model [179], kif5blof larvae display defects in trunk and tail muscle structure. Abnormal chondrogenesis in the compound mutant results in prominent jaw defects [178]. Cartilage alterations is also found in the Col2cre;Kif5bfl/− conditional knock-out mouse, in which the growth delay is correlated to the defects at the long bones growth plate zones due to the specific absence of Kif5b in the cartilage [180]. At a cellular level, mutant chondrocytes are smaller than WT and present a roundly shape and numerous lysosomes, which cumulate in the chondrocyte cytoplasm. These data, together with the deregulation of the autophagic markers, suggest a lysosomal dysfunction that led to chondrocytes apoptosis [178]. The number of TRAP + cells is significantly increased in the kif5blof zebrafish mutant [178], as also found in the tibial growth plate of the Col2cre;Kif5bfl/− mouse [180].
The lack of a normal cartilaginous scaffold in kif5blof mutants impairs perichondral ossification, which remains altered during fish development [178], thus recapitulating the hypomineralization found in patients with mutations in KIF5B [177].
High- and Low-Throughput Techniques to Investigate Zebrafish Tissues in Healthy and Pathological Conditions
In the last decades, zebrafish became a suitable animal model in the field of biomedical research prompting the researchers to fine tune techniques to characterized skeletal and extraskeletal tissues (Fig. 2). In this review high- and low-throughput techniques are classified according to the evaluation of the quantity and timing of sample processing and according to their potential adaptation to higher throughput platforms. A brief description is provided below and summarized in Table 4. Few examples are also provided.
High-Throughput Techniques
The large number of embryos from a single mating, the larvae transparency and the possibility to screen several samples at the same time drastically reducing time and costs, make zebrafish embryo and larvae unique models for the application of high-throughput analyses (Fig. 3).
Whole Mount Stainings
Whole mount vital stainings are often used to visualize tissues during development or to investigate the effect of pharmacological treatments, by exploiting larval body clarity. Bone development can be easily followed in vivo by calcein and alizarin red staining [184, 185]. For instance, calcein staining was used to analyze zebrafish vertebrae mineralization to screen bone-active compounds at increasing doses [185]. Alizarin red (ARS) staining allowed to investigate the tigecycline and minocycline efficacy in zebrafish larvae with prednisolone-induced osteoporosis [186]. Both ARS and calcein stainings have been used to determine the impaired mineralization of the zebrafish model with high iron stress-induced osteoporosis and to test alendronate goodness to rescue the phenotype [187]. Moreover, in the OI field the delayed mineralization in Chihuahua, p3h1upv2/upv2 and crtapupv1/upv1 mutant larvae and the effect of the 4PBA chemical chaperone on Chi/ + cranial bone mineralization have been assessed through ARS [57, 59].
Transgenic Lines
Nowadays, several transgenic lines carrying different fluorophores under specific promoters have been generated to overcome the technical limit posed by low zebrafish antibody availability. Thanks to these models several disease related pathways have been dissected or new cell lines specificity identified. For instance, the osterix:mCherry and entpd5:YFP double transgenic zebrafish were generated to demonstrate the specific expression of the ectonucleoside triphosphate/diphosphohydrolase 5 (entpd5) in pre-osteoblasts [188]. sp7:mCherry zebrafish line has also been crossed with oc:EGFP fish in order to analyze osterix and osteocalcin expression in zebrafish opercle after calcitriol and cobalt chloride exposure [189]. The ins:nfsb-mCherry transgenic fish displaying diabetes-induced osteoporosis have been used to test the effect of cinacalcet and paricalcitol treatment, revealing an increased mineralization area in the operculum as well as an improvement in the caudal fin regeneration ability compared to controls [190]. A more exhaustive list of transgenic zebrafish tracing bone cells and/or pathway can be found in [16].
Many zebrafish reporter lines targeting the skeletal muscle are also available, as reported in [91]. For instance, the mylz2:GFP and the smyhc1:GFP lines allow the identification of fast [191] or slow [192] skeletal muscle fibers, respectively.
Quiescent and proliferating cardiomyocytes can be easily distinguished in vivo under fluorescent microscope thanks to the cmlc2:FUCCI zebrafish transgenic line that expresses red or green fluorescent ubiquitination-based indicator (FUCCI) according to cell cycle phase [193].
Crestin is physiologically expressed until 72 hpf, and then it remains silenced during zebrafish subsequential stages of life. Therefore, crestin:EGFP transgenic fish can be exploited to visualize neural crest progenitors during development as well as melanoma cells in adults [194].
Drug-Screening Platform
The ability of zebrafish larvae to absorb molecules through their mouth and gills allows to screen several compounds directly dissolved in fish water and treat a huge number of samples. Then, malformation development (i.e. embryo coagulation, lack of somite formation, non-detachment of the tail and lack of heartbeat) can be rapidly detected by bright-field microscopy [195]. Also, larval locomotion assays have been developed as high-throughput tools to study behavioral alteration on zebrafish larvae. Indeed, zebrafish embryos movement can be monitored using a recording chamber equipped with an infrared digital camera, allowing the analysis of multi-well plates with a larva per well. The quantification of swimming behavior parameters, such as the total swim distance and the number of movements made by each fish, is automatically performed by dedicated software, such as Stream Pix5 [196].
Semi-automated massive chemical screenings have been generated to reduce the risk of introducing bias from the operator. Functional and morphological parameters such as heart rate, arrythmia and ventricle diameter are registered taking advantage of a semi-automatic technology developed by Dyballa and colleagues to evaluate the effect of cardiotoxic compounds [197].
Recently, new and more rapid approaches for drug screening have been also optimized using juveniles and adult zebrafish. Indeed, at 11 mm the juveniles have developed most of the adult morphology [198] and physiology and can still be kept in 24-well plates, requiring small volumes which allow for reasonable screening throughput and low cost. This approach was used to elucidate the role of NF-kB during osteoblast dedifferentiation and to identify an unexpected role for NF-kB signaling in maintenance of the differentiated state of osteoblasts [199].
More challenging is the application of chemical screens to adult, up to now limited by the additional demands of cost, space, and labor associated with the screens. Nevertheless, thanks to the 3D printed system ScreenCube 96 fish can be treated in ∼3 min with a tenfold reduction in drug quantity compared to that used in previous chemical screens in adult zebrafish [200].
Behavioral Assay
Behavioral changes in animals could be influenced by age, strain [201], drug exposure [202] or could reflect functional alterations in organs and tissues, and they are largely studied in zebrafish larvae as a tool for drug screening [203] or tissue functionality [196]. In recent years, several systems to study swimming performance on adult zebrafish have been developed.
These systems were exploited to study the effect of exercise on zebrafish bone formation and mineralization. Fish subjected to exercise through a swimming chamber display increased bone geometrical parameters values and higher osteoblast numbers and dimension. More recently, the swimming behavior of the dominant OI zebrafish model Chihuahua has been tracked, revealing an altered head meandering and an impaired traveled distance [70].
Low-Throughput Techniques
Zebrafish research is not only restricted to embryo and larval stages studies, but also adult represent a valid tool in the field of disease mechanisms evaluation. Indeed, thanks to the zebrafish easy genetic manipulation several models have been generated by reverse genetic approaches [16]. In addition, since zebrafish have a longer life span compared to rodents, they became also suitable in the field of progressive worsening diseases and in aging. Moreover, the small dimensions of adult zebrafish respect to mammals allow to increase number of samples and thus the statistical power of data, providing first evidence of the positive or negative effects of specific treatment. Therefore, in the last years several techniques have been down-scaling to allow adult zebrafish models characterization [204,205,206].
Regeneration Studies
The ability of adult zebrafish caudal fin to regenerate in only 14 days allows not only to follow bone formation [207] and repair after fracture but also to evaluate pharmacological therapies. Indeed, caudal fin regeneration ability is impaired in osteoporosis-induced zebrafish models [190, 207] as well as in dominant and recessive OI zebrafish mutants [70], and thus they have been exploited to test promising pro-osteogenic compounds [70, 190]. Moreover, fracture repair mechanisms have been characterized in zebrafish caudal fin. In the frf zebrafish mutant, characterized by spontaneous fractures in the lepidotrichia, ARS/calcein double staining revealed an impaired bone callus architecture [149]. Alendronate administration in frf fish reduced spontaneous fracture rate, while it alters bone calli resorption in WT fish [208].
Histological Staining
As for mammals, adult zebrafish histology is one of the most common used techniques, since it provides several information concerning cells morphology, distribution and activity and tissues microarchitecture. Also, in zebrafish the sectioning of mineralized tissues requires decalcification protocols or methacrylate-based polymer embedding. However, some dyes can be used in whole mount approach also in adults, such as ARS, which empowers bone visualization through rhodamine-filtered fluorescence microscopy [209]. The most employed skeletal tissues staining are the Masson’s trichrome and toluidine blue generally performed to visualize bone morphology [56, 89], alizarin red and calcein to evaluate the mineral apposition rate [210] and von Kossa to analyze mineralized tissues [147] and sirius red staining to visualize collagen fibers maturation under polarized light [211]. Von Kossa staining showed highly mineralized endplates with no osteoid in Chi/ + compared to WT, and the low phosphorous diet restored the osteoid in mutants, reaching WT levels [147]. Picrosirius staining revealed a higher amount of collagen in the caudal fin regrowth matrix of Chi/ + fish after 4PBA treatment compared to control fish [57]. To investigate osteoclast activity and bone ECM mineralization functionality tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assays can be performed. These stainings allowed to characterize the effect of alendronate on scales of a glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) zebrafish model [73, 212]. Importantly, transgenic samples maintain specific fluorescent signals during embedding and sectioning, thus allowing detailed high-resolution imaging also in adult zebrafish, that are not any longer transparent [213].
Zebrafish muscular tissue can be visualized by classical staining such as hematoxylin eosin (H&E), while muscle alteration myofiber structure can be detected under polarized light taking advantage of muscle anisotropy coupled with zebrafish larvae transparency. For instance, col6a1 morphants, model of collagen VI-related myopathy, display an abnormal birefringence that is not improved by cyclosporin A treatment [214].
Acid fuchsin orange G staining, which labels cardiomyocytes in orange, fibrin in red and collagen in blue, was useful to demonstrate that the fibrin-rich area, corresponding to the fibrotic tissue that forms after zebrafish heart injury, is strongly reduced by 14 days post injury (dpi) while a collagenous region is still present at 60 dpi [215].
H&E staining was also used in zebrafish skin regeneration studies to investigate the effect of Fgf disruption and hydroxyurea treatment on cell proliferation [216].
Electron Microscopy
Scanning (SEM) or transmission (TEM) electron microscopy provide high-resolution surface imaging or ultrastructural details of zebrafish, respectively. SEM is particularly suitable to describe structures morphology, and it was indeed performed to detect dose-dependent simvastatin-induced alterations in zebrafish embryos tail. SEM can also be used to study zebrafish cutis during development or infection since cells (i.e. keratinocytes) and other cutis element (i.e. scales) can be imaged [217]. Zebrafish cells are typically smaller than mammalian cells, especially during early developmental stages. Thus, TEM can provide detailed information that are not easily detectable through classical histological analysis. TEM allows visualization of fine structural features such as collagen fibrils [57, 147], myofibrils or sarcomere organization [218, 219] and cellular organelles such as endoplasmic reticulum or nuclei [57, 147]. Indeed, TEM analysis on aged scoliotic zebrafish revealed severe myofiber disorganization and degeneration, thus contributing to underline the close biomechanical relationship between bone and muscle [220]. Also, enlarged endoplasmic reticulum cisternae was found in the osteoblasts of Chihuahua [57], p3h1upv2/upv2 and crtapupv1/upv1 [59] zebrafish models through TEM, confirming ER-stress as a possible pharmacological target for both dominant and recessive OI. Indeed, the positive effect of 4PBA, a molecular chaperone known to reduce ER-stress, has been confirmed in Chi/ + fish by TEM images [57].
X-ray Based Imaging Techniques
X-ray imaging is a cheap and quick technique to visualize the zebrafish skeleton. It can be repeated on live organisms and it can be used as a preliminary diagnostic tool for skeletal defects characterization. An intermediate throughput power can be attributed to X-ray considering its role in screening approaches to identify skeletal mutants in forward genetic studies [29]. Although x-ray imaging can be employed to assess skeletal deformities in adult zebrafish, its use for juvenile zebrafish, where the skeleton is too small to be captured on film or digitally, is not feasible. In addition, x-ray images of zebrafish are not suitable for quantification of tissue or bone mineral parameters compared to the high-resolution microCT. Micro computed tomography (μCT) is an x-ray-based technology that enables ex-vivo examination of the complete zebrafish skeleton through the reconstruction of a 3D image. Medium and high-resolution scans on zebrafish samples can be acquired using a 21 μm [60] or a 10.5 to 5 μm voxel size [57, 59, 60], respectively. In particular, the use of low resolution microCT in semi-throughput platform allowed many fish to be examined in multiplex and the development of microCT-based phenomics for a deep skeletal zebrafish phenotyping [60]. Thanks to μCT, compromised bone volume, vertebral thickness and bone mineral density have identified in the dominant OI zebrafish model Chihuahua. μCT analysis can also be performed on soft tissues by using contrast-enhancing staining methods [221]. Indeed, scanning of phosphotungstic acid (PTA)-stained fish allows soft tissue visualization and subsequential 3D rendering of eyes, heart and brain.
Higher-resolution images can also be obtained by synchrotron X-ray tomographic microscopy, which can also distinguish mineralized and non-mineralized bone. Indeed, a 0.65 μm voxel size has been assessed to demonstrated that a low- and high-phosphorous diet, respectively increase the non-mineralized and mineralized matrix in zebrafish vertebrae [204].
The application of high-resolution synchrotron μCT images allowed to demonstrate the presence of fewer osteocytes in the lacunae of the sp7 zebrafish mutant respect to WT.
Imaging and Spectroscopy for the Analysis of Matrix Composition
Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) imaging is often used to observe the striated skeletal muscle of living zebrafish as well as collagen fibers orientation and thickness without employing exogenous labels and eliminating concern about the distortion of structures caused by sample preparation in conventional histological examination [222]. SHG was also exploited to characterize collagen fibers orientation, distribution and thickness in both aged and sp7 mutant zebrafish [89].
Quantitative backscattered electron imaging (qBEI) allows to analyze the inorganic composition of bone matrix. Indeed, backscattered electrons interact with the sample and produces a signal intensity that depends on the local mean atomic number of the sample itself. qBEI helped to detect the hyper mineralized bone tissue area of the dominant OI zebrafish Chihuahua [61].
Other techniques based on vibrational spectroscopy methods, such as Raman spectroscopy (RS) and Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), provide information on both inorganic and organic bone components, discerning tissue components based on their energy-specific vibrations [223, 224]. Confocal Raman imaging identifies specific molecular components of bone tissue, such as collagen, hydroxyapatite, and other mineral phases, offering insights into bone quality and maturation [225]. Using this approach, Høgset and collogues determined in vivo the biomolecular composition of a whole zebrafish embryo, discerning collagens, lipids, DNA and cytochrome-rich regions [224].
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measures the absorption of infrared radiation in tissue samples, thus providing information about the molecular and structural tissues composition. FTIR images revealed a decreased collagen maturity and an increased carbonate-to-phosphate ratio at the vertebrae endplate of Chihuahua zebrafish mutant compared to WT [61].
Mechanical Properties Analysis
The availability of different zebrafish models for skeletal diseases required the down-scaling of specific techniques to investigate biomechanical properties of bone as well as of other tissues. Nowadays stiffness and elasticity can be evaluated at micro/nanoscale level by force spectroscopy methods such as nanoindentation and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Nanoindentation applies higher magnitude force compared to AFM and thus it is preferred for analyzing hard materials, such as skeletal tissues [226].
Nanoindentation was indeed useful to detect alterations of connexons, hemichannels involved in bone growth [227], in the vertebrae of stöpseldtl28d [206] zebrafish mutant as well as impaired elastic modulus in the OI zebrafish Chihuahua [61]. AFM has been used to measure the collagen fiber diameter in zebrafish vertebrae and to calculate the ECM stiffness in regenerating zebrafish myocardium [228].
Electrophysiology Assays
Electrophysiology studies can be assessed to investigate heart conduction system. Indeed, electrocardiogram of the Tg(myh6:cmlc1E17K) fish revealed a slower sino-atrial activity and an increased heart rate irregularity compared to WT, allowing the characterization of the E17K mutation as causative of atrial fibrillation [229]. Patch clamp analysis can also be performed on zebrafish cardiomyocytes in order to determine ionic currents (i.e. calcium flux) [230]. Furthermore, transmembrane action potential can be evaluated using voltage-sensitive dyes such as di-4-ANEPPS, which intercalates in the cell membranes and emits a red fluorescence in response to variations of membrane potential [231].
Skin Functionality Assays
Epidermal permeability or integrity can be investigated by skin functionality assays both in zebrafish larvae and adults. In particular dye penetration assays are often used to determine skin barrier properties, and for instance to evaluate the re-epithelization process during wound healing [138].
Conclusion
The several already available models for dominant and recessive OI prove the goodness of zebrafish in recapitulating the main OI skeletal features. The easy genetic manipulation paves the way for the rapid generation of all the new OI forms characterized so far and likely of the ones that will be identified in the future. The strong evolutionary conservation of development and structure of tissues/organs such as muscles, heart and skin between teleost and mammals supports the power of zebrafish to investigate also the extraskeletal features of the disease, a clear need for the patients. The possibility to employ zebrafish for high-throughput drug screening taking advantage of the rapid embryonal development, embryo transparency and the availability of specific transgenic lines further strengthen the use of this model in OI and in general in skeletal disease field.
References
Marini JC et al (2017) Osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3:17052. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.52. ((in eng))
Forlino A, Marini JC (2016) Osteogenesis imperfecta. Lancet 387(10028):1657–1671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00728-X. ((in eng))
Garibaldi N et al (2022) Dissecting the phenotypic variability of osteogenesis imperfecta. Dis Model Mech. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.049398. ((in eng))
Rossi V, Lee B, Marom R (2019) Osteogenesis imperfecta: advancements in genetics and treatment. Curr Opin Pediatr 31(6):708–715. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000813. ((in eng))
Besio R, Chow CW, Tonelli F, Marini JC, Forlino A (2019) Bone biology: insights from osteogenesis imperfecta and related rare fragility syndromes. FEBS J 286(15):3033–3056. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.14963. ((in eng))
Cohn LA, Meuten DJ (1990) Bone fragility in a kitten: an osteogenesis imperfecta-like syndrome. J Am Vet Med Assoc 197(1):98–100 ((in eng))
Evason MD, Taylor SM, Bebchuk TN (2007) Suspect osteogenesis imperfecta in a male kitten. Can Vet J 48(3):296–298 ((in eng))
Arthur DG, Thompson KG, Swarbrick P (1992) Lethal osteogenesis imperfecta and skin fragility in newborn New Zealand Romney lambs. N Z Vet J 40(3):112–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.1992.35712. ((in eng))
Omar AR (1961) Osteogenesis imperfecta in cats. J Pathol Bacteriol 82:303–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1700820209. ((in eng))
Jensen PT, Rasmussen PG, Basse A (1976) Congenital osteogenesis imperfecta in Charollais cattle. Nord Vet Med 28(6):304–308 ((in eng))
J. Lenffer et al., "OMIA (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals): an enhanced platform and integration into the Entrez search interface at NCBI, Nucleic Acids Res, vol. 34, no. Database issue, pp. D599–601, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj152.
Campbell BG, Wootton JA, Macleod JN, Minor RR (2001) Canine COL1A2 mutation resulting in C-terminal truncation of pro-alpha2(I) and severe osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone Miner Res 16(6):1147–1153. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.6.1147. ((in eng))
Bourneuf E et al (2017) Rapid discovery of de novo deleterious mutations in cattle enhances the value of livestock as model species. Sci Rep 7(1):11466. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11523-3. ((in eng))
Petersen JL, Tietze SM, Burrack RM, Steffen DJ (2019) Evidence for a de novo, dominant germ-line mutation causative of osteogenesis imperfecta in two Red Angus calves. Mamm Genome 30(3–4):81–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-019-09794-4. ((in eng))
Elefteriou F, Yang X (2011) Genetic mouse models for bone studies–strengths and limitations. Bone 49(6):1242–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2011.08.021
F. Tonelli et al., Zebrafish: a resourceful vertebrate model to investigate skeletal disorders, Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), vol. 11, p. 489, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00489.
Lleras-Forero L, Winkler C, Schulte-Merker S (2020) Zebrafish and medaka as models for biomedical research of bone diseases. Dev Biol 457(2):191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.07.009
Meyer A, Van de Peer Y (2005) From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD). BioEssays 27(9):937–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20293
Gistelinck C et al (2016) Zebrafish Collagen Type I: molecular and biochemical characterization of the major structural protein in bone and skin. Sci Rep 6:21540. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21540
Apschner A, Schulte-Merker S, Witten PE (2011) Not all bones are created equal - using zebrafish and other teleost species in osteogenesis research. Methods Cell Biol 105:239–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381320-6.00010-2. ((in eng))
Witten PE, Harris MP, Huysseune A, Winkler C (2017) Small teleost fish provide new insights into human skeletal diseases. Methods Cell Biol 138:321–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mcb.2016.09.001. ((in eng))
Witten PE, Huysseune A (2009) A comparative view on mechanisms and functions of skeletal remodelling in teleost fish, with special emphasis on osteoclasts and their function. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 84(2):315–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00077.x
R. Silva Brito, A. Canedo, D. Farias, and T. L. Rocha, "Transgenic zebrafish (Danio rerio) as an emerging model system in ecotoxicology and toxicology: Historical review, recent advances, and trends, Sci Total Environ, vol. 848, p. 157665, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157665.
Choe CP et al (2021) Transgenic fluorescent zebrafish lines that have revolutionized biomedical research. Lab Anim Res 37(1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-021-00103-2. ((in eng))
Marques IJ, Lupi E, Mercader N (2019) Model systems for regeneration: zebrafish. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.167692. ((in eng))
Wang X, He H, Tang W, Zhang XA, Hua X, Yan J (2012) Two origins of blastemal progenitors define blastemal regeneration of zebrafish lower jaw. PLoS ONE 7(9):e45380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045380. ((in eng))
E. Kague, R. Y. Kwon, and C. Winkler, "Editorial: Fish as model organism for skeletal diseases, Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), vol. 14, p. 1331690, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1331690.
Tasnim M, Wahlquist P, Hill JT (2024) Zebrafish: unraveling genetic complexity through duplicated genes. Dev Genes Evol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-024-00720-6. ((in eng))
Fisher S, Jagadeeswaran P, Halpern ME (2003) Radiographic analysis of zebrafish skeletal defects. Dev Biol 264(1):64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00399-3. ((in eng))
M. T. Valenti, G. Marchetto, M. Mottes, and L. Dalle Carbonare, "Zebrafish: A Suitable Tool for the Study of Cell Signaling in Bone, Cells, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9081911.
Zhao Q, Eberspaecher H, Lefebvre V, De Crombrugghe B (1997) Parallel expression of Sox9 and Col2a1 in cells undergoing chondrogenesis. Dev Dyn 209(4):377–386
Yan YL et al (2005) A pair of Sox: distinct and overlapping functions of zebrafish sox9 co-orthologs in craniofacial and pectoral fin development. Development 132(5):1069–1083. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01674. ((in eng))
Maye P et al (2011) Generation and characterization of Col10a1-mcherry reporter mice. Genesis 49(5):410–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.20733
Li N, Felber K, Elks P, Croucher P, Roehl HH (2009) Tracking gene expression during zebrafish osteoblast differentiation. Dev Dyn 238(2):459–466. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21838
Murayama E et al (2006) Tracing hematopoietic precursor migration to successive hematopoietic organs during zebrafish development. Immunity 25(6):963–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.015
Lam EY, Hall CJ, Crosier PS, Crosier KE, Flores MV (2010) Live imaging of Runx1 expression in the dorsal aorta tracks the emergence of blood progenitors from endothelial cells. Blood 116(6):909–914. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-01-264382. ((in eng))
Weigele J, Franz-Odendaal TA (2016) Functional bone histology of zebrafish reveals two types of endochondral ossification, different types of osteoblast clusters and a new bone type. J Anat 229(1):92–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12480. ((in eng))
Jiang X, Iseki S, Maxson RE, Sucov HM, Morriss-Kay GM (2002) Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault. Dev Biol 241(1):106–116. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2001.0487. ((in eng))
Kague E, Gallagher M, Burke S, Parsons M, Franz-Odendaal T, Fisher S (2012) Skeletogenic fate of zebrafish cranial and trunk neural crest. PLoS ONE 7(11):e47394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047394. ((in eng))
Raterman ST, Metz JR, Wagener FADT, Von den Hoff JW (2020) Zebrafish models of craniofacial malformations: interactions of environmental factors. Front Cell Dev Biol 8:600926. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.600926. ((in eng))
Lautenschlager S, Fagan MJ, Luo ZX, Bird CM, Gill P, Rayfield EJ (2023) Functional reorganisation of the cranial skeleton during the cynodont-mammaliaform transition. Commun Biol 6(1):367. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04742-0. ((in eng))
Schilling TF, Kimmel CB (1997) Musculoskeletal patterning in the pharyngeal segments of the zebrafish embryo. Development 124(15):2945–2960. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.124.15.2945. ((in eng))
C. S. Teng, M. C. Ting, D. T. Farmer, M. Brockop, R. E. Maxson, and J. G. Crump, "Altered bone growth dynamics prefigure craniosynostosis in a zebrafish model of Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, Elife, vol. 7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37024.
Kimmel CB, Ullmann B, Walker M, Miller CT, Crump JG (2003) Endothelin 1-mediated regulation of pharyngeal bone development in zebrafish. Development 130(7):1339–1351. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00338. ((in eng))
Gordon CT et al (2013) Mutations in endothelin 1 cause recessive auriculocondylar syndrome and dominant isolated question-mark ears. Am J Hum Genet 93(6):1118–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.023. ((in eng))
S. Paul, S. Schindler, D. Giovannone, A. de Millo Terrazzani, F. V. Mariani, and J. G. Crump, Ihha induces hybrid cartilage-bone cells during zebrafish jawbone regeneration, Development, vol. 143, no. 12, pp. 2066–76, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.131292.
Fleming A, Kishida MG, Kimmel CB, Keynes RJ (2015) Building the backbone: the development and evolution of vertebral patterning. Development 142(10):1733–1744. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.118950. ((in eng))
P. a. H. B. Witten (2021) Witten & Hall (2021) The Ancient Segmented Active and Permanent Notochord
Bagnat M, Gray RS (2020) Development of a straight vertebrate body axis. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.175794. ((in eng))
Boswell CW, Ciruna B (2017) Understanding idiopathic scoliosis: a new zebrafish school of thought. Trends Genet 33(3):183–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2017.01.001
Gorman KF, Breden F (2007) Teleosts as models for human vertebral stability and deformity. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 145(1):28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2006.10.004
Xie H, Li M, Kang Y, Zhang J, Zhao C (2022) Zebrafish: an important model for understanding scoliosis. Cell Mol Life Sci 79(9):506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04534-5
Gistelinck C et al (2018) Zebrafish type I collagen mutants faithfully recapitulate human type I collagenopathies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115(34):E8037–E8046. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1722200115. ((in eng))
Henke K et al (2017) Genetic Screen for Postembryonic Development in the Zebrafish (" (in eng). Genetics 207(2):609–623. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.117.300187. ((in eng))
Hayes AJ et al (2013) Spinal deformity in aged zebrafish is accompanied by degenerative changes to their vertebrae that resemble osteoarthritis. PLoS ONE 8(9):e75787. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075787. ((in eng))
Suniaga S et al (2018) Increased mechanical loading through controlled swimming exercise induces bone formation and mineralization in adult zebrafish. Sci Rep 8(1):3646. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21776-1. ((in eng))
Gioia R et al (2017) The chaperone activity of 4PBA ameliorates the skeletal phenotype of Chihuahua, a zebrafish model for dominant osteogenesis imperfecta. Hum Mol Genet 26(15):2897–2911. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddx171. ((in eng))
Gistelinck C et al (2016) Loss of Type I collagen telopeptide lysyl hydroxylation causes musculoskeletal abnormalities in a Zebrafish model of bruck syndrome. J Bone Miner Res 31(11):1930–1942. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2977. ((in eng))
Tonelli F et al (2020) Crtap and p3h1 knock out zebrafish support defective collagen chaperoning as the cause of their osteogenesis imperfecta phenotype. Matrix Biol 90:40–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2020.03.004. ((in eng))
Hur M et al (2017) MicroCT-based phenomics in the zebrafish skeleton reveals virtues of deep phenotyping in a distributed organ system. Elife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26014. ((in eng))
Fiedler IAK et al (2018) Severely impaired bone material quality in chihuahua zebrafish resembles classical dominant human osteogenesis imperfecta. J Bone Miner Res 33(8):1489–1499. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3445. ((in eng))
Cubbage CC, Mabee PM (1996) Development of the cranium and paired fins in the zebrafish Danio rerio (Ostariophysi, Cyprinidae). J Morphol 229(2):121–160
Zakany J, Duboule D (2007) The role of Hox genes during vertebrate limb development. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17(4):359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2007.05.011. ((in eng))
Hawkins MB, Henke K, Harris MP (2021) Latent developmental potential to form limb-like skeletal structures in zebrafish. Cell 184(4):899-911.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.003
Daponte V, Tylzanowski P, Forlino A (2021) Appendage regeneration in vertebrates: what makes this possible? Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020242. ((in eng))
Gemberling M, Bailey TJ, Hyde DR, Poss KD (2013) The zebrafish as a model for complex tissue regeneration. Trends Genet 29(11):611–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2013.07.003. ((in eng))
R. Besio et al., "4-PBA ameliorates cellular homeostasis in fibroblasts from osteogenesis imperfecta patients by enhancing autophagy and stimulating protein secretion, Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis, vol. 1864, no. 5 Pt A, pp. 1642–1652, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.02.002.
Besio R et al (2019) Cellular stress due to impairment of collagen prolyl hydroxylation complex is rescued by the chaperone 4-phenylbutyrate. Dis Model Mech. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.038521. ((in eng))
Garibaldi N et al (2021) Targeting cellular stress in vitro improves osteoblast homeostasis, matrix collagen content and mineralization in two murine models of osteogenesis imperfecta. Matrix Biol 98:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2021.03.001. ((in eng))
Daponte V et al (2023) Cell differentiation and matrix organization are differentially affected during bone formation in osteogenesis imperfecta zebrafish models with different genetic defects impacting collagen type I structure. Matrix Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2023.06.003. ((in eng))
Sharif F, de Bakker MA, Richardson MK (2014) Osteoclast-like cells in early zebrafish embryos. Cell J 16(2):211–224 ((in eng))
D. J. M. Bergen, E. Kague, and C. L. Hammond, Zebrafish as an emerging model for osteoporosis: a primary testing platform for screening new osteo-active compounds, Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), vol. 10, p. 6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00006.
Pasqualetti S, Congiu T, Banfi G, Mariotti M (2015) Alendronate rescued osteoporotic phenotype in a model of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in adult zebrafish scale. Int J Exp Pathol 96(1):11–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/iep.12106
Bergen DJM et al (2022) Regenerating zebrafish scales express a subset of evolutionary conserved genes involved in human skeletal disease. BMC Biol 20(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01209-8. ((in eng))
de Vrieze E, Zethof J, Schulte-Merker S, Flik G, Metz JR (2015) Identification of novel osteogenic compounds by an ex-vivo sp7:luciferase zebrafish scale assay. Bone 74:106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2015.01.006. ((in eng))
C. Van der heyden, K. Wautier, and A. Huysseune, Tooth succession in the zebrafish (Danio rerio), Arch Oral Biol, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1051–8, 2001, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9969(01)00064-4.
G. E. Karaman, E. Emekli-Alturfan, and S. Akyüz, Zebrafish; an emerging model organism for studying toxicity and biocompatibility of dental materials, Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand), vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 41–46, 2020.
Taleb K, Lauridsen E, Daugaard-Jensen J, Nieminen P, Kreiborg S (2018) Dentinogenesis imperfecta type II- genotype and phenotype analyses in three Danish families. Mol Genet Genomic Med 6(3):339–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.375. ((in eng))
Chen S, Xie H, Zhao S, Wang S, Wei X, Liu S (2022) The genes involved in dentinogenesis. Organogenesis 18(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476278.2021.2022373. ((in eng))
Song IW et al (2022) Targeting TGF-β for treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta. J Clin Invest. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI152571. ((in eng))
Jackman WR, Yoo JJ, Stock DW (2010) Hedgehog signaling is required at multiple stages of zebrafish tooth development. BMC Dev Biol 10:119. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-10-119. ((in eng))
Perrino MA, Yelick PC (2004) Immunolocalization of Alk8 during replacement tooth development in zebrafish. Cells Tissues Organs 176(1–3):17–27. https://doi.org/10.1159/000075024. ((in eng))
Du W, Yu H (2018) The role of fibroblast growth factors in tooth development and incisor renewal. Stem Cells Int 2018:7549160. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7549160. ((in eng))
Chen JW, Galloway JL (2014) The development of zebrafish tendon and ligament progenitors. Development 141(10):2035–2045. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.104067. ((in eng))
Smeeton J, Askary A, Crump JG (2017) Building and maintaining joints by exquisite local control of cell fate. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.245. ((in eng))
Quarto N, Longaker MT (2005) The zebrafish (Danio rerio): a model system for cranial suture patterning. Cells Tissues Organs 181(2):109–118. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091100. ((in eng))
Symmons S (1979) Notochordal and elastic components of the axial skeleton of fishes and their functions in locomotion. J Zool 189(2):157–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1979.tb03958.x
Witten PE, Fjelldal PG, Huysseune A, McGurk C, Obach A, Owen MAG (2019) Bone without minerals and its secondary mineralization in Atlantic salmon. J Exp Biol. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.188763. ((in eng))
Kague E et al (2021) 3D assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration in zebrafish identifies changes in bone density that prime disc disease. Bone Res 9(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-021-00156-y. ((in eng))
Arponen H, Mäkitie O, Waltimo-Sirén J (2014) Association between joint hypermobility, scoliosis, and cranial base anomalies in paediatric Osteogenesis imperfecta patients: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:428. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-428. ((in eng))
Tesoriero C et al (2023) Modeling human muscular dystrophies in zebrafish: mutant lines, transgenic fluorescent biosensors, and phenotyping assays. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098314. ((in eng))
Jackson HE, Ingham PW (2013) Control of muscle fibre-type diversity during embryonic development: the zebrafish paradigm. Mech Dev 130(9–10):447–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mod.2013.06.001. ((in eng))
Altringham JD, Ellerby DJ (1999) Fish swimming: patterns in muscle function. J Exp Biol 202(Pt 23):3397–3403. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.202.23.3397. ((in eng))
E. Lievens, M. Klass, T. Bex, and W. Derave, "Muscle fiber typology substantially influences time to recover from high-intensity exercise, J Appl Physiol (1985), vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 648–659, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00636.2019.
Huang SH, Hsiao CD, Lin DS, Chow CY, Chang CJ, Liau I (2011) Imaging of zebrafish in vivo with second-harmonic generation reveals shortened sarcomeres associated with myopathy induced by statin. PLoS ONE 6(9):e24764. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024764. ((in eng))
Li S, Wen H, Du S (2020) Defective sarcomere organization and reduced larval locomotion and fish survival in slow muscle heavy chain 1 (smyhc1) mutants. FASEB J 34(1):1378–1397. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201900935RR. ((in eng))
Frontera WR, Ochala J (2015) Skeletal muscle: a brief review of structure and function. Calcif Tissue Int 96(3):183–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-014-9915-y. ((in eng))
Charvet B, Malbouyres M, Pagnon-Minot A, Ruggiero F, Le Guellec D (2011) Development of the zebrafish myoseptum with emphasis on the myotendinous junction. Cell Tissue Res 346(3):439–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-011-1266-7. ((in eng))
Johnston IA, Bower NI, Macqueen DJ (2011) Growth and the regulation of myotomal muscle mass in teleost fish. J Exp Biol 214(Pt 10):1617–1628. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.038620. ((in eng))
Rossi G, Messina G (2014) Comparative myogenesis in teleosts and mammals. Cell Mol Life Sci 71(16):3081–3099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-014-1604-5. ((in eng))
Stickney HL, Barresi MJ, Devoto SH (2000) Somite development in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 219(3):287–303 ((in eng))
C. Qiu et al., "A single-cell transcriptional timelapse of mouse embryonic development, from gastrula to pup, bioRxiv, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.05.535726.
Taher L, Collette NM, Murugesh D, Maxwell E, Ovcharenko I, Loots GG (2011) Global gene expression analysis of murine limb development. PLoS ONE 6(12):e28358. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028358. ((in eng))
Kahane N, Ribes V, Kicheva A, Briscoe J, Kalcheim C (2013) The transition from differentiation to growth during dermomyotome-derived myogenesis depends on temporally restricted hedgehog signaling. Development 140(8):1740–1750. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.092726. ((in eng))
Devoto SH, Melançon E, Eisen JS, Westerfield M (1996) Identification of separate slow and fast muscle precursor cells in vivo, prior to somite formation. Development 122(11):3371–3380. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.122.11.3371. ((in eng))
Ingham PW, Kim HR (2005) Hedgehog signalling and the specification of muscle cell identity in the zebrafish embryo. Exp Cell Res 306(2):336–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.03.019. ((in eng))
Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF (1995) Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn 203(3):253–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1002030302. ((in eng))
Maves L (2014) Recent advances using zebrafish animal models for muscle disease drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov 9(9):1033–1045. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2014.927435. ((in eng))
Kaliya-Perumal AK, Ingham PW (2022) Musculoskeletal regeneration: A zebrafish perspective. Biochimie 196:171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2021.10.014. ((in eng))
Knappe S, Zammit PS, Knight RD (2015) A population of Pax7-expressing muscle progenitor cells show differential responses to muscle injury dependent on developmental stage and injury extent. Front Aging Neurosci 7:161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00161. ((in eng))
Berberoglu MA et al (2017) Satellite-like cells contribute to pax7-dependent skeletal muscle repair in adult zebrafish. Dev Biol 424(2):162–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.03.004. ((in eng))
Oudhoff H, Hisler V, Baumgartner F, Rees L, Grepper D, Jaźwińska A (2024) Skeletal muscle regeneration after extensive cryoinjury of caudal myomeres in adult zebrafish. NPJ Regen Med 9(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-024-00351-5. ((in eng))
Gremminger VL, Jeong Y, Cunningham RP, Meers GM, Rector RS, Phillips CL (2019) Compromised exercise capacity and mitochondrial dysfunction in the Osteogenesis Imperfecta Murine (oim) Mouse Model. J Bone Miner Res 34(9):1646–1659. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3732. ((in eng))
Phillips CL, Jeong Y (2018) Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Muscle-Bone Interactions when Bi-directionally Compromised. Curr Osteoporos Rep 16(4):478–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-018-0456-6. ((in eng))
Veilleux LN, Lemay M, Pouliot-Laforte A, Cheung MS, Glorieux FH, Rauch F (2014) Muscle anatomy and dynamic muscle function in osteogenesis imperfecta type I. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(2):E356–E362. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-3209. ((in eng))
Xia J, Meng Z, Ruan H, Yin W, Xu Y, Zhang T (2020) Heart development and regeneration in non-mammalian model organisms. Front Cell Dev Biol 8:595488. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.595488. ((in eng))
Francoeur N, Sen R (2021) Advances in cardiac development and regeneration using Zebrafish as a model system for high-throughput research. J Dev Biol. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb9040040. ((in eng))
Thomas NA, Koudijs M, van Eeden FJ, Joyner AL, Yelon D (2008) Hedgehog signaling plays a cell-autonomous role in maximizing cardiac developmental potential. Development 135(22):3789–3799. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.024083. ((in eng))
Lamanna A, Fayers T, Clarke S, Parsonage W (2013) Valvular and aortic diseases in osteogenesis imperfecta. Heart Lung Circ 22(10):801–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2013.05.640. ((in eng))
D. Zhao et al., "Cardiovascular abnormalities and its correlation with genotypes of children with osteogenesis imperfecta, Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), vol. 13, p. 1004946, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1004946.
Chen F et al (2014) First mouse model for combined osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J Bone Miner Res 29(6):1412–1423. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2177. ((in eng))
Thiele F et al (2012) Cardiopulmonary dysfunction in the Osteogenesis imperfecta mouse model Aga2 and human patients are caused by bone-independent mechanisms. Hum Mol Genet 21(16):3535–3545. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/dds183. ((in eng))
González-Rosa JM (2022) Zebrafish models of cardiac disease: from fortuitous mutants to precision medicine. Circ Res 130(12):1803–1826. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.320396. ((in eng))
Wu CC et al (2016) Spatially resolved genome-wide transcriptional profiling identifies BMP signaling as essential regulator of zebrafish cardiomyocyte regeneration. Dev Cell 36(1):36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.12.010. ((in eng))
Gupta V, Gemberling M, Karra R, Rosenfeld GE, Evans T, Poss KD (2013) An injury-responsive gata4 program shapes the zebrafish cardiac ventricle. Curr Biol 23(13):1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.028. ((in eng))
R. Ben-Yair et al., "H3K27me3-mediated silencing of structural genes is required for zebrafish heart regeneration, Development 2019, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.178632.
Beis D et al (2005) Genetic and cellular analyses of zebrafish atrioventricular cushion and valve development. Development 132(18):4193–4204. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01970. ((in eng))
Zhang R et al (2013) In vivo cardiac reprogramming contributes to zebrafish heart regeneration. Nature 498(7455):497–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12322. ((in eng))
Zhang R, Xu X (2009) Transient and transgenic analysis of the zebrafish ventricular myosin heavy chain (vmhc) promoter: an inhibitory mechanism of ventricle-specific gene expression. Dev Dyn 238(6):1564–1573. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21929. ((in eng))
Le Guellec D, Morvan-Dubois G, Sire JY (2004) Skin development in bony fish with particular emphasis on collagen deposition in the dermis of the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Int J Dev Biol 48(2–3):217–231. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.15272388. ((in eng))
R. C. Henrikson and A. G. Matoltsy, The fine structure of teleost epidermis. 3. Club cells and other cell types, J Ultrastruct Res, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 222–32, 1967, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80093-5.
Li Q, Uitto J (2014) Zebrafish as a model system to study skin biology and pathology. J Invest Dermatol 134(6):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.182. ((in eng))
Birk DE (2001) Type V collagen: heterotypic type I/V collagen interactions in the regulation of fibril assembly. Micron 32(3):223–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0968-4328(00)00043-3. ((in eng))
Postel R et al (2013) Kindlin-1 mutant zebrafish as an in vivo model system to study adhesion mechanisms in the epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 133(9):2180–2190. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2013.154. ((in eng))
Shaw TJ, Martin P (2009) Wound repair at a glance. J Cell Sci 122(Pt 18):3209–3213. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.031187. ((in eng))
Russo I, Sartor E, Fagotto L, Colombo A, Tiso N, Alaibac M (2022) The Zebrafish model in dermatology: an update for clinicians. Discov Oncol 13(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00511-3. ((in eng))
Feng Y, Santoriello C, Mione M, Hurlstone A, Martin P (2010) Live imaging of innate immune cell sensing of transformed cells in zebrafish larvae: parallels between tumor initiation and wound inflammation. PLoS Biol 8(12):e1000562. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000562. ((in eng))
Richardson R, Slanchev K, Kraus C, Knyphausen P, Eming S, Hammerschmidt M (2013) Adult zebrafish as a model system for cutaneous wound-healing research. J Invest Dermatol 133(6):1655–1665. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2013.16. ((in eng))
Hansen B, Jemec GB (2002) The mechanical properties of skin in osteogenesis imperfecta. Arch Dermatol 138(7):909–911. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.138.7.909. ((in eng))
Micha D, Pals G, Smit TH, Ghazanfari S (2020) An in vitro model to evaluate the properties of matrices produced by fibroblasts from osteogenesis imperfecta and Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome patients. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 521(2):310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.09.081. ((in eng))
Vranka JA et al (2010) Prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1 null mice display abnormalities in fibrillar collagen-rich tissues such as tendons, skin, and bones. J Biol Chem 285(22):17253–17262. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.102228. ((in eng))
F. Tonelli et al.,(2023) Zebrafish Tric-b is required for skeletal development and bone cells differentiation. Front Endocrinol https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1002914.
Watson CJ et al (2020) Phenomics-based quantification of CRISPR-induced mosaicism in Zebrafish. Cell Syst 10(3):275-286.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2020.02.007. ((in eng))
Howe K et al (2013) The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 496(7446):498–503. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12111. ((in eng))
Ruzicka L et al (2019) The Zebrafish Information Network: new support for non-coding genes, richer Gene Ontology annotations and the Alliance of Genome Resources. Nucleic Acids Res 47(D1):D867–D873. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1090. ((in eng))
Kettleborough RN et al (2013) A systematic genome-wide analysis of zebrafish protein-coding gene function. Nature 496(7446):494–497. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11992. ((in eng))
S. Cotti, A. Huysseune, D. Larionova, W. Koppe, A. Forlino, and P. E. Witten, "Compression Fractures and Partial Phenotype Rescue With a Low Phosphorus Diet in the, Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), vol. 13, p. 851879, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.851879.
Gioia R et al (2012) Impaired osteoblastogenesis in a murine model of dominant osteogenesis imperfecta: a new target for osteogenesis imperfecta pharmacological therapy. Stem Cells 30(7):1465–1476. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1107. ((in eng))
Asharani PV et al (2012) Attenuated BMP1 function compromises osteogenesis, leading to bone fragility in humans and zebrafish. Am J Hum Genet 90(4):661–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.02.026. ((in eng))
Weis MA, Hudson DM, Kim L, Scott M, Wu JJ, Eyre DR (2010) Location of 3-hydroxyproline residues in collagen types I, II, III, and V/XI implies a role in fibril supramolecular assembly. J Biol Chem 285(4):2580–2590. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.068726. ((in eng))
Baldridge D et al (2008) CRTAP and LEPRE1 mutations in recessive osteogenesis imperfecta. Hum Mutat 29(12):1435–1442. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20799. ((in eng))
Van Dijk FS et al (2009) CRTAP mutations in lethal and severe osteogenesis imperfecta: the importance of combining biochemical and molecular genetic analysis. Eur J Hum Genet 17(12):1560–1569. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2009.75. ((in eng))
Cardeira-da-Silva J et al (2022) Fin ray branching is defined by TRAP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209231119. ((in eng))
van Eeden FJ et al (1996) Genetic analysis of fin formation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development 123:255–262 ((in eng))
Canty EG, Kadler KE (2005) Procollagen trafficking, processing and fibrillogenesis. J Cell Sci 118(Pt 7):1341–1353. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01731. ((in eng))
Cho SY et al (2015) Identification and in vivo functional characterization of novel compound heterozygous BMP1 variants in osteogenesis imperfecta. Hum Mutat 36(2):191–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22731. ((in eng))
Yamauchi M, Sricholpech M (2012) Lysine post-translational modifications of collagen. Essays Biochem 52:113–133. https://doi.org/10.1042/bse0520113. ((in eng))
Puig-Hervás MT et al (2012) Mutations in PLOD2 cause autosomal-recessive connective tissue disorders within the Bruck syndrome–osteogenesis imperfecta phenotypic spectrum. Hum Mutat 33(10):1444–1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22133. ((in eng))
Lapunzina P et al (2010) Identification of a frameshift mutation in Osterix in a patient with recessive osteogenesis imperfecta. Am J Hum Genet 87(1):110–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.05.016. ((in eng))
Wienholds E, van Eeden F, Kosters M, Mudde J, Plasterk RH, Cuppen E (2003) Efficient target-selected mutagenesis in zebrafish. Genome Res 13(12):2700–2707. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1725103. ((in eng))
Nakashima K et al (2002) The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell 108(1):17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00622-5. ((in eng))
Kague E et al (2016) Osterix/Sp7 limits cranial bone initiation sites and is required for formation of sutures. Dev Biol 413(2):160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.03.011. ((in eng))
Cabral WA et al (2016) Absence of the ER cation channel TMEM38B/TRIC-B disrupts intracellular calcium homeostasis and dysregulates collagen synthesis in recessive osteogenesis imperfecta. PLoS Genet. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006156. ((in eng))
Besio R et al (2023) CaMKII inhibition due to TRIC-B loss-of-function dysregulates SMAD signaling in osteogenesis imperfecta. Matrix Biol 120:43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2023.05.002. ((in eng))
Jovanovic M et al (2023) Absence of TRIC-B from type XIV Osteogenesis Imperfecta osteoblasts alters cell adhesion and mitochondrial function - A multi-omics study. Matrix Biol 121:127–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2023.06.004. ((in eng))
Yang H, Hu M, Guo J, Ou X, Cai T, Liu Z (2016) Pore architecture of TRIC channels and insights into their gating mechanism. Nature 538(7626):537–541. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19767. ((in eng))
Wang XH et al (2019) Structural basis for activity of TRIC counter-ion channels in calcium release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(10):4238–4243. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817271116. ((in eng))
Ramzan K, Alotaibi M, Huma R, Afzal S (2021) Detection of a recurrent TMEM38B gene deletion associated with recessive osteogenesis imperfecta. Discoveries (Craiova) 9(1):e124. https://doi.org/10.15190/d.2021.3. ((in eng))
Kodama Y et al (2023) Novel splice site variant of TMEM38B in osteogenesis imperfecta type XIV. Hum Genome Var 10(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41439-023-00252-x. ((in eng))
Zhao C et al (2016) Mice lacking the intracellular cation channel TRIC-B have compromised collagen production and impaired bone mineralization. Sci Signal. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.aad9055. ((in eng))
E. A. Webb et al., (2017) Phenotypic spectrum in osteogenesis imperfecta due to mutations in TMEM38B: unraveling a complex cellular defect. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-3766
Zhou X et al (2020) TRIC-A channel maintains store calcium handling by interacting with Type 2 ryanodine receptor in cardiac muscle. Circ Res 126(4):417–435. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.316241. ((in eng))
Yamazaki D et al (2011) TRIC-A channels in vascular smooth muscle contribute to blood pressure maintenance. Cell Metab 14(2):231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2011.05.011. ((in eng))
Sarmah S, Barrallo-Gimeno A, Melville DB, Topczewski J, Solnica-Krezel L, Knapik EW (2010) Sec24D-dependent transport of extracellular matrix proteins is required for zebrafish skeletal morphogenesis. PLoS ONE 5(4):e10367. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010367. ((in eng))
Garbes L et al (2015) Mutations in SEC24D, encoding a component of the COPII machinery, cause a syndromic form of osteogenesis imperfecta. Am J Hum Genet 96(3):432–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.01.002. ((in eng))
Neuhauss SC et al (1996) Mutations affecting craniofacial development in zebrafish. Development 123:357–367. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.123.1.357. ((in eng))
Marom R et al (2023) Dominant negative variants in KIF5B cause osteogenesis imperfecta via down regulation of mTOR signaling. PLoS Genet. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011005. ((in eng))
Santos-Ledo A, Garcia-Macia M, Campbell PD, Gronska M, Marlow FL (2017) Kinesin-1 promotes chondrocyte maintenance during skeletal morphogenesis. PLoS Genet 13(7):e1006918. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006918. ((in eng))
Wang Z et al (2013) Kif5b controls the localization of myofibril components for their assembly and linkage to the myotendinous junctions. Development 140(3):617–626. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.085969. ((in eng))
Gan H et al (2019) KIF5B modulates central spindle organization in late-stage cytokinesis in chondrocytes. Cell Biosci 9:85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-019-0344-5. ((in eng))
Bradford YM et al (2022) Zebrafish information network, the knowledgebase for Danio rerio research. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyac016. ((in eng))
P. Flicek et al., "Ensembl 2013, Nucleic Acids Res, vol. 41, no. Database issue, pp. D48–55, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1236.
Harrison PW et al (2024) Ensembl 2024. Nucleic Acids Res 52(D1):D891–D899. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad1049. ((in eng))
Fleming A, Sato M, Goldsmith P (2005) High-throughput in vivo screening for bone anabolic compounds with zebrafish. J Biomol Screen 10(8):823–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057105279952. ((in eng))
Chen JR, Lai YH, Tsai JJ, Hsiao CD (2017) Live fluorescent staining platform for drug-screening and mechanism-analysis in zebrafish for bone mineralization. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22122068. ((in eng))
Kim Y et al (2019) Tetracycline analogs inhibit osteoclast differentiation by suppressing MMP-9-mediated histone H3 cleavage. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20164038. ((in eng))
Zhang W et al (2018) Novel and rapid osteoporosis model established in zebrafish using high iron stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 496(2):654–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.12.172. ((in eng))
Huitema LF et al (2012) Entpd5 is essential for skeletal mineralization and regulates phosphate homeostasis in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(52):21372–21377. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1214231110. ((in eng))
Tarasco M, Laizé V, Cardeira J, Cancela ML, Gavaia PJ (2017) The zebrafish operculum: A powerful system to assess osteogenic bioactivities of molecules with pharmacological and toxicological relevance. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 197:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2017.04.006. ((in eng))
Carvalho FR, Fernandes AR, Cancela ML, Gavaia PJ (2017) Improved regeneration and de novo bone formation in a diabetic zebrafish model treated with paricalcitol and cinacalcet. Wound Repair Regen 25(3):432–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12536. ((in eng))
Moore CA, Parkin CA, Bidet Y, Ingham PW (2007) A role for the Myoblast city homologues Dock1 and Dock5 and the adaptor proteins Crk and Crk-like in zebrafish myoblast fusion. Development 134(17):3145–3153. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.001214. ((in eng))
Elworthy S, Hargrave M, Knight R, Mebus K, Ingham PW (2008) Expression of multiple slow myosin heavy chain genes reveals a diversity of zebrafish slow twitch muscle fibres with differing requirements for Hedgehog and Prdm1 activity. Development 135(12):2115–2126. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.015719. ((in eng))
Han Y et al (2019) Vitamin D stimulates cardiomyocyte proliferation and controls organ size and regeneration in Zebrafish. Dev Cell 48(6):853-863.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2019.01.001. ((in eng))
Kaufman CK et al (2016) A zebrafish melanoma model reveals emergence of neural crest identity during melanoma initiation. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2197. ((in eng))
François Busquet et al. (2014) OECD validation study to assess intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility of the zebrafish embryo toxicity test for acute aquatic toxicity testing. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 69(3):496–511
Sztal TE, Ruparelia AA, Williams C, Bryson-Richardson RJ (2016) Using touch-evoked response and locomotion assays to assess muscle performance and function in Zebrafish. J Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/54431. ((in eng))
Dyballa S et al (2019) Comparison of Zebrafish larvae and hiPSC cardiomyocytes for predicting drug-induced cardiotoxicity in humans. Toxicol Sci 171(2):283–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfz165. ((in eng))
Parichy DM, Elizondo MR, Mills MG, Gordon TN, Engeszer RE (2009) Normal table of postembryonic zebrafish development: staging by externally visible anatomy of the living fish. Dev Dyn 238(12):2975–3015. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.22113. ((in eng))
Mishra R, Sehring I, Cederlund M, Mulaw M, Weidinger G (2020) NF-κB signaling negatively regulates osteoblast dedifferentiation during zebrafish bone regeneration. Dev Cell 52(2):167-182.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2019.11.016. ((in eng))
Monstad-Rios AT, Watson CJ, Kwon RY (2018) ScreenCube: A 3D printed system for rapid and cost-effective chemical screening in adult Zebrafish. Zebrafish 15(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2017.1488. ((in eng))
de Esch C et al (2012) Locomotor activity assay in zebrafish larvae: influence of age, strain and ethanol. Neurotoxicol Teratol 34(4):425–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2012.03.002. ((in eng))
Li F et al (2018) Characterization of the locomotor activities of zebrafish larvae under the influence of various neuroactive drugs. Ann Transl Med 6(10):173. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.04.25. ((in eng))
Suryanto ME et al (2022) Evaluation of locomotion complexity in zebrafish after exposure to twenty antibiotics by fractal dimension and entropy analysis. Antibiotics (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11081059. ((in eng))
Cotti S et al (2020) More bone with less minerals? the effects of dietary phosphorus on the post-cranial skeleton in Zebrafish. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21155429. ((in eng))
Fang C, Di S, Yu Y, Qi P, Wang X, Jin Y (2024) 6PPD induced cardiac dysfunction in zebrafish associated with mitochondrial damage and inhibition of autophagy processes. J Hazard Mater 471:134357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134357. ((in eng))
Zhang Y, Cui FZ, Wang XM, Feng QL, Zhu XD (2002) Mechanical properties of skeletal bone in gene-mutated stöpsel(dtl28d) and wild-type zebrafish (Danio rerio) measured by atomic force microscopy-based nanoindentation. Bone 30(4):541–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00676-2. ((in eng))
Recidoro AM et al (2014) Botulinum toxin induces muscle paralysis and inhibits bone regeneration in zebrafish. J Bone Miner Res 29(11):2346–2356. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2274. ((in eng))
Tomecka MJ, Ethiraj LP, Sánchez LM, Roehl HH, Carney TJ (2019) Clinical pathologies of bone fracture modelled in zebrafish. Dis Model Mech. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.037630. ((in eng))
Sakata-Haga H et al (2018) A rapid and nondestructive protocol for whole-mount bone staining of small fish and Xenopus. Sci Rep 8(1):7453. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25836-4. ((in eng))
Bensimon-Brito A, Cardeira J, Dionísio G, Huysseune A, Cancela ML, Witten PE (2016) Revisiting in vivo staining with alizarin red S–a valuable approach to analyse zebrafish skeletal mineralization during development and regeneration. BMC Dev Biol 16:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12861-016-0102-4. ((in eng))
Durán I, Marí-Beffa M, Santamaría JA, Becerra J, Santos-Ruiz L (2011) Actinotrichia collagens and their role in fin formation. Dev Biol 354(1):160–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.03.014. ((in eng))
Pasqualetti S, Banfi G, Mariotti M (2012) The zebrafish scale as model to study the bone mineralization process. J Mol Histol 43(5):589–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10735-012-9425-z. ((in eng))
Oralová V et al (2019) Beyond the whole-mount phenotype: high-resolution imaging in fluorescence-based applications on zebrafish. Biol Open. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.042374. ((in eng))
Telfer WR, Busta AS, Bonnemann CG, Feldman EL, Dowling JJ (2010) Zebrafish models of collagen VI-related myopathies. Hum Mol Genet 19(12):2433–2444. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq126. ((in eng))
Schnabel K, Wu CC, Kurth T, Weidinger G (2011) Regeneration of cryoinjury induced necrotic heart lesions in zebrafish is associated with epicardial activation and cardiomyocyte proliferation. PLoS ONE 6(4):e18503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018503. ((in eng))
Richardson R et al (2016) Re-epithelialization of cutaneous wounds in adult zebrafish combines mechanisms of wound closure in embryonic and adult mammals. Development 143(12):2077–2088. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.130492. ((in eng))
Bullard SA, McElwain A, Arias CR (2011) Scanning electron microscopy of “Saddleback” lesions associated with experimental infections of Flavobacterium columnare in Channel Catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae), and Zebrafish, Danio rerio (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). J World Aquaculture Soc 42(6):906–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00527.x
Charvet B et al (2013) Knockdown of col22a1 gene in zebrafish induces a muscular dystrophy by disruption of the myotendinous junction. Development 140(22):4602–4613. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.096024. ((in eng))
Sehnert AJ, Huq A, Weinstein BM, Walker C, Fishman M, Stainier DY (2002) Cardiac troponin T is essential in sarcomere assembly and cardiac contractility. Nat Genet 31(1):106–110. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng875. ((in eng))
Gerhard GS et al (2002) Life spans and senescent phenotypes in two strains of Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Exp Gerontol 37(8–9):1055–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0531-5565(02)00088-8. ((in eng))
Babaei F, Hong TL, Yeung K, Cheng SH, Lam YW (2016) Contrast-enhanced X-ray micro-computed tomography as a versatile method for anatomical studies of adult zebrafish. Zebrafish 13(4):310–316. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2016.1245. ((in eng))
LeBert DC, Squirrell JM, Huttenlocher A, Eliceiri KW (2016) Second harmonic generation microscopy in zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol 133:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mcb.2016.01.005. ((in eng))
Mahamid J, Sharir A, Addadi L, Weiner S (2008) Amorphous calcium phosphate is a major component of the forming fin bones of zebrafish: Indications for an amorphous precursor phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(35):12748–12753. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803354105. ((in eng))
Høgset H et al (2020) In vivo biomolecular imaging of zebrafish embryos using confocal Raman spectroscopy. Nat Commun 11(1):6172. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19827-1. ((in eng))
Unal M, Ahmed R, Mahadevan-Jansen A, Nyman JS (2021) Compositional assessment of bone by Raman spectroscopy. Analyst 146(24):7464–7490. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1an01560e. ((in eng))
O. Lingyun Kong, Fahimeh Hadavimoghaddam, Chunxiao Li, Kouqi Liu, Bo Liu, Amir Semnani and Mehdi Ostadhassan (2021), AFM vs Nanoindentation: Nanomechanical properties of organic-rich Shale. Marine and Petroleum Geology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105229.
Misu A et al (2016) Two different functions of connexin43 confer two different bone phenotypes in Zebrafish. J Biol Chem 291(24):12601–12611. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.720110. ((in eng))
Garcia-Puig A et al (2019) Proteomics analysis of extracellular matrix remodeling during zebrafish heart regeneration. Mol Cell Proteomics 18(9):1745–1755. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.RA118.001193. ((in eng))
Orr N et al (2016) A mutation in the atrial-specific myosin light chain gene (MYL4) causes familial atrial fibrillation. Nat Commun 7:11303. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11303. (in eng)
Rottbauer W, Baker K, Wo ZG, Mohideen MA, Cantiello HF, Fishman MC (2001) Growth and function of the embryonic heart depend upon the cardiac-specific L-type calcium channel alpha1 subunit. Dev Cell 1(2):265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1534-5807(01)00023-5. (in eng)
Panáková D, Werdich AA, Macrae CA (2010) Wnt11 patterns a myocardial electrical gradient through regulation of the L-type Ca(2+) channel. Nature 466(7308):874–878. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09249. (in eng)
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Pavia within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This work was supported by Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR) Dipartimenti di Eccellenza (2023–2027)] to AF; by PRIN 2022 20223C8C5B to AF; by Regione Lombardia, “r9/2020, resolution 3776/202000 to AF; PON-React-EU Research and Innovation 2014–2020 art 34, paragraph 3 a), law 30th December 2010, n.240 and s.m.i and D.M. 10th August 2021 n. 1062 to FT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Cecilia Masiero, Carla Aresi, Antonella Forlino and Francesca Tonelli have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Masiero, C., Aresi, C., Forlino, A. et al. Zebrafish Models for Skeletal and Extraskeletal Osteogenesis Imperfecta Features: Unveiling Pathophysiology and Paving the Way for Drug Discovery. Calcif Tissue Int (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-024-01282-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-024-01282-5